User talk:AlexR.L.

Hello Alexis Rojas, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Alexis Rojas, good luck, and have fun. --Student7 (talk) 19:32, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! I work almost exclusively with Mexico related articles so if you need advice or help, let me know!Thelmadatter (talk) 15:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics of Aguascalientes

Hello. I've just seen the above-named article you created and thought you might find this template useful. Even though that template is for countries rather than subdivisions, I can't find any reason why it can't still be used here. LordVetinari (talk) 02:04, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there AlexR.L., thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:AlexR.L.. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can some one put more pictures bigger than 1024x768 and high quality pictures of Mexico State cities please

Check on Spanish translation

The article National Autonomous University of Mexico has had the English translation of the university's motto changed several times recently; I think wrongly. The motto is "Por mi raza hablará el espíritu". The translation currently there is "The spirit shall speak for my race". I think it should be something like "The spirit shall speak through my people". Surely "through" not "for", but the exact sense of "raza" here needs an expert! Could you change it if you think it's currently wrong? Peter coxhead (talk) 18:49, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! ComputerJA (talk) 07:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alex, please consider using an edit summary. It facilitates surfing through peoples' watchlists. Be considerate. Cheers, ComputerJA (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guaviare department

On 14 February 2013, you changed the area of Guaviare department from 53,460 sq.km. to 42,327 sq.km. without citing a source. The Colombian web page for Guaviare department still gives the area as:

Extensión total: 53460 Km2

as does the 2009 "Datos y Cifras del Guaviare" document, and other official Colombian documents.

On what basis did you make the change? I realize that in the 1990s that several unofficial sources listed 42,327 sq.km., but I understood that the number had been officially revised upwards, but I do not have a source for when that happened or the exact circumstances. --Bejnar (talk) 03:10, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I note the same thing for the Vaupés department. You changed 54,135 sq.km. to 65,268 sq.km., while the official Colombian number, from, for example here, or in this spreadsheet, is:

Extensión total: 54.135 Km2

What's up? --Bejnar (talk) 03:28, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see the problem. Your source is a secondary source that used 25 year old published data for the areas, those areas have since changed. Guaviare department was listed as 42,327 sq.km. when it was created as a national territory in 1977. Guaviare was formed by presidential order in December 1977. Its 16,342-square-mile (42,327-square-kilometre) area incorporated the majority of Vaupes' inhabitants when it was formed. 1993 Encyclopedia Britannia, Micropedia page 538. Then there was a transfer, prior to 2009, of 11,133 sq.km. from Vaupés department to Guaviare department, and some sources have not updated their records. Secondary sources that have updated their records include the 2012 Historical Dictionary of Colombia which indicates 53,460 sq.km. for Guaviare department (page 248) and 54,135 sq.km. for Vaupés department (page 291). I have restored the current figures to the articles in question. --Bejnar (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I caught all of the changes, including the changes in rank by area. I have also provided several of the infoboxes of the Colombia department articles with proper citations for area, including, I hope, all of the problematic ones. That still leaves about 24 departments lacking citations for area. See Talk:List of Colombian Departments by area#Sources for stated areas. I've done: Amazonas, Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina, Boyacá, ‎Cesar, Cundinamarca, Guaviare, Magdalena, Putumayo, Vaupés, and Vichada. --Bejnar (talk) 02:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1900 Mexico Census

Hello AlexR.L.,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1900 Mexico Census for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, ♥ Tentinator ♥ 06:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1910 Mexico Census

Hello AlexR.L.,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1910 Mexico Census for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, ♥ Tentinator ♥ 06:24, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1921 Mexico Census

Hello AlexR.L.,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1921 Mexico Census for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, ♥ Tentinator ♥ 06:24, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1930 Mexico Census

Hello AlexR.L.,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1930 Mexico Census for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, ♥ Tentinator ♥ 06:24, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico Census

I've deleted all the iterations of the mexico census except for the first one, as they all consisted only of {{MXCensus}}. The first one is tenuous but I'll let it exist for you to make expansions. Please add some content before recreating them. You may wish to develop them in userspace. Thanks for your contributions, I am only deleting them as they currently have no substantive content. NativeForeigner ^Talk 06:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican States Flags

Hello AlexR.L. I think your proposed flags for the Mexican states are very interesting proposals but I would like to know if there is any motivation behind them like some symbology or meaning for the designs. I know some have a historical background like from the old republics of Baja California or Yucatan but for others I don't know. Please let me know since I was thinking on the same idea and to make a convincing proposal I think you should add meaning to the flags, justify the designs based on symbols and history. Fermin (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

             Hello Ferminx, I will put why the reason for my proposal, but I've been quite busy. --Alex 18:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed flags

Hi, I left you a message on Commons. I saw that you now don't contribute much there any more, so I'm putting my message here too. The summary of my message is that if you are going to upload any new proposed or fictional flags, please use the {{Fictional flag}} template in the file pages on Commons, so that nobody is mislead in thinking that the flags are in official use by a government. Many people assume Wikipedia has some good level of correctness, and it would be good if Wikipedia was more correct on this matter, because most people don't double-check. Another advantage of using the template is that it is multilingual and appears in the user's own language, so proposed flags won't be taken as real by editors of other Wikipedias (for example the Estonian Wikipedia). Thanks. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 23:44, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Yucatán does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! bojo1498 talk 14:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AlexR.L.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican States Flag

Hello AlexR.L., I’ve been reviewing your proposed flags for the Mexican States and I’d like to know if we could talk about the Baja California flag. I’m a fellow Mexican interested in vexillology. Thanks, Coiki (talk) 14:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Size by population Bar Chart MX

Template:Size by population Bar Chart MX has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 22:17, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]