User talk:Ahabibullah

Welcome!

Hello, Ahabibullah, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Muthana Mithqal Sartawi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- RoySmith (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Muthana Mithqal Sartawi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Muthana Mithqal Sartawi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I created this page https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Muthana_Mithqal_Sartawi, and it was deleted for (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)reason. It is a translation of an Arabic wiki page. Can anyone help me to remove the promotional materials or at least show me some examples where I used promotional materials in the article? thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahabibullah (talk • contribs) 19:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahabibullah. Is it the same article as Draft:Dr. Muthana Sartawi? It's written in a very promotional tone, including "internationally renowned", "He is one of the pioneers", "achievement is a remarkable addition", "is a source of pride to Kuwait". Wikipedia articles need to just include facts without offering opinion. The article also includes a list of his patents. It looks as if you might have a conflict of interest with the subject, in those cases it is best to just wait for the subject to become notable enough that someone else writes an article on them. If you have any further questions you can write here below. – Þjarkur (talk) 20:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Þjarkur, thank you for your response. I think you are referring to the old article Draft:Dr. Muthana Sartawi where I made some mistakes by using promotional tone. In the new article Draft:Muthana_Mithqal_Sartawi I removed the promotional terms that you mentioned ( such as He is one of the pioneers etc). Can you please take a look at the new article and point out where you think is the problem? Does listing his patents consider promotional?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahabibullah (talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I'm not an admin I can't see the deleted article. You can request help from an admin by adding {{Admin help}} here below, asking that they point out some examples from the deleted article, however I won't advise that you do so, since articles aren't speedy deleted unless they are unambiguously promotional.

Even without the promotional terms, the draft which I can see (Draft:Dr. Muthana Sartawi) does not really explain to me how influential his contributions to the sciences have been, only that he has a patent on a technique. If the technique is new, it might be just a little too early to write an article about him. You can also have a look at the guideline Wikipedia:Notability (academics).

Listing patents is usually a sign of someone writing an autobiographical or otherwise promotional article. Again, if you have a conflict of interest regarding the subject, I highly advise that you just wait until someone else thinks he's notable enough for an article and writes about him. Writing autobiographies is strongly discouraged.

Wikipedia is only annoying and overwhelmingly complicated at first, it only takes a couple of weeks to get used to editing here. I recommend that you try contributing to already existing articles, if you have specialized medical knowledge for example, there are lots of articles in our WikiProject Medicine that need expansion.

And remember to sign your messages using four tildes: ~~~~.

Regards, – Þjarkur (talk) 01:12, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Muthana Sartawi (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Muthana Sartawi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dr. Muthana Sartawi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahabibullah! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Drsartawi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drsartawi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]