User talk:Acemanipulator

Welcome!

Hello, Acemanipulator! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2014

Hello, I'm Snowcream. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Onam because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Snowcream (talk) 10:07, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jollson's Requested Vanity Number Plate

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jollson's Requested Vanity Number Plate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vahurzpu (talk) 02:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide the reason why I was blocked indefinitely from editing?

1. I made an edit to an old article I created and it was inadvertently activated. You have blocked me indefinitely for a very minor offense without any warning.

2. You did not follow the following steps "Dealing with disruptive editors" set by Wikipedia guidelines.

3. You blocked me indefinitely in September 2022 when the change I made was in December 2020 with no further edits on any topics from my side. Acemanipulator (talk) 22:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please acknowledge why I was blocked indefinitely without any warning? Acemanipulator (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Acemanipulator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I plan to add or edit information confirming to the guidelines set by wikipedia. I also read the policies in detail for disruptive editing and please revoke the indefinite block for my account.

The following text from my review request was removed. I have been blocked indefinitely for Disruptive editing. My edits has been cited for disruptive, and I have been asked to create new account by 2 administrators who denied my review request, which is a violation of wikipedia regulations. So if I am not addressing the reason for the block, please provide me the reasons to correct my mistake. Please do not treat my edits like a cardinal unpardonable sin. I was also verifying the action history. I had done my past edits in 2020 while I have been blocked indefinitely after 2 years when there was no editing from my end. My user contributions have been only for about 4 articles and only article I was blocked indefinitely by an user whom I cannot reach because of the block. So please do review of my block and provide my edit privileges back. If I am required to make any specific corrective action on any of the 4 topics I have edited, please let me know, I can make the necessary corrective action going forward.

My review request was altered without any explanation, and followed up by a generic question "This does not include specifically what articles you intend to edit, and exactly what edits you would like to make." I plan to edit information which are accurate and verifiable. If I don't follow the norms, I can see how difficult it is get your edit privileges back. I respect the platform.

 Acemanipulator (talk) 01:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocking with the consent of the blocking administrator. SQL ^{Query Me!} 01:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This does not include specifically what articles you intend to edit, and exactly what edits you would like to make. SQL ^{Query Me!} 20:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"My review request was altered without any explanation" is demonstrably false. I added an idle timestamp to your unblock template. It's something us reviewing admins do when we're managing the unblock queue, and evaluating unblock requests. There is an explanation clearly visible in the edit summary here: [1]. "Comment, and mark as awaiting a reply".

I'm asking the question for a reason. If you don't wish to answer it, you are welcome to decline to do so. It would have been helpful to me to know specifically what articles you intend to edit initially, and what changes you'd make in order to attempt to determine if unblocking you would be a net positive for the encyclopedia. SQL ^{Query Me!} 23:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining this in detail.

My talk page has been continually be updated by many admins, couple of them were blocked as well. Let me start from the beginning, my last edit on Wikipedia was in September 2020, and I was blocked indefinitely on September 2022 as you can see the trace. I have submitted prior review requests, and every request was declined stating it does not address the reason. Yes you have the time stamp for edit, however my review request order is now changed as you see from the edits.

I have absolute respect for admins who keep Wikipedia safe. I am planning to edit wiki documents about people while ensuring the wikipedia updates and guidelines while editing are followed. Acemanipulator (talk) 14:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am appealing the indefinite block on my account for a minor transgression on a joke Jollson's Requested Vanity Number Plate created in 2010 which I just checked in 2020. I didn't even realize that page was re-activated, in 2020 and without any warnings or due process my account was indefinitely blocked on September 2022, the particular admin appears to be trigger happy with blocks based on the information on his talk page. I have been trying to get it reviewed. All I am seeing is my talk page ending up being some Admin wars. So please, if you have the administrator ability to revoke the block, or atleast reach out to the blocking admin let me know. Asking me about my future edits sounds like a parole board asking my future edits. I am saying that I can be careful with my edits in future. Acemanipulator (talk) 12:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've reached out to the blocking admin for more details surrounding this block. Please be aware that I am a volunteer, and this week is extremely busy for me off-wiki. I may not be around much. SQL ^{Query Me!} 00:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Having spoken with the blocking administrator, I have unblocked you. It seems that this block may have been placed mistakenly. Please note, that had you been willing to demonstrate that you are here to contribute productively by answering my (and others before mine) question, this process would have not taken nearly as long. SQL ^{Query Me!} 01:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for unblocking me. Every reviewing administrator before you was denying my request with no option to reply to person. My talk page was even vandalized by competing admins on some day. Even you can see from history I was able to reply to blocking administrator only from last week after the new wiki page.

Appreciate your volunteering effort in following up my case and getting it fixed. Thank you once again from the bottom of my heart. Acemanipulator (talk) 13:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]