User talk:79.67.88.242

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Big penis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Big penis was changed by 79.67.88.242 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915336 on 2017-10-01T11:45:01+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roberto Esquivel Cabrera. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Roberto Esquivel Cabrera was changed by 79.67.88.242 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975849 on 2017-10-01T12:32:30+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Macropenis, you may be blocked from editing. Hayman30 (talk) 12:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.67.88.242 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Abnormallylong. I have no idea who he or she is. I'm not sure how to prove that we are different people but my i.p. geolocates to the U.K. It also doesn't make sense to presume we are the same since we even had disagreements on the layout of the page we both edited. We also edit differently in other ways. A-long uses visual - while i don't know how to use visual editor. A-long responds to false-positives by reporting it - I respond by adding punctuation marks. A-long edits while leaving the interface bare - I never do that. Also, A-long was unable to edit while I was, suggesting that we are editing from different computers. Furthermore, A-long seems not to know how to format articles while I do. Our editing style is so different it should be obviuos we are not the same people.

Decline reason:

It looks to me like you are either User:Abnormallylong or a WP:meatpuppet. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proof

In order to prove I am not Abnormallylong, I will tag the usernames of some checkusers, who will hopefully help to prove I am innocent. User:Ivanvector, User:Ks0stm, User:Mailer diablo, User:Vanjagenije, User:Berean Hunter, User:L235, User:GeneralizationsAreBad, User:Callanecc. Thank you. 79.67.88.242 (talk) 13:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only three of those editors are CheckUsers, and in any case, we can't prove a negative. —DoRD (talk) 13:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So how can I prove that I am not Abnormallylong? I feel like a grave injustice has been committed. 79.67.88.242 (talk) 13:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any way to speed up the block review? 79.67.88.242 (talk) 16:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@User:DoRD ?? 79.67.88.242 (talk) 16:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Abnormallylong

If you are watching this page, could you please leave a note on your talk page saying that we are not the same person? Or better yet, you could log out and make an edit to prove we have different I.P. addresses. That way, we will both end up unblocked. 79.67.88.242 (talk) 14:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

False sock accusations

I know the following editors have previously had major issues with false sock accusations: User:OhanaUnited, User:Codename Lisa, User:Rich Farmbrough, User:DHeyward, User:Randykitty, User:Nil Einne, User:Rjensen User:Hijiri88, User:Meters, User:Vjmlhds User:Mztourist. The following admins have issued blocks for false sock accuations: User:Drmies. Therefore I have tagged them because they have experience in this issue. 79.67.88.242 (talk) 15:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even know where this is coming from. Last time I blocked someone for socking was 5 years ago. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 15:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your name must have come up in the archives where I was searching. 79.67.88.242 (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any way to speed up the block review? I've been blocked for being someone i'm not for almost 6 hours now. 79.67.88.242 (talk) 16:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@User:OhanaUnited ?79.67.88.242 (talk) 16:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's funny--the only time your language is somewhat precise is when you're mentioning me. Sorry, though, I still don't know what you're talking about. Drmies (talk) 23:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editor power

The more editors find out about my false accusation, the faster something will probably be done. Hence I will tag several names. So here goes: User:Beagel, I have been fasely accused. User:A lad insane User:Woodstone User:Prattlement, I have been fasely accused. User:Mattythewhite, i've been falsely accused User:Vladyreaper User:Ankurc.17 User:Sławomir Biały User:FrB.TG User:Cote d'Azur User:Inter&anthro User:Codyorb User:Unreal7 User:Asiaticus User:MarioSoulTruthFan, i've been falsely accused User:Rusty1111, I have been falsely accused. User:Iiibalesiii, i've been falsely accused User:Mark the train User:Rusty1111, I have been falsely accused. User:PlyrStar93, I have been falsely accused. User:Derek R Bullamore, I have been falsely accused. User:Spike 'em, I've been falsely accused User:Bacardi379, I've been falsely accused User:Motacilla, I've been falsely accused User:Juergen Weidner, I've been falsely accused User:Another Believer, I've been falsely accused User:Narky Blert, i've been falsely accused User:WilliamJE, I've been falsely accused

Comments

You may comment here if you have any thoughts.

Talk page access revoked due to continued abuse. --Yamla (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.