Jump to content

User talk:63.143.205.136

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Anocracy— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:07, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Impeachment in the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Demagogue, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Jerk. My edits were delightful, and a much-welcomed counterpoint to the overwhelming pro-Trumpkin bias around here. This place is more conservative than a morgue. 63.143.205.136 (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's interesting, since many people think Wikipedia is rabidly liberal. See Conservapedia for further details. --Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites05:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]