Jump to content

User talk:45.73.35.210

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Swatjester. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2003 invasion of Iraq have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 18:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Information icon Hi 45.73.35.210! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2003 invasion of Iraq several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ASUKITE 19:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The cheers thing is totally justified. This is just delayed justice which is denied justice. But I'm not on my main computer. I can vote on the Arb Com. Maybe I'll get back to all this on the Talk, but it's pretty ridiculous. 45.73.35.210 (talk) 19:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]