Jump to content

User talk:4TheRecord

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:2freespace)
Hello 2freespace! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Smee 14:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Smee 14:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

July 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Roscoe Arbuckle do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vicenarian (T · C) 19:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. PhilKnight (talk) 19:08, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 19:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

4TheRecord (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have updated specific individual bios with link to that specific individual record on the 1930 Census. This record supports data in the individual's bio. I notice that Findagrave.com has a link to gravesite on some of these bios. Why would the census be spamming and a gravesite link not be spam? They both to be historial and biographical public record data.Thanks for reviewing and the anticipated lift of the block

Decline reason:

No. Every link is to a commercial site advertising a book. We don't need that. --jpgordon::==( o ) 21:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Golden Palate Partner (September 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- Happysailor (Talk) 17:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 2freespace, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Happysailor (Talk) 17:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Golden Palate Partner has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Golden Palate Partner. Thanks! My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 21:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Golden Palate Partner (September 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred Bollaci (September 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 04:11, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Golden Palate Partner, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Golden Palate Partner

[edit]

Hello, 2freespace. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Golden Palate Partner".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fred Bollaci, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fred Bollaci

[edit]

Hello, 2freespace. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Fred Bollaci".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin Let's talk! 08:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anna Lee Evans, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anna Lee Evans

[edit]

Hello, 2freespace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anna Lee Evans".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harriet White Fisher Andrew has been accepted

[edit]
Harriet White Fisher Andrew, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Louise G Rabinovitch has been accepted

[edit]
Dr. Louise G Rabinovitch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe deckertalk 01:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Kline Rikert has been accepted

[edit]
Annie Kline Rikert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:30, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura E. Chase has been accepted

[edit]
Laura E. Chase, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:32, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure to add "lead sections" to your articles like Annie Kline Rikert

[edit]

In a couple of your drafts, you've skipped over the Lead and just started explaining where someone was born and who she married.

Before you get into that, you need a brief description of why this person matters. For example, in Rikert's case it isn't until the second section that you even begin to explain that she was a Confederate spy; that should be absolutely clear in the lead. See WP:Lead section for what to include there.

Overall really nice work, you just need to be sure to include a lead for each draft. MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Pryor (Los Angeles pioneer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red

[edit]
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.63% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
  • Our priorities for May:

Women of the Sea Villains Women in Sport Central Eastern European women #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 06:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Luella Trescott (May 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Luella Trescott has been accepted

[edit]
Mary Luella Trescott, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:23, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article 90 Pound Suburban Housewife has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references and a notability tag since 2020. Does not appear to meet notability requirements

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 22:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]