Jump to content

User talk:142.129.67.159

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

he's not an exec producer on innocence- it's a friend of his making the film he didn;t work on it. i know because i am his assistant also you have incorrect info on his family will rechange thanks

On Nicholas Jarecki

[edit]

Hey, man/woman. I saw your edits done to Nicholas Jarecki's wiki page and was wondering why you deleted his family information and his work on the film Innocence. I've restored the work that was previously done. In the future for large removals remember to list the reasons why you're removing something. Thanks, AndThenTheySaid (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to IMDb you're wrong on him not being the the co-exec producer on Innocence. There is information on him being the co-exec producer so that will be included on his Wiki page, but if there is opposing information I urge you to include it. Also, you removed the entire filmography section without citing a good reason. I'm looking at as vandalism, but I'm going to return it and leave it at that. If you do it again I'll report you for vandalism. You simply stating you're his assistant doesn't big you any weight behind your actions. I'm again going to restore the work that was previously done, remove it again without citing a (solid) reason and I'll be forced to report you. Thanks, AndThenTheySaid (talk) 20:56, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've continued this game for a month and have been warned several times. I'm reporting you. You're removing information without a reason, beyond your personal desire to see it changed. Alas, that isn't how Wikipedia works. Maybe a Wikia might suit your needs better. AndThenTheySaid (talk) 22:47, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--

Hello- thank you for your vigilance. What would you like in order to confirm that Mr. Jarecki didn't work on innocence? I could have him call you from his listed CallerID and let you know that this is a fact? If that is not satisfactory perhaps a sworn deposition from the producer of that film? Mr. Jarecki is in a position to know whether or not he worked on something. Additionally, he is aware of who his parents are, and you continually list them with wrong names. How can I satisfy you since I am not spending my time doing this but you are continually spreading incorrect information? if you email arbitragelunch@gmail.com with your contact information I will have Mr. Jarecki reach out to you by telephone. Maybe he can provide his birth certificate for your review?

Thanks, John

The problem lies with a lack of an article. Find an article or something along those lines and cite that as reason for removing the information. Also you might want to contact IMDb about him not working on Innocence. It should be noted that Kevin Smith hardly worked on Good Will Hunting and still got producer credits. AndThenTheySaid (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changed back yet again. You are engaging in libel by propagating false information. I have offered to contact you and provide de facts prove via mr Jarecki. His mother is Marjorie Heidsieck and he did not work on innocence no matter what imdb says. I don't need to get a takedown off imdb for that to be true. Imdb is not a legally valid source. Here I am offering for the subject to confirm his identity and speak with you directly. Please don't change this back again. If you insist, then provide a phone contact and if you refuse then a street contact so you can be legally served. Thank you. John 3239924350 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.129.67.159 (talkcontribs) 10:49 11 January 2013

December 2012

[edit]

Hello, 142.129.67.159. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Nicholas Jarecki, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 06:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013

[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nicholas Jarecki , without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Dougweller (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


The block is more or less automatic. Legal threat, block. I have confirmed that his mother is Marjorie Heidsieck and sourced that. Dougweller (talk) 11:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]