User talk:Uncle Milty: Difference between revisions
Wayne Slam (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by Tomas Gilbfarb (talk) to last revision by Uncle Milty (HG) |
|||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
Look, the guy is not a BLP. He's not alive. He founded a company in 1926. Get your facts straight. I'm reverting you. Consider this your only warning. [[User:Tomas Gilbfarb|Tomas Gilbfarb]] ([[User talk:Tomas Gilbfarb|talk]]) 22:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC) |
Look, the guy is not a BLP. He's not alive. He founded a company in 1926. Get your facts straight. I'm reverting you. Consider this your only warning. [[User:Tomas Gilbfarb|Tomas Gilbfarb]] ([[User talk:Tomas Gilbfarb|talk]]) 22:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Alive or not you do not add unreferenced claims such as those to an article --<span style="outline:1px dotted #d1bfa4;"><font color="#ffffff">|</font> [[User:Uncle Milty|<font color="#000051">'''Uncle Milty'''</font>]] | [[User talk:Uncle Milty|<font color="#005c00">talk</font>]] <font color="#ffffff">|</font></span> 23:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC) |
:Alive or not you do not add unreferenced claims such as those to an article --<span style="outline:1px dotted #d1bfa4;"><font color="#ffffff">|</font> [[User:Uncle Milty|<font color="#000051">'''Uncle Milty'''</font>]] | [[User talk:Uncle Milty|<font color="#005c00">talk</font>]] <font color="#ffffff">|</font></span> 23:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
::It's pretty common knowledge around these parts. I suggest you back the fuck off. [[User:Tomas Gilbfarb|Tomas Gilbfarb]] ([[User talk:Tomas Gilbfarb|talk]]) 23:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:03, 25 November 2010
![]() |
Hello! On Wikipedia, I spend most of my time patrolling recent changes. If, while doing so, you believe I have made a mistake, please note:
|
This is Uncle Milty's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Welcome!
Hello, Uncle Milty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Slade (TheJoker) 17:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Recent change to http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Rock_Hill,_South_Carolina
The change I made was a result of needing to correct information that is wrong. YC Magazine is not part of The Herald. It is a seperate publication. My intent was to correct the information in a positive manner rather than simply deleting reference to YC Magazine. Please let me know if I should make the changes again or delete reference to YC Magazine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Btcrook (talk • contribs) 15:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, I see what you mean. Looked to me like a grammar problem with the sentence, so I have fixed it (I think)and I don't think any implications remain. Your addition of the promotional phrase "with entertainingly informative content" is what caught my eye originally, and is why I reverted your edit. Also, external links in the text of an article are generally frowned upon: WP:ELPOINTS. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 15:59, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Heads up -
Hi - someone may have told you this before, but just a heads up: you should be waiting more than a few seconds before tagging articles with A1 or A3, as you did in Pasco banks. I've heard on multiple occasions, that 5 minutes is a good limit on when you can tag pages with these templates. Cheers! ∙:∙:.:pepper:.:∙:∙ 17:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kdjgoeghs, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kdjgoeghs was changed by Uncle Milty (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2010-11-03T14:19:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:19, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
- ClueBot NG was wrong, and has major problems. In this case it auto-reverted my tagging the article with a CSD G3. That should never be reverted by a bot. Of course, the article was deleted as tagged so the diff is now gone. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 15:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Christians in Guinea-Bissau
Hello: I just saw you changed the wording in my addition to the Guinea-B article, on the Christan minority. For two reasons, I think you are wrong there. First, as the article says in the part on religion, Christians represent an estimated 10%, which is not really "small". Second, this minority has a social (political, cultural) importance well beyond its numbers, especially because their educational level is (on average) considerably higher than that of the other religious groups. This is why I wrote "important minority", and I still think this is the appropriate wording. -- Aflis (talk) 18:55, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for undoing the vandalism on the United States congressional delegations from California page to my previous edits.--SargentIV (talk) 19:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
DeMinus deletion?
I dont understand why you wish to delete my page. —Preceding unsigned comment added byWhylifewhy213 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- You are not yet notable. Please see WP:MUSICBIO for more info. Also, please visit WP:YOURSELF. Thank you.
Hello
Hello Milty
As you have realised i have edited some information today, just by adding a couple of middle names. Just So you know i recently found out from a friend that any content on this website can be changed in anyway!!! Much to my disbelieve. I just couldn't sit back and not change something could i, i wanted to see if it actually worked!
Can i ask... If i continue to change information can i get in trouble for this? This is such a strange website, why would you make it that anybody can change things??
And just for the record i wont change anything else ok... just having a play. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vauxhallketchup (talk • contribs) 13:26, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
John Fell (drummer) edit reverted
The article on John Fell (drummer) cites the year of his birth incorrectly. What is the appropriate procedure for having it changed? I am his sister, and I hate to see him unduly aged. His correct birth year is 1962. Please let me know what we need to do. Thank you. Klutitude (talk) 15:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Klutitude Klutitude (talk) 15:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Jahirzinho
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/48px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User talk:Jahirzinho requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. | Uncle Milty | talk | 15:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Saexplorers
Hi there, I declined this speedy because I don't think the proto-article in user space is unambiguously advertising. However I have warned the user not to remove CSD templates in future, and to proceed carefully as there is an obvious COI issue here. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 22:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
John Hemenway
Look, the guy is not a BLP. He's not alive. He founded a company in 1926. Get your facts straight. I'm reverting you. Consider this your only warning. Tomas Gilbfarb (talk) 22:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Alive or not you do not add unreferenced claims such as those to an article --| Uncle Milty | talk | 23:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- It's pretty common knowledge around these parts. I suggest you back the fuck off. Tomas Gilbfarb (talk) 23:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC)