User talk:Ugog Nizdast

Feel free to post here, especially if I made any mistakes. I am not experienced enough here and one never stops learning. Need some help with anything or perhaps an article? I generally am lazy and slow in my contributions but with a little prodding or help on an article, I'll get encouraged to work on it.

Some Help

Hey UN, since you've helped me out before, I thought I'd ask again. I've been tangling with a remarkably obtuse POV pusher at Medha Patkar. I do not in any way imply that the article was perfect earlier, it's just that some of his statements are so outrageous that I do not know how to deal with them. I also do not believe my conduct has been perfect, but I have tried hard to keep it so, and I would appreciate your input very much. Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello again...I'll check it out when I get time and reply here. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

It would appear that my redoubtable opponent has been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry on an unrelated page. So I don't need your assistance any longer, although the offer is much appreciated. Of course, the page is still a mess, so if you're willing to look at it you're more than welcome. Have a good day, my friend. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry that I didn't respond soon enough. As you can see, I've not been very active these past few days and looks like I missed the fun. I've briefly skimmed through the really long discussion and commend your resolve in continuing it for so long. Though I'm not exactly sure about your "opponent's" exact reasoning for deleting some quite non-controversial content. Curiously enough, I couldn't find any Sockpuppet investigation report filled under that username...maybe just got blocked per WP:DUCK. Best regards as always, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Tim tam dunk

Good call. I was wondering how that would get answered. --Stfg (talk) 11:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Hehe thanks, nice to know that you too have started volunteering there...now the list will be empty more often. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Social Media Section of Omar Abdullah's Wikipedia Page

How you can say that Social Media section is pointless? Then why Twitter and Facebook on Wikipedia page? Are they not pointless? And even though mainstream media has recognized it. Articles links are also posted for the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajivgupta33 (talk • contribs) 05:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi @Rajivgupta33: the section is weakly sourced since the given references do not indicate any claims on his social media presence. Have you seen any decent article on our politicians having such a section overhere? At the most you could provide his social media links in the "external links" section. Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi @Ugog Nizdast:, The link which I had provide is of mainstream media of India. IBN and Times Of India are the two authentic source of news. We can't point finger on them. So please, don't consider those link as 'Weak'. And for this parody account link is given in IBN news article. If there is no section of social media of other politicians that doesn't mean we should not do the with others. Nowadays social has very impact in India especially in General Elections. I think you are not from Indian origin so you don't know about these buzz else you won't call those articles as 'Weak' source. Better to have debate any Indian regarding articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajivgupta33 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 12 April 2014‎ (UTC)

@Rajivgupta33: What I meant by "weakly sourced" was, none of the sources mentioned anything about any extraordinary social media notability; both sources, just talk about his parody accounts and contain just passing mentions--the sources were misrepresented. Also, I repeat again, it is simply not encyclopaedic. Even if you do get good sources saying it, doesn't mean we have to add each and every trivial thing written about them.

Have you checked the article's history? This was added multiple times before by a new account, only to be removed by different experienced editors, the same is happening to you. Each of them even told that editor to stop too.

I'm sorry, we can keep discussing about this on and on but you still need consensus to add it. It will be considered disruptive if you keep adding it again and edit warring. You seem to be a new editor, so please take some time to familiarise yourself with how we work here (policies, guidelines etc, see your welcome message). I can help too if you need anything. Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ugog Nizdast,

Dude are you founder of Wikipedia? I think Homespun has clearly requested you to wait and let other editors give their point of view but still you are not agreeing to him. Please be patient and don't take it on your ego. Please wait and wait. Don't be so eager to remove the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajivgupta33 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

NaMo

Hey, it's me again. A couple of editors appear to be making an attempt to modify the lead of the Modi article, which almost seems like a pre-election push to me. I cannot revert any further, as I have no intention of getting blocked; could you look into it? Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:30, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Since you've already called the cavalry (Sitush and DS), you'll probably get help soon plus...this is Namo's page we're talking about...this is not going to be ignored. Why don't you tag the "though it was cleared" statement or whatever you dispute with the "dubious" tag yourself till it gets resolved, since you can't revert?

You probably know by now that I have a generally avoid such topics since I can't tolerate the usual heated discussions and pesky POV pushers. I don't know how anyone can manage it and I really salute you along with the other editors who do it. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks friend, no worries. I called on all the help I could, seeing as this is during the election, and POV tampering is even more of a problem. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ugog Nizdast. You have new messages at Delibzr's talk page.
Message added 05:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Benfold (talk) 05:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Stop vandalising

I am asking you what is your problem with Freedom of religion in India why ? are you removing shiite section. If it is not reliable that is kind of problem. But you are vandalizing the section of an encyclopedia. Please behave normal. You are being warned else i should report you in case of vandalism after a user has been warned. Hope you understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inside99 (talk • contribs) 12:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes, sorry I 'vandalised'. Why don't you report me to the WP:AIV? -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:28, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Uniform civil code

Hi Ugog, can you provide a quote that verifies the claims in this diff? I see that it is supposed to be verified by this Google Books link, but it is currently broken.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 19:56, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you may not believe me but I've was just on your talk page about to leave you a message asking if "if the article was fine now". Odd, the link worked before... I've found another duplicate one, see the preface page. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 20:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Mullah do-Piyaza

I made some further edits to Mullah Do Piaza and added a few more "clarification needed" tags and notes to editors (different from before). I also wondered why the name in the article is spelled differently from the name of the article. There is also a third spelling at the bottom of the page. If you would like my help formulating sentences that clear up the ambiguities, let me know. CorinneSD (talk) 19:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

I'll be delighted. I never actually gave much attention to that article since I expanded mainly as a by-product of writing Birbal. I will check out your latest edits soon. See you there, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:08, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Ballet image

Thanks for the reply on my talk page, Nizdast. It appears that you do have an opinion about this: you believe the image to be irrelevant to ballet. Would you be so kind as to register your opinion at talk:ballet? Although ballet is probably widely watched, as you surmised, no one else has bothered to comment about this issue there. Thanks! Lambtron (talk) 17:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

@Lambtron: No problem but I see no point in intervening yet as long as the editor who added the image does not bother to respond (maybe that's what everybody else thinks?). The image seems blatantly irrelevant to a layperson and that editor has some explaining to do. Tell you what, I'll watch this page for some time and pitch in if needed. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:52, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Islam in India

Dude, Islam didn't originate until the seventh century; how could it arrive in India in the first century?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bitbut (talk • contribs) 01:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

@Bitbut: Take a look at this edit again, notice "arrived in the 1st millennium CE" which is 1000 CE, and not 1st century (100 CE). Hope it's clear now, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ugog Nizdast,

You lazy ass motherfucking piece of shit. Unemployed extra mass on earth. Why don't you give your mother to Digvijay. He will become your new Papa. Together you can perform cunnilingus on your sister also.

By the way how is your sister Amrita Rai. I hope Dogvijay is doing her good.

Happy masturbating,