User talk:Stephenjh

Plus From Us

This stephen J is fucking stupid! You dont know what are you saying about Nik Abdul Aziz. Please dont rubbish internet with wrong fact about someone you dont know. He is my teacher stupid. You dont know anything!

Sorry, I screwed up my edit and failed to put anything in the edit box. I reverted it because that part of the discography is only for compilations of Hammill songs. If you want to make a section for appearances of single Hammill songs in multi-artist compilations, go ahead, although personally I don't think such a list belongs in the article. Best wishes, --Richardrj ^{talk email} 20:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Lifemask

I take your point about track listings. However, it should be clear from the first listing that it was originally vinyl, as CDs tend only to have one side, and subsequent listings should only indicate variations from the original. In particular, it isn't usual to cite catalogue numbers in headings. I'm just working my way through Harper's early issues (downloading, burning & listening), but the rewrites to meet standards will wait until I've finished the Fairport Convention catalogue. Way too many redlinks there, and they deserve better. --Rodhullandemu 23:01, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

• "subsequent listings should only indicate variations from the original" exactly, so let's not just focus on the 1990 CD re-issue, there's a cassette version to be listed too, hopefully my edit reflects that. As for "downloading, burning & listening", well, I hope you're paying for them ;) ! Where do you download from? Stephenjh (talk) 23:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Battle of the Beanfield

I understand that this is a emotional article, and that police brutality probably did occur here. Which is all the MORE reason to be objective in proper citation per WP:CITE. The more objective and reliable the citation, the more readers will trust the accusations presented within. Having personal essays and herbalism websites cited only detracts from the believability of the article, and leaves the impression that the article was written by disgruntled Neo-Pagans. Having objective, third-party citations alone helps bolster the claims of brutality.

Best,

Djma12 ^(talk) 20:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah, mea culpa. Thanks for the clarification. The article would be much stronger if it was placed in context, namely WHY the police were cordoning Stonehenge to begin with. Since you are obviously more versed with the event, I'll let you write this. Djma12 ^(talk) 21:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Science Friction (music)

Why are you blanking the page? Kylu (talk) 22:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Wait, nevermind, I see... you "moved" it to Science Friction. Okay, so, here's the thing: We use the GFDL license, right? It requires attribution (in our case via the History tab of an article), and if you simply cut-and-paste an article to the new location, it creates a violation of the license, as anyone who worked on the article previously had no attribution of their contributions to that article. In short, it caused us to violate our own license.

I've corrected the erroneous move, but in the future, if you'd like to move a page, please use the Move tab at the top of the page. If you can't do it yourself, ask an administrator (like, say, me) to correct the issue instead of cut-and-paste. It makes life much easier on us that way. :)

Anywho, have a great day! Kylu (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks Kylu. It all came about as a result of a new disambiguation page that seemed unnecessary and broke a host of links, I hope this is resolved and ok now. Stephenjh (talk) 00:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Jugula

What are you talking about? The album is listed on most chronologies as being "Roy Harper & Jimmy Page". It even says so on the album cover. The infobox says "Studio album", so it's referring to one album not "albums", so it's indicating to the reader only one album. There are plenty of instances on wikipedia album infoboxes that list joint artists for one album. MegX (talk) 06:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Stephen, there is also another solution. Look at Raising Sand. In the album infobox, it lists two seperate entries at the bottom, keeping intact two different solo discographies to imply it was a one-off colaboration. Would that be satisfactory to you? MegX (talk) 06:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I am aware who the album is credited to. The issue was, that the chronology section was factually incorrect as a result of that edit. I'm happy to see that error has now been corrected, perfect solution. Stephenjh (talk) 07:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Upham

I take your point. British is confusing. Remember he is British as NZ was in the British Commonwelath at the time. I changed it to British and Commonwealth. Allied is incorrect, as some Americans earned more than on MOH plus other medals, which would put them higher than Upham. The same applied to Soviet soliders who were Heroes of the Soviet Union multiple times. Wallie (talk) 12:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

OK. As mentioned, I said British and Commonwealth, although the term British has somewhat changed over time. Someone else has challenged the point that Upham is the most decorated British/Commonwealth soldier in WW2. This is clear, as the VC is the top award, and he has two. Wallie (talk) 16:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it says British and Commonwealth now, but it didn't before. Anyway, I'm aware of the term and it's meaning... because I am :D . Stephenjh (talk) 16:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Hergest Ridge Tracklist Format

I noticed it being used on a large number of articles, and initially thought that it looked tidier than the standard 'list' setup. I was under the assumption that it had become an accepted standard, but after reading the previous discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums#Tracklist template (which I should have read earlier), I might change them back. Thanks for pointing that out. --TubularWorld (talk) 17:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Well don't go doing any work changing articles, unless it would greatly improve the look of the track listings. I should have checked if it was a properly accepted template before using it on those few articles. Anyways, Thanks. --TubularWorld (talk) 17:55, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Georgia flag on user page

I see mixed in among state flags of the US on your user page the flag of Georgia the country. Should it be the flag of the US State? My apologies if you in fact visited the country. Sswonk (talk) 15:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey! well spotted! Thanks :D Stephenjh (talk) 15:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

template

Stephen, there has been a discussion on this for sometime on wikipedia and there has been no consensus either way to remove it or keep it. Most editors either choose to use the template or don't. Personally, I like the look of the template as it keeps the songlist neat and ordered. If you object to it, you your welcome to reverse it but there is nothing "illegal" about using the template, and it appears on just about every new album article these days. MegX (talk) 23:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Do you fancy changing the rest of the Roy Harper album pages then? (as I don't! :-)) Stephenjh (talk) 23:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)