Jump to content

User talk:Secret of success: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mahanandi (talk | contribs)
Line 143: Line 143:


([[User:Mahanandi|Mahanandi]] ([[User talk:Mahanandi|talk]]) 10:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC)).
([[User:Mahanandi|Mahanandi]] ([[User talk:Mahanandi|talk]]) 10:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC)).

== Super Vandal is here - secret of success ==



and more over this user should be extra careful,

He should not point at other editors, and say

'instead of simply inserting names and pics, useful content in prose is needed

when this [[user:Secret of success]] does same mistake, in another article - Tamil Cinema, he should think when he is abusing fellow editors, with non sense


([[User:Mahanandi|Mahanandi]] ([[User talk:Mahanandi|talk]]) 12:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC)).

Revision as of 12:36, 9 February 2012




Tamil Wiki Media Contest

Tamil Wiki Media Contest

Greetings from the Tamil Wiki Community,
We are organising a Media Contest for images/videos/audios related to Tamil, Tamils and Tamil Nadu.

  • Prize Money: Total prize money for the contest is 850 US$. First prize is 200 US $ and there are a total of 9 prizes including three continuous contribution prizes. Certificates will be awarded to prize winners
  • Upload: Files have to be uploaded to Wikimedia commons through the Contest portal using a customised version of the commons upload wizard. Or if you choose to upload directly to commons, the category "TamilWiki Media Contest" has to be added to the files.
  • Dates : Nov 15, 2011 - Feb 29, 2012
  • Themes : Anything related to Tamil and Tamils (more detailed rules here)
  • All files should be uploaders' own work. Copyright expired and PD/CC images of others are not eligible.

We invite you all to participate in the contest. Please spread the word among your friends and share our Facebook page: Share with Facebook

-

-Sodabottle (talk) 09:39, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Timestamp — 15:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Secret of success. You have new messages at Karthikndr's talk page.
Message added 12:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- Karthik Nadar 12:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Firstly, should I answer in my talk page or yours :P ?

Second, I hope so. I haven't had an exactly great time with my friends. Some of my "friends" back-stabbed on me and said some lovely things behind my back, thinking I never saw, but I believe you aren't one of them. Let's just keep this aside and continue editing; perhaps on some new totally non-film related article. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, you totally didn't get me. "Do you have any idea on what kind of attitude some of your "friends" have? No pinpointing, just the hint for you to decipher." Actually, I'm not talking about any SRK fan at all. I don't want to take names, but I can give you hints: One, I have already said about quite frequently. The other, well just rewind back to the dramatic "consensus" that took place over some issue on the Ra.One article... forget which one. Its in the archives right now. I'm sure you'll understand whom I'm talking about.
Actually, I can't think of editing anything except films, or sports (I have a GA for one sports article). I've not been in sport-related editing for like 2 years, so films is all I have. I don't want to change, but its stuffy especially with the load of bias. Believe me, I've never been angry enough to quit when I was editing sports articles. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WHAT? That's terrible. But I've done only one thing in geography articles, and that's collapse multiple images into a single template :D. I'm lousy at geography, be it as a subject or as Wikipedia topic :D. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

X.One, please! I have had enough of science yaar :P. Frankly, let's just continue films. Btw, you in FIITJEE Chennai? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You'll be hearing a lot of "yaar", especially from some of the faculty. Who are your faculty actually? And you're in 11th, if I am not wrong? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Adyar? Tch tch. i only know one faculty in Adyar, and he's MKS. I'm in Kilpauk Integrated (completed now actually). ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Teasing about the... what? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good enough. that's about it actually :D. And definitely Adyar isn't as fun as Kilpauk. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Newbie

Is this user a newbie ?--Vensatry (Ping me) 11:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dabangg 2

This topic needs a new article NOW. The sequel section of Dabangg is terribly outdated; besides, filming is more than 60% complete, and even the music is ready. What say you? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, there is an article already :D. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you have sources to provide commencement of filming or ongoing shooting, please show them and you can undo the redirect. X.One SOS 16:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sources? Well I know for a fact that the music is complete. And I also know for a fact that the shooting will take place in Kanpur, not in Mumbai. I'll have to dig up the references for that. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Housefull 2

Have a look at this, and honestly tell me whether you felt like puking :D. The trailer:- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-1_SS_iZOE ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P. S. - Its an official trailer :D. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My download level is limited, so I shall not see it if it makes me puke. Thanks for the advice. :-) X.One SOS 17:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

Bodyguard collections

Hi SOS. Would you please comment here. Thanks in advance. Scieberking (talk) 05:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Maatraan

Because I don't find it's anything special anymore. Indian and Tamil films are more and more using Stan Studios for special effects, it's seriously not a big deal that we need to discuss about it. Also the film has not relased yet, we don't know how big a role the special effects play in the film (like in Enthiran for instance). If you think it's important, do add it. Johannes003 (talk) 12:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Landmark Tamil Films

I've had a long desire to expand and elevate articles such as Mouna Raagam, Nayakan, Thalapathi and many more. However, finding sources for them is really a challenging task. These films deserve a great place in the history of Tamil cinema. When a film like Paiyaa can be elevated to GA status (no offense though), these films can very well be promoted as they have a lot of potential. To do that we need to collaborate, without which it's not going to be that easy. Vensatry (Ping me) 16:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nayagan and Thalapathi to GA? Dreams and reality are separated by a large and crystal clear barrier. People's sights do not see through that. X.One SOS 16:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? when a 1960 Bollywood film can be taken to GA there are chances for atleast one of these films too. On a side note, pls don't post the reply on my talk, whenever the discussion is initiated at your talk page. You don't look like following the last point of your edit notice :P Vensatry (Ping me) 21:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Its just a guideline, and MEA is only start class now, not GA. Its a 100 times more iconic than Nayagan and Thalapathi. Plus, none of us really have time to spend hours together to round up a single source with trivial coverage. Tamil films lacked a proper marketing facility at that time. If you could wait till March end, we can round up some stuff. But until then, I am not free. X.One SOS 06:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
IMO Nayagan is more a landmark film than MEA. See the articles of art-films like Swayamvaram and Kanchana Sita. I'm pretty sure that atleast 3/4th of the Malayali population don't even have an idea about these films. Vensatry (Ping me) 12:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

instead of simply inserting names and pics, useful content in prose is needed in the musician section contributed by you in tamil cinema, the biggest fake star of wikipedia is u

(Mahanandi (talk) 10:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

Super Vandal is here - secret of success

and more over this user should be extra careful,

He should not point at other editors, and say

'instead of simply inserting names and pics, useful content in prose is needed

when this user:Secret of success does same mistake, in another article - Tamil Cinema, he should think when he is abusing fellow editors, with non sense


(Mahanandi (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC)).[reply]