User talk:Salvio giuliano/General archive: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:39, 26 August 2010

Status: Unknown

If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error (even a really stupid one) on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. Thank you.

“

→ Fiddle-dee-dee!

”

— Today's Motto of the Day

Archives

Archive 1 - Archive 2 - Archive 3 - Archive 4
Archive 5 - Archive 6 - Archive 7 - Archive 8
Archive 9 - Archive 10

your a faggot you butthole. i worked for hours and my article got deleted. burn dickhole burn

Thank semi-spam

Thanks for your support in my RfA, which was closed as successful. I'm glad I provided no reason not to support ;-). Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 15:07, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL and congrats! Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 15:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

News and notes: Pending changes poll, Public policy classes, Payment schemes debate, and more

In the news: Zionist editing courses, newspaper denies editing candidate, net neutrality

WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology

Features and admins: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:58, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Iranians

I assume that you have warned the other user as well…? If not, please explain why when he is just as responsible (if not more so because the source he has provided actually proves what I say). A war is between two people; please confirm you acknowledge this. 78.150.23.206 (talk) 14:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I haven't yet, because I'm sure he's aware of the 3-revert rule; whereas, since I didn't know whether or not you were aware of the rule, I wanted to make sure you knew that you can't revert more than three times, so that you won't be blocked out of the blue (that is to say I was trying to help and not to take sides). My suggestion is to start discussing the issue on the talk page and, then, if it doesn't help, try a third opinion or mediation (WP:MEDCAB or WP:MEDCOM). Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 14:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks for the clarification. I am aware of it and will consider my options should it continue. 78.150.23.206 (talk) 14:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Seagal's Lightning Bolt

SERIOUSLY DOODER. YOU'RE ITALIAN. YOU DON'T KNOW STEVE LIKE I DO. STOP CHANGING MY EDITS. SENSAI SEAGAL TOLD ME TO MAKE THE EDITS SO THEY REFLECT HIS TRUE ZEN. STOP MONITORING HIS PAGE YOU NON-ZEN WARRIOR.

REGARDS,

D. PAYNE MINISTER CHURCH OF SEAGAL — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.110.194.203 (talk • contribs)

I'm sorry, but I can't; gotta earn my dark side salary... Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 15:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Movement of 1977

Many thanks for your help...--Presbite (talk) 20:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 23:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:User page reverting

Many thanks for the IP reverting on my user page earlier today. Much appreciated. ;) Regards, Cs-wolves (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure.

Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 23:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article marked for speady deletion (Shoesandbags)

Please give me further information as to what is the problem with the article or which bits should I rewrite as I can not see why this article should be deleted. I have followed the guidelines of other articles about the same subject such as Matches fashion and Net-A-Porter on wikipedia and of course wikipedias own guidelines. My wording of the article is the same as it appears in publications out of my control. Please advise as to what do I need to change in the article if at all? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoesandbags (talk • contribs)

Well, first of all, the first thing that you ought to read is Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations. There, most of your questions can be answered.

However, in short, Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopaedia and not a means of promotion, I'm sorry. Promotional material is not accepted either in articles or in your userpace. Your userpage keeps being deleted because it is deemed promotional and, therefore, deleted under criterion G11 of the rules regarding speedy deletions.

That said, as I've already told you, I'd invite you to read the FAQ. If you have further questions or if there's something unclear there, you're welcome to come back and ask me anything you need. Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 16:19, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Azerbaijan

Do you want me to paint you an effing picture of the edit I am requesting? What part exactly of my request is ambiguous in the least ? Please do tell. Or don't. Just leave it as it is. Thank you for preventing me from improving Wikipedia. --78.34.223.239 (talk) 19:21, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to prevent you from improving the 'pedia; however, when one takes a cursory look at the various captions, a full stop may go unnoticed; since you have clearly identified where the problem lies, it could save other people some work if you could just say: it's the third photo from the top or whatever. That would make it easier for us to help you and make Wikipedia better. It's not like I'm an evil bureaucrat who turns down your application due to a scrivener's error. Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 19:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would amount to painting you a picture of the edit, that's exactly what I meant. Describing that edit would take more time than doing the edit itself. What is so hard for you to understand? Just go through the article and remove the erroneous full stops. A trained dog could do that edit without further instructions. Ok, I'm heading out now, laughing this idiocy off with a refined 1992 Auchroisk. Too stupid. Just too stupid. --78.34.223.239 (talk) 19:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prosit. Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 19:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hijacked

sorry about the daily show edit as well as the edit of one or more pages. while at a locacl library i forgot to log out as i left. and as you may guess the vandal quickly took advantage of that and commited the hanus crimes against knowledge my sincerest appologies.

-the real fact — Preceding unsigned comment added by The real fact (talk • contribs)

It was no big deal, don't worry; vandalism can be quickly undone!

That said, since we have no way to know who was operating your account at any given time, my personal suggestion would be to keep an eye out for vandals trying to hijack your account or you might end up blocked even if you're innocent... Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 21:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 <!-- Please enter your message at the bottom of this page or, if there are no previous sections, beneath this line
 —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-->
+your a faggot you butthole. i worked for hours and my article got deleted. burn dickhole burn
-== User:Skitrirun - New Articles ==
-Hi Salvio,
-Being new to this I would appreciate some advice. I've created 3 new articles, but all of them have been marked for speedy deletion and all by the same user (who seems to have bit of a track record for speedy deletions). Unfortunately the user in question has not given any reasons for the speedy deletions and interestingly other users have since edited the pages with one user considering 2 of the pages as possibly notable. Also, the pages I've created are similar (if not moe informative) to others I've seen that are established and widely accepted, which to me does question consistency within Wikipedia.
-Therefore I welcome any suggestions on how the pages could be improved to make them more acceptable, whether that means removing inappropriate elements or adding more notable details and references. I am in the midst of trying to obtain more verifiable references, but please appreciate that this will take time (as I need to check with the sources concerned). Likewise I can't upload any associated images yet to support the articles because of my new membership status. I hope you don't mind the call for help, but you did post the welcome message on my talk page and I notice that you are an adopter.
-Many thanks/Grazie mille!
-[[User:Skitrirun|Skitrirun]] ([[User talk:Skitrirun|talk]]) 21:51, 23 August 2010 (UTC).
-:Hello. Well, I've taken a look at the articles you created and they were tagged for speedy deletion, because the new page patroller who read them thought that you hadn't really specified why those clubs are important or significant. However, don't worry, an admin has reviewed those requests and has declined them. Mind you, please: this doesn't mean that your articles can't be deleted; it only means that, if someone thinks they don't belong on Wikipedia, they have to take a longer route, which involves a weeklong community discussion (called an [[WP:AFD]], that is to say "articles for discussion").
-:A very important thing you have to remember, however, is that if an article you wrote has been tagged for deletion, this doesn't reflect on you as a contributor; I mean, that isn't to say that your contributions here are not appreciated!
-:Wikipedia chose to give itself some rules, to decide what qualifies for inclusion and what doesn't, in order not to become a repository of bits of trivia or of garage bands... For that reason, only articles on things that are considered [[WP:N|notable]] can be included in Wikipedia. The rule of thumb is that if something has received significant coverage in third-party [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] it qualifies for inclusion; there are, however, some particular criteria for particular categories of things, such as, for instance, organisations (they are listed [[WP:CLUB|here]]).
-:At the moment, only one article has been taken to AFD (that is to say that the community has been called upon to decide whether it meets our criteria or not); so the first thing you might do is find reliable sources to help establish that club's notability... If you need further help or if you think I wasn't clear enough, feel free to ask more questions. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">  '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]'''</span> [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| <sup>Let's talk 'bout it!</sup>]] 23:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 == Thank semi-spam ==