Jump to content

User talk:Ohnoitsjamie: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Fikusfail (talk | contribs)
47 edits
←Replaced content with '{{Notability|date=May 2010}}'
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Notability|date=May 2010}}
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------->
<!----------- Leave new comments at BOTTOM of page --------------------->
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------->

{{User:Ohnoitsjamie/Talktemp}} <!-- :} -->

==Welcome to Jamie's talk page!==
Please add new messages to the '''bottom of the page'''. If a conversation is started here, I'll respond here; if it starts on your talk page, I'll respond there.

====Contacting me====
I prefer to communicate via '''talk pages.''' Please only email me if there is a good reason not to conduct a conversation on a talk page. I usually '''''do not respond to emails''''' unless there's a valid reason why the question could not have been posted on a talk page.

====Why did you remove my external links?====
'''''If you've come here because you want to know why I removed some external links you've added''''', please read [[WP:SPAM|Wikipedia's policies on spam]], [[WP:EL|Wikipedia external link guidelines]] and [[WP:COI|conflict-of-interest]] first. Because of Wikipedia's popularity, it has become a target for folks looking to promote their sites, which is against Wikipedia policies. If you read [[WP:SPAM]] and still feel that your link(s) does not violate those policies, let me know.

One common argument I hear is ''But so-and-so link is on that article, and it's commercial!'' [[WP:EL]] doesn't explicitly forbid In links to commercial sites; it depends on the notability of the link, its content, and if it's a reference or a notable pro/con argument on a controversial subject, etc. On the other hand, I think that many Wikipedians would agree that there are way too many commercial links at present time, so feel free to "prune away" if the link doesn't meet guidelines in [[WP:EL]]. Incidentally, if you've come here to complain that I've deleted links to your blog (especially a blog with advertising), don't bother. You'll have to find free advertising somewhere else. A good Google search will reveal plenty of places for that sort of thing.

Vandalism and insults left here will be recycled in the bit bucket. Remember: [[Wikipedia:Civility|be nice!]]

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------->
<!----------- Leave new comments at BOTTOM of page --------------------->
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------->
====Talk archives====
*[[/archive1|2005 archives]]
*[[/archive2|Jan 2006 - Mar 2006 archives]]
*[[/archive3|Apr 2006 - June 2006 archives]]d
*[[/archive4|July 2006 - August 2006 archives]]
*[[/archive5|August 2006 - November 2006 archives]]
*[[/archive6|December 2006 - January 2007]]
*[[/archive7|February 2007 - March 2007]]
*[[/archive8|April 2007 - July 2007]]
*[[/archive9|August 2007 - October 2007]]
*[[/archive10|November 2007 - January 2008]]
*[[/archive11|February 2008 - April 2008]]
*[[/archive12|May 2008 - August 2008]]
*[[/archive13|September 2008 - October 2008]]
*[[/archive14|November 2008 - January 2009]]
*[[/archive15|February 2009 - April 2009]]
*[[/archive16|May 2009 - August 2009]]
*[[/archive17|September 2009 - October 2009]]
<!------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
<!-- LEAVE NEW COMMENTS AT BOTTOM OF PAGE. IF YOU DO NOT DO THIS, YOUR COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED. -->
<!------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

'''PLEASE LEAVE NEW COMMENTS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.'''


==Block?==

I answer to personal attacks. I never attack! The others can attack and me not?--[[User:Testosterone vs diabetes|Testosterone vs diabetes]] ([[User talk:Testosterone vs diabetes|talk]]) 15:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
:Unfortunately while they are responsible for their actions you are responsible for your actions. So no you can't attack back. [[User:Hell in a Bucket|Hell In A Bucket]] ([[User talk:Hell in a Bucket|talk]]) 15:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

== Requesting reconsideration of my "spam" contributions... ==

First of all, let me say thank you for dedicating your time to improving wikipedia.

I've recently made some contributions to various articles, and you have flagged as spam.
As a starting point for discussion, please review the contribution I made here:
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Cambridge%2C_Ontario&action=historysubmit&diff=323185370&oldid=323156043

In my opinion, this seems like a quality edit to an existing article, adding valid and helpful information to the article. If the site being referenced if your cause of concern, could you explain which aspects of it are deemed to be "spammy"? It is significantly more user friendly than the official census page.

I don't want to take up any more of your time than is necessary, but I would appreciate more of an explanation from you, if possible.

Thanks in advance,
[[User:Jimmy socks|Jimmy socks]] ([[User talk:Jimmy socks|talk]]) 06:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
: We don't need commercial "mirror sites" for providing stats when government sites providing the same stats are available. This site has been spammed by three different [[WP:SPA|single purpose accounts]]. If the link is added again, it will be blacklisted. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

== tao lin spam ==

many of the articles being spammed have been proposed for merger, some with the merger banner being up for months. how can we get the process facilitated? [[User:Theserialcomma|Theserialcomma]] ([[User talk:Theserialcomma|talk]]) 03:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
: We could just be [[WP:BOLD|bold]] and do it... <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 04:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
::i don't know how, or i would. i assumed it was an admin-only action. [[User:Theserialcomma|Theserialcomma]] ([[User talk:Theserialcomma|talk]]) 04:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

==Forum links==
Hi, was wondering based on your greater experience whether the addition of forum links such as [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Lexus&curid=18329&diff=323911673&oldid=323555768] are ok...it's a new user. Thanks, [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar|talk]]) 20:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
: It's a little bit of a gray area (forum links are common and tolerated in some pages), though I tend to err on the side of removal unless there is an especially popular or notable forum. Popular forums are easy to find via websearches as it is. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 20:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

::Ok, thanks for the guidance. [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar|talk]]) 20:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
==1857 Article==
The war is not considered a mutiny by both India and Pakistan...the term Indian mutiny is only employed by the then British Occupation Regime, the Indian and Pakistani governments refer to this war as "War of Independence".
: Take it to the article's talk page. There is already a consensus there (in the archives). <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 04:49, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Fine, I will not edit the title..but changes with regard to biased and non-neutral words used in the article will be edited.
: I suggest you propose changes to the talk page first on controversial topics such as this. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 04:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

==Oral Sex pics==
Please provide your reason for removing the hard core pics on the article's talk page.[[User:Moby-Dick3000|Moby-Dick3000]] ([[User talk:Moby-Dick3000|talk]]) 14:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

==re: Richard Relucio==
Appears to be socking again to get around his temporary topic ban of [[University of the City of Manila]] via [[User:Nash17]]. See [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=University_of_the_City_of_Manila&diff=prev&oldid=324310600 this edit], which appears to be classic [[User:Richard Relucio]]. (Note that several months ago I'd blocked [[User:Nash16]] as a Relucio sock). I'll leave it up to you whether you'd like to reblock RR (I've already blocked the sock).<b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 18:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

:Thanks very much for alerting me to this. I contacted the editor to ask for his comments and as I have had no response so far I've reblocked him. If and when he replies, I'll ask the committee to formally review the position. &nbsp;[[User:Roger Davies|<span style="color:maroon; font-variant:small-caps">'''Roger&nbsp;Davies'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 17:40, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

::Based on technical evidence, it is extremely unlikely that [[User:Nash17|Nash17]] is a sock of [[User:Richard Relucio|Richard Relucio]]. Richard Relucio has therefore been unblocked and the tag on Nash17 removed. &nbsp;[[User:Roger Davies|<span style="color:maroon; font-variant:small-caps">'''Roger&nbsp;Davies'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 13:18, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

=="Spammed links''?==
What do you mean by that? The NY Times article I cited is clearly a reliable source and in no way spam.[[User:Hoponpop69|Hoponpop69]] ([[User talk:Hoponpop69|talk]]) 17:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
: My comments were regarding the dyingscene.com link, not the NYT link. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 18:50, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

== [[Avatar (2009 film)]] protection ==

Hello Jamie, I've noticed you've protected the Avatar article. I don't blame you to be honest, but is there any chance you can change this to semi protection? The problem is coming from a single anonymous IP which keeps changing, not the registered users. I've reported the IP for 3rr violation, and the problem is that he keeps removing the proper budget estimate with references and replacing it with $500m. The reverts from the other editors have been to simply restored referenced information, so it would be great if we could get on with looking after the article. Thanks. [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 15:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
: Oh sorry, it is semi-protected. I'm in thick mode today! [[User:Betty Logan|Betty Logan]] ([[User talk:Betty Logan|talk]]) 15:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
:: No problem. I figured semi-protection might be preferable to a large range-block. Cheers, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

== Industrial robot ==
HELP1
Someone keeps entering their company in the list of manufacturers and I keep deleting it. It's an edit war and we need arbitration of some sort. I have no idea how to go about it. Can you help please.
HELP2
Also in the list was a company called TOSY who make a ping pong robot. I deleted the link but they have their own page. Is that right? It looks like self promotion to me and fails on notoriety. How can I get that assessed for deletion?
You are the only administrator I know. It's not clear how to get in touch with admin [[User:Robotics1|Robotics1]] ([[User talk:Robotics1|talk]]) 22:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
: Regarding the first dispute; discussing the issue on the talk page if the first step. Whether or not the mfr belongs in that list is debatable, though the other editor may have a [[WP:COI]] issue. Regarding the second; see [[WP:PROD]] and [[WP:AFD]] for info on how to nominate pages for deletion. Cheers, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

== Flying Spaghetti Monster parody ==
You recently removed my edits to this page due to a lack of cited references, however what I added is (1) referenced in a book by Richard Dawkins and (2) simply a statement about a colloquial usage. I suggest adding my comments to another section in the article.
:"Proponents of intelligent design sometimes consider the use of this parody as a cop-out to serious discussion. Some other internet and IM users consider phrases like, "time for the flying spaghetti monster" as a request for a joke or a more jovial topic." <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Blairius|Blairius]] ([[User talk:Blairius|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Blairius|contribs]]) 17:33, 26 November 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Advertising Education page ==
Hi Jamie, I am confused: you just removed a link that I just added. The link is to an ad school, and it was at the [Advertising Education] page. How is that spam? it seems to me that is totally related and useful? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/83.32.134.31|83.32.134.31]] ([[User talk:83.32.134.31|talk]]) 19:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Per [[WP:EL]], Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising schools. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 19:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

== Worldenc's charts ==

I would just like to inform you that I've started a thread [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cities#User:Worldenc_and_their_charts|here]] about Worldenc's charts. If you could take a look, that'd be great. [[User:Killiondude|Killiondude]] ([[User talk:Killiondude|talk]]) 20:53, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


== hallo from uwe kils==
* the article has been written by my former students, i only added high resolution royalty free images, some information and links. everything is true and proovable. do you know of any professor who has the Heinz Maier Leibnitz Prize[2], the Heisenberg Prize and the 500,000 Bioscience Prize of the Volkswagen Foundation? an eb-1 visa http://www.foreignborn.com/visas_imm/immigrant_visas/employment_immigration/eb-1.htm for which you need an international notable price in the league of nobel prices? you have my colleague daniel pauly http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Daniel_Pauly_Pauly_Symposium.jpg, he is not half as famous as i was. i am retired long time.

we donated thousands of photographs and i editied thousands.
i donated over 40 000 dollar anoumously over the years.
it would be nice if you have the entry alive, so my grandchildren and former students could find me. i shut down all other accounts. you can cut it down to 5 lines no picture. it would be nice if the categories stay.

best greetings and good luck to wikipedia, which is the greatest on the planet (see my endorsements on user kils, my gallery there and my gallery on commons user uwe kils

http://web.archive.org/web/20010803121250/krill.rutgers.edu/uwe/

Professor Dr. habil.habil. u. k.

user kils [[User:Kils|<font color="A29EBA">'''''Uwe Kils''''']]</font> [[Image:heringmini.jpg]]
: The deletion discussion is the venue for this, not here. My opinion is unchanged. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 18:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

== Admin's Barnstar ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Admin_Barnstar.png|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | To <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]]</b>. Many thanks for keeping articles clear of spam and other nonsense, particularly in catching (twice), the returning "askgeo-mapzones" Sock/Spammer. Wikipedia is a better quality project because of hardworking Admin's like you! --[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 18:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
|}

Cheers;)--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 18:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
: Thanks very much! I only wish I would've caught it sooner. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

==Please explain this deletion==
[http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Uwe_Kils_%282nd_nomination%29&diff=328922086&oldid=328919682] --[[User:Geronimo20|Geronimo20]] ([[User talk:Geronimo20|talk]]) 00:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
:Hey I commented on this (just after you did below) and I've already added it back in. I'm sure it was an accident. '''~a''' ([[User:Arichnad|user]] • [[User talk:Arichnad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Arichnad|contribs]]) 00:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

== Accident ==

Hey you accidentally removed this reply. [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Uwe_Kils_%282nd_nomination%29&diff=328923040&oldid=328922086 my diff]. '''~a''' ([[User:Arichnad|user]] • [[User talk:Arichnad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Arichnad|contribs]]) 00:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
: Sorry about that, certainly didn't mean to....surprised the software didn't detect it as an edit conflict. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

==re: your message==

Hi Ohnoitsjamie, I've left a reply to your message on [[User_talk:Marek69#PTiger1985_on_Alimony|my talk page]] -- [[User:Marek69|{{#if:|<span style="background-color:Marek;color:DarkBlue;"></span>|<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Marek</span>}}]]<small>.</small>[[Special:Contributions/Marek69|<small>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:69;color:Blue;"></span>|<span style="color:Blue;">69</span>}}</small>]][[User_talk:Marek69|<small>{{#if:|<span style="background-color:<sup>'' talk''</sup>;color:Green;"></span>|<span style="color:Green;"><sup>'' talk''</sup></span>}}</small>]] 19:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

==Why Spam ==
My additions are with geninue interest to the reader with additioinal information. Why you thought those are spams?--[[User:Haja maideen|Haja maideen]] ([[User talk:Haja maideen|talk]]) 05:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
: The links provided on your talk page warnings explain why. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

==uhse elite university==
i erased it for him, he is sailing, he asked me to transmit to all that he is sorry. it was written by me. good luck - chandra (uwe´´s secretary)
[[User:Kils|<font color="A29EBA">'''''Uwe Kils''''']]</font> [[Image:heringmini.jpg]] 15:40, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

==Christmas song links==
Hi Jamie. I'm trying to figure out the rules here. Read the policies on spam. It sounds like my external links edits were appropriate but need to be reviewed by another person. I was trying to add links to recordings and music scores for several Christmas songs (a hot topic for the next few weeks). In some cases there were none and my links were unique. Do I understand correctly? - EltonSmith <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:EltonSmith|EltonSmith]] ([[User talk:EltonSmith|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/EltonSmith|contribs]]) 16:13, 4 December 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: No, they're not appropriate. Wikipedia is not a song directory, nor is it for promotion. See [[WP:EL]] and [[WP:COI]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:22, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you again. I'm trying to understand how Wikipedia works. Why are there other similar links on some of these pages? Are they grandfathered or are they different somehow? I know you are the boss, but I don't understand. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:EltonSmith|EltonSmith]] ([[User talk:EltonSmith|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/EltonSmith|contribs]]) 16:35, 4 December 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promoting an artist. I've already provided you with the policy links. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

== [[Gang]] article ==

I have improved the [[Gang]] article as best as I can. I have made over 50 edits on it. So, How did I do?. I am trying to get the [[Gang]] article in a good article status. What needs to be done to get it in good article status. Is it missing some information and references.

I like your help and input.--'''<font color="navy" face="Matisse ITC" size="2">[[User:Zink Dawg|Zink Dawg]]</font> -- 16:58, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
: I'm about to head out the door, but if you haven't already read [[WP:FACR]], that's a good place to start. (Oh, and right of the bat, I'd say the stylized rendering of "Gangs" in the infobox has to go. It looks silly). <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:16, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
::I removed the gang logo in the infobox. Let me know if I need to do something. --'''<font color="navy" face="Matisse ITC" size="2">[[User:Zink Dawg|Zink Dawg]]</font> -- 17:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

== Inappropiate links ==

Hi. I was sure this was going to happen, and I perfectly understand why. But if you will take 1 minute to take a look at the website [http://www.homemade-atlas.org/ ], you will see that is not a commercial site, or anything like that. Just an informational website to which I want to gather some visitors, and, given its content, the links, I believe, were rather in context. Sorry if you feel that it should belong here. [[User:Ionut Cojocaru|Ionut Cojocaru]] ([[User talk:Ionut Cojocaru|talk]]) 17:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
: Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle. Also see [[WP:COI]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
:: If it wasn't a personal site, I'm sure it wouldn't have been any problems. I guess it doesn't matter THE ACTUAL content of a website, just the owner... [[User:Ionut Cojocaru|Ionut Cojocaru]] ([[User talk:Ionut Cojocaru|talk]]) 11:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
::: The fact that you've been reverted by three different editors should tell you something. Add the site again and your account will be blocked indefinitely. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
::::This is still going on, [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#homemade-atlas.org]]. Looks like image spamming is occuring...--[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 18:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

== Vendetta ==

If you have a serious grievance, please contact the arbitration committee before you attempt to wikilawyer an established user in good standing into an indefinite block. ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 07:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
: I simply reported an obvious policy issue to another editor, who took appropriate measures. I stand by my action. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 18:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
::You were in a long-standing and convoluted dispute with a user and you attempted to get them blocked from editing wikipedia by soliciting a sympathetic admin. "Simply" is a bit of an understatement. ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 00:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
:::I was one of many admins to decline an unblock of the user following legal threats. In reviewing the editor's history, I noticed a pattern of [[WP:COI]] regarding two articles with questionable notability, both of which I nominated for deletion. I call that policy enforcement; if you want to call it a dispute, that's your call. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
::::<s>I gathered you recognized it as a dispute because you asked a third party to intervene when you dug up some dirt about that user, instead of blocking him yourself. There's no reason that you can't report apparent policy issues to another user, but your approach did not appear to be a neutral one. First, you contacted an administrator who was already involved in the situation rather than contacting an uninvolved and neutral admin. Second, you did not take the time to confirm these allegations with the user, who is presumably mature and intellectually honest enough to handle them. Third, your reply rephrased my comment to mean that I was disagreeing with your motivation regarding the legal threats, coi editing, and self-promotion. For the record, I don't. However it is telling that the only issue you neglected is the accusation which led to the block and my involvement in the first place.
::::The issue appears to be working itself out, so there is no reason for me to press any further. This post was simply one of those "don't piss on my back and tell me it's raining" reminders. ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 01:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)</s> Your suspicions were correct and then some, I'm sorry for doubting your motives. ˉˉ<sup>[[User:Anetode|'''anetode''']]</sup>[[User_talk:Anetode|╦╩]] 23:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
::::: Thanks for the analysis. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 01:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
:::::: I appreciate the follow up. I'm sure we're all happy to put the matter behind us. On another topic: yay for [[Remain in Light]], truly a fantastic album and well-deserved article for FA. Cheers, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

== Kils ==

Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#|{{{thread}}}]]. }}{{#if:WP:ANI#Role account used for COI editing|The discussion is about the topic [[:WP:ANI#Role account used for COI editing]].}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 15:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

:Honestly curious-- does a secretary typing for you via phone count as a meatpuppet, or a sockpuppet? Would it depend if you were on the line at that very moment? ...So, with that last ANI "resolved" does that mean it's over now? Like, really over? Can I just pretend that none of the photobucket user pages and other articles created are just... not there? Can that freaking fish picture in the signature be removed? ...And seriously, should the whole massive streak of the Norse user alliance group starting in 2003 with CUs outing people they didn't like actually be looked into, or should I just forget about that, too? ...Sorry to interject. It's just a name I'm in no mood to ever see again. ...Thanks. <b>♪</b> <span style="font-family:Verdana;font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Datheisen|daTheisen]][[User talk:Datheisen|(talk)]]</span> 15:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
:: The outcome of the [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kils CU] investigation perhaps will give the matter better closure. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 18:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
== Medina, Ohio ==

Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. This is regarding your change to the Medina Ohio page on Dec 4 and the following message you left: '''"Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)"'''
Retrieved from "http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Medinafrancis1925"
Hidden categories: User talk pages with Uw-advert1 notices

I did read all the Wiki pages prior to posting and I '''also''' read the current Medina page under the heading I posted to. There it lists several companies both national and local with no more or less relevance than Aadvantage Cab. Here is the actual text from that page:

'''Economy

'''''Due to Medina's location, approximately 30 miles south of Cleveland,[4] many residents of Medina now work in the Cleveland area and the city has acquired a somewhat suburban status.[7]Medina is home to the first Super Kmart Center.[9] The 24/7 grocery and general merchandise store opened in 1991 and continues to operate today. However, mainly due to Medina's boom in population throughout the 1990s, the novelty of having a Super Kmart soon wore off, and Kmart's lack of response to competition from Buehler's, Giant Eagle, Target, and especially Wal-Mart, left it on the brink of closure after Kmart's bankruptcy. Medina is also home to a Wal-Mart Supercenter, which is also an 24/7 grocery and general merchandise store. In recent years, Medina has encountered the arrival of other large retailers such as Borders, Home Depot, Starbucks, Bed Bath and Beyond, Old Navy, PetSmart and Pier 1 Imports. In October 2006, Target completed an extensive renovation.''''
'''''Medina is still home to the A. I. Root Company, now a candle manufacturer. A. I. Root is also the name of the local middle school.'''''

'''''The Bil-Jac dog food company was founded in Medina in 1947. It is still locally owned and operated.


Here again is what I added: '''''By 2004. Medina's population growth coupled with the city and county's increased enforcement of drunk driving laws, made it clear the community needed a full-time, full service cab company. In November 2004, Aadvantage Cab & Courier opened. Locally owned, they put several cabs in service to relieve the stress on the burgeoning court calenders by giving citizens a safe alternative to drinking and driving.'''''

In addition, the company I added has made many more contributions to the community and as someone who lives here I know that. I am not affiliated in any way except as a member of this community who has witnessed the impact the company has had. Having lost 2 family members to drunk drivers before they opened, I stand by my edit and will continue to. I will appreciate your either leaving it as is or removing all references to the other businesses as they '''are''' obviously a "soapbox" for large corporations
[[User:Medinafrancis1925|Medinafrancis1925]] ([[User talk:Medinafrancis1925|talk]]) 18:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
: If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 18:56, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

== Uwe Kils ==

You may relist [[Uwe Kils]]. The recent AfD was seriously compromised by sock puppet votes. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 13:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
: Though the AfD was a puppet fest, a number of established editors did make reasonable arguments for inclusion (Google scholar links, etc). I'm fairly certain a relisting would result in another keep anyway. Thanks for the notice, though. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
::Right, then we are done. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 15:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

== Someone's CV? ==

what'd'ya think: [[Christian_Beranek]]

[[User:Cramyourspam|Cramyourspam]] ([[User talk:Cramyourspam|talk]]) 00:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Cramyourspam
: Notability is a little weak, though the work with Disney and the coverage/involvement with a notable comics-oriented publication ([[Newsorama]]) make it likely that the article would survive an AFD. I've seen much worse subjects survive AfD. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 01:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I posted that geico insurance is number 1 in lawsuits. This is true. How do I get this added to the geico wiki? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.113.2.217|76.113.2.217]] ([[User talk:76.113.2.217|talk]]) 13:46, 9 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: You find a [[WP:Reliable source|reliable source]] to back up the claim, and use [[WP:NPOV|neutral wording]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I made the statement more neutral and added a link to ALL state insurance commission sites but was deleted again. STATES that have a site and have GEICO listed SHOW that they are above average in consumer complaints to the Insurance Boards. This is the most 100% relevant and in fact is the only source for counting official complaints. About the lawsuits. I don't feel I should clutter the page with a count of lawsuits per state, but I could. Would that help? They are the number 1 sued auto insurance company in NM, CA, VA, and several other states. Also when combined they are number 1 in lawsuits in ALL states.
: If you can't provide evidence, you can't post it. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
==hallo from Uwe Kils==
can you please vote again on http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Uwe_Kils_(3rd_nomination).
Best wishes [[User:Kils|<font color="A29EBA">'''''Uwe Kils''''']]</font> 15:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
: Which part of [[WP:CANVASS|do not canvass]] are you not comprehending? <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

== Geico state insurance complaints. ==

I took out the lawsuit information completely until I have time to go state by state and pull up this information. I understand this point and deletion.

I don't see why the fact that Geico has substantially above average state insurance commission complaints can not be included when I also include the link to every state insurance regulation department. The state insurance department is the one and only source for this information. It is the only reliable, verifiable source of information on this.

I think that the assertion that geico's profitability is related to it's lack of agents is false. But this is listed as true when there is no verification. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.113.2.217|76.113.2.217]] ([[User talk:76.113.2.217|talk]]) 19:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: It's ridiculous to force the reader to sift through all 50 states data to determine if a statement is true or not. If you find other statements in the article that are dubious and lacking sources, feel free to remove them or tag them as needing a source. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 20:53, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

== OK, I need a mediator. - that is the national statistic! ==

ok, this is insanity. I need someone to mediate this. GEICO's headquarters are in Maryland! That was a national statistic! You are not neutral on this situation. GEICO's national complaints as recorded are 2.95 on that statistic. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.113.2.217|76.113.2.217]] ([[User talk:76.113.2.217|talk]]) 14:57, 10 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Feel free to file an [[WP:RFC]]. You're going to hear the same thing there; sites such as [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=GEICO&action=historysubmit&diff=330772054&oldid=330703631 self-published pov] sites and forums do not meet [[WP:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] criteria. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

==Barbaro hoaxer==
Nothing at [[WP:LONG]], though there probably should be. I see you found the main page for organizing info on this hoax. The link is humorous, though I find the way the Royal Forum shredded the hoaxer's claims to be more funny. [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 05:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

== Spamming Claim ==

Hi there,

I'm not sure if the message you sent me was automated, because if you look at what I'm doing, I think you'll agree that it's not spam.

I am definitely adding links to OpenRegs, but it is relevant for all the pages. OpenRegs is a site that keeps track of regulations from federal agencies, and what I'm posting are sites keeps track of the regulations from the specific agencies for each page on Wikipedia.

I was worried I might get flagged for linking to it for all of the agencies, but I think you'll agree that what I'm doing is legitimate. I have noticed that DMOZ is a legitimate site to link to, and I think OpenRegs is, in the same way. May I continue?

Thanks,
Seth Goldin
--[[User:Seth Goldin|Seth Goldin]] ([[User talk:Seth Goldin|talk]]) 20:50, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

:Also, I think if you look at the guidelines, I am doing something absolutely legitimate.
:http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:External_link#What_should_be_linked
:--[[User:Seth Goldin|Seth Goldin]] ([[User talk:Seth Goldin|talk]]) 21:01, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
:: No, I don't agree. Are you affiliated with openregs? Furthermore, any relevant regulations links should be to the official site for that, regulations.gov, not a commercial site. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:50, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
:::Yes, I am affiliated with the OpenRegs. Part of the appeal of OpenRegs is that it is an alternative to Regulations.gov, since OpenRegs actually has a separate page for each agency, while Regulations.gov does not, so OpenRegs is more easily navigated. Does this qualify?--[[User:Seth Goldin|Seth Goldin]] ([[User talk:Seth Goldin|talk]]) 21:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
:::: No, especially when the link in question is commercial and a government version is available (hard to navigate or not). Also see [[WP:COI]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
:::::OK, I apologize. I thought it would be legitimately helpful, and wasn't doing it to boost page rank. Thanks for clearing this up. I definitely never meant to spam. I apologize for any inconvenience. --[[User:Seth Goldin|Seth Goldin]] ([[User talk:Seth Goldin|talk]]) 21:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
:::::: No worries. Thanks for understanding, and keep up the good work elsewhere! <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 23:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|AfD]] nomination of [[Used car]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|left|48px|]]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion]]. The nominated article is [[Used car]]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also [[Wikipedia:Notability]] and "[[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]]").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Used car]]. Please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the [[WP:AfD|articles for deletion]] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 01:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

== Article rescue ==

FYI: the page [[User:Ohms_law/Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116]], an article which you contributed to, has recently been userfied. I planned on changing it to an article more generally about the Swedish Naming Laws eventually, so and assistance you can give in this respect would be more than welcome. Thanks!<br/>— [[User:Ohms law|<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><i>V</i> = <i>I</i> * <i>R</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ohms law|talk to Ω]]) 12:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

====Lost Tampon=Joke?====
OK, trying again - not sure why it is OK for you to refer to lost tampons as a joke but maybe if you actually had a medical background or did some research you would realise that this is a serious issue and that it is one that ought to be addressed in a serious article about Tampons. The section on Toxic Shock Syndrome seemed most appropriate - instead of ignoring the topic perhaps you could pass the review on to a woman or someone who isn't just going to dismiss this?
It is hard not to get annoyed at someone who makes a snide remark about jokes and seriousness and can't even be bothered to find out if the topic IS serious. Perhaps it is unfortunate that the only information that has any depth about the topic available to refer to is trying to engage the topic with humor - but the content is completely serious - just read the comments on the link I posted to see how people feel about... <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Owenl1998|Owenl1998]] ([[User talk:Owenl1998|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Owenl1998|contribs]]) 19:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Lost tampons are indeed no joke, but a common medical issue. [[User:Craftyminion|Crafty]] ([[User talk:Craftyminion|talk]]) 21:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of YouTube celebrities (4th nomination)]] ==
As a major contributor to the article, I am letting you know about the 4th AFD. [[User:Ikip|Ikip]] ([[User talk:Ikip|talk]]) 21:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

== Parkchester website listing www.parkchesterinfo.com ==

You have removed the first ever to be listed Parkchester website on Wikipedia - www.parkchesterinfo.com. Look at the Wikipedia history for Parkchester going back to 2001 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.15.211.62|98.15.211.62]] ([[User talk:98.15.211.62|talk]]) 19:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Please stop removing the www.parkchesterinfo.com external link on the Wikipedia entry for Parkchester. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.15.211.62|98.15.211.62]] ([[User talk:98.15.211.62|talk]]) 00:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Happy Holidays ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Father Winter Solstice.jpg|150x100px|left]] [[File:Roodborstje.jpg |150x100px|right]]

<font face="Century Gothic"> [[User:Ret.Prof|Ret.Prof]] ([[User talk:Ret.Prof|talk]]) 15:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC) </font> is wishing you [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|Seasons Greetings]]! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's [[Solstice]] or [[Christmas|Xmas]], [[Eid al-Adha|Eid]], [[Diwali]], [[Hogmanay]], [[Hannukah]], [[Lenaia]], [[Festivus]] or even the [[Saturnalia]], this is a special time of year for almost everyone! <br />

<small>Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{[[WP:SUBST|subst]]:[[User:WereSpielChequers/Dec09]]}} to your friends' talk pages</small>.
</div>
== About My links ==
Why do you think my links are inappropriate? I chech the sourse every time. Stella Vesper [[User:Stella Vesper|Stella Vesper]] ([[User talk:Stella Vesper|talk]]) 13:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
: Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle for your website. See [[WP:EL]] and [[WP:COI]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
:You are not an owner of Wikipedia and know nothing about Moscow. My links are useful, but you wish the article about Moscow to be uninformative. Stella vesper [[User:Stella Vesper|Stella Vesper]] ([[User talk:Stella Vesper|talk]]) 17:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Who are you and why do you remove especially my links? My competitors pay to you? Stella Vesper 17:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Stella Vesper|Stella Vesper]] ([[User talk:Stella Vesper|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stella Vesper|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: I'm a admin here, and will block you if you add links to your site again. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

====My links====

Why are you removing my links, they are genuine links providing useful information with maps. Please stop removing them. Digglog <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Digglog|Digglog]] ([[User talk:Digglog|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Digglog|contribs]]) 16:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== [[Haifa Wehbe]] ==

Hi, I stumbled onto this article yesterday. Seems there's a bit of a brouhaha about the issue of how old she is. I removed the birth dates because there appears to be conflicting informatoin, and the date used is not backed up by the reference (it says she is 35 but does not say what her actual date of birth is). There are also other sources (not particularly reliable it must be said) saying she was born in 1976. At the moment I think the best thing is to not have a date in, unless there are some more definitive sources. [[User:Quantpole|Quantpole]] ([[User talk:Quantpole|talk]]) 16:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
: It has been tough to find a good source for it; the [[AFP]] article was the best I could come up with, but it's admittedly shaky. Unfortunately, if we remove it we'll probably have to semi-protect the article for awhile as there is an endless stream of anon's who'll attempt to add it/change it. I'm OK with either route.<b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
::Yeh, I agree that's probably the best out of a bad bunch. The problem is I can find other (albeit not what WP would call a RS) references to her winning a competition at the age of 16 in 1986, which would put her DOB in 1970, other ones say 1976. Hence, I would rather have nothing there. Better nothing than something that could quite possibly be incorrect. I think semi-p may be necessary either way. [[User:Quantpole|Quantpole]] ([[User talk:Quantpole|talk]]) 21:17, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Then "please" quit spamming my talk page with your sanctimonious lectures. Who do you think you are? [[Special:Contributions/173.65.221.85|173.65.221.85]] ([[User talk:173.65.221.85|talk]]) 07:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
: If you continue your disruptive editing, you will be blocked. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:01, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

== [[Frontline Test Equipment]] ==

Hi there Ohnoitsjamie.<br>
You put this article up for deletion, 9 April 2009 '''CSD A7'''. But it is still here. Looks like an IP [[Special:Contributions/12.189.80.221|12.189.80.221]] removed the notice [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Frontline_Test_Equipment&diff=next&oldid=282748964 HERE]. <br>Can't see any notability, very possible the article written by [[Special:Contributions/ToothTeam|editor]] with COI. Should it have been deleted? --[[Special:Contributions/220.101.28.25|220.101.28.25]] ([[User talk:220.101.28.25|talk]]) 07:23, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
: I [[WP:PROD]]'d it, and someone disputed the deletion suggestion. Next step would be to send it to [[WP:AFD]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

== Thanks ==
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Barnstar_of_Reversion2.png|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For reverting vandalism on [[Liu Bang]]. I had a hard time dealing with that vandal. You came at the right time! Thanks. _[[User:Lonelydarksky|LDS]] ([[User_talk:Lonelydarksky|talk]]) 15:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
|}
: Thanks, very appreciated! <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


== Boffo Box ==

Jamie, I think you have misunderstood my intentions of my link posting. Boffo Box is a new Theatrical Index Website that has recently been released to help people view Broadway information in an organized manner that can not be found anywhere else. I am posting links to Boffo Box on pages that Boffo Box is congruent with Wikipedia to provide users who are looking for information on the topic they are searching on Boffo Box. If you question this, i beg for you to view Boffo Box for yourself to see the helpful information that this site can provide, and i ask you not to remove any more of my links. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ridaderek|Ridaderek]] ([[User talk:Ridaderek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ridaderek|contribs]]) 01:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Please read the blurb at the talk of my talk page, as well as the links on your talk page about our external link policy. Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle for your website. If you continue to add the links, you will be blocked from editing. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 01:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

This is not even my website, I am an Avid fan of Broadway and i found this website and i thought others may use it for anything they need to know about shows like i have. I am not an employee nor am i receiving any financial benifit from boffobox. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ridaderek|Ridaderek]] ([[User talk:Ridaderek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ridaderek|contribs]]) 01:57, 22 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: It doesn't matter. You need to stop canvassing Wikipedia with links if you want to retain your editing privileges. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 04:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

these links provide substantial information on the topic in s format that Wikipedia cannot provide, this is not advertisement, it is providing more accessible information on the topics that cannot be provided in a friendly format on Wikipedia <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ridaderek|Ridaderek]] ([[User talk:Ridaderek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ridaderek|contribs]]) 05:19, 22 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: You will be blocked if you canvass links again. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 05:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

This is not spamming this is providing additional information on topics and i have requested a wikipedia editor to intervene on this issue[[User:Ridaderek|Ridaderek]] ([[User talk:Ridaderek|talk]]) 05:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Furthermore, if this is not the proper route to take to settle this dispute, please i would like to involve a Wikipedia administrator, because Boffo Box provides information the same way that Imdb and Ibdb do and until these sites are removed I see no reasons sites to Boffo Box should be.[[User:Ridaderek|Ridaderek]] ([[User talk:Ridaderek|talk]]) 06:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
: I am a Wikipedia administrator. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:39, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi OhNoItsJamie - First, thanks for your work and effort in helping to maintain Wikipedia. I am the founder of BoffoBox.com and I want to apologize if I or [[User:Ridaderek|Ridaderek]] have violated the EL policy of Wikipedia. Similar in form to IMDB.com, we provide both a free and paid version of our website. One for casual viewers and one for theatrical professionals. Per your EL policy, I realize that I was in violation by linking to a site that I own. I am hoping that you can help me determine how else Boffo Box is in violation of your policies. Our publicly available pages provide a wealth of information that is not available from other sources including show links, reviews, synopses, images, full credits, gross and attendance information and more. I feel that this provides enough unique and useful content to be of benefit to Wikipedia users who find this page. Boffo Box's goal is not to SPAM or violate policies in anyway but to help increase the usefulness of Wikipedia and in return gain greater exposure. Any help you can provide in this matter would be greatly appreciated. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Brianmcm32|Brianmcm32]] ([[User talk:Brianmcm32|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Brianmcm32|contribs]]) 06:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small> [[User:Brianmcm32|Brianmcm32]] ([[User talk:Brianmcm32|talk]]) 06:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
: Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle. We don't allow people to canvas the site with links to non-notable sites, period. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:39, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


I thank you for taking the time to consider my case. But, I feel that you may not have seen everything that Boffo Box contains on the website when relating to shows. After reviewing [[WP:ELYES]] #3, i find that Boffo Box fully fits this criteria. View the page:
*[http://boffobox.com/broadway/shows/1091/a-chorus-line A Chorus Line on Boffo Box]
This is a page for a show which has already done a Broadway run, and there are many aspects of this page which cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia format, if you click on the grosses button st the top of the show, a graph is displayed showing weekly grosses compared to their potential (this information is also updated on a weekly bases for currently running shows). If you dig deeper into the Boffo Box website by clicking the attendance/capacity sidebar you can also see a graph displaying the attendance at a show compared to the possible capacity on a weekly basis as well. This aspect certainly fits the requirements listed in [[WP:ELYES]] #3.[[User:Ridaderek|Ridaderek]] ([[User talk:Ridaderek|talk]]) 18:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
: There is nothing further to discuss here. You'll have to find some other way to promote the site. Wikipedia is not the place for it. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 18:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


Hi [[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] - In your last response to me, you said that Boffo Box is non-notable. Could you help me understand what that means. I did some research and I came across these links: [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Stifle/Don't_just_say_non-notable Don't Just Say Non-Notable]. I have also read ([http://www.doshdosh.com/guide-to-wikipedia-website-listing/ Guide to Wikipedia Website Listing]) that notability is not measured by an editor's subjective judgement. So it would be helpful if you could provide reasons why BoffoBox.com is not considered notable.

Again, after reading and re-reading the EL policy I can see why I and subsequently [[User:Ridaderek|Ridaderek]] were marked as spam. I added a link to a site that I owned and [[User:Ridaderek|Ridaderek]] added multiple links in a short amount of time. I'd like to walk through an example with you before you provide your reasons why we are not notable. Here are several links for the Broadway show A Little Night Music:
*[http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/A_Little_Night_Music Wikipedia Page]
*[http://ibdb.com/production.php?id=485016 IBDB Page]
*[http://stageagent.com/Shows/View/735 StageAgent Page]

If you look at the link for StageAgent, it provides some basic information on the show including Synopsis, Character listing and some credits. But it also has 6 advertisements on the page. iBDB provides a listing of show credits and opening night cast information.

If you will then look at the [http://boffobox.com/broadway/shows/1233/a-little-night-music BoffoBox Page] you will see that we provide synopsis, show credits, show links, show reviews, and the past four weeks of attendance and revenue information on the show. With no out-side advertising but links to upgrade if users would like more information (again similar to IMDB which is another notable site on Wikipedia).

I hope that you will take the time to review these links. Again, it is not our intention or goal to SPAM or blatantly self-promote through Wikipedia. Our hope is that we can come to a mutually agreeable way that we can provide content and professionally verified information to Wikipedia.

Thanks for your time. [[User:brianmcm32|brianmcm32]] [[Special:Contributions/67.84.143.57|67.84.143.57]] ([[User talk:67.84.143.57|talk]]) 20:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
: I'm not spending any more time on this. We've already made it clear that we don't permit spamming here. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 20:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]], thanks for the time that you have taken so far in this matter. If it is not too much to ask, as an administrator, could you please point me in the right direction so we can get a second ruling on this. I would like to make it clear to you that I don't feel that we have gotten a fair look at our site or our content. I have provided examples above which I feel shows that we are not spamming Wikipedia and I would like to have another administrator take a second look. Again, I do appreciate the work that you do for Wikipedia. Thank you. [[User:brianmcm32|brianmcm32]] [[Special:Contributions/67.84.143.57|67.84.143.57]] ([[User talk:67.84.143.57|talk]]) 20:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
: There is no second ruling; see [[WP:FORUMSHOPPING]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 20:39, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]], if you review the link that you sent me, you will see that it says "For instance, if you're blocked you can ask for an outside review of said block; if this review concludes that the block was proper, it is generally inappropriate to repeatedly continue to ask for yet another outside review." since you have blocked Boffo Box, I would like an outside review of this block. I don't believe that asking for an outside review in this matter constitutes Forum Shopping. [User:brianmcm32|brianmcm32]] [[Special:Contributions/67.84.143.57|67.84.143.57]] ([[User talk:67.84.143.57|talk]]) 20:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
: There are already two other opinions on this in addition to my own; [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests&action=historysubmit&diff=339313418&oldid=339300946] and [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brianmcm32&oldid=339298668]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

This dispute was posted on [[WP:3O]]. Despite being resolved at least three other ways already, to satisfy the requesting user(s), I'll give my take. Since this site is not notable enough to merit its own Wikipedia page, citing the inclusion of IMDB is not a valid comparison, since IMDB is widely considered to be ''the'' foremost aggregation of facts about film and TV shows. The site also doesn't appear to include any shows outside New York City. Additionally, [[WP:ELNO]] #1 states, "One should avoid any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article." [[User:Mildly Mad|Mildly Mad]]<sup>[[User talk:Mildly Mad|T]]</sup><sub>[[Special:contributions/Mildly_Mad|C]]</sub> 22:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


[[User:Mildly Mad|Mildly Mad]] - thanks for taking the time to review this and for providing your reasons behind the not notable ruling. [[User:Brianmcm32|Brianmcm32]] ([[User talk:Brianmcm32|talk]]) 23:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

==Looking forward to more contributions==
I can see you contributed to "Contracts" article. If you have some spare time would you like to contribute to http://www.wikilawschool.org It is a non-profit law school study guide resource for law school students. Looking forward to your help! Thanks for kind consideration.[[Special:Contributions/119.202.38.234|119.202.38.234]] ([[User talk:119.202.38.234|talk]]) 08:04, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

== [[Florida]] ==

I reverted your change to this article, because you totally nuked the infobox and broke the template. My subsequent edit removed what I think you were trying to fix. If I guessed wrong, by all means fix it, but let me know what you were trying to do. I know that you weren't trying to vaporize the infobox. (grin) '''[[User:Horologium|<font color="DarkSlateGray">Horologium</font>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Horologium|(talk)]]</small> 01:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
: Nice catch; thanks for cleaning up my mess! (I get overconfident sometimes and forget to do a preview). <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 01:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
::Preview is your friend. (grin) If you don't believe me, look at my edit history and some of my edit summaries. (big grin) '''[[User:Horologium|<font color="DarkSlateGray">Horologium</font>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Horologium|(talk)]]</small> 01:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

== Over 9000 END OF STORY ==

Do not delete over 9000. It is far too popular to be deleted.
And no it is not spam.

== Florida Languages ==

Thanks for the concern about the citations, and you are right despite the "de facto" ideology. A citation has been added, as well as Wikipedia links to both languages which also verify the citation and the change. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Glenrqz|Glenrqz]] ([[User talk:Glenrqz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Glenrqz|contribs]]) 16:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== A quick favor? ==

Will you please do me a quick favor? Delete this subpage: [[User:RepublicanJacobite/Chandler bibliography]] as it is now superfluous. Thank you! ---<font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 19:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
: You got it. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 19:34, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks! ---<font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 19:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

== Fredy.00 ==

Hello! I noticed you deleted the ridiculous image this troublesome editor uploaded. I'm watching him closely too, and warned him informally on his talk page (which I'm sure you saw). I don't think his latest stunt shows that he learned one thing during his time off. Very sad... [[User:Doc9871|Doc9871]] ([[User talk:Doc9871|talk]]) 23:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
: He's made a few reasonable edits, but he doesn't seem to get that anti-(insert country here) doesn't fly at Wikipedia. If he crosses the line again, maybe a longer block will make him think twice. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 23:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
:: Well, I can think of two editors who will be watching him ''very'' closely... ;> [[User:Doc9871|Doc9871]] ([[User talk:Doc9871|talk]]) 00:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
:::Hehee! [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Avatar_(2009_film)&diff=340436409&oldid=340436172 Nice]. At least Fredy's creative! This guy has a one-track purpose in his WP life... [[User:Doc9871|Doc9871]] ([[User talk:Doc9871|talk]]) 00:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
::::Wow! I seriously didn't realize (or just forgot) that you were an admin! Awesome - I can't tolerate overt vandals and edit warriors that disrupt article improvement. There is a suspicion among the editors that Theremes is a sock, so an SPI might be in order. Guess I contacted the right one, huh? ;> [[User:Doc9871|Doc9871]] ([[User talk:Doc9871|talk]]) 00:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi again Jamie! Fredy.00 contacted me, asking why he couldn't use his "freedom of expression", and I reminded him that there are rules we all have to follow. So far he's been quiet, but in researching his edit history, I've discovered another self-created [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_USA_in_2050.JPG image] that is orphaned after its removal from three articles: [[51st State]] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=51st_state&diff=prev&oldid=325615060 here], [[Americanization]] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Americanization&diff=prev&oldid=325615710 here], and [[Globalization]] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Globalization&diff=prev&oldid=325615744 here]. Seeing as it is orphaned and is in the same spirit as his other image, should it remain on WP? Thanks for your time! [[User:Doc9871|Doc9871]] ([[User talk:Doc9871|talk]]) 21:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The DFenders]] ==

Please explain why you [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FThe_DFenders&action=historysubmit&diff=340435823&oldid=340434525 rollbacked] my addition of the [[Template:Delrevafd]] tag to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The DFenders]]. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 06:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
: My mistake. I'm in the habit of reverting changes to closed AFDs. I should've looked more closely at the edit. I've restored the tag. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
::No worries. Thanks for restoring the tag. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 23:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

== User:Obituarist ==

Hi Jamie, I happened across this user who you have previously warned about spamming ([[User talk:Obituarist]] [[Special:Contributions/Obituarist|(contribs)]]), and this person has continued the same habit. It appears that this users only contributions are the adding of links to [[obituaries]] in [[The Daily Telegraph]], sometimes obits which are only marginally related to the topic of the article. Some examples: [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=The_Turn_of_the_Screw_%28opera%29&diff=prev&oldid=327514592], [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Economic_Sciences&diff=prev&oldid=331650831], [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=The_Magic_Circle&diff=prev&oldid=339387660], [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Fisons&diff=prev&oldid=339180134], [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Rugby_School&diff=prev&oldid=337834827], [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=The_Hongkong_and_Shanghai_Banking_Corporation&diff=prev&oldid=335136886]. I thought as an admin who has experience dealing with spammers, and this user in particular, you would be in a better position that I to have a look into this. Cheers! [[User:Wine Guy|<font color="#000080">'''Wine Guy'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Wine Guy|<font color="#000000"><small>Talk</small></font>]] 22:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
: Thanks for the heads-up. I reverted a bunch and gave a level-3 warn. I have a strong suspicion that it's a [[WP:COI]] matter as well. Thanks, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:42, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
::No problem. While I try to AGF (maybe they're a Telegraph reader who's obsessed with obits?), this did seem very suspicious in regard to spam/COI. Thanks for your help. [[User:Wine Guy|<font color="#000080">'''Wine Guy'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Wine Guy|<font color="#000000"><small>Talk</small></font>]] 22:54, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

== Help ! ==
Hello !
I need help with this user : [[User talk:98.122.100.249]] ! [[User:YellowPops|YellowPops]] ([[User talk:YellowPops|talk]]) 22:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

== [[User talk:King of Mercia]] ==

If this guy means what he says (although he's probably just blowing off), I prefer to have his threats fully visible, if only that it's easier to talk law enforcement through our pages if they haven't been deleted- I've learnt this through dealing with the FBI. Cheers. [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 01:13, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
: Fine by me. Easier for them to trace him than him you. Cheers, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 01:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

== Happy Birthday ==

{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 1px solid #CC9999; background-color: ugly;"
|align="center"|[[Image:Choco chip cookie.png|75px]]
|align="left" width="100%"|Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the [[WP:BDC|Wikipedia Birthday Committee]]! Have a great day, <b>{{ROOTPAGENAME}}</b>!
|}

== "We've got a bogie in sector 7-G..." ==

I'm not sure if this is a "gaggle of young goslings" or not, but there seems to be a common denominator in the previously blocked [[User talk:DuKu]]. There's an edit war that a blocking/watching admin should intervene in, IMHO... [[User:Doc9871|Doc9871]] ([[User talk:Doc9871|talk]]) 12:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
:Kindly disregarded the above message... [[User:Doc9871|Doc9871]] ([[User talk:Doc9871|talk]]) 12:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

==Mistake?==
Hi Jamie. [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AMaterialscientist Mistake], right? -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 18:56, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
:What zzuuzz said. [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3AMaterialscientist&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=] <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">[[User:Frank|<span style="color:cyan;background:blue">&nbsp;Frank&nbsp;</span>]]&nbsp;{{!}}&nbsp;[[user_talk:Frank|<span style="color:blue;background:cyan">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 18:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
::*Yes, I noticed that too... what did MS do? Why the BLOCK? *international head scratching* --[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™]]</span></sup> 19:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
::: Yes, a mistake...meant to block an IP, must've slipped and clicked on the wrong link. Thanks for the quick heads up. (I unblocked and apologies to MS). <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 19:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

::::Nice job Jamie. Here is your reward:

<div style="text-align: center;">
[[File:Rainbow trout.png|50px]]

<small style="color: #c00;">Whack!</small>
</div>
{{-}}
[[Category:Wikipedia fauna]]
::::{{=)|wink}} Regards '''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #AC0000">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #35628F">Why</span>]]''' 19:06, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

{{minnow}}
That was for the boo-boo you just did... *lol* --[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™]]</span></sup> 19:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
: A well-deserved one. (Note to self; ''sloooowwwww doooowwwwnnnn''). <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 19:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
:: And you'll be like ""F*** You! And kick her in the face with your ''ENERGY LEGS''! /Obligatory [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRuNxHqwazs Powerthirst] reference. I'll go now... [[User:Throwaway85|Throwaway85]] ([[User talk:Throwaway85|talk]]) 23:56, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

== TheEatery ==

Please tell me if you are a "Patrolling Admin". I was going to move an entry. Thank you. [[User:Senor Reparar|Senor Reparar]] ([[User talk:Senor Reparar|talk]]) 23:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
: I was the admin who blocked both accounts as spam-only. The CU report can be closed. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. I do not know how to "close", but I thought you were admin. thank you. [[User:Senor Reparar|Senor Reparar]] ([[User talk:Senor Reparar|talk]]) 00:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
::Yeh, after you've also blocked the IP and "Sr. Reparar" which are also obviously socks. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 00:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
:::He also tends to write Spanish when it suits him (especially edit summaries), and that's not kosher. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 00:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
:::: No worries. If the link appears again (and I will check frequently) I'll block and blacklist with a quickness. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::Roger. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 00:20, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
::::::Here's a logic question though: If the link gets posted again, you're going to blacklist it. Which means it's not supposed to be used. So why not blacklist it now? ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 00:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

== User pushing spam diet ==



Many thanks for blocking this [[User:Kheim002]] who was vandalizing my user page. They appear to have created a bunch of accounts

[[User:Pram008]] [[User:Rav chandni]] [[User:219.91.227.235]] [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 18:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
: Pow, pow, pow! <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 18:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

== Warning re Brendan Burke delete discussion ==

It is hardly a personal attack to point out someone's faulty reasoning. The editor took a broad description and applied it to himself. This was his response: "In that case, fuck you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 04:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC--[[User:Interactbiz|Norm, Vancouver, Canada]] ([[User talk:Interactbiz|talk]]) 23:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC))"
: Yes, I saw that response. Many consider it extremely inappropriate to be referred to as a "Nazi." If you or other editors continue to make ad-hominem attacks on other editors based on their AFD votes, you will be blocked. Period. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
::This is my response to your comment on my talk page where you suggested I had applied the same "personal attack" more than once.:
By applied again, do you mean that I posted essentially the same message at talk pages of both danflave and FisherQueen. It seems fair to make each aware of the comment since they were involved in the original conversation. If FisherQueen considers my comment a personal attack, what was the F.U. statement she posted? Perhaps you could explain what the "many people" considered a personal attack. I merely pointed out that FisherQueen took offense to a statement that she determined was directed to her yet it could have been a criticism intended to apply generally.
::: I'm going to suggest that you (and others) lay off the drama. I'm not interested in participating in AFD drama. My interest is in ending it. FisherQueen has stepped away from the situation; I suggest that you do the same. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
::::If you issue a warning that you will block an editor, you ought to be accountable for the reasons why you took that action. I respectfully suggest you issued that warning inappropriately and have not made an effort to defend it and have not retracted it.--[[User:Interactbiz|Norm, Vancouver, Canada]] ([[User talk:Interactbiz|talk]]) 03:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
::::: I stand by my warning for reasons that have already been enumerated by myself and others. I'm not interested in debating the matter further. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 03:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
::::::You issued a warning that alleged I made a personal attack on another editor. You further claimed that I repeated that action and warned me "Editors who make repeated attacks on other editors (especially when they're based on a good faith vote at an AFD) will be blocked."
:::::Since I made no personal attack, I asked you politely to explain your warning. You replied that it is "extremely inappropriate to be referred to as a "Nazi." and "if you or other editors continue to make ad-hominem attacks on other editors based on their AFD votes, you will be blocked. Period." I called no editor a Nazi and have never used the word on WP. I made no "ad-hominem attacks" on anyone.
:::::Rather than explaining your warning as I asked, you compounded your error by further incorrect statements. I asked you to be explain your claim of personal attack and be be accountable for your acts as admin. You said I should lay off "the drama." Is it drama for me to expect that warnings should be justified by the person who issues them. I expect an accurate response from you, one that does indeed enumerate reasons for the initial and the second warning and does not reference words written by anyone but you and me.
:::::If you are unwilling to retract or explain your actions, I will refer this to dispute resolution.--[[User:Interactbiz|Norm, Vancouver, Canada]] ([[User talk:Interactbiz|talk]]) 04:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)



Please read the following:

You MUST (that's right I am emphasizing this word) look at the etymology of the word and the context.

From enotes.com "In modern times, the word "Nazi" has meanings that go beyond this. We of course use the word to apply to the actual members of the Nazi Party. But we also use it to refer to anyone who is a fanatic about a cause, especially one who wants to force others to agree with/be like them." and "Either way, the word's meaning (its "semantic range") has grown considerably in the last few decades of the 20th century. The popular comedy show Seinfeld introduced us to "Soup Nazi," for example, and women activists for equal rights are sometimes still derisively called "feminazis.""

Today there are "Shoe Nazis," "Spelling Nazis," "Style Nazis," etc. The list is extensive and could go on for pages actually.

The etymology of words change over time or vary by place. In the US a "biscuit" is called a "cookie," "Crisps" are "Chips," and "Chips" are "French Fries". Over time a "computer" stopped being a job that a person held, and started being a reference to a machine.

People have been PASSIONATE (there I go again using all caps) about this subject, but being offended by some of the comments that have been made really does take an assumption of bad faith on the part of the "offendee" in some instances. [[User:Lou2u|Lou2u]] ([[User talk:Lou2u|talk]]) 10:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
: Please stop posting messages on my talk page about this topic. As I said before, I've already stated my case.
<b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 13:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

== External Links Removal (Job Hunting, Cover Letters) ==


The links you removed were current articles (not advertisements) that speak to the subject of the topic. While I understand the question of conflict of interest, they are no more promotional than pointing to any 'branded' website (about.com, etc.) (and the examiner.com link is to a parody, not sure this is what you want to be sending people to).
thanks,
[[User:WillardRobinson|WillardRobinson]] ([[User talk:WillardRobinson|talk]]) 19:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Will Robinson
: The answer is still no, for tbe same reason that hundreds of other similar attempts at adding links there have been removed. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:38, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

== [[Transfer factor]] ==

Do you think perhaps {{user|AaronMatthewWhite}} is the same editor as {{user|Aaronmwhite}}, given their interest on the TF page? I've added a couple sources pointing out that it's more than a bit of quackery. There certainly doesn't seem to be sufficient evidence to support their use as a mainstream treatment of cancer, let alone the other wild claims made about it. I also read somewhere that [[Andrew Wakefield]] was a believer. Interesting... [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 19:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
: Most likely they are the same person, though the first account isn't blocked. I haven't had a chance to review the latest additions (with requested sources), but at first glance it looks like it's going to have some NPOV and SYNTH issues, as well as requiring careful correlation of sources to statements. 20:46, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
::It's already getting ugly [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Transfer_factor&action=history] [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 21:12, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

==[[User:98.122.100.249]]==

Hi, not sure if you remember the user that keeps adding non-NPOV stuff to Taiwan, but this user is at it again, this time at the [[Republic of China]] article. If you could take care of it, it would be great, thanks. [[User:T-1000|T-1000]] ([[User talk:T-1000|talk]]) 20:06, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
: Thanks for the heads up, I'll check it out. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 20:46, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
::You also should check [[User talk:98.71.6.81]], seems to be one of his alternate accounts. [[User:T-1000|T-1000]] ([[User talk:T-1000|talk]]) 00:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
:::Seems like this guy is using a lot of IP addresses, here's another one [[User:66.57.172.93]]. [[User:T-1000|T-1000]] ([[User talk:T-1000|talk]]) 08:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

==Showspace==
Please undo your removal of [[Showspace]]. The MTI Showspace is a social network site like [[facebook]] and others, only for young artists. The posting is not an advertisment (there is no profit or gain involved in the posting]. I don't see how you would delete the Stub for a NON-PROFIT organization that encourges young people to develop themselves as artisits. ShowSpace is free, non-profit, social networking website for kids. I would think Wikipedia would support youth groups. Please reconsider placing the article back online, and of course edit the stub to make it better. Best Regards.... <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Endicium|Endicium]] ([[User talk:Endicium|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Endicium|contribs]]) 22:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Please read our [[WP:WEB]] notability policy. The deletion has nothing to do with the merits of the organization; it is simply a function of our notability policy. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

the external page was not for marketing. it is for the poeple who are travelling to dubai, or the people will to do business in dubai but dont have reference there <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Inshasoft|Inshasoft]] ([[User talk:Inshasoft|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Inshasoft|contribs]]) 18:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: The answer is still not per [[WP:EL]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 19:10, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


==C++==

Hi, I appreciate your concern over external links, but I think the link to C++Org should be on the C++ page for a few key reasons. The documents you mention above state:

"What should be linked
:1. Wikipedia articles about any organization, person, website, or other entity should link to the subject's official site, if any. See Official links below."

C++Org belongs to the C++ community and as it grows it will be an official hub of news, FAQs, software library reviews and so on. It has been running for about a year, with 200 users, so far. There is no charge for using the site, and it is entirely non-commercial (and there is no advertising on the site). It is endorsed by Bjarne Stroustrup, the inventor of C++ and there is a link to it from his home page.

"3. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons."

C++Org contains much material that is highly relevant to C++, which for technical reasons cannot be integrated.

Could you please re-instate the link?

Thanks,
dch888. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dch888|Dch888]] ([[User talk:Dch888|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dch888|contribs]]) 22:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Sorry, but no. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

:: Can you please explain on what grounds you object? I have put forward a case which is consistent with the Wikipedia guidelines, and you just say "no". I think at the very least you could explain why you object. Thanks in advance.[[User:dch888|dch888]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 14:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::: [[WP:EL]] and [[WP:Reliable sources]], as well as the blurb at the top of my page, make it pretty clear. With 200 users, it's hardly notable among the multitudes of resources on thew topic. See also [[WP:COI]], which suspect applies here as well. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
:::: I have already read [[WP:EL]] which I quoted above, and that page gives reasons for links to be included which coincide with the aims of C++Org. [[WP::Reliable sources]] I can't see how C++Org can be considered an unreliable source. It is a community site, collectively owned by everyone and anyone in the C++ community. The fact that it only has 200 users, is because it has only been running for one year. We get about one new user a day, so in another year's time we might have 500 users - when is the boundary going to occur when you are anyone else at Wikipedia consider it to be "reliable". The whole thing about reliablity seems to be highly subjective if you ask me - unless there is a specific section on that page which you are referring to, which you think C++Org doesn't comply with? As far as COI goes, there is no conflict anywhere - as I've already said (at least twice), it's a community - owned and run by anyone interested in C++, it has no affliation with any paricular group and it is totally non-commercial. For all these reasons can you please consider re-instating my edit? Thanks, [[User:dch888|dch888]]. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 00:27, 25 February 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::::: For the reasons I've already stated, no. I'm not discussing it further. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:29, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::: I am not satisfied that you have answered my objection at all. I am therefore going to put the link back on. If you take it off again, I will escalate it with Wikipedia management. The conception for C++Org was with Bjarne Stroustrup, the inventor of the language. This should be enough for you. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dch888|Dch888]] ([[User talk:Dch888|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dch888|contribs]]) 01:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::::::: I am an admin, which is Wikipedia management. If you continue to add the link, I will block your account from editing. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 01:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::::: Firstly I think you are confusing the roles of administration and management. Secondly you have sent me a message saying "Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia" which is the crux of the matter since I fundamentally disagree with your assessment that the link I am trying to add to the C++ page is "inappropriate". Answer me this: how can a website, the original idea for which was from the author of C++, be considered inappropriate? The only reason I want the link on the C++ page, is because the C++Org website belongs to the C++ community and should be linked from this Wiki page. I happen to manage the C++Org website, but I only promote it for the benefit of the community - I have precisely no other interest in this website. Simply saying "No, and I'm not going to discuss this further", not answering my specific points (which were answers to specific points raised in the official guidelines you referred me to) seems to be to be opposed to the spirit of this information sharing website. Finally why should one person decide this? This review process seems to be slightly inadequate to my mind, as for one thing there is no appeal process it would appear. Please answer my specific points and tell me what the appeal process is (if any exists). Thanks [[User:Dch888|Dch888]] ([[User talk:Dch888|talk]]) 10:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
: You may also want to review our [[WP:COI]] policy, as it's pretty obvious that you're the owner of the site. I gave you a template warning reminding you that you will be blocked if you add the site again. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
:: I understand your concerns here and that you have a job to do, but I think you are reading the situation wrongly. You seem to think that I have something personal to gain from this - I don't. I have nothing to gain from it, other than the wider dissemination of information in C++Org to the C++ community. I am not really the true owner of the site - the site is collectively owned by the C++ community. I happen to pay for the hosting and I set it up (following the ideas from Bjarne Stroustrup and other members of the C++ community), but I do '''not''' own it. I merely administrate it to make sure it runs OK. I have contacted Bjarne Stroustup about this and he personally is going to request that the link be placed on the Wiki page. I don't see how any more official you can get - the creator of a computer language asking for a link to a site being placed on the page about the language he brought into existence. [[User:Dch888|Dch888]] ([[User talk:Dch888|talk]]) 23:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
::: The answer remains the same. There is absolutely nothing notable about your site among the hundreds if not thousands of C++ websites out there. Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle, period. As I said before, adding the site again will result in a block. Petitioning Barack Obama will not get your site up here. Please devote your energies elsewhere. Users who attempt to spam Wikipedia persistently will have their sites blacklisted as well. Please '''do not''' post here again about this topic. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 23:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

== Main Image of [[Penis]] Article ==
What do you think about changing opening picture of the [[Penis]] article? Your [[Talk:Penis#Main_Image_Upgrade|opinion needed]]. Thanks! [[User:Yestadae|Yestadae]] ([[User talk:Yestadae|talk]]) 08:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

== Raising Kaine ==

I have removed the prod you placed on [[Raising Kaine]] as it has been prodded a couple of times in the past and nominated at AfD in January 2009. I have no objection to you bringing this article back to AfD. &mdash;<span style="color:#808080">[[User:Kuyabribri|'''KuyaBriBri''']]</span><sup><span style="color:#008080">[[User_Talk:Kuyabribri|''Talk'']]</span></sup> 20:47, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

== re: [[user:Richard Relucio]] probation violation ==


I'm very sorry but your message of the 27th completely passed me by and I've only just seen it. [[User:NuclearWarfare|NuclearWarfare]] re-blocked earlier and I've just endorsed it on Richard Relucio's talk page as an ArbCom block. Thanks for the heads up and, once again, apologies. &nbsp;[[User:Roger Davies|<span style="color:maroon; font-variant:small-caps">'''Roger&nbsp;Davies'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 21:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

== Northridge cookies ==

Hi, Ohnoitsjamie. I see you just deleted [[Northridge cookies]] under [[WP:CSD#G1]]. While I certainly agree that the article content was not encyclopedic and should have been deleted, unfortunately G1 didn't apply: "Pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This ''excludes'' poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism and hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material." The paragraphs in the article were meaningful English text; they just weren't appropriate for an encyclopedia. I'm not sure if any of the speedy deletion criteria applied, in fact; I was in the middle of declining the speedy request and substituting a {{[[Template:prod|prod]]}} tag when you deleted the article.

No harm done here, really—the article was going to be deleted sooner or later. I'm just a little concerned that the speedy deletion criteria are being applied rather loosely. —[[User:Bkell|Bkell]] ([[User talk:Bkell|talk]]) 01:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
: You're correct; I should've changed it to A7, as G1 was a bit of a loose application. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 01:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

::I considered that too, but I decided that A7 didn't apply either, because the article wasn't about an individual, an animal, an organization, or web content. It was about cookies (I think—there was also a bit about lunch ladies in there too). —[[User:Bkell|Bkell]] ([[User talk:Bkell|talk]]) 02:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
::: It might not apply to the absolute letter, but I don't think deleting an article about a high school's cookies is going to be too controversial. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 03:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

::::Like I said, there was no harm done here really. However, I believe it is important for administrators to abide by the policies that have been established. There is a reason A7 specifies those four categories (individuals, animals, organizations, and web content) and excludes others. Arbitrarily deciding to ignore those restrictions and apply it to an article about a high school's cookies could come off as a bit [[WP:BITE|BITE]]y and capricious to a newcomer. (Of course, take this with a grain of salt; there's also [[WP:IAR]] and [[WP:SNOWBALL]].) I was just going to {{[[Template:prod|prod]]}} the article and let it die quietly and uncontroversially in a week. —[[User:Bkell|Bkell]] ([[User talk:Bkell|talk]]) 03:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mctrain]]==
I have just posted some suspected socks there. [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 15:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks for blocking the socks. I'm wanting to move [[Barbaro]] to [[Barbaro(racehorse}]] then create a disambiguation page listing the horse, the events named after the horse, the Venetian family and its members, the buildins, the modern Italian criminal organization and its members, the Major League baseball player, the pro golfer, the pro football player, the missionary, and the piano piece by Bartok . [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 14:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
:: I'd support that idea. Let me know if there's anything else I can assist with. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

==Possible vandalism==
Hello sir, sounds like a new IP user making some strange edits: [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Lexus&curid=18329&diff=347575564&oldid=346165763] Thanks for the help. [[User:SynergyStar|SynergyStar]] ([[User talk:SynergyStar|talk]]) 23:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


== Apologies ==

hello. &nbsp; how are you. &nbsp; I'm sorry. &nbsp; I did not realize it at first that it was an Admin that did the change there. &nbsp; What I don't understand though, to be honest and frank, is why the bias against this source on this particular matter? &nbsp; Maybe cuz of the religious thing with Roman Catholicism? &nbsp; I guess, maybe.&nbsp; Or maybe the implying of exploitation, which I didn't really see there necessarily, so much. &nbsp; But, I have to say that I hope it's not to summarily in toto diss or dismiss any WT publication on any matter under the sun as "unreliable", cuz that's just not fair, accurate, or true. &nbsp; But I do understand the concerns though. &nbsp; No doubt.

But aside from that, regardless of any real or imagined over-tones there, I still think (I'm being honest and sincere here) that "Catholicism" is much more neutral and precise, than merely saying "Christianity". &nbsp; Plus the rest of the article DOES use the term "Catholic". &nbsp; "Christianity" is broad, and can mean whatever someone wants it to mean. &nbsp; But "Catholicism" or "Roman Catholicism" tells people just what form of "Christianity" it was.

I have regular history text books that say "convert to Catholicism."

Anyway, whatever happens happens. &nbsp; I am glad that the substance of what I put there to elaborate what went on in the Second Voyage was left. &nbsp; I do appreciate that. &nbsp; Like I said, I really meant no harm or slants or anything. &nbsp; In fact just the opposite. &nbsp; And established sources are established sources, even if we may not totally agree with everything they say or publish otherwise. &nbsp; But like I said, I do understand the concerns, especially when dealing with an overall religious magazine. &nbsp; I do hear that. &nbsp; Anyway, thank you. &nbsp; [[User:Sweetpoet|Sweetpoet]] ([[User talk:Sweetpoet|talk]]) 23:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
: I don't object to the change from "Christianity" to "Catholicism." However, a religious publication does not meet [[WP:Reliable sources]] guidelines in most cases, and certainly not in this context. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 23:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
==GA reassessment of [[Condoleezza Rice]]==

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the [[WP:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps|GA Sweeps process]]. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at [[Talk:Condoleezza Rice/GA1]]. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 23:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

==Merge discussion for [[Media planner]]==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] An article that you have been involved in editing, [[Media planner]], has been proposed for a [[Help:Merging and moving pages|merge]] with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going {{ #if:Talk:Media_planner#Merge_discussion |[[Talk:Media_planner#Merge_discussion|here]]|to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article}}, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. <sup>[[User:Avicennasis|<font color="red" size="1px">Avic</font>]]</sup>[[User talk:Avicennasis|<font color="blue" size="1px">enna</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Avicennasis|<font color="green" size="1px">sis</font>]]</sub> <small>@</small> 09:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC) <!-- Template:mergenote --> <sup>[[User:Avicennasis|<font color="red" size="1px">Avic</font>]]</sup>[[User talk:Avicennasis|<font color="blue" size="1px">enna</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Avicennasis|<font color="green" size="1px">sis</font>]]</sub> <small>@</small> 09:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
==Gibnews.net==

I see you have removed the link to gibnews.net in the links section on the Gibraltar page. The discussion on the site at wp:rs concluded that it was OK for citations. It seems rather discriminatory to remove it from the links section as it is a gibraltar news site at least being updated daily, unlike gibfocus.gi which is not. Can you reconsider this as I don't want to start an edit war. --[[User:Gibnews|Gibnews]] ([[User talk:Gibnews|talk]]) 17:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
: It still exists as a citation on some articles. I only removed it from the external links section at the bottom. I'm one of two editors so far that doesn't think it is necessary in the external links section. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:32, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

==User Wiki-Expert-Edit==
I was going ahead and request he be blocked per EdJohnston's comments. I wasn't sure what venue to make the request when I noticed you had commented. What do you think? --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 22:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
: As far as I'm concerned, he's had his last warning. Further contentious edits to the Naveen Jain article will result in a long if not indefinite block. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:17, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
::Good enough. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 22:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

== Henna article external link ==

I restored the external link you removed from the Henna article because the link was allowed severla years ago after some discussion with other Wikipedia editors who agreed that the site is, in fact, non-commercial, devoted to information, research and discussion on henna and related topics. The site is owned by Wikipedia member 1hennaphd, who is a PhD candidate in geography at Kent State University, working on a dissertation on the development of the worldwide spread of henna usage since the 1990s. She did an extensive rewrite of the Wikipedia henna article in 2006. She included the link to hennapage.com because the site contains articles based on her own research and links to scholarly, technical, medical and scientific writing on henna and related subjects that go far beyond the limitations of the Wikipedia article. 1hennaphd owns a henna distribution business but on hennapage.com, aside from the links in the site header which includes text links to her commercial sites, there is no advertising, no solicitation to purchase any product or service or any commercial promotion expressed or implied in any of the articles.

I hope that you will take all of the above into consideration and let the link remain a part of the henna article. [[User:49oxen|49oxen]] ([[User talk:49oxen|talk]]) 03:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)


== Christopher Whitney Page Deletion (Please Undelete) ==

I created the Article on this Person today, and have done nothing wrong, please could you reconsider reopening this page, as many people are great fans;
The article is based on a viral superstar, who is high success, and many people would be in fascination to see a wikipedia page on him,
He much deserves a page as he has a remarkable story.
I was finished completely editing, and was sat down typing and retyping for 6.5 hours; I'm at home, not much to do.
6.5 Hours has felt forever, I'm tired, worked hard, learned how to make articles, done everything I've been asked of, just all I'm asking you to do, is to do what's right. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Chris380|Chris380]] ([[User talk:Chris380|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chris380|contribs]]) 16:23, 16 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== thanks! ==

For sorting out the dogo argentino page and related matters! [[User:CheesyBiscuit|CheesyBiscuit]] ([[User talk:CheesyBiscuit|talk]]) 19:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
: No worries. I'm baffled by some of the IPs complaints...removing a bunch of poorly-related "See alsos" is rascist?!?! OK. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 19:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
:: Lol - missed that bit! [[User:CheesyBiscuit|CheesyBiscuit]] ([[User talk:CheesyBiscuit|talk]]) 17:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

== HELP!!!!!!! ==

i need help can u help <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Thedeathking|Thedeathking]] ([[User talk:Thedeathking|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Thedeathking|contribs]]) 06:09, 18 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== re: Hello ==

{{Talkback|Roger Davies|Hello|ts=17:31, 19 March 2010 (UTC)}}

== [[Wikipedia:Alternative text for images]] ==

Hi,

Alt text for images is required to comply with United States law on people with disabilities. Wikipedia requires [[alt text]] for Featured articles and soon will require it for all articles. See [[Wikipedia:Alternative text for images]]. So if you see [[alt text]] that you do not like, please fix it rather than revert it whole sale. It is a lot of work to do and it is very discouraging to see efforts to aid the blind and others using screen readers or who do not download images reverted summarily with no attempt to fix it. Thank you, [[User:Tuxedo junction|Tuxedo junction]] ([[User talk:Tuxedo junction|talk]]) 23:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
: Sorry about that, my mistake. I didn't realize what you were doing; at first glance, it appeared that you were adding lengthy POV captions to photos, didn't catch the "alt" tag. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:27, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

== RAID 1 ==

I think you need edit this page to be clear that RAID 1 ISNT a form of backup ! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/195.224.167.170|195.224.167.170]] ([[User talk:195.224.167.170|talk]]) 15:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: I think you need to observe [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:Reliable sources]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

A user saves data A,B,C,D onto a RAID 1 array, distributing it to both drives. User then mistakenly deletes data B. RAID duplicates delete onto both drives. Wheres the backup of B ? I just think it may seem unclear to some people, giving them the idea that RAID 1 will backup data. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/195.224.167.170|195.224.167.170]] ([[User talk:195.224.167.170|talk]]) 16:06, 22 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: The article never states that RAID 1 provides backup, only disk error fault tolerance. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes it does, Quoting....

=====RAID 1=====
RAID 1 mirrors the contents of the disks, making a form of 1:1 ratio '''realtime backup'''. The contents of each disk in the array are identical to that of every other disk in the array. A RAID 1 array requires a minimum of two drives.

Im only trying to help in the accuracy of the document. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/195.224.167.170|195.224.167.170]] ([[User talk:195.224.167.170|talk]]) 16:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: As I just said, it's already accurate. We don't need to slap warning labels on everything. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


== SEO article link ==


On the SEO article, i placed a link concerning on the part that describes new pagerank sculpting technique by using nofollow. I see that i has been removed. Personaly i think it is a 100% relevant and accurate link. Additionaly the wikipedia article has included part of the text of blog but without placing a reference. Maybe it worths a revision by you to check it out, nevertheless if you don't choose to restore it, i will not add it back.

cheers ;) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/62.38.147.98|62.38.147.98]] ([[User talk:62.38.147.98|talk]]) 08:37, 23 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Given your IP addresses's [[WP:SPA|history]], you may want to read our [[WP:COI]] policy, for starters. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 09:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

== Chatroulette Language Links ==

those links which you added , do not exist. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Camoka4|Camoka4]] ([[User talk:Camoka4|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Camoka4|contribs]]) 19:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: With the exception of ht and hr, all of those do indeed exist. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 20:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

==Image==
Based on your edit summary, any thoughts would be appreciated: [[Talk:Teabagging#Image (newer one)]] [[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 23:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

== More link spam from [[User:Camdic]] ==

I've just reverted some more link spam from [[User:Camdic]] at [[Avicenna]]: see diff [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Avicenna&diff=352611104&oldid=351975031 here]. I noticed you had put a final warning on his talk page for this but I don't know how to go about reporting someone for this. Could you do so on my behalf or else give me a clue how to do so myself?

All the best. &ndash;[[User:Syncategoremata|Syncategoremata]] ([[User talk:Syncategoremata|talk]]) 22:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

== One Billion Minds ==
Hi Jamie, can you please explain why you deleted an article on One Billion Minds?
Please let us know how we can improve it
[[User:Sanjukt|Sanjukt]] ([[User talk:Sanjukt|talk]]) 04:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
: It was [[WP:ADVERT|blatant advertising]], with an obvious [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] issue. Also see [[WP:CORP]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

==Reconsideration of my "testing" in Manila article==

As per [[WP:Neutral point of view]] and [[WP:Aticle size]], I did a better version but considered it as experimental. You can view the [[Talk:Manila|Manila talk page]] and see my log. The article needs to be rewritten to meet the criteria for Wikipedia. Thank you.
--DragosteaDinTei 15:17, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
: The version you are restoring makes no sense. I removed the excess history that that the IP keeps re-adding. If you continue to revert to a version with an opening that makes no sense, you will be blocked. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

== Trout ==

I gratefully accept the trout-slapping award. It's not just for me, though, it's for my Mom and Dad, my first infant school teacher who set me on the road to randomly blocking admins, my Sunday school teacher when I was nine, the homeless person I saw on the street who inspired me on that cold night in February [pause to wipe away tears]. The whole crew deserve this award as I couldn't have done it without them [more tears]...I'd like to say [becomes incoherent and is led away from the stage by [[Billy Crystal]] ]. I ''did'' remember to remove the autoblock as well, though. Cheers, [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</sup> 07:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

== Circumcision article ==

Thank you Jamie for your concern. I am committed to removing bias as well, what would you suggest as a replacement for my statement? Thank you very much.

-Doctor of Math <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Doctor of Math|Doctor of Math]] ([[User talk:Doctor of Math|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Doctor of Math|contribs]]) 03:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: See [[WP:Verifiability]], [[WP:Reliable sources]] and [[WP:NPOV]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 13:38, 6 April 2010
(UTC)

== Re-request Ayurveda Link inclusion ==
Hiya Jamie, Ive read the guidelines, please re check my site, I feel the external link is valid, (my site is a lot better content etc, and i feel it contributes!,
If you dont feel that way please at least check out the site, before deleting the link a second time, Many Thanks , Humbly yours Brian [[User:Brian Colborne|Brian Colborne]] ([[User talk:Brian Colborne|talk]]) 17:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
: Definitely not, per [[WP:EL]] and [[WP:COI]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)



Hi this is me. I will use the sandbox from now on thanks.[[User:Larrybird333|Larrybird333]] ([[User talk:Larrybird333|talk]]) 00:40, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

== Tech pump revert ==

Why did you make the revert [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29&diff=next&oldid=355014574]? [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter|talk]]) 20:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

==Village Pump Queston==
I asked a question on the technical page and you erased it. Why? I was refered to the Pump page by Tnxman307, who suggested I ask there after trying on the Help page. [[User:Grand Bison|Grand Bison]] ([[User talk:Grand Bison|talk]]) 20:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
: Read the exchange immediately above this one. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 20:53, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
::OK, thanks....sorry I'm new and felt bitten. [[User:Grand Bison|Grand Bison]] ([[User talk:Grand Bison|talk]]) 20:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
::: My apologies! It's one of the downsides of a 10" screen and keyboard. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:07, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
::::You accidentally deleted the reply to my post in [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ohnoitsjamie&diff=prev&oldid=355017193]. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter|talk]]) 21:12, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

== Rainbow Bridge (pets) edits on April 9 2010 ==

You recently reversed edits I made to the Rainbow Bridge (pets) page. I edited a link that you have now left without any details in the External Links section (I see you fixed the [1] link now). Anyway, I still feel the link I added is completely relevant and non-commercial. Please reconsider.

Ps. I'm unfamiliar with editing the talk pages, so I hope I got it right this time by putting it at the bottom of the page.

Thanks, [[User:MsKirie|MsKirie]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.215.194.135|72.215.194.135]] ([[User talk:72.215.194.135|talk]]) 00:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Though the link isn't commercial, we don't need to start a collection of tribute links there. See [[WP:NOT]]. Thanks, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 01:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for rolling back the vandalism to my user page. [[User:Flatscan|Flatscan]] ([[User talk:Flatscan|talk]]) 04:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

==Reference re-inclusion for Cloud_computing#Hybrid_cloud==
you deleted a reference to an article about Hybrid Hosting, This is a reference to an article it's not spamming! please roll it back for this section: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Cloud_computing#Hybrid_cloud== <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nabeez|Nabeez]] ([[User talk:Nabeez|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nabeez|contribs]]) 17:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: I'm not rolling back anything. If you add spam links to your review site again, you will be blocked. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:50, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

I have contributed in wikipedia about Hybrid Hosting which wasn't mentioned before and I got the reference from my site blog, so a link as a reference should be included, and that doesn't conflict with wiki guidelines, if you think ti does you have to prove it. Is it mentioned anywhere that you can not cite from reviews site blog??? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nabeez|Nabeez]] ([[User talk:Nabeez|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nabeez|contribs]]) 17:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: In addition to [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] issues, review blogs do not meet [[WP:Reliable sources]] guidelines, period. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

I reviewed those, and I think the article doesn't have any conflict of interest! the article is only talking about Hybrid Hosting without any specific reviews about any web hosts. It's a pure technical guidance article written by experts! So it's NOT a reviews blog it's a separate section that had pure technical articles! [[User:Nabeez|Nabeez]] ([[User talk:Nabeez|talk]]) 19:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nabeez|Nabeez]] ([[User talk:Nabeez|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nabeez|contribs]]) 19:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: No, for the reasons already mentioned. There's nothing further to say. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 20:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Why then you are not deleting citation # 18 on the same page: #18 ^ Cloud Computing Savings – Real or Imaginary?, it's the same concept, commercial site with a blog and the citation is from a blog post! This should be considered as a conflict of interest then! If you don't want to roll back my citation then you have to be fair and apply this to everyone! OR be fair and get back my citation! If you are not willing to revisit this issue I would want to escalate it! [[User:Nabeez|Nabeez]] ([[User talk:Nabeez|talk]]) 21:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

==Crime in Houston==
I don't see where to put, so I am putting it here. I did not state any opinions on the Houston page. That is factually incorrect. I cited a Times-Picayune newspaper article. Facts cited: Houston's homicide wave began before Katrian. Houston recorded 225 homicides in the months before Katrian. Simple math tells you they were recording an average 28.125 homicides a month. They were on pace for 337 homicides that years. These facts are all verified in the newspaper article I cited. It is a fact that Houston gangs were targeting New Orleanians in the SW part of Houston. That's a fact. Those are facts. It is a fact that a false rape claim was made against New Orleanians and caused an anti-New Orleans hysteria in Houston. Those are facts. And here's one last fact: by deleting those facts you are promoting anti-New Orleans bigotry. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.217.202.107|173.217.202.107]] ([[User talk:173.217.202.107|talk]]) 21:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: See our policies on [[WP:OR|original research]] and [[WP:SYNTH|synth]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't see anything there that says the Times-Picayune is not a legitimate resource. Could you explain?  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.217.202.107|173.217.202.107]] ([[User talk:173.217.202.107|talk]]) 21:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: I added a reference to the article's counterargument in neutral language, unlike the language used in your version. See changes [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Houston&action=history here]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)


While I appreciate that you added reference to the Times-Picayune article, I still believe that the article, as stated, is dangerous. It still lends voice to those who are scapegoating the New Orleanians in Houston. The facts that I cited from the T-P article is extremely relevant to the scapegoating nature of the Houston article at this point. Therefore, the facts I cited should remain in the article, unless you are going to likewise remove the scapegoating nature of the article on Houston that currently exists. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.217.202.107|173.217.202.107]] ([[User talk:173.217.202.107|talk]]) 22:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: It's not Wikipedia's job to judge. The Houston Police's interpretation is presented, along with the Times-Picayune's opinion. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

See, there you go again with this "opinion" nonsense. That is not an editorial by the Times-Picayune. That is all fact. And it may not be Wikipedia's job to judge, but it should owe something to the truth. HPD is doing what all public officials and offices do--- protecting themselves politically by pointing the finger elsewhere. The Times-Picayune is doing what newspapers do, report facts. Now, while I suppose that in wiki's zeal for being "fair and balanced" you may not have any problem with balancing the truth with a lie, the article, as you've edited it is not even balanced, as it does not take into account the many facts the T-P article cites. The fact that 19 of Houston's homicide victims that year were New Orleanians --- they were victims ---A FACT. The fact, that Houstonians went to such lengths to blame New Orleanians for their problems that they believed false allegations against New Orleanians and spread hysteria against them, only to mumble under their breaths later that they were wrong. The FACT that New Orleanians were being railed against as a major threat to Houston by local businesses who called them Katricians, as part of this hysteria. http://articles.latimes.com/2006/sep/18/nation/na-guns18The FACT that gangs in SW Houston targeted New Orleanians. None of these FACTS are in the Houston article. They all belong there since the article claims that New Orleanians are at fault for Houstons problems. You also conveniently left out that Houston experienced 225 murders before Katrina even ocurred. These are NOT opinions. These are facts. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.217.202.107|173.217.202.107]] ([[User talk:173.217.202.107|talk]]) 23:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: You're interpretation of "fact" is not in line with [[WP:Verifiability]], [[WP:SYNTH]], [[WP:Reliable sources]], and [[WP:NPOV]]. I suggest you spend some time reading those policies. I've already added some balance to the crime section, including two sources (one you found, one I found myself) that cast doubt on the evacuees role in the crime increase. Your interpretation of why the Houston Police said what they did is an interpretation (i.e., [[WP:SYNTH]]). The fact that the Houston Police said it is well-documented. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
:: Your last contribution was mostly OK, though I toned town the language a bit (calling it a "myth" is making a judgement on an issue that is contested; better to call it an "assertion" or something similar). I appreciate your efforts to bring more balance to the section; the current version is more neutral and balanced than the [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Houston&action=historysubmit&diff=356086838&oldid=355776097 previous version]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 01:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

== [[User:ZincBelief]], [[The game (mind game)]] ==

Hi,

I see you dealt with {{user|ZincBelief}} a couple of years ago on [[The game (mind game)]]. Looks like this editor has decided to become active on that article again. [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Game_(mind_game)&diff=prev&oldid=356181861 His] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Game_(mind_game)&diff=prev&oldid=356189538 edit] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Game_(mind_game)&diff=prev&oldid=356217565 summarie]s don't suggest it's going to be any more productive this time around. Any suggestions? [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 18:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
: As much as I'd like to help, you'd probably be better off posting at [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts]] to get some uninvolved input. My patience levels aren't where they used to be, and I'd prefer to avoid the drama associated with that ridiculous article. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
:: No probs. I prefer to avoid the centralised boards (locii for drama as they are) in the first instance, but I can understand your reluctance in this case. :) Cheers. [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 22:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
==Valley Entertainment Monthly==
There are now at least three links and references directly to ''VEM'' in the article now. You noted when voting "delete" that there were none, when in fact the Flipside Magazine article was there from the onset. In light of this, you may want to consider changing your vote as the article has been updated with the information you cited as being missing. [[User:Nineteen Nightmares|Nineteen Nightmares]] ([[User talk:Nineteen Nightmares|talk]]) 16:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares
: I'm not changing my !vote, as I still don't see any non-trivial coverage in a reliable source (i.e., as Flipside Magazine does not appear to be notable, I fail to see how it can lend credence to VEM's notability).<b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 19:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

== Labrador Retriever External Link ==

Have you even read what an external link is? Let me help you:

Some acceptable links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy.

The link I posted is (1) on-topic and (2) cannot be added to the article because of copyright laws. The link will be added back as it is not link spamming, however, it is adding relevant information to the topic. Let me know when you revert or I can add the link back.{{unsigned|Myndp2510}}
: I am very familiar with the external link policy. I'm also familar with [[WP:COI]], which apparently you are not. If you continue to add the links, you will be blocked. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:50, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


Conflict of Interest? That is my area of expertise and have given lectures regarding related topics. So by my understanding, having a doctor cite a related link to his publishing in a medical journal about a recent Enteroplasty would be a conflict of interest? Please explain how the link I posted does not provide a benefit to the reader? If you can provide a valid reason, then I will drop this issue.
: See the blurb at the top of my talk page, which explains our policies on external links. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

== Raised Relief Map Reference ==

I added a reference link (ref 9) to a company that is a technological leader in this area, and who's "how we do it" page is better than another company reference listed now (ref 8). The new reference (9) was removed. If the other reference (8) is allowed, why isn't this new and better reference allowed? --- 3Dmapmaker <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:3dmapmaker|3dmapmaker]] ([[User talk:3dmapmaker|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/3dmapmaker|contribs]]) 21:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: See the blurb on spam on the top of this talk page, as well as our [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] policy. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

I did read the blurb at the top of the page. I dont' understand how you can allow a reference link to one commercial site and not another which provides as much or more information. This doesn't seem right or fair. You should enforce the policy equally with regard to all of us professionals who advance this technology -- either delete all the commercial reference links, or allow them, but do it with a consistent policy. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:3dmapmaker|3dmapmaker]] ([[User talk:3dmapmaker|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/3dmapmaker|contribs]]) 12:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: [[WP:COI]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
== Changeman ==

Would you mind giving a second third opinion here?—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>]]) 01:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

He is still at it, but further down the page from your comment.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>]]) 04:15, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

== Moscow ==

The bit I posted about Moscow being attacked by Doctor Octagonapus was, as specifically labeled, a myth. It is actually a popular myth here at our school. This would be beneficial to keep on the website simply because the people of Moscow should know their mythological history, rather than live in ignorance. Being clearly labeled as a myth, it is not "false information." I would appreciate it if you would put it back on. Thanks! <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Andrew J Yach|Andrew J Yach]] ([[User talk:Andrew J Yach|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Andrew J Yach|contribs]]) 17:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: No. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 18:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Aha, but why not? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Andrew J Yach|Andrew J Yach]] ([[User talk:Andrew J Yach|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Andrew J Yach|contribs]]) 18:09, 7 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: If you don't know the answer to that question, you shouldn't be editing. If you add it again, you will be blocked indefinitely. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 18:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

==Credit Counseling==
The Credit Counseling article contribution I submitted is accurate information and needs to be shared. Instead of reverting my edits and declaring them as spam, rewrite them in a way that you feel is objective enough. And stop leaving spam badges on my talk page. [[User:Searchmaven|Searchmaven]] ([[User talk:Searchmaven|talk]]) 21:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
: If you continue to add commercial links as references, you will be blocked for editing. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
::IT'S A LEGITIMATE REFERENCE. Why don't you do some referencing work yourself instead of following my edits around. Get off your high horse. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Searchmaven|Searchmaven]] ([[User talk:Searchmaven|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Searchmaven|contribs]]) 21:49, 7 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::: No it's not, and you should also familiarize yourself with our [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] policy. I'm not warning you again. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
:::: And you feel that the Principality of Sealand article is Notable??? Have you checked the references!? They are all links to his content. The article is a joke. I AM familiar with the conflict of interest policy and I don't work for Debtmerica so thanks but no thanks. [[User:Searchmaven|Searchmaven]] ([[User talk:Searchmaven|talk]]) 21:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
: And you can say truthfully that they're not a client of yours either? Regardless, it's not a reliable source, period. Sealand has plenty of legit news references. Take it to AfD if you don't think it's notable. It'll most likely be speedily kept. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 21:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

== Areapal ==

Hi @ohnoitsjamie I would like to know why the page Areapal was marked for deletion ? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Spoiltsport|Spoiltsport]] ([[User talk:Spoiltsport|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Spoiltsport|contribs]]) 17:25, 9 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Because it doesn't appear to meet [[WP:WEB]] notability guidelines, as explained on the nomination. Further discussion belongs on the article's AFD page, not here. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

== Talkback ==

{{talkback|Jayjg|Quick question|ts=03:30, 12 May 2010 (UTC)}}
[[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 03:30, 12 May 2010 (UTC)


==Debt Settlement Citations ==
Those debt settlement references from debtmerica.com and credit.com are the best references I can find. Given the nature of the industry it's not easy to find a more reliable source. Especially the credit.com article... it's just a general industry news article on their site and not related to their offer. That article needs a lot of citations in general. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.5.15.62|68.5.15.62]] ([[User talk:68.5.15.62|talk]]) 22:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: I understand that the topic is one that is tricky to find non-commercial references for, but that still doesn't make it OK. Try [http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=site:nfcc.org+%22debt+settlement%22 this site-specific Google search] instead. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:30, 12 May 2010 (UTC)


== Massimo ==
{{userlinks|Fabritius}} claims to be "H.E. the Prince Massimo, Prince Don Fabrizio Massimo Brancaccio"[http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&diff=prev&oldid=343716084] and is adding that claim to [[Massimo]] He started by removing sources to insert his unsourced claim.[http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=343720883&oldid=341293191] A couple IPs repeated Massimo's removal of sources to make the claim, while adding a source that gets vastly less GScholar hits than the one he removed.[http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=345961421&oldid=345773166] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=347167738&oldid=346297434] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=348700581&oldid=348520065] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=351526241&oldid=350783938] Fabritius then repeated the same [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=349582653&oldid=349122753] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=352201574&oldid=352151366] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=352704709&oldid=352508095] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=353319924&oldid=352939727] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=353506997&oldid=353503901] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=354485890&oldid=353678306] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=354607555&oldid=354515777] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=354779023&oldid=354772628] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=354969853&oldid=354798727] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=355559143&oldid=355381176] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=355712221&oldid=355567463] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=355795058&oldid=355783291] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=355915459&oldid=355804566] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=356136709&oldid=356033592] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=356403511&oldid=356343633] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=356427063&oldid=356424470] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&diff=prev&oldid=356427063] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=356466674&oldid=356440512] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=357165371&oldid=356565162] [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=357180151&oldid=357179238] eventually adding a sources before his birth and the websites of some private clubs (that don't seem to mention his claims) to "prove" he is the rightful head of the Massimo family. The page was locked and good deal of time spent on the talk page trying to explain Conflict of Interest and Reliable Sources to Fabritius, which he ignored.[http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=historysubmit&diff=362114382&oldid=361676312] [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 01:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
:Thank you for attempting to reason with Fabritius. As you saw, his sources consist of a few web pages (which don't meet his own unique definition of an authoritative sources) and sources from before he was born, which obviously can't prove he exists, let alone his claims about being a prince. I have showed him sources, including the English translation of the Italian Constitution, which show that Italian titles of nobility were abolished in 1948, yet he still insists he is a prince. I have shown him that the Almanac de Gotha is cited on Google Scholar over 80 times more often than "elenco ufficiale" and "libro d'oro" combined, yet he refuses to accept Gotha as a source. Now that you have warned him and reverted his edits (the 28th time he has been reverted bu my count), maybe this will get his attention. Regardless, thanks for trying. [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 23:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

== Engagement ring ==

Hi, you deleted some information on the Engagement ring page because you considered it advertising. Could you please explain exactly what was wrong with it? All I did was make two very vague statements more accurate. The first one was about the first engagement ring. The original line states that it was given by "an" archduke in Vienna in the 1470's. I provided the names of the people involved an the exact year. I also added that the diamond in the engagement ring symbolizes eternal love. I think this is important because this explains why engagement rings have a diamond in it. This is not mentioned anywhere else on the page and I think it is important to explain how the tradition started.
The second piece of information I added was about what factors determine the cost of an engagement ring. Once again, I think this is valuable information that needs to be present on this page.
I think I only added objective and factual information. It was in no way advertising or even mend to be advertising. I agree that we need to be very careful when using commercial websites as references. But I never stated the name of the website or provided a link to a page were products were offered. The only references I used were good and solid information pages. I also don't think it's out of line to use a jeweler's website as a reference for which factors influence the price of an engagement ring.
I am very interested in hearing your thoughts about this.
Kind regards
[[User:Stevenvdveken|Stevenvdveken]] ([[User talk:Stevenvdveken|talk]]) 12:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
: You explanation can be found in the following (1) the blurb at the top of my page (2) [[WP:EL]] (3) [[WP:Reliable sources]] (4) [[WP:COI]], [[WP:SPA]]. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 14:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

== Algeria pre-history theory ==

any reason for deleting once/twice the addition i made to the pre-history section on the [[Algeria]] page? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:123xyzabc|123xyzabc]] ([[User talk:123xyzabc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/123xyzabc|contribs]]) 13:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Misunderstanding ==

Although I reported [[User:Rape me, my friend. 1]] to UAA the only problem was the user's ''username'' their edits appeared to be anti-vandalism efforts in good faith, I've reverted your rollback of the user's edits to the [[Grey goo]] page, please check [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Grey_goo&diff=362536125&oldid=362535729 this diff]. <span style="font-family:Segoe Media Center">[[User:Jeffrey Mall|Jeffrey Mall]]</span> <small>([[User talk:Jeffrey Mall|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jeffrey Mall|contribs]])</small> - 01:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
: Thanks for catching that! I misread the diffs every once in awhile. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<font color="#D47C14">itsJamie</font>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

== Substing Welcome Templates ==

Just a quick note, can you make sure you subst welcome templates when you add them to a users talk page? Thanks =] '''[[User:Addshore|<span style="color:black;">·Add§hore·</span>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Addshore|<span style="color:black;">T<small>alk</small> T<small>o</small> M<small>e</small>!</span>]]</sup></span> 19:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

==Massimo article - Fabritius has ignored your advice + a request for help==

Dear Jamie. I write as a follow up to Edward321's [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Ohnoitsjamie#Massimo post above] on the [[Massimo]] article, and your subsequent post on [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fabritius&diff=362265994&oldid=362265723 Fabritius's talk page] on 15/05/10, asking him to 'Please continue use the talk pages before making controversial and/or major changes to articles. You have yet to achieve any sort of consensus on this page for the edits you are proposing'.

Since then, Fabritius has ignored your warning/request (although he has clearly read your comments) and simply continued to edit war the article, resuming a practice he followed before the first protection of the article on the 20/04/10 (see [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&action=history Massimo article edit history]).

Fabritus's changes replace the simple three line last paragraph on the heirs to the family honours (in which he is respectfully referenced as one of the main title holders - indeed he is mentioned first) with a series of vanity paragraphs about himself, the deletion of all other heirs and other information, and the deletion of the correct sources (for which there is a consensus).

He has done this without any sort of consensus for his changes, which are significant and clearly controversial. Indeed, there is a clear consensus on the talk page against his proposed changes to the last paragraph, a paragraph which has remained essentially unchanged in format since 2006 (see the edit by 'CARAVAGGISTI' on 28/09/06 in [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&diff=84162301&oldid=78376938 this version, para at bottom]) until Dec 2009 (see the edit by LeilaniLad on 2/12/09 in [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&diff=329287716&oldid=329287559 this version, para at bottom]). Between Sept 2006 and Jan 2010 many editors altered content in the article itself, but the paragraph in dispute remained essentially the same until Fabtitius began changing it in Jan 2010.

The issue here is that despite a huge amount of patience and extensive reference work by myself and by Edward321 on the [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Massimo Massimo talk page], and despite repeated warnings/urgings by other editors (Fabritius has been warned about the need to seek consensus by yourself, and by other editors and admins, for example see [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Massimo&diff=357595641&oldid=357473634 this post by TheDJ]), he is simply ignoring the rules and just making the changes anyway, without a single person agreeing with him on the talk page.

He has a clear COI (see [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fabritius&diff=357194971&oldid=357192919 this warning by Dave1185]). His behaviour is often very aggressive despite no one else ever responding in kind - indeed he has repeatedly insulted any editor who does not simply roll over and agree with him, branding them 'biased' (see [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dave1185&diff=360729878&oldid=360519988 this post]), a 'liar' (see [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nick-D&diff=357265014&oldid=357244861 this post]), and 'ridiculous' (see [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Massimo&diff=357417727&oldid=357402393 this post]). His tactic seems to be to simply try and wear people down until he gets his way without abiding by the spirit and rules of Wikipedia. He has been warned against this sort of behaviour (see [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dave1185&diff=prev&oldid=357832278 this warning]) by other editors, but simply ignores all this advice and/or these warnings.

All I and Edward321 are trying to do is keep the last paragraph in its original format and defend it against serial, non-consensus based vanity editing, and we have backed up the original with extensive sources and references, yet all this work is being ignored by this editor. After his first resumption of edit warring on the 14/05/10 I posted a message [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Massimo#A_request_to_Fabritius_-_please_stop_the_edit_warring_you_have_resumed politely asking him not to do this again], yet he has done this twice since I posted and indeed twice since your warning (with Edward321 reverting the article back each time). I have tried so hard to keep things calm and based on facts, and invested an enormous amount of time to do the exhaustive research (as you can see from the article talk page), yet I just don't believe Fabritius is interested in a discussion, he just wants to steamroll others to get his way and I think this is deeply unfair.

As you can see there is a clear consensus for the original version (as restored at 23.53 on the 18/05/10 by Edward321 in [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Massimo&diff=362911042&oldid=362894563 this edit]).

Is there anything you can do to help us with this editor? I was just about to revert Fabritius's last edit myself and restore the original/consensus version when I thought I would ask you if you would be prepared to do it instead, having noticed that you are currently online. I think if the revert came from an administrator - particularly one whose warning/advice he had already ignored once - it would be much less likely to be undone. I (or Edward321 I would imagine) will do it if you don't feel you can, but I wanted to ask you first as I think a revert from you with a warning not to change it back without first getting a consensus would be much more effective in putting an end to this rather exhausting example of serial abuse.

Your help on this and indeed anything else you could do to prevent this from happening again would be much appreciated.

Kind regards, [[User:Historybuff1930|Historybuff1930]] ([[User talk:Historybuff1930|talk]]) 17:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:45, 20 May 2010

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ohnoitsjamie&oldid=363294283"