User talk:Mhking/Archive 8: Difference between revisions
→Deletion of the Brittany Smyth Page: Added response |
No edit summary |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
That is indeed why I am working to ensure that the article has verifiable and constant evidence to back it up and allow it to stay.[[User:ARMY101|ARMY101]] ([[User talk:ARMY101|talk]]) 02:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC) |
That is indeed why I am working to ensure that the article has verifiable and constant evidence to back it up and allow it to stay.[[User:ARMY101|ARMY101]] ([[User talk:ARMY101|talk]]) 02:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
== [[WIAT]] == |
|||
Stop telling me to quit editing Wikipedia, if you continue, you will be blocked from editing, you got it.[[User:Jesse50|Jesse50]] ([[User talk:Jesse50|talk]]) 02:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:29, 5 March 2009
Archives |
---|
Barnstar
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For all your work with vandalism, but especially tonight (New Years Eve), I, Sharkface217, hereby award you with this barnstar. Good job, man.S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 03:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
AGF
Please learn to AGF in future. No, this is not spam, and no, I am an established contributor - I'm putting another tag on until further notice. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I declined the speedy deletion nomination. His article mentions that he won the "Jaques Cartier Memorial Award". Although the award hasn't got an article yet, a cursory google search indicates the award is notable. If you believe the bio is unverifiable or otherwise erronous, please use AFD instead. - Mgm|(talk) 12:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replied at article talkpage
replied at article tp.User:Yousaf465 (talk)
Deletion of the Brittany Smyth Page
Hi,
I was previous warned that a more neutral way of writing would prevent this page from being deleted, and that has been what I have been working on. She is certainly a relevant and important figure in Carleton University's and CUSA's history - she was the president during an important, shaping period. Her decision to stand behind those who dropped Shinerama gave Carleton and CUSA international news and attention.
Please keep the article, and I'll do my best to make sure the information is accurate and neutral.ARMY101 (talk) 02:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
That is indeed why I am working to ensure that the article has verifiable and constant evidence to back it up and allow it to stay.ARMY101 (talk) 02:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Stop telling me to quit editing Wikipedia, if you continue, you will be blocked from editing, you got it.Jesse50 (talk) 02:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)