User talk:Mark Arsten: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Replaced content with 'BAHO MO!' |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
BAHO MO! |
|||
{{Administrator|icon_nr=1}} |
|||
{{sidebar |
|||
| outertitle = Archives |
|||
| topimage = [[File:Replacement filing cabinet.svg|40px]] |
|||
| style = {{box-shadow}} {{border-radius}} background: #F8EABA; |
|||
| content1style = text-align: left; padding-left: 7em; |
|||
| content1 = |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the first|Archive I]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the second|Archive II]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the third|Archive III]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the fourth|Archive IV]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the fifth|Archive V]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the sixth|Archive VI]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the seventh|Archive VII]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the eighth|Archive VIII]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the ninth|Archive IX]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the tenth|Archive X]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the eleventh|Archive XI]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the twelfth|Archive XII]] |
|||
* [[User talk:Mark Arsten/Archive the thirteenth|Archive XIII]] |
|||
| content2style = text-align: center; |
|||
| content2 = |
|||
<div align="center"> |
|||
<span style="display: inline;"><span style="display: table-cell; border: 5px solid rgba(64,255,64,0.9); {{box-shadow|0|0|2.0em|rgba(64,255,64,0.9)}} {{border-radius|0.5em}} background-color: #eee; opacity: 0.9; -moz-opacity: 0.9;">[[File:Llama lying down.jpg|200px]]</span></span> |
|||
</div> |
|||
The llama of drama is all tired out, <br /> time to give it a rest. |
|||
| content3 = |
|||
{{#tag:inputbox| |
|||
bgcolor=transparent |
|||
type=fulltext |
|||
prefix={{FULLPAGENAME}}/ |
|||
break=no |
|||
width=22 |
|||
searchbuttonlabel=Search |
|||
}} |
|||
| navbar = none |
|||
}} |
|||
<big>Welcome to my talk page, please leave new messages at the bottom of this page</big> |
|||
== Goh YiLing== |
|||
Hello, Just wondering. Why did you delete the page before the dateline 10 october? I believe that more sources would have been added to it. Could you undo the page so that sources can be added? Thank you. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Summergirl999|Summergirl999]] ([[User talk:Summergirl999|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Summergirl999|contribs]]) 16:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I deleted because there was a clear consensus to do so. Can you offer any new reliable sources that demonstrate notability. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 16:13, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
I see. I thought that sources have to added before 10 october as stated before the page could be deleted? Why was it deleted before that? Just wondering, how is consensus based on? Is it based on the number of people against or supporting it ? Cos it's quite hard to tell how many accounts a certain person has created. |
|||
Yes, I have notable sources to back it up. I noted that the previous one only had one source so it is not reliable. Could you undo it so that I may add more sources? It would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your help. Do allow the addition of sources. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Hastywarrior123|Hastywarrior123]] ([[User talk:Hastywarrior123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Hastywarrior123|contribs]]) 16:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Oh yes, the new page that has been created was contested for speedy deletion although it has notable sources now. Could you undo that? For both the sources as the new one has reliable sources so I do not know why it has been marked under deletion. Please address. Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Hastywarrior123|Hastywarrior123]] ([[User talk:Hastywarrior123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Hastywarrior123|contribs]]) 16:30, 7 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:First, please only use one account. If you use multiple accounts, you may be blocked for sockpupptry ([[WP:SOCK]]). Second, there was a consensus to delete the article and the participants used reasonable arguements, so I deleted it. Deletion discussion run seven days usually. If you disagree with the discussion you have to contest it at [[WP:DRV]]. You can't just restore the article. We need to see significant coverage, see [[WP:GNG]]. Merely having sources isn't enough, there has to be significant coverage. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 16:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Hello, why was the page being deleted? I noted that the page was deleted only after 5 days because it is 7 days usually. Please assist. The person was awarded with an award known internationally in asia. Why is there no significant coverage. Please undo. Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Hastywarrior123|Hastywarrior123]] ([[User talk:Hastywarrior123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Hastywarrior123|contribs]]) 16:50, 7 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:I'm not sure why there is no significant coverage in this case, but if there isn't, we can't have an article on her. Which award did she win? [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 16:55, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Hi Mark. Given what's happening at the article I've requested page protection, and deletion with a serving of salt. [[User:JNW|JNW]] ([[User talk:JNW|talk]]) 16:55, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Mark, I have deleted [[YiLing Goh]] per [[WP:CSD#G4]]. You can check it and restore/userfy if you disagree, but the "extra refs" were her Facebook page and two which as far as I could see didn't mention her, and there were claims of one minor title and various runner-up/finalist results; I saw nothing there which overcame the conclusions of the AfD, or made a second AfD anything but a waste of time. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 17:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thanks a lot JNW and John. I've opened a relevant SPI at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Immaculatefancy]]. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:15, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::Thank you Mark and John. I can add two cents to the SPI, but think it would be gratuitous. The closing administrator will be able to discern the merits of the report. Cheers, [[User:JNW|JNW]] ([[User talk:JNW|talk]]) 17:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Ayn Rand == |
|||
The changes by Miles Money should be reverted as that specific phrase is under an RfC which he is participating. He has basically had you protect his preferred version and he actions directly work against WP norms and procedures folling RfC's. [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel|talk]]) 17:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I usually try to avoid reverting to a specific version after protecting unless there's a clear consensus supporting it. Do you think that's the case here? I can look into it more. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::I'm actually not a big fan of the version you froze it to, but almost any qualifier is better than the bare term, which is inaccurate. As for consensus, the problem we're having is that Rand is very popular, which is to say she has many fans who are apparently more interested in the article making her look perfect than being accurate. We're flooded with these POV-pushers who are ignoring both policy and our sources. [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 18:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::What a load of BS. The version frozen definately does not have any concensus regardless of the lack of good faith illustrated by MM. [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel|talk]]) 20:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::I'd need to use the fingers of both hands to count up all the behavioral policies you just violated here, but the most basic problem is that what you said isn't accurate. [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 01:08, 27 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Please see [[WP:BLUDGEON]]. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 02:55, 27 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
This is the second time that I see the Ayn Rand article is locked with a POV characterization for a month, I know it is not an endorsement, I don't ask this time to be locked with the NPOV description without adjectives but at least there should be a dispute-inline on the "untrained" characterization which is disputed in the talk page. Could you add it until we resolve this issue? --[[User:DagonAmigaOS|DagonAmigaOS]] ([[User talk:DagonAmigaOS|talk]]) 17:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I didn't actually want it to say "untrained"; it was a compromise that I attempted, but it pleases nobody. However, we can't just remove the qualifier so that it sounds as if Rand was a regular philosopher. [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 17:20, 29 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::I honestly don't know what to do here. I suggest asking another admin for a second opinion. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:55, 29 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Mark, I'm not sure if you saw, but there's an RFC [https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Ayn_Rand#Request_for_comment:_Invalid_RFC_due_to_massively_biased_and_inaccurate_framing here] discussing the issue specifically. It's due to close in about 2 days, so perhaps your best past forward might be to do nothing for that time, close the RfC, then do whatever is needed to the article (if anything) to reflect the close. (In any case, I think an uninvolved admin ''will'' be needed to close that RfC, and I think most would agree that you fit the bill :-P <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~[[User:Adjwilley|Adjwilley]] <small>([[User talk:Adjwilley|talk]])</small></span> 21:55, 29 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::Ok, that is good advice. I'll probably unprotect when the Rfc closes to implement the consensus over the current version, which no one seems to like. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 22:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Problem is that there's a non-consensus majority that's going to edit-war to remove all qualifiers. The RFC is invalid due to the dishonest opening statement, and there hasn't been a single persuasive argument for why we should ignore our best sources. [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 00:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Interesting. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 00:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Very! [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 03:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
I guess I was wrong about the 7 days to close an RfC, though an argument could be made for closing it earlier than that. (30 days is a long time to have the article locked down.) Perhaps you'd be willing to intervene a bit at [[Murray Rothbard]]. I had previously protected the article for edit warring, and there's another request for intervention on my talk page, but I'd rather not take any action myself because I currently have a SPI open on one of the recent participants, and would rather not get any more involved at the moment. (Or feel free to do nothing and somebody will probably make a request at RPP or something...up to you.) Thanks <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~[[User:Adjwilley|Adjwilley]] <small>([[User talk:Adjwilley|talk]])</small></span> 16:48, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah, looks like protection is definitely merited on Rothbard. These libertarian articles are become such hotbeds of conflict lately. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Just a helpful suggestion: Instead of protecting it, you could ask Rich and Bink to stop edit-warring. Or even block them. [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 23:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::No one broke 3RR, so I'm very hesitant to block in that situation. [[User:Srich32977]] came the closest, I suppose, making 3 reverts on two separate days this week on the article. Hopefully he will stay further from the line in the future. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 00:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::No one has to. [[WP:3RR]] states: |
|||
:::::"While any edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a bright-line rule called the three-revert rule (3RR), the violation of which often leads to a block." |
|||
::::You would clearly be within your rights as an admin in blocking Srich32977 for tiptoeing near the bright line. Barring that, absolutely no one would question it if you gave Srich32977 an official warning reminding him that he's not ''entitled'' to edit-war slowly. Would he listen? We can hope so. But if he doesn't, then he can't claim to be surprised by the block. I'd sooner dissuade him than block him, but I'm pretty sure blocking would reliably dissuade him. |
|||
::::Now, I'm going to stop telling you how to do your job and go back to doing mine. Carry on, good sir. :-) [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 02:00, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Factors involved in decision == |
|||
Hello, Mark |
|||
I was hoping you could explain something to me. I am curious; what exactly made you come up with [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Android_version_history&curid=40613747&diff=575075959&oldid=574684718 this decision]? |
|||
Best regards,<br/> |
|||
[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 03:16, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, this is a bit of a difficult Afd to close. Some of the Keep !votes certainly were fairly week, though they had a clear numerical advantage. The delete !votes were pretty consistent in saying that it failed the guideline on not publishing changelogs, but several keep !votes disputed this, arguing that it was or had the potential to be more than just a changelog article. It's difficult for me to say which side is right about its changelog-ness because I'm supposed to close based on consensus rather than my own opinion. Looking over it again though, it seems more like a "no consensus" close than a "Keep" close. I'll adjust my closing comment to reflect that. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 03:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Hi. |
|||
::Thanks for clarification. It is a sound explanation, one that can impact the article and its future. Could you please add it in front of your decision in the deletion discussion? |
|||
::Best regards, |
|||
::[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 03:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Megan Young New Section == |
|||
Hi Mark. I would like to ask your opinion if I can add a section for Megan Young's article about her stint in Miss World Philippines 2013. I hope I can hear from you soon. |
|||
greenmarktea78 07:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Marktanoja78|Marktanoja78]] ([[User talk:Marktanoja78|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Marktanoja78|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Yes, you're free to do so. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 14:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Talkback== |
|||
{{talkback|talk:PrankvsPrank|Edit warring|ts=18:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)}} |
|||
<font style="padding:2px 5px;background:#ADE6E1;border:1px solid" face="BRITANIC BOLD">'''[[user:Ross Hill|<span style="color:#000000;">Ross</span>]]{{spaces}}[[User_Talk:Ross Hill|<span style="color:#000000;">Hill</span>]]</font><font style="padding:1px 5px;background:#000000;color:#ADE6E1" face="BRITANIC BOLD">''18:29{{spaces}}30{{spaces}}Sep{{spaces}}2013{{spaces}}([[UTC|<span style="color:#ADE6E1">UTC</span>]])''</font>'''</span> 18:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==HMCS Preserver== |
|||
Sir, you deleted facts which were added to the HMCS Preserver. If you would like to put what I wrote back up I will be more than happy to add citations or weblinks to each of the facts that I added. For her service history you can see a few new notes that I added. People should know about how dangerous this ship and command team are to the sailors that try to serve our country. |
|||
:Feel free to re-add the information, but please make sure you include references so your changes are verifiable, per [[WP:V]]. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 01:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Ok I added links to stories written that show what I had written is accurate. If you delete this a third time then I give up. |
|||
First hand accounts should mean something. I served on board during the times I referenced. Should personal experience not be able to serve as a reference. |
|||
:No, personal experience cannot serve as a reference, see [[WP:OR]] for details. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 03:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Ok so once it is written by a newspaper then refs are credible. Ok more to follow on this one. A member of her crew is about to be court martialled for refusing to be quiet. |
|||
== A barnstar for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png|100px]] |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For making sure WP:RPP doesn't ever get backlogged ever again. [[User:I dream of horses|I dream of horses]] <span style="border:1px solid #ffa500;background:#ffce7b;"><small>If you reply here, please leave me a {{[[Template:Talkback|Talkback]]}} message on [[User talk:I dream of horses|my talk page]].</small></span> @ 21:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
:lol, thanks. It's a good feeling to clear out a backlog :) [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 21:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Re: vandalism/libel against Jorge Erdely Graham == |
|||
Hello, I was wondering if you can help me with a series of edits made by a user named Ajaxfiore, which are libelous and constitute vandalism against [[Jorge Erdely Graham]]. I made a noticeboard entry at: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Jorge_Erdely_Graham |
|||
Thank you for your consideration.[[User:AbuRuud|AbuRuud]] ([[User talk:AbuRuud|talk]]) 23:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I'm not sure I can be of much help here. Since I can't read Spanish I can't really understand whether the references support the text. You might ask [[User:Thelmadatter]] for advice, she edits a lot of Mexican topics. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 23:35, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Czechia - the name dispute == |
|||
Hi Mark, who can vote on the deletion of this article? Anyone? If yes, why don't you put a link on the discussion page so everyone can vote? Can I vote? Are you following the discussion? My point is this: First, the article has problems but it could be worked on collectively to be improved. I have suggested ways to deal with it in the discussion. Second, and more importantly, there is very little information on the term "Czechia" in Wikipedia and I believe that people who want to find out more about the term should be able to find it here. It should be neutral and non-partisan but almost all attempts to put any information on Wikipedia have been vandalized or deleted. I also think that Wikipedia should not discriminate against non-native speakers and use their less than perfect English as an excuse to delete the information they are trying to put in. It should be a collective effort and they should get help. I am relatively new here as a contributor so I do not have my page set up. I have to find time to learn how to do it. Sorry.[[User:Geog25|Geog25]] ([[User talk:Geog25|talk]]) 02:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Mark, I found the link on the page, I was looking on the discussion page. Sorry to bother you.[[User:Geog25|Geog25]] ([[User talk:Geog25|talk]]) 02:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:No problem. Anyone is free to participate in the discussion, as long as your arguments are based in Wikipedia policy, see [[WP:ATA]] for details. There is usually just a link to the discussion on the article itself, but you're free to add links to it on other talk pages as long as you don't ask people to !vote a certain way. Let me know if you have any more questions. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 02:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Afghanistan Semi-Protection == |
|||
Hello Mark. Sorry to interrupt the useful work you are doing (or always keep doing). You semi-protected Afghanistan for a week. Will it revert back to PC-1 after one week or will it be a no protection? --[[User:Smsarmad|<span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span><span style="background:white;color:DodgerBlue">'''M'''</span><span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Smsarmad|Talk]]</sup> 03:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:After one week is up it will automatically revert back to pending changes as usual. [[User:George Ho]] requested temporary semi-protection due a recent spurt in vandalism, so I agreed to temporarily provide that as well. Permanent semi-protection might actually make more sense than pending changes though, now that I think about it. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 03:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Sock question == |
|||
Hello, Mark Arsten! SPI is not my strong point, and I'm not sure if you can do anything, but maybe you can point in the right direction. A [[User:OperatorBot|user]] you just blocked is a [[WP:DUCK]] of another [[User:Beurocraticobama|user]] who was just blocked. I (as a dynamic IP) reverted the latter's wikilove on Jimbo's page, and noticed the former's wikilove also on Jimbo's talk page, and they both edited [[User talk:24.246.104.98]]. I know they are both blocked, so it is worth it to file an SPI to check for a master, or is whack-a-mole the way to go? Rgrds. --[[Special:Contributions/64.85.216.33|64.85.216.33]] ([[User talk:64.85.216.33|talk]]) 12:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for the info, I hadn't connected the two. I'll check with a CU. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 16:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== A barnstar for you! (1 October) == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Administrator Barnstar Hires.png|100px]] |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I thereby award you with this '''Admin's Barnstar''' for your continued work at the [[WP:RFPP|''Requests for protection'' noticeboard]]. [[User:Armbrust|Armbrust]] <sup>[[User talk:Armbrust|<font color="#E3A857">The</font> <font color="#008000">Homunculus</font>]]</sup> 12:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
:Thanks, glad to help! [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 16:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::x2 make it two. Thanks for the work at RPP. <span style='border-radius:8px;border-top:4px solid #F63; border-bottom:4px solid #6C0'>'''[[User talk:Sohambanerjee1998|<small><font colour="white" face="segoe script">Sohambanerjee1998</font></small>]]'''</span> 18:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::My pleasure. I don't know why most other admins don't get involved there. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 19:22, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::This the pleasure is all yours, to be true [[User:Ged UK|Ged of Britain]] also works hard. Occasionally I've seen some other administrators too. <span style='border-radius:8px;border-top:4px solid #F63; border-bottom:4px solid #6C0'>'''[[User talk:Sohambanerjee1998|<small><font colour="white" face="segoe script">Sohambanerjee1998</font></small>]]'''</span> 06:29, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Yeah, Ged and I are in different timezones so it works out pretty well that way. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:22, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Both of you never disappoint me. <span style='border-radius:8px;border-top:4px solid #F63; border-bottom:4px solid #6C0'>'''[[User talk:Sohambanerjee1998|<small><font colour="white" face="segoe script">Sohambanerjee1998</font></small>]]'''</span> 14:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Deletion review for [[Exari]]== |
|||
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Exari|deletion review]] of [[Exari]]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> |
|||
== vandal == |
|||
Hi Mark,<br> |
|||
I noted that you made an advisory comment on the talk page for this IP user: [[Special:Contributions/71.55.154.102]]. I myself had just fixed a mess this account left on another article (which I doubt was a simple mistake). A look at the contribs shows a total of only 7 edits, all recent. Aside from the edit you commented on and the edit I repaired, all 5 of the remaining edits were clearly vandalism. As an admin, I though I would bring this to your attention. Thanks. - '''''[[User:Thewolfchild|<font color="red">thewolfchild</font>]]''''' 20:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Ok, thanks for the note. He hasn't edited in over a week though, so I probably won't block. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 20:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Mark S. Gold == |
|||
Thanks for the Semi on [[Mark S. Gold]]. I wasn't thinking, and should have requested [[WP:PC1|PC1]] - especially given that Copyvio is one of the key reasons for it. Will you change it to PC1, or should I wait and see if Semi covers it? Cheers, [[User:Tgeairn|Tgeairn]] ([[User talk:Tgeairn|talk]]) 21:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't know, we might stick with semi for now and maybe revisit in a week. I don't have strong feelings either way. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 22:45, 1 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Province of Georgia]] == |
|||
I am fully aware of the fact that you are very busy, but I do ask that you protect this article because of ongoing vandalism by IPs. I kindly suggest semi protection. One look at the view history will tell you the story. Personally, I have no idea why this article is being vandalized, but it's happened multiple times now. Thank you [[User:Avenzhang|Avenzhang]] ([[User talk:Avenzhang|talk]]) 00:36, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Ok, I'll check it out. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 00:38, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Thank you for semi-protecting. --[[User:Avenzhang|Avenzhang]] ([[User talk:Avenzhang|talk]]) 00:43, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Westwood High School (Austin, Texas)]] == |
|||
Hi. I am going to ask you to reconsider my request you just denied at RPP regarding the above article. The reason is that the problem is still the same one from when you protected it in August. Same edits, same IP range. If you have a better solution, by all means let me know; but this is a continuation of the prior problem exactly, and not a new issue. The material being put back in is just garbage; I would find it poorly written as a sports story if I were the high school's newspaper editor. It certainly has no place here. They just edit warred it back every time I tried to tone it down before and I have no reason to think it just won't be the same story again. Thanks. [[User:Gtwfan52|Gtwfan52]] ([[User talk:Gtwfan52|talk]]) 03:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah, it is a problem, but since the protection expired a couple weeks ago they've only added it back in once. I usually look for more frequent disruption when protecting. I guess you could get a second opinion from another admin if you like. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 03:52, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Handedness == |
|||
Hi Mark |
|||
Re Catholics being called "Leftfooters" or "lefthanders". You gave no reason for undoing my edit. Is it disputed or is it against some guidelines to include this fact? [[User:Timlynch22|Timlynch22]] ([[User talk:Timlynch22|talk]]) 11:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Tim |
|||
:Which edit of yours did I revert? Could you link to it? I probably reverted because you did not include a source with your change, see [[WP:V]] for the guideline. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 14:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Mark, er well I left you some clues: "lefthanders", "leftfooters" being a slang term for Catholics. It was on the "handedness" page. Raised as a Catholic I can vouch for this first hand. Wikipedia also references it on page: "Left-hand path and right-hand path". I am new to editing so please forgive i didn't link to that article. should i just put it back in or have you some doubts? Tim [[User:Timlynch22|Timlynch22]] ([[User talk:Timlynch22|talk]]) 16:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:You can re-add the information, but you should include a link to a reliable source ([[WP:RS]]) when you add the information. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Fringe-y thing you may be able to help with == |
|||
Hey, Mark. Been a while since we worked on anything together. I, perhaps foolishly, recently decided to try and improve the article on the [[Creation Museum]] in [[Petersburg, Boone County, Kentucky|Petersburg, Kentucky]]. There were some talk page complaints, valid in my view, that the article had become a [[WP:COATRACK]] for the evolution vs. creationism debate. I think I've done a pretty good job of improving the article, especially considering that I don't hold the mainstream view of the museum, but now it's come down to issues of how much and what kind of criticism to include. Since you've done work on some pretty [[WP:FRINGE]]-y topics before, I thought your experience might be valuable in helping us sort through things. The presently-open discussion is [[Talk:Creation Museum#Remaining Controversies and criticisms items|here]], although you may want to review all the talk page conversations from 2013 for background. On the other hand, you may not think this is worth your time or effort, and that's fine, too. I've had you in mind as a possible peer reviewer if we ever got to that point, but I think that if we can't resolve the open issues cleanly, it'll never get to that point. |
|||
BTW, I don't know (or necessarily care to know) your views on the subject of the article. I just know you've done good work on fringe-y articles before, and that's the reason I'm pinging you. Hope this isn't seen as [[WP:CANVASS]]ing. If it is, I'll own up to it and try to rectify it. [[User:Acdixon|Acdixon]] <sup><span class="plainlinks">([[User talk:Acdixon|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Acdixon|contribs]])</span></sup> 14:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:That does sound interesting, I'll try to take a look at it. I think I've heard of that before, but I thought it was in a different city. Is there more than one creation museum? [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 15:34, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes, but this one is by far the biggest, most expensive, and best-known. Petersburg is right outside Cincinnati, so you may have heard someone say it was in Cincinnati, Ohio. [[User:Acdixon|Acdixon]] <sup><span class="plainlinks">([[User talk:Acdixon|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Acdixon|contribs]])</span></sup> 15:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Oh, yes, that was it. Back to geography class for me! [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 15:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Malik Noureed Awan - which version should stand? == |
|||
You have recently edited [[Malik Noureed Awan]]. Please see [[Talk:Malik Noureed Awan#Call for reasons why the NPOV/poorly-referenced version should stand]] and contribute your thoughts. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])</small></small> 19:07, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== "Fixed refs" from multiple IP addresses? == |
|||
I wonder what's going on here. The edits looked benign, but seem to come from many different IP addresses. Is this some kind of sockpuppet attack? Anyway, thanks for your cleanup efforts. [[User:JustinTime55|JustinTime55]] ([[User talk:JustinTime55|talk]]) 19:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Very odd situation here. Some details at [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Sophisticated_mass_vandalism_from_IP_ranges.3F]] and [[Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC]]. Basically someone was running an unapproved bot to add links to his archive site and when it got blocked he started using a huge network of IPs to evade the block. Since those edits were technically block evasion I rolled them back. I haven't seen anything like this before. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 19:42, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Protection of 2013-14 UEFA Champions League page. == |
|||
Hello, Thank you for protected the page from the disruptive editors. I can still edit on that page when the matches are finished though right? [[User:Skyblueshaun|Skyblueshaun]] ([[User talk:Skyblueshaun|talk]]) 20:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, established accounts (more than ten edits over four days) can still edit the page. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 20:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Richard Huggett == |
|||
Hello thank you for your genuine reply, i must admit the comment about the monkey was in jest however you will find Richard Huggett was in fact born on the 18th. Yours sincerely a fruit monkey. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.40.59.190|68.40.59.190]] ([[User talk:68.40.59.190|talk]]) 21:58, 2 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Ok, thanks for the note. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 22:33, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Copyvio-revdel== |
|||
Hi! Thank you for dealing with those revdeletes. I'm afraid I screwed up at [[Susan C. Aldridge]]: I identified and [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Susan_C._Aldridge&diff=572792964&oldid=572788690 removed] a further copyvio, but failed to update the template. Is it OK to ask you to deal with that too, or should I re-add the template with the later revision? |
|||
By the way, do you have any advice on what to do about [[Emergy]], where there is, despite various efforts on my part to remove it, again a massive and impenetrable screed posted by " MT Brown and S Ulgiati according to a mandate received from the International Society for the Advancement of Emergy Research (ISAER) during the most recent Biennial Emergy Conference (16-18 January 2010)"? It doesn't seem to me that that is how things are done round here, but I don't know what the next step should be. Thanks, [[User:Justlettersandnumbers|Justlettersandnumbers]] ([[User talk:Justlettersandnumbers|talk]]) 23:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Ok, revdeleted the rest. I haven't looked a the Emergy thing in too much detail, but maybe try holding a talk page RFC about whether to keep the content or not? [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 00:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
Thanks for handling these blocks. It's the same person who's been harassing me for a while under different IPs, but I'm looking into avenues to deal with that. –[[User:Roscelese|Roscelese]] ([[User talk:Roscelese|talk]] ⋅ [[Special:Contributions/Roscelese|contribs]]) 02:08, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:No problem. Feel free to let me know if you spot any more socks. I can semi any pages he's targeting as well. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 02:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Macgyver == |
|||
Seriously, re-read the Macgyver edit and tell me again how it's not constructive. Is there a region on this planet that isn't represented there? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/74.77.255.96|74.77.255.96]] ([[User talk:74.77.255.96|talk]]) 02:37, 3 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Your most recent edits look fine to me. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 02:41, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Somatics]] == |
|||
Hi - following a suggestion at [[WP:FT/N]] I'm contacting you about the [[Somatics]] article, which was the subject of an AfD earlier this year[https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Somatics_%282nd_nomination%29] which you closed with a result of ''delete''. Since then the article has re-appeared. Could you clarify what has happened? it seems to me the article is still as worthy as deletion as it was before. Thanks, [[User:Alexbrn|Alexbrn]] <sup>[[User talk:Alexbrn|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Alexbrn|contribs]]|[[User:Alexbrn#Conflict_of_interest_declaration|COI]]</sup> 15:48, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Will reply there. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 15:56, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks - [[WP:SOFTDELETE]] is a new thing to me ... [[User:Alexbrn|Alexbrn]] <sup>[[User talk:Alexbrn|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Alexbrn|contribs]]|[[User:Alexbrn#Conflict_of_interest_declaration|COI]]</sup> 15:57, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yeah, it's a tricky situation when an Afd is open for three weeks but no one wants to vote on it. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 16:00, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::Some of these fringe articles don't fit very well into the AfD categories, I think that's part of the problem. [[User:Alexbrn|Alexbrn]] <sup>[[User talk:Alexbrn|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Alexbrn|contribs]]|[[User:Alexbrn#Conflict_of_interest_declaration|COI]]</sup> 16:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== A beer for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Export hell seidel steiner.png|70px]] |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | In recognition of your great work at Requests for Page Protection. Cheers! <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — [[User:Keithbob|<b style= "color:#090;"><i>Keithbob</i></b>]] • [[User_ talk:Keithbob|<span style="color:#075;">Talk</span>]] • </span> 16:41, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
:Thanks, but it's a little early in the day for that! [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 16:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:: It's always 5 pm, somewhere {{smiley}} -- [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 15:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::LOL, I guess so. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 15:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Makers/ someone using wiki to promote besharam, manipulating with stats == |
|||
Makers of besharam or someone else is trying to create false impression that the film is doing well. The film's actual budget is rs 80 cr. Somebody tampering with it, changing to 50 sometimes, 20 sometimes. Real budget is 80 cr. |
|||
Public opinion is completely negative. They are trying to make it mixed. |
|||
Collection figures are under 19 cr... showing 21.65..etc... |
|||
What is this ? Is wiki a place to present fake stats, false opinions ? Are there no controlling authority to present the true facts and figures of bollywood movies ? |
|||
And this is a new tactics. Lock the page and show whatever suitable for the makers.... |
|||
this cant be the reputation of wiki....a site presenting misleading facts favorable for makers of the film.... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/14.99.4.37|14.99.4.37]] ([[User talk:14.99.4.37|talk]]) 16:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:The best thing you can do is to explain your concerns at [[Talk:Besharam (2013 film)]]. Then other editors can observe and weigh in on the issue. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Sam Gagner]] article == |
|||
Mark, there is what appears to be a vandal at the Sam Gagner article: User:Henrietta8. The editor has already violated [[WP:3RR]]. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 20:55, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Ok, blocked for 3RR. Not sure if it was actually vandalism since that does appear to be a real nickname for the guy. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 21:00, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Note that [[User:DSF99]] attempted to remove this comment - possibly a sock. ~[[User:Charmlet|<span style="color:maroon;">Charmlet</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Charmlet|<span style="color:black;">-talk-</span>]]</sup> 21:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Ok, I semi-d the article since it looks like a lot of new users have been hitting it lately. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 21:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::[https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mark_Arsten&diff=575634892&oldid=575634746 This] is the revert Charmlet is referring to. User:Henrietta8 and User:DSF99 are obvious [[WP:Sockpuppets]] of User:Snowpants89 ([https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Snowpants89 already indefinitely blocked]). Use:DSF99 [https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/DSF99 was registered] after I left [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Henrietta8&diff=575634006&oldid=575632689 this message] on User:Henrietta8's talk page, then followed me here to revert me. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:07, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::Ok, blocked. That doesn't look like a coincidence. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 21:09, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::LOL, no. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::::That mess has been going on at that article for several months, sporadically. I came across the older [https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Schutzstaffel89 Schutzstaffel89] (indefinitely blocked) account and saw that it was used to make the same addition. That article is clearly going to need long-term semi-protection, since, going by [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Sam_Gagner&diff=575637979&oldid=575635421 this edit] by [[User:Leech44|Leech44]], perhaps there is no [[WP:Reliable source]] referring to Gagner by that name. And even if there is, it shouldn't be in the lead unless it is a nickname that he is significantly known/well-known by. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 22:17, 3 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== SkyTeam == |
|||
Hello there, Mark Arsten. Do you think {{diff|SkyTeam|575380202|575139205|this edit}} warrants {{diff|SkyTeam|575585184|575380202|your reversion}}? I think the IP provided two valid links for sources that otherwise are dead. Regards.--'''[[User:Jetstreamer|Jetstreamer]]''' ''{{sup|[[User talk:Jetstreamer#top|Talk]]}}'' 00:36, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I reverted as the IP was engaged in [[WP:BE|block evasion]]. After his main account was blocked he used a network of IPs to continue editing. Edits made in evasion of a block are free to be reverted by any editor. But, if you think the edit was helpful, you're free to re-add the links. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 00:57, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::I did so. Thanks for your explanation.--'''[[User:Jetstreamer|Jetstreamer]]''' ''{{sup|[[User talk:Jetstreamer#top|Talk]]}}'' 01:16, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== A tip for you == |
|||
Since I see your recent activity with [[WP:HG|Huggle]], not sure if you know this, but since your an admin, on Huggle you could use Ctrl+B to block a user. Just a tip! [[User:EuroCarGT|<font color="cyan">'''///Euro'''</font><font color="grey">'''Car'''</font>]][[User talk:EuroCarGT|<font color="orange">'''GT'''</font>]] 02:22, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Huh, to be honest, I had no idea about that keyboard shortcut. Thanks! [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 02:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks for protecting [[Indira Samarasekera]] == |
|||
Just wanted to thank you for protecting [[Indira Samarasekera]]. Hopefully I can work with some of these editors and we can get it up to snuff. |
|||
--[[User:Rawlangs|Rawlangs]] ([[User talk:Rawlangs|talk]]) 15:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:You're welcome, glad to help. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 15:59, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Berzerk == |
|||
Hey again Mark, I saw your decision on [[WP:ANEW]], but as I suspected no discussion occurred in the slightest, and now the page is completely unprotected. The only reason I reported the one user (Hometown Kid), is that he had made five reverts, and had blatantly reverted again after given the 3rr warning, which Iknow32 had not done. I think that kind of gives Kid the impression that he can now edit war, after recieving a clear final warning and nothing will happen. Frankly I think it would have been more fair to block both of them, rather than fully protect the article, but I respected your decision, and it is kind of pointless to do anything now. The only reason I am commenting here is that [[Berzerk (song)]] was already semi-protected for another 10 days, so if you could restore that I would appreciate it, because the IPs are already nibbling. <font color="#BA181F">'''[[User:STATicVerseatide|STATic]]</font> <font color="#BA181F"><small>[[User talk:STATicVerseatide|<span style="vertical-align:super;">message me!</span>]]</small></font>''' 05:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Ok, thanks for the feedback. I'll take another look at how I handled it. I re-enabled the semi for now, since it was in effect before. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 06:04, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Sharlin Class Warcruiser AfD == |
|||
Hi. I don't agree with your consensus assessment at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharlin Class Warcruiser]] and I wonder if you could provide clarification, and possibly amend your closing rationale. |
|||
The way I see it, there are 4 keep !votes and 2 delete !votes (3 if you count the nomination). If the situation was straightforward, I'd agree with you, but DGG's [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sharlin_Class_Warcruiser&diff=573579037&oldid=573167144 keep !vote] is entirely based on a rejection of [[WP:NOTPLOT]], and I see no other argument in it. As I've indicated in my own !vote, per [[WP:AFDFORMAT]], comments based on policy denial should not have any weight. Deathlibrarian's [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sharlin_Class_Warcruiser&diff=575385758&oldid=575248681 !vote] that the article is "reasonable" doesn't appear to refer to any applicable policy, and resorts to [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST]], an argument to avoid at AfD. As such it should also be given no weight in the final count. |
|||
That leaves us with only 2 valid keep !votes against 2 delete !votes. I consider that I have provided a solid enough argumentation well grounded in policy that the sources recently added do not allow for GNG to be met, contrary to the non argumentated assertion that they do from Jclemens and Mark viking. There are examples (such as [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Siege_Perilous_(comics)]]) of arguments more in line with policy outweighing others even when comments are equally divided. |
|||
In my view, there is enough to justify a "delete" outcome, but I'd say a "no consensus to keep" outcome clearly stating that some keep !votes have been discarded, would be an acceptable compromise if you can't bring yourself to call it a delete. What do you think about it ?[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] ([[User talk:Folken de Fanel|talk]]) 15:31, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I think it was closed correctly. Basically, as [[User:Jclemens]] pointed out, everyone other than the nominator was supportive of keeping or merging the article. Two of the three deletion supporters noted that a merge would be acceptable, and merging is still an option after my close. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 16:27, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Maybe I wasn't clear enough, but my aim was to draw your attention on two of the keep supporters (especially DGG) whose comments were not in line with acceptable arguments at AfD per [[WP:AFDFORMAT]]. I think your closing rationale could have elaborated more on that, and that there was probably room for a "no consensus to delete" outcome rather than undisputed keep, which doesn't consider enough the arguments from merge supporters that the article doesn't meet GNG.[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] ([[User talk:Folken de Fanel|talk]]) 17:14, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Please don't feel bad, Mark. Folken de Fanel has a history of challenging administrator decisions where his view does not prevail. My interactions in the past have... left something to be desired, so don't take it personally. Cheers, [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 17:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Ok, I won't take it personally. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::Discussing an AfD outcome with the closing admin in case of questions or concern is regular practice per [[WP:CLOSEAFD]], and I can't see anything worth "feeling bad" over or "taking personally" in my request for clarification. Jclemens, as usual, exaggerates.[[User:Folken de Fanel|Folken de Fanel]] ([[User talk:Folken de Fanel|talk]]) 18:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almor == |
|||
Mark, |
|||
Would you mind if I undeleted the history on this article underneath the redirect? Not interested in contesting the redirect, just want non-admins to be able to see the article history there if anyone's interested in merging any content into the target of the new redirect. I think the outcome is entirely consistent with [[WP:ATD]]. Thanks, [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 17:48, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Sure, go ahead. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 18:13, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Done, thanks. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 22:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Reverted archive links == |
|||
Hi Mark. You reverted numerous edits (e.g. [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Oleksandr_Serdyuk&diff=prev&oldid=575586368]) where an editor replaced a broken link to the 2008 Olympics website with a valid archived one. What was the purpose of this? [[User talk:Sillyfolkboy|SFB]] 19:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I reverted as the IP was engaged in [[WP:BE|block evasion]]. After his main account was blocked he used a network of IPs to continue editing. Edits made in evasion of a block are free to be reverted by any editor. But, if you think the edit was helpful, you're free to re-add the links. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 19:14, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Will do. Thanks! [[User talk:Sillyfolkboy|SFB]] 19:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Ideally I would have used an edit summary explaining that, but it wasn't feasible as I reverted about 700-800 of them. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 19:34, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== {{u|OperatorBot}} == |
|||
You blocked {{u|OperatorBot}} as a vandal-only account. Why? Looking at his contribs, the only thing that could be considered vandalism is his message on the talk page of {{u|Ross Hill}}, which he removed, apologized for, and was forgiven. Were his vandalism contribs deleted? I don't want to accuse or attack you, just curious. Thanks, <span style="face:Geneva;text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7AF;">[[User:Theonesean|<span style="color:#000">the</span>]][[User talk:Theonesean|<span style="color:#000">one</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Theonesean|<span style="color:#000">sean</span>]]</span> 21:49, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I blocked per [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=575229032 this diff], where he posted a picture of an erect penis on Jimbo Wales' talk page. I added it to the image blacklist afterwards, so it doesn't show up now if you look at the diff. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 22:33, 5 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Liam Patton AfD == |
|||
Hello Mark, you deleted Liam Patton but not the other three articles listed in the AfD [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Liam Patton (2nd nomination)]] [[User:JMHamo|JMHamo]] ([[User talk:JMHamo|talk]]) 03:42, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for the note, got it. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:19, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Coming Soon (french band) == |
|||
The English page of this french band has been deleted because there are no reference. I saw them this summer and would like to read about them on Wikipedia. one reference is here http://www.last.fm/music/Coming+Soon <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/109.192.176.76|109.192.176.76]] ([[User talk:109.192.176.76|talk]]) 08:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Sorry, but we need more than one reference to have a page on a band. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:20, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Taelon pages AFD == |
|||
Good morning, I saw that you closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taelon pages|this AFD]] but I wonder if you saw that there were additional pages included in the same nomination? [[User:Jerry Pepsi|Jerry Pepsi]] ([[User talk:Jerry Pepsi|talk]]) 14:31, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for the note, got it. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:19, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:: Hi Mark, sorry to bug you again, but I was wondering if there was some issue with the article [[Zo'or]] included as part of this AFD that keeps it from being deleted? [[User:Jerry Pepsi|Jerry Pepsi]] ([[User talk:Jerry Pepsi|talk]]) 16:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Ok, I got it. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Candacrox == |
|||
Hi Mark, I saw your ban for Candacrox just as I posted this up: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Canadacrox]] |
|||
I suspect it is no longer required and can be removed. Thanks :) [[User:Kirachinmoku|<font color="#ff7f00">'''Kira'''</font><font color="Red">'''Chinmoku'''</font>]] 17:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Well, it might be best to leave it open so they can check for other accounts. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== peer review == |
|||
Hi Mark: |
|||
Could you please help work up science article [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Fluorine/archive3|Fluorine (peer review)]]? Pick a section maybe? [[Special:Contributions/98.117.75.177|98.117.75.177]] ([[User talk:98.117.75.177|talk]]) 18:03, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
P.s. I still miss Mbz and her pretty pictures. |
|||
:I don't really do too much science work, but sure, I'll try to help out a bit with some of the wording at least. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 18:06, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks kindly for hitting the article and upgrading it. (Minor grammar thing, per AP style guide, "U.S." should be not be used as a noun, only as a modifier.) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/108.162.44.194|108.162.44.194]] ([[User talk:108.162.44.194|talk]]) 01:08, 10 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:::Glad to help, and sorry about the mistake! [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 01:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Sock == |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/109.155.171.251|109.155.171.251]] appears to a sock of the banned editor discussed about a week ago. Could you please have a look as they're pretty quick and effective. Many thanks. [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 18:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Could you jog my memory a little? Who was the master here? [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 18:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:No specified master, as far as know (dynamic I.P.) I [[User_talk:Materialscientist#Sock|left a note for Materialscientist]], which leads on to another investigation. It actually looks pretty serious, as this is the third time I've come across them. I'm currently rollbacking all their edits to artificially increase my edit count. (If only...) [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 18:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Ok, did I block one of the past IPs? [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 18:26, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::I think you actually denied it ([[User_talk:Mark_Arsten/Archive_the_thirteenth#FYI|here]]) but somebody was complaining about my premature report. It was eventually revealed to be a case of block evasion, and somebody else stepped in and blocked them. The edits seem to be characterised by changing dates in British media, and using ''Fixed'' as every edit summary, which makes them easy enough to follow. Hope that helps. [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 18:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::Oh, now I finally understand what you're talking about. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 18:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Thanks. You're fabulous. [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 18:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Ashley Tisdale needs some copy-editing == |
|||
Hi Mark, fancy something a bit different from all the RFPP work? Not a gruesome article, I'm afraid (unless one thinks of the subject that way), but may be interesting anyway... |
|||
[[Ashley Tisdale]] reached GA back in 2008. It recently failed its third FAC at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ashley Tisdale/archive3]], largely due to prose concerns. (The nominator asked for copy-edits ''after'' concerns about the prose were raised in the FAC, which of course usually doesn't end well.) It's actually quite a short article, albeit extensively referenced, and I've been through the prose myself and brought it to what I consider a solid GA+ level. However, it obviously needs a fair bit more work on the prose to be ready to bring back to FAC. Would you be able to look at it? |
|||
(There's also a peer review open at [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Ashley Tisdale/archive2]]). |
|||
Thanks! --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 19:55, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:That would be a lot easier than the Fluorine request that I got earlier today! I think I should be able to help a bit, maybe later this week. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 20:29, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Question == |
|||
Hi, Mark. What happened to the [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=576055939&oldid=576055522 helper bots]? [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 22:42, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:That's a very good question. Archive bots seem to be missing in action on a number of pages. I have no idea what's going on. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 22:45, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== User page protection == |
|||
Hi, thanks for protecting [[User:Vzaak/Sheldrake_response|this user page]], however it looks like autoconfirmed users would still be able to vandalize it? This page is under attack by conspiracy nuts who are already autoconfirmed on Wikipedia, and the act of removing conspiracy vandalism will only heighten the craziness. [[User:Vzaak|vzaak]] ([[User talk:Vzaak|talk]]) 23:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Ok, so you want it fully protected, even though you won't be able to edit it then? [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 23:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes, please. [[User:Vzaak|vzaak]] ([[User talk:Vzaak|talk]]) 23:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Archiving == |
|||
Hi, Mark, I noticed you manually archived AN3 - thanks. Perhaps you know more about bot archiving than I do, but there's a real problem at ANI as no archiving is taking place. Apparently the owner of MiszaBot is not responding, so NE Ent took it upon himself to change ANI to ClueBot. However, for whatever reason, ClueBot hasn't archived, so my assumption is there's something wrong with what NE Ent did. I have e-mailed the owner of ClueBot, but they haven't responded. Meanwhile, every save at ANI takes forever because it's so large. Is there anything you can do to help? If not, is there someone else who understands these things whom I could contact? Regards.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 23:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:It's very strange that no archive bots seem to be working. I don't know much about the technical details though. This could be to blame: [[Wikipedia:Bot_owners%27_noticeboard#You_may_need_to_reset_your_bot.27s_password]]. Cyberpower mentioned something the other day about pywiki, whatever that is. I might just ask on ANI, actually. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 23:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::I read that discussion, but that was about MiszaBot. ClueBot ''is'' working, just not at ANI based on a probably incorrect configuration.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 23:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Ok, I just started a section at ANI. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 23:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::You wanna make it even bigger, huh? :-) I have this mental image of ANI exploding like an overinflated balloon and all that drivel/drama scattering all over Wikipedia like ashes from a volcano.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 23:38, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::lol, that would be quite the mess! [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 23:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Sockpuppet Question / Advise == |
|||
Hi - you recently suspended a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/FortyTwoAndAHalf/Archive|7-identity sockpuppet]] editing [[Ronan Farrow]]. In [[Talk:Ronan_Farrow#RfC_Ethiopia|a new RfC]] on [[Ronan Farrow]], the first non-party comment came, almost immediately after the RfC was posted, from a first-time IP editor. Considering the immediacy of this post (and the fact [[Ronan Farrow]] is a very lightly edited entry that only attracts two regular editors]]), I strongly suspect this IP-editor is the same sock who has been aggressively inserting promotional language into [[Ronan Farrow]] but I do not believe I have enough of a case to request a CheckUser. I was wondering if you could advise me as to a proper course of action if, indeed, I should request a CheckUser or simply ignore it and move on? Thanks, kindly, in advance. [[User:BlueSalix|BlueSalix]] ([[User talk:BlueSalix|talk]]) 01:58, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Checkuser won't connect an IP to a named account, unfortunately, so I don't think they'd be able to do anything here. I'll semi-protect the talk page though if it keeps being targeted by socks. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 02:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::That would be much appreciated, thanks. We have a RfC that appears to be going off the rails really fast and to have likely sock IP editors begin inundating it is going to make accomplishing anything nearly impossible. [[User:BlueSalix|BlueSalix]] ([[User talk:BlueSalix|talk]]) 02:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Explanation needed - unlocking pH article == |
|||
Hi! |
|||
Could you explain the need to lock pH article, where is the so-called persist vandalism? The history of the article does not record any vandalism from my last edit there. <s>Or perhaps has it been made invisible?</s>--[[Special:Contributions/188.26.22.131|188.26.22.131]] ([[User talk:188.26.22.131|talk]]) 11:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
I wanted to add some details, but I'noticed it is locked and I don't appreciate being forced to register. I see that vandalism was more than 10 days ago before my last edit when it was not locked.--[[Special:Contributions/188.26.22.131|188.26.22.131]] ([[User talk:188.26.22.131|talk]]) 11:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I disagree, I think the vandalism was pretty persistent throughout August and September, at a glance. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 14:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Yours Truly (Ariana Grande album)]] == |
|||
This article is frequently edited. Is "pending changes" appropriate? --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 19:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Ok, sure, I've semi'd it. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 19:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Reinstating of the page "Federer–Murray rivalry" == |
|||
I would like to request that the aforementioned page is re-listed on Wikipedia, as I feel it is a noteworthy rivalry. The two men have now played 20 matches against each other, 4 of these coming in Grand Slam tournaments, 3 in finals, and this total is more than the total of Djokovic-Federer who have only ever contested one GS final in their careers; also the two have contested 8 finals in total, which is exactly the same number of finals as the aforementioned Djokovic-Federer rivalry. In addition, it is a much more competitive and equally balanced rivalry than that of [[Federer-Roddick rivalry|Federer and Roddick]], who played 24 times however Roddick only won thrice, however that merits it's own page. Furthermore, this has had a good amount of media coverage, more so than other "rivalry" pages that have been deleted, especially over the last few years, and I have definitely heard Federer vs Murray referred to as a rivalry multiple times. [[User: thetradge|thetradge]] ([[User talk: thetradge|talk]]) - 8 October 2013, 00:04 (UTC) |
|||
:Can you provide evidence of the media coverage? [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 00:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::I found several articles that I think will answer your question, including one from the official ATP website.............. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/tennis/article-2063741/Andy-Murray-stokes-rivalry-Roger-Federer.html - http://www.atpworldtour.com/news/tennis/2012/11/features/rivalries-federer-murray.aspx - http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/370454/20120805/olympics-federer-murray-final-watch-live-stream.htm - http://blog.wimbledonticketsonline.co.uk/2012/12/one-of-tennis-great-rivalries-murray-vs.html ................Please let me know if you need any further proof |
|||
:::I think the best thing to do would be to create a sourced draft in your userspace and then we can work from there. See [[WP:USERSPACEDRAFT]] for details. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 01:35, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== List of Cardiology Trials == |
|||
It's a shame you removed such a well made wiki article. |
|||
A disappointed cardiology fellow. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/74.58.160.216|74.58.160.216]] ([[User talk:74.58.160.216|talk]]) 23:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Sorry, but some content just isn't right for Wikipedia. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 00:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== BCG == |
|||
I don't think static salary information from 2012 really belongs on a company page (especially for one that is apparently in 43 countries and I assume pays different everywhere). It felt odd reading that. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.124.202.13|76.124.202.13]] ([[User talk:76.124.202.13|talk]]) 01:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Ok, you're free to remove it again, but please explain your reason in an [[WP:EDITSUMMARY|edit summary]] so your change isn't mistaken for vandalism. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 01:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Alfred Apps == |
|||
Hi Mark; |
|||
Thanks for you prompt response to the accuracy of Mr. Apps' Bio. |
|||
:You're welcome, glad to help. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 03:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== {{user|91.232.101.32}} == |
|||
When protecting articles based on sock abuse, it is best to revert the sock first. Otherwise it just makes cleaning up after them harder. [[User:Werieth|Werieth]] ([[User talk:Werieth|talk]]) 15:12, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Oops! Sorry about that. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 15:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== A barnstar for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Administrator Barnstar Hires.png|100px]] |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for your work at [[WP:RFPP]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 15:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
:You're welcome. And that you for your help, as well. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 15:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Blond]] article == |
|||
Mark, mind semi-protecting the Blond article? There is a persistent sockpuppetry problem going on there (and at other hair color articles); see [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Flyer22&diff=576213145&oldid=576207236#Sockpuppet_of_.D9.85.D8.AD.D8.A8.D8.A9.D8.A7.D9.84.D9.83.D8.AA.D8.A8 here] and [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Flyer22&diff=576213145&oldid=576207236#The_Politics_of...Hair_Color.3F here] for details if you haven't already seen those sections on my talk page. In addition to stopping that IP range, semi-protecting the article will draw out that IP range's registered account and that can be used as further evidence that these accounts are being operated by the same person. I'm not sure if [[User:SQGibbon|SQGibbon]] is still watching that article or is simply tired of dealing with this person. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 15:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah, I'm still watching. I just missed the last couple of days of edits. And I support Flyer22's request. This sock refuses to engage in discussion and is able to jump around pretty easily. I didn't get around to reporting one of their most recent sockpuppets but it is a persistent problem. Semi-protecting the article would provide a nice break and might provide additional evidence as to their sock identities. [[User:SQGibbon|SQGibbon]] ([[User talk:SQGibbon|talk]]) 15:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Ok, I gave it some semi. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:48, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thank you. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 17:54, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::[https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Blond&diff=576514730&oldid=576510717 As predicted]. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 23:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::[https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Samer154&diff=next&oldid=576510373 This] looks like it may be the problem. We might be butting up against the [[WP:CIR|competence]] issue. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 00:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Yes, a competence issue (which is also no doubt in part due to the English barrier, the broken English; the broken English aspect was also noted on my talk page in the aforementioned first discussion linked above), but, as has been noted, that user was already indefinitely blocked under a different account. He or she shouldn't be here based on that alone. Time for another sockpuppet case against him or her. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 00:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Oh, Ok. What was the previous account? [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 00:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::It's shown and explained in the first discussion linked above in this section, Mark. [[User:محبةالكتب]] is the previous account. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 01:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::Ok, got it, sorry for being so slow. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 01:37, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::LOL. Thanks for [https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Samer154 blocking that user] and for [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Blond&diff=576526341&oldid=576523391 extending protection] of that article. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 02:44, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== A barnstar for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Administrator Barnstar Hires.png|100px]] |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | In case you didn't get the "thank thank thank thank thank thank thank" message, thanks for housekeeping at [[WP:RFPP]]. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
:LOL, thanks a lot. I saw 13 notifications and figured I had done something really good or was in a ton of trouble! [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 17:45, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::You are racking up barnstars these days. All well-deserved, obviously. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 17:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::Well apparently I'm terribly unoriginal. I came here to pop an admin's barnstar on your talk as well but I see others have beaten me to it! The sentiment remains; thank you for all of the work you do in keeping the backlogs down at AIV and RFPP. You're a star!--[[User:Ponyo|<b><font color="Navy">''Jezebel's''</font></b><font color="Navy">Ponyo</font>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<font color="Navy">''bons mots''</font>]]</sup> 18:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::Thanks a lot. I appreciate the work you three do as well. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 19:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I am also terribly unoriginal, I don't pop barnstars but said once and for all that you are [[User:Gerda Arendt/PumpkinSky Prize|precious]]. I miss [[User:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky]] who told me, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 19:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Yes you did :) I hope PS ends his wikibreak soon, there are altogether too many good Wikipedians missing these days. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 19:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Main Page appearance: George Went Hensley == |
|||
This is a note to let the main editors of [[George Went Hensley]] know that the article will be appearing as [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article|today's featured article]] on October 27, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask {{user|Bencherlite}}. You can view the TFA blurb at [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 27, 2013]]. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions]]. The blurb as it stands now is below: |
|||
==Barnstar== |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
'''[[George Went Hensley]]''' (c. 1880 – 1955) was an American [[Pentecostalism|Pentecostal]] minister. He experienced a religious conversion around 1910 and came to believe that the [[New Testament]] commanded all Christians to [[snake handling|handle venomous snakes]]. Although illiterate, he was a licensed minister of the [[Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee)|Church of God]] from 1915 to 1922. He was arrested on [[moonshine]]-related charges and sentenced to a term in a workhouse, from which he escaped. He then held [[Revival meeting|revival services]] in [[Ohio]], and established churches, known as the [[Church of God with Signs Following]], in Tennessee and [[Kentucky]]. His services ranged from small meetings in houses to gatherings with hundreds of attendees and media attention. He was arrested for violating laws against snake handling at least twice. He claimed to have survived more than 400 snake bites, but fell ill after being bitten during a service in 1955. He refused medical attention and died the next day. Despite his personal failings—he had conflicts with his family because of his drunkenness, frequent travels, and lack of steady income—Hensley convinced many residents of rural [[Appalachia]] that snake handling was commanded by God, and his followers continued the practice after his death. {{TFAFULL|George Went Hensley}} |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
[[User:UcuchaBot|UcuchaBot]] ([[User talk:UcuchaBot|talk]]) 23:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
==Barnstar== |
|||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[File:Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png|100px]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for reverting Mathgenious989's changes to my talk page [[User:Eggishorn|Eggishorn]] ([[User talk:Eggishorn|talk]]) 01:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
|}<!--template:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar--> |
|||
:You're welcome, glad to help. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 01:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Kohs AfD == |
|||
Might you consider restoring the revision history to the redirect? It did include material and sourcing about MyWikiBiz that is not in that article and it would be easier for someone to merge that material over there.--[[User:The Devil's Advocate|<font color="vermillion">'''The Devil's Advocate'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:The Devil's Advocate|<font color="burntorange">tlk.</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/The Devil's Advocate|<font color="red">cntrb.</font>]]</sub> 04:20, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't know, comparing the bio article before deletion with the company article I'm not sure there was much to merge over. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 14:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Showing that you're neutral == |
|||
I'm asking you to get involved in [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAyn_Rand&diff=576392101&oldid=576389229 this], in the capacity of an admin. [[User:MilesMoney|MilesMoney]] ([[User talk:MilesMoney|talk]]) 05:27, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes. Please do. Both the edits before & after the diff that Miles has supplied. Thanks. – [[User:Srich32977|S. Rich]] ([[User talk:Srich32977|talk]]) 05:49, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::I've commented there. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 14:51, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== A kitten for you! == |
|||
[[File:Young cats.jpg|left|150px]] |
|||
Everyone loves kittens, so this is one just for you! |
|||
[[User:Kirachinmoku|<font color="#ff7f00">'''Kira'''</font><font color="Red">'''Chinmoku'''</font>]] 08:37, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
<br style="clear: both;"/> |
|||
:Great, thanks. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 15:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Nefarious: Merchant of Souls == |
|||
Hi Mark, |
|||
Thank you for encouragement with respect to the [[Nefarious: Merchant of Souls]] article. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide at [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Nefarious: Merchant of Souls/archive1|its featured article candidacy]] would be greatly appreciated. |
|||
[[User:Neelix|Neelix]] ([[User talk:Neelix|talk]]) 22:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, I'm glad we have people working on our [[Human trafficking]] articles. I'll see if I have time to make some edits on the article or post a review, but I've been keeping fairly busy lately. See you around, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 22:20, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Hi mark, you reverted one of my changes a moment ago, and I would like to discuss something with you == |
|||
Hi mark, you reverted one of my changes a moment ago, and I would like to discuss something with you |
|||
:Sure, what would you like to discuss? [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 01:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Some falafel for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Falafel award.png|120px]] |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks if you reply to me [[User:Kevin syria|Kevin syria]] ([[User talk:Kevin syria|talk]]) 01:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
== Why was my page deleted == |
|||
Hi Mark, just wondering why you deleted my page "Lake County Captains Managers" on 00:39, 27 August 2013. Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bill3490|Bill3490]] ([[User talk:Bill3490|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bill3490|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Did I? I'm not seeing any deleted revisions at [[Lake County Captains Managers]]. [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten#top|talk]]) 01:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== My Recent Longboarding Edits == |
|||
Hello there, I recently made several adjustments to the Longboarding page and they were quickly revoked due to lack of sources. I am a professional longboarder and am very active in the community. The edits I made were from my own experiences and knowledge and most of those facts have not been documented anywhere since the sport has such a tiny community. What should I do about not having any sources? I suppose I could write an article on a blog or something and then source myself? Thanks [[User:Kmg1434|Kmg1434]] ([[User talk:Kmg1434|talk]]) 03:40, 10 October 2013 (UTC). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.91.31.57|24.91.31.57]] ([[User talk:24.91.31.57|talk]]) 02:11, 10 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Revision as of 13:26, 10 October 2013
BAHO MO!