User talk:Marechal Ney: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:14, 1 December 2011

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Marechal Ney. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canal de las Estrellas Edits

I redirected all Mexican TV station to their network of affiliation (Canal de las Estrellas). It makes much more sense than having them redirected to Canal de las Estrellas' flagship station XEW-TV. Canal de las Estrellas contains a list of all its affiliates with all their available info. I will be happy to answer any other questions you may have, -AMAPO (talk) 04:22, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Marechal Ney. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit.
Message added 02:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 02:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I did not make those edits. Something is seriously wrong here. I never wrote anything that had to do with dead pancreases. --74.92.159.245 (talk) 18:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

Hi Marechal Ney. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:03, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ryan Braun. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Epeefleche (talk) 02:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I totally understand your explanation on my talk page, and am sorry that the computer snafu caused the misunderstanding. Consider this a retraction of my above warning, as I understand it was completely due to computer error. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage design

I saw your userpage, and I think you should look at the userpage design centre, which gives pretty easy instructions on how to spruce up your userpage. pluma Ø 22:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your works on, well, anti-vandalism! Happy editing! pluma Ø 22:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar/userpage building advice. My userpage is now slightly less hideous. Marechal Ney (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for re-joining. Your username will be on the "official" list soon. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs 20:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marechal Ney. You have new messages at 69.181.251.214's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Death of Muammar Gaddafi

Sorry for putting the message on your user page - my error. Now please tell me why you considered my edit on this page disruptive? 86.174.90.5 (talk) 00:09, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on your talkpage. Marechal Ney (talk) 00:09, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint

I just wanted-to let you know that you are in no position to go deleting people's stuff. Jeremiah II's journal was just discovered only a week ago. You were not on the trip the archeology trip I took to Canada along with my colleagues. I demand an apology from you this instant. Thanks.

Even if that statement above, almost certainly false, turns out to be true, then it should be deleted as original research. Marechal Ney (talk) 01:09, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but my colleague found a journal entitled with the name written. Whether it is a fable, we will never know, or we might know in time. However, I left it up to people to comment on their opinions. But only 2 seconds later, what do you know? The page was deleted. I sincerely hope you are not a, excuse me, an idiot who goes around re-editing articles, and deleting stuff, only for the pleasure. If you are however, I think you know this too, you are in no position to be holding a wikipedia account, for that is not the main purpose. I'm glad I didn't write all the information down too, for I am not subject to, as well as I would of had to re-write it as well. But I just wanted to let people what was going on, whether or not it might be true, the journal is. If I believe so, I am most positive I mentioned that the information was found from the journal. If I did not, I will apologize. However, next time you find fault with an article, why don't you let the person know? It could be an accident or misunderstanding or misuse of word search. Always remember to take in all possibilities before doing something. It's actually quite a familiar phrase, "Think before you act." I will no longer demand an apology as I do not see one coming in the future anyway. But thank you for taking the time to read this to you, or other users who may have been accidental victims. Once again, Wikipedia is not a place to do whatever you want. And I don't suspect you are, I just wanted to let you know. Thank you for listening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericnelsonfreak (talk • contribs) 01:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but you seriously want me to believe that...

Around 1771, a man named Jeremiah is born to be King of Canada (a title that never existed), then somehow is almost buried alive
Canada conquers Persia
Persian facial hair traditions are completely changed
Canada attacks France
French revolution begins because of this
King Jeremiah was painted in a Byzantine style, as shown on the page (I'm pretty sure you copied it from somehwere and that it's a copyright violation).

Yeah, right. Marechal Ney (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Careful There Quickdraw

There was very clear and detailed explaiantion of my edit that you undid within seconds. There is more to patrolling then clicking undo on every large IP. An edit with a valid edit summarry is in no way vandalism. 71.52.31.6 (talk) 02:14, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 *King Jeremiah was painted in a Byzantine style, as shown on the page (I'm pretty sure you copied it from somehwere and that it's a copyright violation).
 Yeah, right.  [[User:Marechal Ney|Marechal Ney]] ([[User talk:Marechal Ney#top|talk]]) 03:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
+==Careful There Quickdraw==
+There was very clear and detailed explaiantion of my edit that you undid within seconds.  There is more to patrolling then clicking undo on every large IP.  An edit with a valid edit summarry is in no way vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/71.52.31.6|71.52.31.6]] ([[User talk:71.52.31.6|talk]]) 02:14, 1 December 2011 (UTC)