User talk:Lugia2453

Welcome

Hello, Lugia2453, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! GiantSnowman 14:45, 18 July 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

July 2012

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Kenneth F. Warren: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 15:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Anti-vandal tools

Hey, I use STiki to help me fight vandalism. Just wondered if it might help you out. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC) (Fixed link at 03:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC))

My edit to the Mondale page was simply noting that Dianne Feinstein was Jewish, not just a woman, thus setting another precedent on the ticket. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.171.233.71 (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Salt

Hey bro I was just wondering why you undid my edit about testicles on the article about salt? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariopeach69 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Pernis

Your recent actions at Articles for Creation

Hi Lugia2453, thanks for helping at WikiProject Articles for creation. However, I couldn't help noticing some of your recent decisions were questionable. For example, you have accepted MYLAPS Sports Timing, an article about a company, which has no independent reliable references. You also accepted Onset Computer Corporation, when most of the sources were not about the company and it clearly did not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for companies. I would advise you to look again at Wikipedia's general notability guideline and familiarise youself with the basic policies. If you want to ask me any questions you are welcome to do so. All the best! Sionk (talk) 01:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Me again! You might want to look at Wikipedia:CLASSES#Grades, which explains how to assess the quality (stub, start, C, B, etc.) of articles. Articles should only be graded 'B' if there are no major issues and it is more or less complete. Most of the articles going through AfC seem to be 'start' class at best, with the occasional 'C'. Sionk (talk) 19:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

some further comments. It is important to give the correct reasons,and the ones in the box are not always suitable. . Your decline of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Middle Rainton a Lost Village was correct, but the problem was not lack of notability, the problem was that it was a personal essay without any published sources or indications of any. You might want to see what I said on User talk:Johncharvey

In general, when an article is overly promotional, say so as a reason, even if you have to give a custom reason--do not just say insufficient sources--that's a very general comment which does not really give the guidance needed--we will delete a promotional article very rapidly, even if there are sources--promotionalism is worse than inadequate sourcing and much harder to deal with. Of course, they often do go together.

When an article has been repeatedly declined, the author probably needs some help. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HUGO Ross is hopeless--at this stage in his career, he does not meet Notability criteria for music. that there are inadequate references are the least of it. It helps to make a sufficient comment to stop him from wasting his efforts. DGG ( talk ) 03:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Kwokyboi

Hey I was wondering why a post about a Youtuber was not "of significant importance" , as you have a post about a TV show. Please enlighten me on why you have chosen to delete my article as isn't isn't important. How is an article about a TV show important? (Kwokyboi (talk) 20:54, 24 October 2012 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ed Byrne (musician), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Willie Colon and Larry Harlow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.64.230.79 (talk) 19:36, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

ARTICLE ~ HISTORYLINKS M USEUM

Thank you for your feed-back on my recently submitted article about the Historylinks Museum at Dornoch. I was aware, when I began drafting the article, that its content should be objective and, to avoid any slant towards advertising, I closely followed the format and type of content used for the Highland Museum of Childhood (Strathpeffer) article. This latter article has been successfully published on Wikipedia and, in the interests of consistency, I would be grateful if you would indicate how my article should be amended to fit Wikipedia's guidelines.

Stgilbert (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

listen

read my version again. from start to finish. carefully. and you will see why i made these changes. its very constructive. you ll see. if you dont like it delete it. but read it carefully first. bye. (im talking about the molko page) - 89.210.205.207 (talk)

Arnold Anthony Schmidt

I've added several new sources and cited them parenthetically. Better? Fussy Scholar 16:38, 5 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fussy Scholar (talk • contribs)

Steve Gottlieb article: revised as per your recommendations/guidance

I implemented your helpful advice, and I'd like to know if the article is acceptable.

Thanks so much,

Kent Frederick

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Steve_Gottlieb — Preceding unsigned comment added by KentFrederick (talk • contribs) 17:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Virappin Waradarassou article : regarding reliable resources

Hi, I have the hard copies screened and uploaded on the below link. http://perpetualthinkings.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/varadha-veerappanchevalier-et-officer.html Is that helpful to solve the issue? This person(my grand-dad) died on 1981 ,and the source I got by googling are the wikibuster and other links with fr.Otherwise,I got only Hard-copy Proof of two framed Original certificate signed by the French Governor.Is there a way to get the screenshots of honors uploaded to act as a proof except the one on the above link? Kindly guide me in this process

Looking forward for your reply, Thank you, Uma Anandane Umaanandane (talk) 23:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)umaanandane

Issue regarding acceptance of new Wiki article.

I understand correctly you are the Wiki user that has reviewed my requested new Wiki article [[1]] and declined it for reasons I knew it would be declined. I'm happy to search and contact Michael O'Connor (the man the article is being made for) for references related to the content published in the article. I would just like to know if you could site out what specific parts of the article need appropriate references and I would be happy to add them. Thanks! - DONALDderosa (talk) 01:25, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Welcome from STiki!

Hello, Lugia2453, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison to other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 10:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyright

Hi. FYI: we never want to PROD copyright violations. Blatant infringements like this one should either be simply removed from the article immediately, or tagged for speedy deletion under section G12 if no substantive content would remain if the copied content was removed. Less-blatant violations (close paraphrasing, etc.) are a bit more tricky, but should at least be tagged for another editor if you are unsure what to do. See Text Copyright Violations 101 for a brief overview of the subject. We just don't want to PROD, because PRODed articles stay around for seven days - copyvios are illegal as opposed to mere violations of internal policy so they have to be deleted immediately. Respectfully. NTox · talk 17:02, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

I'm having problem with my submisson on "Comment SPAM Wiper". I fail to understand why Akismet gets approved and has totally unreliable sources cited and why my submission, which has proper citations, gets declined. What more independant and reliable sources can I list when over 2.500 sites uses "Comment SPAM Wiper"? And why Akismet is notable and Comment SPAM Wiper is not?

Hope you will enlighten me. Thank you, Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alextrout (talk • contribs) 07:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Issue regarding acceptance of new Wiki article: Harry Crews - Survival is Triumph Enough

Hi. I'm writing with the hope that you will offer some guidance on the following: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harry Crews: Survival is Triumph Enough. I based the formatting for this new article on the entries in the list of documentary films, and after further review, I do not see how my new article is lacking. In fact, some of the currently approved documentaries listed include no sourcing at all. Thank You. --Mycotn (talk) 10:21, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Comment SPAM Wiper submission

Hi,

  How wordpress website, programableweb (API directory) and Trac project are not independant? What do you mean by independant?

Alextrout (talk) 17:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Gyula Koi

Hi! What is the problem with this entry? There are many reliable sources. This scholar exists, he is a living person. Why I must to waiting for the validating of my entry? This entry exists in Hungarian Wikipedia, too... (In Hungarian, the name order is reversecompared to the Western name order, please, search "Koi Gyula". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alkabala (talk • contribs) 20:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your kindness:-). I cited three different other sources... Alkabala

So, I finished my contribution on Gyula Koi. I would like to request the validation of this work, as the normal Wikipedia entries... Alkabala —Preceding undated comment added 11:37, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

recent article for submission

Hi I'm new to Wikipedia, have updated some content ok but would like to submit a page, the article was rejected & I'd like some guidance as to why please? I can't actually see the reasons why on the comments, but I'm probably looking in the wrong place...

Thanks Helen HelenLandon (talk) 11:39, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rodney M Bennett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richmond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Dyslexia: A Hoistic Understanding and Medical Treatment

Thank you for your rapid response. To comply, several questions remain: 1-How many more secondary sources would be satisfactory? Clearly, hundreds are possible, although many have been included which refer to hundreds more. 2-Since only primary sources establishing & clarifying the role of the cerebellum & related vestibular function in dyslexia existed for approximately two decades prior to secondary validations, are you also suggesting these primary sources be minimized? 3-Would not an encyclopedic presentation tend to make this discussion & topic more difficult for the average WIKIPEDIA reader?

Thanks for your guidance. Harold Levinson, MD (talk) 18:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)HNL

hey

i do not have an account since im not a regular user of wikipedia. sometimes i perform an edit if i see something that could use a touch up or something i know is wrong. though for the last day i have been told all my edit are auto marked vandilisim...i haven't even made any edits in over 3 months. why have i been targeted for something i didn't do? just thought i would say that since i have no account i have no idea on how you could reply.....

thank you for takeing the time though i was surpised to get one. i'll make an account next time i try to edit. i didnt know that about the IP, im sorry for whatever trouble you were ccased. seems like you guys have your handsfull around here. have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.78.225.234 (talk) 23:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank You

I would like to thank you for fixing the vandalism on the coat of arms of Mexico page. I was trying to revert the page back to its normal text but I couldn't figure out how. Anyway thank you a lot sir. --ImFromCuliacan (talk) 01:27, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

official watson

CAN SOMEONE MAKE A PAGE ABOUT OFFICIAL WATSON THE RAPPER. PLEASE.74.5.125.5 (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

hi

why did u change my edits???? dont u dare!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glivaja (talk • contribs) 04:15, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Airglow rejection

Hi, you've just declined my article on airglow HPA. Can you please clarify your reasons. The first line of your message suggests that the subject isn't noteworthy enough to be included in wikipedia, but your comment at the end suggest that the references aren't good enough. Which is it? (or maybe it's both?). Also can you clarify your comment about the references, are you saying a) the facts mentioned in the article can't be found in the references, or b) the source referenced don't seem to be from prestigious enough sources and therefore can't be relied upon? I do have other sources for the article, these are the minutes of presentations given by the Royal Aeronautical Society about Airglow, however these minutes were emailed to me as text documents, so I can't add a link to them or really prove their accuracy, so basically my best references for this article are useless! Can you suggest how to proceed? If there are only a couple of facts/references you don't like, can you just tell me which ones and I'll remove them (or maybe you could remove them yourself?) Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by LimaSeven (talk • contribs) 09:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Airglow resubmission

Hi, I've added some references to BBC articles that mention airglow and to a Guardian Newpaper article from last year. Hopefully this will demonstrate the notability of the subject. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by LimaSeven (talk • contribs) 16:22, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

William Turner Davey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Acton, Landseer, St Pancras, Holloway, Lady Butler and Alexander Johnstone

Carl Claude Welch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Purple Hearts

Jeff Truman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Last Man Standing

Jonathan Crow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Prince George

Renz Julian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rapid City

Ruth Livier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Showtime

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter

Hey Lugia2453. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:43, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Magnate Magazine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kings Cross and Liverpool Street

Mundos opuestos (Colombia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chilean

Walter W. Stone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to La Trobe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

I need your support

Hi Sir,

 Thanks for your immediate reply.

If you list out me 3 to 4 reasons, then it would be great for myself in article writing.

http://webchat.freenode.net I have given the nick name. here I am not able to interact with any one else?

May I know the reason.

I am waiting for your reply.

Manuscript Pen Co Ltd resubmission

I have added additional information and references which I hope demonstrates that this submission is noteworthy. As this is my first article on Wikipedia, I am trying to understand the rules and am very grateful for your assistance Malissastockbridge (talk) 12:33, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Drafts

I have created a draft(not Grace Wells) a while back, but I can't remember the name of it. Is there any way I could find it?--Lucky102 (talk) 16:17, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes thank you.--Lucky102 (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

We made the exact same edit at the same time

The vandalism revert at UFC on Fuel TV: Struve vs. Miocic. No edit conflict, it's just like my edit never happened. I'm not complaining, since the result is the same, just pointing it out because I've never seen that happen before. Maybe you haven't either. Thought it was an interesting coincidence. Anyway, take care.
LlamaAl (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:MMA

Thanks for helping to make MMA articles on wikipedia better! In September 168 people made a total of 956 edits to MMA articles. I noticed you havn't listed yourself on the WikiProject Mixed martial arts Participants page. Take a look, sign up, and don't forget to say hi on the talk page. Kevlar (talk) 04:04, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Can you help this guy?

All I can understand he created a BLP article which was an attack page. Can you help this guy: Special:FeedbackDashboard/51230? --Tito Dutta ✉ 17:39, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pingpu peoples, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Taoyuan County and Houli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	thank you Hymath1234 (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

A thank you to you too! Lugia2453 (talk) 17:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thank You for not deleting the Selection of CaptainSparklez I really appreciate it. From, Alexchar Alexchar (talk) 03:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Declined article

Hi Lugia2453

I recently created this page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/testForBot which you declined. The page was not intended to be declined neither accepted. It was a test page for me to try a bot and help improve the bot, specifically this one: Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script.

I contacted on #wikipedia-en-help what would be the better approach to deal with this, since I couldn't tested the bot on my pc, due to it use wikipedia scripts. It was told me that creating a page saying it is a test for the bot would be ok. Can you please revert this decision? I need the page to test the bot... (and the page must be specifically on the state I left it, waiting for submission.)

With the amount of articles waiting for creation, at least give me more 2 or 3 days... I'm sure it will not arrive the first 200 more recent articles to be reviewed on this period of time... Thanks Jorgecarleitao (talk) 23:10, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Jorgecarleitao (talk) 23:14, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi Lugia2453. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Yunshui 雲‍水 09:32, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for ruining your work

Sorry for ruining your work Lugia 2453 my cousin was playing on my laptop and undid your work and put stupid things on it. I'm very sorry about it and I'll give my cousin some words. I'll be thankful if you would forgive me.

By Alienzjokerz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alienzjokerz (talk • contribs) 18:03, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Sarcasm Edit

This picture clearly belongs on the Sarcasm page because it is an excellent example of someone making a sarcastic facial expression.

File:Kevin Sarcasm.jpg

The visual definition of sarcasm

KevLynch2012 (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)KevLynch2012

Thanks Lugia2453

I was trying to prove to one of my instructors the reliability of Wikipedia. By editing the British Isles page you changed it back in under two minutes, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noahkoch (talk • contribs) 18:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Apologies

Lugia, I am sorry for my possible misinterpretation about a religious topic concerning a certain scientist named 'John' At first I thought it was based upon possible discrimination, but after review of the second pillar of Wikipedia, I have learned that it is a site of pure unbiased, resourceful, free information.

From, a person without an official wikipedia account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.10.196.201 (talk) 19:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate

your recent vandal fighting edit at Karl Blossfeldt, which, for some reason draws a lot of vandalism for an article of its size, shape, sexual orientation, creed and nation of origin. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

IEDM wiki page help

Hello. Can you please clarify why this post was not accepted so i can make the necessary changes for approval?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlspangl (talk • contribs) 20:23, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

THANK YOU

Thabks for your help for taking care of that jerk who was vandlizing my page Digifan23 (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of How long is a sea snake

Hey, Lugia! Nothing wrong here, I was just wondering: I see that you tagged this through HeartGold Huggle, judging by the edit summary. It had already been tagged through the Page Curation tool, eleven minutes earlier; did you see any indication of this in Huggle? Page Curation uses a different set of templates (redirects to the normal ones, actually), and I'm wondering if Huggle doesn't pick them up because of that. It's been a while since I've used Huggle, so I don't really remember what it does in terms of that. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:35, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Re:October 2012

Hi, thank you very much for messaging me. I'm actually the guy who created the Memory Lane... Best Of McFly page but im not logged in and i have just found that there is another page under the same title, same info etc. and is Memory Lane: The Best of McFly, so if you're an admin could you please put up the Memory Lane... Best Of McFly for deletion.

Thanks & best regards

85.211.137.185 18:23, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Bay City Rollers

I recently removed a link from the Bay City Roller wiki page because the person that runs that site has been known to sell bootleg material of the band and is using wiki to do so.I am new to wiki and didnt realise that I had to give a reason Squashy778 (talk) 19:05, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

yeah I realise I removed the catagory by mistake but there was only ever one link ..which I thought was strange considering it was that one ..so how do i get it removed ? Squashy778 (talk) 21:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Steve Jobs

I misread your edit on Steve Jobs' biography. I read it as 'reverted edits by Rex425 AND nbanato(HG))'. Please accept my apologies.

Cheers, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbanato (talk • contribs) 08:57, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Jimmy Savile

why is the edit at Jimmy Savile regarded as vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.4.222 (talk) 20:29, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

cant answer?

It has a quoted source it is not vandalism _20:33, 13 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.4.222 (talk)

number one fan?.... did Jim Fix it for you? stop being so partial.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.200.118 (talk) 21:58, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

again, a failure to answer.....makes you sound biased, saville is getting very bad press, this is not a BLP issue — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.200.118 (talk) 22:03, 14 October 20 12 (UTC)

I tahe it 3rr doesn't apply to you, friend of savile?

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South County High School, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages FCPS and West Springfield High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Please ease up off of the 'AutoDelete' button before you actually READ the article...

The article The Bra Doctor was submitted and flagged for automatic deletion with a speed that belies the user's ability to actually READ the material that was submitted. If you skimmed the submission and found an objectionable section, then a simple Talk message would have been appreciated. I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A DELETION DISCUSSION on this and any future submissions since this is NOT an advertisement, but an article about a REAL individual who has performed the REAL actions alleged in the article. I am NOT the individual in question, but am drafting this as part of a larger article base in order to document the existence of this individual, her accomplishments and the existence of this type of do-it-yourself-entrepreneur. Incidentally, the model for The Bra Doctor Article was taken directly from the Martha Stewart Article, which has a similar voice, premise and subtext. I wanted to return to add references about The Bra Doctor later this evening; however, your actions have now made that impossible. A brief skim of your own talk messages shows that I am not the only new user to have this same experience with your quick finger trigger. Please return the article, The Bra Doctor, to my userspace so that I can edit it in my sandbox. Thank you TeriLeDantec (talk) 19:11, 16 October 2012 (UTC) N.B. You also did not have to add a UserPage or TalkPage to my account since one already existed; I worked this article first in my own sandbox.

• Contact an admin. I'm not an admin, so I can't undelete articles. When you write an article, you don't want to make it sound promotional like "The Bra Doctor" was. Even though it was an article about an individual, it sounded more promotional than encyclopedic, which was why it was deleted. You'll want to read Wikipedia:Your first article if you haven't already done so. Lugia2453 (talk) 19:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Luigi, your assertion that 'it sounded more promotional than encyclopedic' is an OPINION and not a fact. The assertions that were advanced in the Article were FACTS and not opinions. Voilà la difference! I did read the Guidelines, How-Tos, etc. When you review an article, you'll want to keep an open mind and actually READ the entire article before you pull the delete trigger. Otherwise, you might want to let someone who might be a better fit for the task at hand perform this responsibility objectively. Remember, each Article represents time that someone has invested in Wikipedia in an attempt to educate other people about a particular subject; that represents their precious TIME spent away from their family, friends and other equally pressing activities; it's not nice to throw that away without a basic exchange of civility. TeriLeDantec (talk) 20:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Comment: Lugia2453 was acting 100% appropriately in tagging the article for deletion. Had any attempt been made to purge the promotional material and retain only the encyclopedic material, little to nothing would have remained. Being the truth (and even having refs) does not overcome the fundamental flaw that the article was written in a highly promotional tone that would require a fundamental rewrite to overcome. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Barek, Thanks for joining the discussion. As I mentioned to Luigi, 'it's not nice to throw that [a person's time/efforts] away without a basic exchange of civility.' I asked Luigi to read before he/she hits the delete button, and then, to grant a New User a Deletion Discussion...neither of which are unreasonable requests in a global, grass-roots, 'free-information' forum; nor did they necessitate intervention from anyone other than the intended reader. What's more: this is not a new concern that I raise, or is it one that has not been raised by another more seasoned member of the WIKITeam prior to my commentary; to wit SionK's comments entitled Your recent actions at Articles for Creation. Again, I respectfully requested that my article be restored to my personal Sandbox where it could be supported by media article references which cite the very same facts forwarded in my Article. But, THANK YOU for your objective, unbiased feedback; which, of course, you had the delicate sensibilities to frame in the most considerate and supportive of manners. I can only hope that the other members of the WIKITeam are able to interact with a bit more tact. After all, most humane individuals would agree that there is no need to kick an effort when it is already dead and moot. TeriLeDantec (talk) 00:45, 19 October 2012 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by TeriLeDantec (talk • contribs) 00:43, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: August: Osage County (film)

I removed the summary from the page on the film because A. The film is not out yet and B. It is unnecessary to spoil the plot on the film's page, as the plot is already completely laid out on the page for the original play. It seems superfluous to have the summary on the film's page, especially when the plot could be tweaked for the film version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.240.47 (talk) 00:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for protecting my user page. I appreciate it. Go Phightins! 01:21, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you for reverting that nonsense on my talk page. (: Webclient101 (talk) 22:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)