Jump to content

User talk:Liquidluck: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Itayb1 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Liquidluck is a loser!
'''Image concerns archives:''' [[User:Liquidluck/imagearchive1|first]]
'''Image concerns archives:''' [[User:Liquidluck/imagearchive1|first]]



Revision as of 03:55, 5 February 2010

Liquidluck is a loser! Image concerns archives: first

Talk page archives: first second third

Thank you very much

Hello, Liquidluck. You have new messages at Ladybrainbypass's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have replied to you via my talk page. I apologize if I have made a mistake in posting this reply here. Thanks again! Ladybrainbypass (talk --Ladybrainbypass --Ladybrainbypass (talk) 15:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Leather

Thanks for the feedback. I'm working with the author of the image to get you the proper permission to use the image. I will work on cleaning up the references by added the missing information as suggested. Thank you and I will have those changes done shortly. --Azlord (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Garth Jones

Thanks for the comments, I was a little concerned about my objectivity too and will include references where the text sounds a little glowing and revisit my style. Can I ask a few questions that I was not able to answer through the Help (maybe I didn't try hard enough)? I have now included an external link to an article in French Wikipedia (Jerome Doucet) - can this be included in the English text through the usual [[]] technique? I tried, even with the correct French accents, but it went "red". I should also allow the artist to be referenced as the shortened "Garth Jones", how do I do that? Thanks again, GarthJones (talk) 10:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could've Been You

Hi Liquidluck!, the Could've Been You article needs more edits? Kekkomereq4 (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry- I've been meaning to finish that GA review. Thanks for the reminder, I'll do it next. Liqudlucktalk 19:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work! I've taken a look and added a few more comments on the talk page. Liqudlucktalk 00:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I've done all, but you can check my english?

P.S. Can you also help me with this review Hell on Wheels (song)? Kekkomereq4 (talk) 20:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a few more comments to the CBY GAR. I'll take a look at Hell On Wheels tomorrow. Liqudlucktalk 02:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC) I[reply]
Ok I've done all, and very thank you for the check :-) Kekkomereq4 (talk) 10:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work, I've really appreciated your help! Kekkomereq4 (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cynthia Cozette Lee

Thank you very much for your insightful critique of my article http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Lezahstar/Cynthia_Cozette_Lee on the composer, Cozette. Would you please let me know how I can contact or find an editor that deals with composers so that I can further develop my article to a workable piece suitable for Wikipedia? I came across the Wikipedia Composer Project but I was not certain how I can contact them about considering an article on Cozette. Perhaps you could provide me some information. Again thank you.Lezahstar (talk) 04:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Heston

Thank you very much for your comments! I've added third-party references and removed the text that seemed to resume-ish. Do you have any recommendations for further changes that would make the article suitable for Wikipedia? Thanks! Resumerenovators (talk) 20:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)ResumeRenovators[reply]

DYK for All Is Love

Updated DYK query On January 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article All Is Love, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

talk page does not need sources; topic is relevant to her bio.

I would agree if (1) the edit was framed as a suggested improvement for the article (which is the purpose of the talk page) and (2) the edit was not potentially contentious to a living person. The spirit, if not the letter, of WP:BLP must surely apply to all wikipedia content. -- Timberframe (talk) 23:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the messages; I've also replied to you on the talk page of the Miley Cyrus article.
I should have explained myself better on either your or the article's talk page when I undid your edit; since I've been writing the article for The Last Song (film), I've read more about their relationship than I would like (every search for "the last song" turns up articles on them). I therefore already knew of the HQ RS sources discussing their relationship (satisfying BLP), and reasoned that the contributor was a fan who, in good faith, wanted the info to be included- Cyrus' past relationships are already there. I also felt that reverting the very first edit of a new contributor with a summary containing "frankly who cares" was a bit bitey. I decided to open a discussion on the information- but I recognize that I should have included sources myself. I've now done that, so thank you for the reminder. Liqudlucktalk 06:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about my biting the newbie. Like you, my reaction was conditioned by my recent experience. Much of my wikitime is spent reverting deliberate vandalism and in particular WP:BLP violations, much of which occurs in articles which also attract "fanzine-style" edits (non-notable, unsourced, gossip with little, if any, long term importance to the article). Too often I forget to switch from whack-a-mole mode to patienty, nurturing, gently correcting mode, so thanks for reminding me! All the best -- Timberframe (talk) 09:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift discography

Hey! Can you comment on Talk:Taylor Swift discography#Issues with new version. Please comment soon. It's this whole commotion with an editor. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 21:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When I Look at You

Hey! Liquid, I think it'd be appropriate for an article for "When I Look at You". It will be released soon and here's the single cover. It already charted in Canada and there's enough information. Do you want to make the page or will you wait for someone else to make it? I don't know myself if to do it since it's constantly going to be under the watch of IPs and inexperienced users but maybe we could stop it with hard work and a semi-protection. Also, I think it's time to discuss wether Meet Miley Cyrus is her debut album or just a soundtrack on Talk:Miley Cyrus discography and raise some other points about that and Hannah Montana discography. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 22:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussions are up now and please comment. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 23:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
When I Look at You was already a redirect, so I went ahead and made it a stub. It's at 1172 characters; 400 more and it can be a dyk- let's work on it. I'll comment on the discussions later, and what exactly do you mean by Beautiful Eyes personnel? Liqudlucktalk 00:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great, I'll totally help and by the personnel I mean the credits. Check in Hannah Montana: The Movie (soundtrack). Also, should we have the citation dates as "January 9, 2010" or "2010-01-09". I don't know. I think it should match the rest of her single pages with the first. Also, you did the title with all capitals. Was that on purpose? -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 00:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't care how the dates are formatted; the ones that are there already are cut and pasted from the Last Song article. You can change it if you'd like. It was a complete mistake putting the article at When I Look At You; I meant to put it at When I Look at You. I actually went to the latter later, and got all confused because I didn't realize I put the info at the wrong caps :P Liqudlucktalk 20:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, I added an infobox but do you want to work the article immediately. I guess I can, though taking it slowly because I can't start on Miley Cyrus discography until I disccuss my most important edits on the talk page. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 23:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can take care of it. Don't feel forced to work on the same pages I'm doing unless you want to, and I'll try to do the same for yours =]. Liqudlucktalk 23:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's O.K. I can help but not before I finish Miley and Hannah discographies. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last Christmas#Ashley tisdale (Alternate cover)

Dear Liquidluck, I need you to take this reference http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/B001202T8S/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=163856011&s=dmusic and make this as the alternate cover for the Ashley Tisdale version of "Last Christmas". Please do this. I beg of you. This is the alternate cover and Amazon.com cover of Tisdale's version of Last "Christmas". Label the this cover as the Alternate cover and Amazon cover. from Dbunkley6. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbunkley6 (talkcontribs) 18:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming good faith is overall a good policy, but consider a few questions.
  1. Why won't Dbunkley6 make this change himself?
  2. Why is this image in the "Customer Provided" image area for an MP3? If it was a real alternate cover, wouldn't it show up as a standard image?
  3. Is it possible that someone is trying to trick you into making a malicious or false edit?
  4. Even if you think all the above is innocent, how could this image possible make it past WP:NFCC#8?—Kww(talk) 21:13, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kww(talk) 21:13, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wine rating methodologies

Hi, it's good to see the wine rating article appear. In my opinion that's a much-needed topic. Until you included that reference to Robert Parker's wine rating methodology, I had no idea how he rated wine.

If you can find sources for other methodologies, it would be good to describe each one briefly in the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad the article is useful, but I've actually only patrolled the article and moved it from the plural title to the singluar title; the actual author is [[::User:DalekAGB|DalekAGB]] (talk · contribs)- as he/she is a new user, I'm sure he'll be happy to receive constructive criticism. Liqudlucktalk 19:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THE PARTY'S JUST BEGUN

DEAR LIQUIDLUCK, I NEED YOU TO TAKE THIS REFERECENCE, WHICH HAS AN IMAGE(http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B000LPS3TE/sr=8-12/qid=1263584508/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=229816&s=music&qid=1263584508&sr=8-12} AND MAKE IT AS THE COVER FOR THE CHEETAH GIRLS SONG "The Party's Just Begun". PLEASE DO THIS. KWW WOULDN'T DO IT FOR ME. I DON'T KNOW HOW TO MAKE IMAGES ON WIKIPEDIA. FROM DBUNKLEY6 talk.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Dobermann
Runology
Hymir
Penrith High School
Tomte
Camauro
Sydney Secondary College
You Lucky Dog
Martha
Devil's Millhopper Geological State Park
Balder
Heretic II
Ghansoli
Sanpada
Up Close & Personal
Turbhe
Agrarian Party of Russia
Fyrisvellir
Ginnungagap
Cleanup
Hunter School of the Performing Arts
Queen (album)
Hurlstone Agricultural High School
Merge
Svartálfar
Billy Ray Cyrus
Kumquat
Add Sources
Caringbah High School
Sefton High School
Smith's Hill High School
Wikify
The Emperor's New School
Gender identity
Navi Mumbai
Expand
Asgard
Thomas the Rhymer
Joan Cusack

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Evans

Thanks for sorting out that title for Peter Evans. I certainly hadn't intended to create two articles. It was my first attempt at creating an article and I got into a bit of trouble with the template. No idea why. HiLo48 (talk) 06:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chrnoicles of the Nerds

Thanks for the input. I've changed a few things around on the entry, and hope it's now more suitable as an encyclopedia entry. If you get a chance, can you check it out again and see if there is anything else needing to be changes? Thanks. Emb92 (talk) 22:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since they are somewhat new, all of the sources that I listed were really the only ones available. But, can it remain a user page until more credible sources become available? I'm sure this will happen before long. Emb92 (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Signature

Hey Liquidluck, I randomly noticed that you're missing an i in "Liquid" in your signature! : D – Kerαunoςcopiatalk 00:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, that's embarrassing. I've fixed it now, thanks! Liquidlucktalk 00:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My first star! Thanks a lot, Liquidluck! Your "underlined" i didn't go unnoticed ; ) – Kerαunoςcopiatalk 02:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THE PARTY'S JUST BEGUN 2

DEAR LIQUIDLUCK. ON FRIDAY (JANUARY 15, 2010) I ASKED YOU TO TAKE THE FAVOR THAT I SEND TO YOU ON THAT DAY. MY FAVOR WAS NEVER DONE AND YOU YOU NEVER RESPONED. PLEASE GO TO YOUR TALK SECTION WITH THE TITLE THE PARTY'S JUST BEGUN. THERE, YOU'LL FIND THAT I ASKED YOU TAKE THE PICTURE FROM THE REFERENCE AND TURN IT INTO THE COVER FOR THE CHEETAH GIRLS SONG "The Party's Just Begun". PLEASE DO THIS FAVOR FO ME. I DON'T KNOW HOW TO UPLOAD A PICTURE FILE. FROM Dbunkley6...talk

Citing Sources

Quick question on citing my sources. If there is an article in which I know information from personal experience, or by contact with individuals being represented by the article, how would I go by editing these topics without my information being quickly removed for lack of citation. Keep in mind the information source is myself and there is no previous documentation. Thank you. Antony11031989 (talk) 07:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Citing Sources

Thank you for the information and your quick response.Antony11031989 (talk) 06:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds of the Season

Hey Liquid! I'm doing the article for Sounds of the Season: The Taylor Swift Holiday Collection and I desperately need the personnel for the EP. I can't seem to find it or any digital booklet to download on the Internet. Same thing for Beautiful Eyes. Got any clue?? -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 06:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. Thanks -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 22:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that "Crazier" is still open. I have not seen anything for "7 Things". I saw "Butterfly Fly Away" but had not got around to doing the review. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 22:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah... I have it almost finished. I'm missing like one comment which we're discussing. I'll wrap it up in a few minutes. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 22:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just looked and You'll Always has a review started. I'll do that. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 22:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

7 things GAN

Extremely sorry, got hold up. Will do it today for sure. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The New York times article talks about what is "assumed" to have happened. Due to confidentiality and employee rights, the Lab refused to make any public statements confirming or denying the rumor. Leaves a whole lots of ambiguity for the person attacked, but that is what it is. I am not personally involved with NIF in any way! I just want to have this good person's name cleared up and reading it here in wikipedia seems unfair when there is no way to refute the claim. the references to the GAO report are not complete and Campbell's rebuttal to the claim is not stated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsure (talkcontribs) 20:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Article

It's been about a month since we worked on an article together. I'm currently working on Taylor Swift's debut album on User:Ipodnano05/Sandbox4. Wanna join? Of course, if your not busy. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 19:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

7 Things again

Replied at the GA page. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Alba archives

I am not sure if you are watching her talk or not, but I replied.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Miley Cyrus articles

I logged on today and noticed many articles created for non-notable songs and others which just cannot warrant an article. We should nominate them for deletion. I don't know how to, though. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 22:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]