Jump to content

User talk:Kralizec!/Archive 2009: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
HexaChord (talk | contribs)
29,105 edits
m Reverted edits by 99.141.59.31 to last revision by Dusti (HG)
Wsedr (talk | contribs)
11 edits
←Replaced content with 'Get off Qwertgb's tail you no good nosey pervert or I'll slap you silly!'
Line 1: Line 1:
Get off Qwertgb's tail you no good nosey pervert or I'll slap you silly!
{{Administrator}}


{{User talk:Kralizec!/Talk header}}
<!--Please add new messages to the BOTTOM of the page-->
<!--Please add {{talkback}} templates to the "Talkback sink" section below-->

== Talkback sink ==
Please drop all {{tl|talkback}} type messages (aka "I have responded to your message on my own talk page") in '''this''' section. Thanks, [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 05:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

{{talkback|Call me Bubba}}
{{Talkback|kotra|RE: AIV report declined}}
{{talkback|Zvika|RE: AIV report declined}}
{{talkback|Wpwatchdog|Thank you}}
{{reply|PatPeter|Friendly note regarding talk page messages}}

== What is your problem deleting "Chicago Film Producers Alliance" ==
We were still discussing this page. What is your problem deleting it?--[[User:ATurnerIII|ATurnerIII]] ([[User talk:ATurnerIII|talk]]) 17:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
:I don't care for a subjective and inconsistent process. And the fact that you and others have group think and banded together to delete the article is more evidence of the site's weakness. Sure, I can have more 3rd party article written about CFPA and will. In fact, they are being writting now. But, it's too late. This has become a legal issue. I'm in contact with my attornies about antitrusut violations and soon will contact the site's owner. You can't accept other similar groups for different reasons and selectively reject CFPA. It's illegal. And rest assured, when the summons are issued, your name will be on one.--[[User:ATurnerIII|ATurnerIII]] ([[User talk:ATurnerIII#top|talk]]) 00:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

== Paki90 ==
Hmmm ... I'm inclined to [[WP:AGF|extend a little good faith]], after reading his talk page message. But he must understand that this is his absolute last chance, and even one slip-up will result in an indefblock with no preliminaries. [[User:Blueboy96|Blueboy]][[User talk:Blueboy96|96]] 15:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
:Yeah, that should work ... how many other admins besides us are waiting with raised banhammers for this guy? [[User:Blueboy96|Blueboy]][[User talk:Blueboy96|96]] 18:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
::Just wondering ... I don't think we'd have too much trouble getting support for a ban if it came to that, since the community has very little tolerance for that kind of behavior. So let's present it to him--take it or leave it. [[User:Blueboy96|Blueboy]][[User talk:Blueboy96|96]] 18:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

== Thanks ==
Thanks for your nice message. I appreciate the time you took and your contacting me about it. Have a happy New Year!--[[User:RandomHumanoid|<font color = "green">'''R'''</font><font color = "blue">andom</font><font color = "green">'''H'''</font><font color = "blue">umanoid</font>]]<sup>([[User_talk:RandomHumanoid|<font color="crimson">&rArr;</font>]])</sup> 18:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

: But I will add, that was actually a rather impressive hoax attempt. Given the effort that must have gone into writing those lengthy articles, I suspect someone was trying to measure how long a blatant hoax can pass unnoticed here. :) --[[User:RandomHumanoid|<font color = "green">'''R'''</font><font color = "blue">andom</font><font color = "green">'''H'''</font><font color = "blue">umanoid</font>]]<sup>([[User_talk:RandomHumanoid|<font color="crimson">&rArr;</font>]])</sup> 18:57, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

==Wow==
Wow - it's so uncluttered here, and it takes just a moment to load. I see you take the same attitude towards archiving as the people in the Middle Ages had towards baths - once a year, whether you need it or not!--<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype">[[User:Kubigula|Kubigula]] ''([[User talk:Kubigula|talk]])''</span> 19:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

== Collateral damage from Angelo de la Paz block ==
{{user|Sanada Yuki-kun}} is requesting exemption from the autoblock. He seems legit. Can you review? [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 15:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

==Talk page comments==
thanks for your comment, I was told by another admin ages ago that official block notices should be left on the page, especially whilst this block is in force. this user has had a recent history of extensive vandalism and has been warned on several occasions. blanking the page gives the reader no indication of this. [[User:Michellecrisp|Michellecrisp]] ([[User talk:Michellecrisp|talk]]) 22:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

== geek ==
come on you fat bitch why are u going round deleting peoples wikipedia pages if were just trying to spread the word of Kosu u little faggot get a life why would u spend all ur time goin round wikipedia editing i mean seriously ur "college sweetheart" must be so fat that u cant have sex with her so u wank off to editing wiki instead <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Swaaaaan|Swaaaaan]] ([[User talk:Swaaaaan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Swaaaaan|contribs]]) 10:01, 9 January 2009</span><!-- Template:Unsigned2 -->
:Meet my friend [[WP:RBI]]. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 15:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
::I agree, This guy is sad, He has go no life so he gets his kicks out of deleting peoples pages and then blocking them because hes afraid of CONFLICT! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Seahorse Kosu|Seahorse Kosu]] ([[User talk:Seahorse Kosu|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Seahorse Kosu|contribs]]) 08:28, 12 January 2009</span><!-- Template:Unsigned2 -->

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008) ==
The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Outreach/Newsletter December 2008|December 2008 issue]]''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by [[User:BrownBot|BrownBot]] ([[User talk:BrownBot|talk]]) 03:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)</small>

== RE:Message at [[User talk:195.158.85.3]] ==
Erm it was only 10 minutes after he had been blocked not 31 hours. The anonblock template only provides more information. I had accidently supplied a warning when the i.p. was blocked so I felt it was the right thing to do. [[User:Freakmighty|FM]]&nbsp;<small>[&nbsp;[[User_talk:Freakmighty|<span style="color:#000000">talk to me</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Freakmighty|<span style="color:#000000">show contributions</span>]]&nbsp;]</small>&nbsp; 11:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
:I just had a look and a message has come up which advises to use that template. A bit too late now. [[User:Freakmighty|FM]]&nbsp;<small>[&nbsp;[[User_talk:Freakmighty|<span style="color:#000000">talk to me</span>]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Freakmighty|<span style="color:#000000">show contributions</span>]]&nbsp;]</small>&nbsp; 18:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

== banner==
I am not under any ban or warning. please do not keep putting the isp banner on my page as it violates my privacy. I will continue to remove it. [[Special:Contributions/69.14.244.157|69.14.244.157]] ([[User talk:69.14.244.157|talk]]) 20:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

== Please help! ==
User Ronz is continually harassing me on my talk page! Can you please do something about this? He's not an administrator and has a personal vendetta against me. [[Special:Contributions/69.14.244.157|69.14.244.157]] ([[User talk:69.14.244.157|talk]]) 20:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS John Stagg]] ==
Hi, this article has been nominated for del.--[[User:Jmundo|J.Mundo]] ([[User talk:Jmundo|talk]]) 02:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

== AIV report declined ==

Hi Kralizec! (I guess I'm excited to talk to you). Concerning your comment [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=263633181&oldid=263633064 here], how should the user have been warned differently? No worries if you're busy, I'm just curious so I don't make more bad reports. -[[User:Kotra|kotra]] ([[User talk:Kotra|talk]]) 19:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

== That doesn't work ==

And it was very foolish of you to try <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.120.155.90|124.120.155.90]] ([[User talk:124.120.155.90|talk]]) 11:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Removal of warnings - question ==

Thanks for your message; Regarding the policy on removal of warnings from talk pages in [[WP:USER]}...was that a recent change, or has it always been in place? I was involved in a similar case some time ago and the user in question ended up being blocked. Thanks. -- [[User:Gmatsuda|Gmatsuda]] ([[User talk:Gmatsuda|talk]]) 16:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

: Since you already answered this on [[WP:AIV]], please feel free to disregard. :-) -- [[User:Gmatsuda|Gmatsuda]] ([[User talk:Gmatsuda|talk]]) 16:05, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Check out one of the versions of [[User talk:68.192.223.254]] that has the numerous vandalism warnings. The user blatantly vandalized two articles and then decided to be much more subtle in his/her vandalism by changing numbers in articles. The vandalism warnings came after the editor was asked to stop doing that because it doesn't conform to [[WP:MOSNUM]]. Despite that, the edits continued. At that point, vandalism warnings appeared to be the only course of action. Hope that helps. -- [[User:Gmatsuda|Gmatsuda]] ([[User talk:Gmatsuda|talk]]) 16:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

: Hmmm...thought it was just warnings, not block notices as well, that could be removed. Sorry. -- [[User:Gmatsuda|Gmatsuda]] ([[User talk:Gmatsuda|talk]]) 23:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

== [[M.I.A. (artist)]] ==

Can I have some help here please, a potentially very big BLP problem, I'm trying to keep the material off the article until/if it is sufficiently sourced. [[WP:RFPP]] is backlogged. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 04:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

==Your response to my [[WP:AIV]] report...==
is currently being discussed on [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Severe_personal_attacks_bordering_on_vandalism]]. [[User:Kristen Eriksen|<font color="FF7700">'''The</font> <font color="FF4400">Nordic</font> <font color="red">Goddess</font> <font color="FF0066">Kristen'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kristen Eriksen|<font color="FF0099">Worship her</font>]]</sup> 05:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

== Hung ==

Will you un-delete [[Hung (Napalm Death)]]. It was a single by the band, and it was released on a very notable [[Earache Records]]. It should never have been deleted through A7. [[User:Undead warrior|Undead Warrior]] ([[User talk:Undead warrior|talk]]) 10:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

== [[User talk:NightHunter35]] ==

Hello, and thank you for taking the time to read this message. I know that you have blocked this user once before, and was wondering if you could do something again. I do not necessarily mean blocking, but leaving a message of some sort as the user continues to delete the "track listing" from the [[Before I Self Destruct]] page. I have obviously tried to talk/warn this user numerous times, as have others, but this continues. If you can help, thank you. And if not, thank you anyway. <span>--'''[[User:JpGrB|H]][[User talk:JpGrB|E]][[User:JpGrB/My Userboxes|L]][[User:JpGrB/Articles I Created|L]]'''Ø Ŧ'''[[User:JpGrB/Wikiproject Wishlist|H]][[User:JpGrB/Sandbox/Archive 1|E]][[User:JpGrB/Sandbox|R]][[User:JpGrB/Sandbox 2|E]]'''</span> 18:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

== Talk Page Reverts ==

Thank you for reverting my innappropriate edits. I was not aware that anon users were permitted to remove warnings from their own talk pages. I will use more care in the future. [[User:Nutiketaiel|Nutiketaiel]] ([[User talk:Nutiketaiel|talk]]) 16:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

:That is certainly true. Well, I'll go back to doing my part to keep Wikipedia clean. [[User:Nutiketaiel|Nutiketaiel]] ([[User talk:Nutiketaiel|talk]]) 16:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | [[Image:Civility barnstar.png]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''Civility Award'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | [[user:Nutiketaiel|I]] hereby award this [[WP:BARN|Barnstar]] to [[user:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] for his great civility, courtesy and fairness when dealing with my inadvertant policy violations. He is a shining example of the [[WP:AGF|Assume Good Faith]] doctrine and how Admins should act towards users. Well done. [[User:Nutiketaiel|Nutiketaiel]] ([[User talk:Nutiketaiel|talk]]) 17:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
|}

You're welcome, and I meant every word of it. [[User:Nutiketaiel|Nutiketaiel]] ([[User talk:Nutiketaiel|talk]]) 18:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

== CSV article deleted ==

Why have you deleted "costly state verification article"?
Did you find some definition somewhere that is comparable?
Are you qualified to make this judgment?
Also, why you haven't deleted the [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Complete_contract] "Complete contract" article?
Why you are destroying the work that I've done which very few individuals are capable to do?
[[User:V sq|V sq]] ([[User talk:V sq|talk]]) 19:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

== Notability criteria ==

Please explain what you think would fit ''your'' "notability criteria?
Simple search on CSV provides over 160 thousands references to papers in major peer-reviewed scientific magazines.

And also, please explain why Complete contract article meets those criteria and this article doesn't.

I don't want to waste my time "improving" my already well-written article until I get some explanation due for the act of vandalism committed. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:V sq|V sq]] ([[User talk:V sq|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/V sq|contribs]]) 20:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Deletion review for [[:Costly_state_verification]]==
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Costly_state_verification|deletion review]] of [[:Costly_state_verification]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ -->
[[User:V sq|V sq]] ([[User talk:V sq|talk]]) 20:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

:Out of curiosity, what was the rationale for deleting it? The log says it's speedy under criterion A7, which does not apply. The comment also says expired prod. Which is applicable? —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 22:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

== [[Bob Muran]] ==

This is a blatant copyvio - how can you ''not'' speedy?&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 04:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

:OK you stubbified, no problem.&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 04:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Please take another look at this -- user has added back all the copyvio material.&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 16:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

== OTRS for Bob Muran ==

The ticket no. 2009012810027179 refers to the text and NOT the photo. --[[User:Zureks|Zureks]] ([[User talk:Zureks|talk]]) 16:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

== Re: Thanks! ==

No problem ;) [[User:Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FF0000">Inferno, </span>]] [[User talk:Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FFA500">Lord of </span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FFFF00">Penguins</span>]] 00:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

==75.108.73.219==
Many thanks on blocking that user. Take Care...<small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • February 2, 2009 @ 00:22</small>
:Thanks for the note. I actually didn't know that the policy included anon users too. I knew it included signed in account users like you and me, but I thought when it came to anons they weren't allowed to do so, hence my revision. I learned something there. Take Care...<small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • February 2, 2009 @ 01:14</small>

== Edit war ==

I am trying to improve the [[German Shepherd Dog‎]] article with a gallery and more and better pictures. The old ones does not illustrate the dog article well, being dark and unclear. User : Ameliorate is reverting the pictures. I removed one because it is uncertain if it should be in the article, (Young Alsatian and Sheperd mix) but the rest should stay.

He reverted them 3 times already :


14:41, 2 February 2009 Ameliorate! (Talk | contribs) (25,448 bytes) (→Description: rv photo back


01:31, 3 February 2009 Ameliorate! (Talk | contribs) (25,381 bytes) (there is more than


13:53, 3 February 2009 Ameliorate! (Talk | contribs) (25,381 bytes) (1) don't add a messy, ugly gallery


That gallery is not uggly.
And I think removing it is also constitutes vandalism.

[[User:Warrington|Warrington]] ([[User talk:Warrington|talk]]) 17:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. Ok, than that means that it is not vandalism, only an edit war. Sorry. The other editor seems to revert me without dicussing anything. I have to note that have been encouraged many times to add galleries to articles, when there was a lot of nice pictures which were not used in the article on Commons. That because many readers do not know how to find them. A dog article, I belive should show good pictures about the dog breed, I think this is one of the main reasons why people want to read dog articles. I think that pictures are an important part of the articles, wich, if you remove the pictures, will consist of a large amount of text without any visual documentation.

[[User:Warrington|Warrington]] ([[User talk:Warrington|talk]]) 19:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

== Not justified ==

I am not an administrator, however, I feel that you as an administrator has abused your authority for the blocking of Klasyays. One administrator declined the unblock request for the reason of a 'direct threat of harm'. When you read the Wikipedia polices to blocking it does not cover the type of comment made by Klasyays as the comment was not a direct threat of harm. Because the comment could have meant anything with no stating threat embedded within it, then multiple emotions could have arisen from the recipient, in this case it would seem the comment is threatening, but blocking someone when there is doubt of there true intentions is unjust to Wikipedia policies and an abuse of your administration. I hereby strongly request the immediate unblocking of this user. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shawtydoit|Shawtydoit]] ([[User talk:Shawtydoit|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shawtydoit|contribs]]) 05:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Hello from french user [[Arapaima]] ==

Hello Kralizec ! I am completing an article on WP:fr about [[Donald Thomson]] , an australian anthropologist (1901-1970) who worked on the ground and fought from the '30 to the '60 for Indigenous Australians rights recognition. I found your beautiful aerial view of Ranger Uranium Mine, and should like to know if you would accept its being deposited into [[Donald Thomson]] french article. BTW, what an amazing user's page is yours! Congrats, and hope I'll hear from you soon. --[[User:Arapaima|Arapaima]] ([[User talk:Arapaima|talk]]) 15:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

::Thanks a lot, "Kralizec!" for your allowance about "Kakadu U*-mine aerial photo". And for your humor & kindness too, which differ notably from "Justin"'s pertness (cf on my user-page, his reaction after I dared to blunder into his article about who founded the first european settlement on Falkland Islands : "I dont wish to dampen your enthusiasm...but I delete").Some tips if you travel again through francophone lands : 1/ blank looks can be easily transformed in latin-lover looks (to be used with parcimony though...). 2/ and here are 3 "phrases passe-partout" (master-key sentences) : with a woman : "Vous êtes trés jolie" (you are so pretty)- & with a man "Vous êtes trés sympa" (you are so nice) - & at the restaurant :"C'était trés bon" (it was so good). As I deduce from your discuss.-page that you are quite stolid, and as you already know "merci beaucoup", you ought to fare well.That's my wish; hope we meet again some other day... --[[User:Arapaima|Arapaima]] ([[User talk:Arapaima|talk]]) 16:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

== Thank You ==

Thanks for protecting the [[Erica Durance]] page. [[User:Rbanzai|Rob Banzai]] ([[User talk:Rbanzai|talk]]) 22:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

== Dune ==

Your vote pleased me a lot, as I'm devoted both to Frank Herberts' Dune (read it many times) and movie & mini-series. At first I was a bit disappointed by both movie and mini-series, but gradually I grown to like them both :-) [[User:SpeedyGonsales|SpeedyGonsales]] ([[User talk:SpeedyGonsales|talk]]) 13:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

==[[User:217.41.243.16]]==
{{user|217.41.243.16}} has received four warnings, how many do they need? [[User:AnyPerson|AnyPerson]] ([[User talk:AnyPerson|talk]]) 18:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate the second look. [[User:AnyPerson|AnyPerson]] ([[User talk:AnyPerson|talk]]) 02:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

==Ohio meetup==
Brainstorming is [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Ohio 1|taking place]]! Feel free to check it out, and make sure to add your name to the possible attendees if you'd like more information, as this page is mostly gauging interest at the moment. '''<font face="times new roman">[[User:hmwith|<span style="background:#999;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">hmwith</span>]][[User talk:hmwith|<span style="background:#666;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">τ</span>]]</font>''' 02:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for semi-protecting the [[Kazuhito Yamashita]] page, disallowing anon edits. [[User:Whosafraidofthedark|Whosafraidofthedark]] ([[User talk:Whosafraidofthedark|talk]]) 21:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009) ==
The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Outreach/Newsletter January 2009|January 2009 issue]]''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by [[User:BrownBot|BrownBot]] ([[User talk:BrownBot|talk]]) 04:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)</small>

== Lame ==

Yeah, lame for sure. I'll be five years here in two days time. I guess the responsibility was on me and I should've just ignored it all as I knew before hand what that guy was like, though I didn't know he still bore a grudge. Feel free to add it to the [[WP:LAME]] page as my well-deserved trout slapping. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 18:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

== Huh? ==
Precisely what did you mean by [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADeacon_of_Pndapetzim&diff=269820911&oldid=269709402 this]? You know that his conduct was unbecoming of an admin, yet, you'd have "most likely" cast a stone in the other direction? It would help explain why groups of editors become anti-admin after a while. One rotten fruit can make all of them look rotten; but it's a real shame for the project when that happens. The only reason he wasn't strongly admonished for his conduct was because every admin who wanted to respond knew that it'd have fallen on blind eyes - and I know that for a fact because I was told so by 3 respectable admins who were trying to make sure I stayed calm. Other than mischaracterising my posts, he's been stirring this up from the beginning, and tried very hard at the end, despite Kurykh's message to stop.

First he's going to say something needs to be done, then he's going to make up a grudge, and next he's going to make up something else. Why bother noting that his comments are uncalled for? Howwwww pointlesssss...instead, seeing it's most likely, might as well cast a stone in the other direction, rightttt? Thanksssss...thankssss soooo sooooo muchhhh...words cannot express my appreciation for thisssss, Kralizec! [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 06:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
<small>Message removed [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kralizec!&diff=prev&oldid=269996359] by author, and restored by me since we are continuing the discussion. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 15:53, 11 February 2009 (UTC)</small>

:Sorry I was not more clear. I -and probably everyone else- recognize that his extended block was way over the top. However it was fixed in short order and the issue resolved. Everyone makes mistakes, and I see little point in riding people mercilessly when they screw up. However your insistence on "having the last word" with the aggressively worded resolved tag was also way over the top ... which is probably why three different people tried to re-write it to be more neutral.

:However since you have not reverted the latest person to re-write the tag using neutral language, I will assume that you have recognized your mistake and decided to stop edit warring over the issue. As I said earlier, I do not believe in riding people over their mistakes, which is why I am not going to cast any stones.

:Everyone wins when people learn from their mistakes, so personally, I am thrilled that you and Deacon both gained from this otherwise unpleasant situation. Again I apologize for any misunderstandings caused by my lack of specifics. Thank you, [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 14:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC) ''(original reply [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANcmvocalist&diff=269999496&oldid=269352561] copied from [[User talk:Ncmvocalist]])''

::I agree, everyone makes mistakes; but that's a mitigating factor rather than a justification. And of course, I'm not blameless; ideally, if I was a user of another status, I wouldn't have cared enough to insist so. I'd have gotten over this by now, but given that [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Dayewalker/Ncm this], in my opinion, expresses an intention of pursuing dispute resolution, this is still an issue.

::If for a moment, there was a glimpse that he understood what the mistake was, I would've overlooked him refactoring my comment and we wouldn't even have gotten this far. He showed all appearances against understanding the problem and was unreceptive to the feedback he got from no less than 5 users at the discussion. He then tried to hide the problem in the concluding tag by talking about motives that don't exist (in editsummary, discussion, and subsequent discussions - including above!) Other than being provocative, what does that intend on achieving? In other words, he did not act in a way that you'd expect an admin to, even after the mistake.

::Dayewalker wound up climbing on a high horse and reverted on the grounds that Deacon is an admin. That was plainly unhelpful in the absence of discussing it with me or notifying me, in the presence of 5 users having a problem with Deacon's action, and given that the tag was written by the most involved user of all: Deacon. Until Alex's intervention, Deacon continued revert-warring.

::I would've walked past your message as I considered it closed. But as Dayewalker would've no doubt added your message into the diffs collection and construed it to mean that I'm the sole problem here, I felt a need to speak. I was annoyed that you suggested casting a stone in my direction without looking at the mitigating factors from my perspective. You've talked about 3 users reverting; I'm talking about 5 users opinions on his action, and several other users who strongly feel on his general approach to adminning - merely insisting on writing out this opinion does not make it a personal attack, nor does it warrant having the stone flung in my direction. I made one mistake in reverting; but he didn't merely just make mistakes in his block, and his reverting - he did more than that. Hope you understand what I'm getting at. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 14:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

:::If you are concerned about a DR or RfC from Dayewalker, then [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAlex_Bakharev&diff=270000843&oldid=269844810 this] may help put it into perspective. Regarding your "3 users reverting vs. 5 users' opinions" concern ... having an admin decision reversed via AN/I consensus rarely causes more than a trout-slapping for the admin who screwed up (again, most of us recognize that everyone makes mistakes). However edit warring is against policy and often results in people getting blocked. As an un-involved admin, I see both issues as being a concern, however only one might necessitate administrative action on the part of me or other admins. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 15:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC) ''(original reply [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANcmvocalist&diff=270014568&oldid=270008375] copied from [[User talk:Ncmvocalist]])''

::::I don't see how the diff you provided puts it into perspective - please explain.

::::If there was to be prevention, it wouldn't be equitable to make me the only one. Just because 1 other editor mirrored his revert or because he made less reverts or just because he has tools is no justification. (Note: Alex acted to try to resolve the dispute on the actual page, rather than use the same revert) Again, the user you would not throw a stone at was playing games. If you're experienced with dealing tendentious/problem/civil-pov pushing editors, you will not find it difficult to see the edit-war mentality in [[User:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim/How_to_win_a_revert_war|this]]: eg ''will ameliorate the bad appearance of "edit warring" in any random admin's eyes'' should make your alarm bells ring, along with the rest. Would you be able to justify inequitable blocks in the interests of this project? No. Enforcing the relevant policy in such a manner was not how it was envisaged by the community, yet, if you were throwing stones, you say you'd promote his mentality in the name of a letter rather than what was intended in spirit. ArbCom wanted admins to enforce policy that is both in letter and spirit, rather than just to the letter. This comment may not be worded very well, but I think you'll understand the point it makes. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 17:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

:::::Whoops, looks like I pasted the wrong diff. Here is what I meant to say: "If you are concerned about a DR or RfC from Dayewalker (a la [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAlex_Bakharev&diff=270000843&oldid=269844810]), then [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&diff=269634348&oldid=269632919 this] may help put it into perspective." Sorry for the mixup. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 20:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC) ''(original reply [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANcmvocalist&diff=270072614&oldid=270061614] copied from [[User talk:Ncmvocalist]])''

::::::Cheers; that's fine - but that diff page will need to be deleted at some point. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 06:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

(OD)Luckily, I have Kralizec's talkpage watchlisted, or I would never have known I was being discussed here. Ncm, I began making out that page when it became apparent you were not going to stop your edit war to make your opinion known in the resolved tag. As I said, I consider the entire discussion [[WP:LAME|lame]] and reverted you once, then stopped. My edit summary clearly said "There's no need to edit war commentary into the resolved tag, [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=269498313]" and as such, I wasn't going to. You seemed dead-set on changing the tag to reflect your opinion on the situation, both adding the "punitive" tag and replacing it five more times. You were edit warring, and I filed the diffs away in case you wouldn't listen to reason. When you were reverted by the third different editor, you stopped, and so I did not file a report of any sort. Your comments to me and to other editors (and indeed, above) didn't seem to show that you understood what had happened and that you were edit warring, so I just finished the page and saved it.

I have no desire to file a report on you. I'd much rather not have contact with you again, to be honest. At the same time, if this situation comes up again (as you seem to keep returning to it), I'd like to have the diffs available to show any admin my conduct.

Since this same discussion appears at Ncm's page, I'll also repeat these comments over there. Kralizec!, apologes for taking up your time with this. I appreciate your patience. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 03:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
:Despite the fact that I'd quite clearly said that this was over, and did not take any further action, you still chose to compile that page; this was the sole cause for me initiating this discussion both here, and Alex's talk page, despite considering this informally resolved. In these circumstances, I see no good cause to have created this page so late in the dispute - but what's done is done. Thing is, if you intend on keeping that page like similar pages you've created earlier (including as far back as December last year), then I will make a move to have them deleted, as some or all or not compliant with userspace requirements. I hope it will not become necessary for me to do so. In this case particularly, those diffs, as well as the accompanying commentary, aren't designed to show your conduct in this matter as you assert at the end of your comment. My views on your involvement and approach to this are already well known so I need not repeat them. The only part of your comment that is worth explicit endorsement at this point is about rather not having contact with you again - that's mutual. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 06:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

== Your block ==

You blocked me for disruptive editing. What kind? Where it is visible?--[[Special:Contributions/71.252.55.101|71.252.55.101]] ([[User talk:71.252.55.101|talk]]) 00:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
:Thank you for your question on my talk page [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kralizec!&diff=next&oldid=270471852]. You were blocked for [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]] as per [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=270137939&oldid=270137041 this] report at [[WP:AIV|Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. Specifically for edits to the [[Jasenovac concentration camp]] article, after ignoring [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:71.252.55.101&diff=prev&oldid=270146700 these warnings]. Wikipedia works by [[WP:CON|consensus]], so if someone reverts your changes to an article, you should discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page, rather than just reverting the other person. Blindly reverting other editors rather than discussing things will most likely result in your being blocked again. Please let me know if you have any other questions or issues. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 00:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
''(reply [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A71.252.55.101&diff=270564884&oldid=270561575] copied from [[User talk:71.252.55.101]])''
*The above does not constitute any right for this block. I was open for discussion and did not see any willing for discussion of those who sent 'warnings'. These 'warnings' are mere personal attacks and when calling upon rules you have to weight it against reality and not just exercise your ability to block me. About 'consensus' - many changes done there are done by other without any consensus and against basic editorial ethics. Very bad thing that your accusation like "Blindly reverting other editors rather than discussing" is applicable to the accusers - not to me. ''What you are doing here -is just throwing blind accusations against me in order to justify your block.'' Just see my talk page - I am again pestered by people who are not willing to discuss anything - rather to blindly disqualify me. I am even a money contributor to Wikipedia and I am going to ask a few questions Mr Wales about very roots of his idea that everyone can contribute and about Wikipedia's administrators--[[Special:Contributions/71.252.55.101|71.252.55.101]] ([[User talk:71.252.55.101|talk]]) 19:02, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for the reminder. [[User:Techman224|<font color="339933">'''Techman224'''</font>]][[User talk:Techman224|<font color="3300ff">'''<sup>Talk</sup>'''</font>]] 22:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

: Someone already has removed my warning. [[User:Techman224|<font color="339933">'''Techman224'''</font>]][[User talk:Techman224|<font color="3300ff">'''<sup>Talk</sup>'''</font>]] 23:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

For blocking the two IPs (socks?) who messed up my user page a couple of times. I appreciate it. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 06:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

== Message on My Page ==

Thanks for the advice on my page. It is noted --[[User:Sikh-history|Sikh-history]] ([[User talk:Sikh-history|talk]]) 08:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

== Block change heads-up ==

Just wanted to let you know that I changed your block time for [[User:Markvision55]] to indefinite, as it turns out it's one of a rash of sockpuppets of [[User:EnglandIslas]]. '''[[User:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">AK<font style="color:#006400;">Radecki</font></font>]]'''<sup>[[User_talk:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">Speaketh</font>]]</sup> 05:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

== Java Scriptus ==

I've been reverting edits by [[User:Java Scriptus|Java Scriptus]] because he has seemingly been adding false information. (Please see [[User talk:Download#Stop vandalizing|my talk page]] for what he wrote to me.) I do think he is a threat and his IP should also be blocked, if not already. Thanks for your attention to this issue. <font face="Papyrus" color="#9966CC">-</font>'''[[User:Download#top|<font face="Papyrus" color="#7B68EE">down</font>]][[User talk:Download#top|<font face="Papyrus" color="#9966CC">load</font>]]''' <font face="Papyrus" color="#7B68EE">|</font> '''[[User:Download/Guestbook#top|<font face="Papyrus" color="#8A2BE2">sign!</font>]]''' 00:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

== Vandalism by user:sikh-history ==

Pleasde can you kindly do something about the persistent vandalism on my and other people talkpages.

user:sikh-history continues to vandalise the talk pages of user:jsu and my own talk page on several occasions and perhaps many more with whom he disagrees with. He suggests I am canvassing! When I am simply '''thanking''' user:jsu for his input to which sikh-hisstory does not seem to like or agree.

'''I am simply responding''' Now how can this be canvassing, if I am not making an '''initial''' statement, remark or request? He also suggests we are the same user?

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jsu&diff=prev&oldid=269291241

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jsu&diff=prev&oldid=269383918

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jsu&diff=prev&oldid=270179329

The links above show blatant vandalism of user talk pages of user:jsu, now this user is probably unaware of this vandalism because it has been vandalised so many times by user:sikh-history

He seems to be a rather audacious character. Please advise him not to vandalise user talk pages and getting away with POV.

Thank you [[User:Khalsaburg|Khalsaburg]] ([[User talk:Khalsaburg|talk]]) 18:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
: Khalsaburg, please stop being so childish. You have been caught removing ISBN numbers and references that did not concur with your POV. It is not only me that reverted your edits but nearly every editor on the Sikh Wikipedia team, and some others too.--[[User:Sikh-history|Sikh-history]] ([[User talk:Sikh-history|talk]]) 09:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for the welcome, it is much appreciated.
I hope I am able to help and contribute in a positive manner!
[[User:Jargon777|Jargon777]] ([[User talk:Jargon777|talk]]) 02:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

== Re: Your revert to Seven Wonders of the Ancient World ==

Simple mistake with Huggle, my bad. Thanks for notifying me. &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 16:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

== Please Block ==

Could you please block {{user|Cardsplayer4life}} from making any edits. They are editwarring with me through the edits I was making via my IP address, I am not sure if you actually read the edits that were made, you would see that my edits were actually not vandalism, but were improving the content of the article by clarifying the subject in order to help the article reach a better "point of neutrality" which is one of the core concepts of Wikipedia.[[User:TheTruthLeadsMe|TheTruthLeadsMe]] ([[User talk:TheTruthLeadsMe|talk]]) 20:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
:For clarity's sake, this editor also appears to be the IP {{user|65.96.67.105}}, who was involved in an edit war at [[NCAA Division I FBS National Football Championship]]. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 20:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
::1) Yes that user is the registered version of the IP, and 2) I was one of three people (in addition to BCSPro and NewGuy34) reverting the (latest) edits of the user in that article, which is apparent if [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=NCAA_Division_I_FBS_National_Football_Championship&action=history the edit history of the article] is pulled up. [[User:Cardsplayer4life|Cardsplayer4life]] ([[User talk:Cardsplayer4life|talk]]) 21:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

== 50 largest banks ==

'USAA bank one of largest in world', San Antonio Express-News
Published 2/24/2009
1. We are the 28th largest bank in the nation

thanks <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/167.24.104.150|167.24.104.150]] ([[User talk:167.24.104.150|talk]]) 17:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:That could be, however your institution is not on our source list, the [[Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council]]'s quarterly [http://www.ffiec.gov/nicpubweb/nicweb/Top50Form.aspx Top 50 bank holding companies] report. Since {{tl|50 largest US banks}} is 100% [[WP:SOURCE|sourced]] and [[WP:CITE|cited]] to the FFIEC list, we can only include the banks they include. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 17:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

== Rollback ==

Hi! thanx for considering me for the priveledge. I'll abide by the guidelines & rules regarding rollback and will be happy to get this privelege. --[[User:Faizhaider|Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi]] ([[User talk:Faizhaider|talk]]) 05:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

== Re: Friendly note regarding talk page messages ==

The situation has already been explained and dealt with. In other words, you're a bit late. =/ <i>[[Recca|Elm-39]] - [[User talk:Elm-39#top|T]]/[[User:Elm-39/Notes to self|C]]</i> 19:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:16, 26 February 2009

Get off Qwertgb's tail you no good nosey pervert or I'll slap you silly!

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kralizec!/Archive_2009&oldid=273517331"