User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 4

Please add new messages to the BOTTOM of the page by starting a new section heading - just use the 'New section' tab above. Also: note that I will likely respond to new messages here, so please watchlist my page. If I leave YOU a message, I'll watchlist your page and look for a reply there. Thanks!

Welcome Message

• Welcome to my talk page. For those with the wrong impression, though active in anti-vandalism here, I am not a Wikipedia administrator.

• Like it also says above: Please add your new thoughts, praise, complaints or whatever else is on your mind AT THE BOTTOM of this page by creating a new section.

• It is easy to do that by using the 'New section' tab at the top of this page. Or, join in an existing discussion by posting at the bottom of the section you are interested in.

• Also, please sign your posts with 4 of these tildes ~ If you are looking for material placed here between December '09 and June 11, '10, look for it in Archive #3.

Thanks! Jusdafax 02:09, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Hare Krsna

"Anyone who does not float in this inundation is most condemned. Such a person cannot be delivered for millions of kalpas. PURPORT The kalpa is explained in the Bhagavad-gītā (8.17): sahasra-yuga-paryantam ahar yad brahmaṇo viduḥ. One day of Brahmā is called a kalpa. A yuga, or mahā-yuga, consists of 4,320,000 years, and one thousand such mahā-yugas constitute one kalpa. The author of Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta says that if one does not take advantage of the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, he cannot be delivered for millions of such kalpas." (Śrī Caitanya Caritāmṛta Antya 3.255) [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.184.135 (talk) 20:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

First off, as it says repeatedly, please sign your talkpage posts with 4 of these: ~. Secondly, regardless of one's beliefs, Wikipedia has concrete rules regarding the encyclopedia's format; editors who don't do so are blocked, as I see you have already been. If you want to edit, please learn from the mistakes you have made here today. Good luck! Jusdafax 21:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Any rules which are against Krsna consciousness are demoniac/atheistic rules. So one who is against Krsna consciousness, be it Wikipedia or anything - must be considered demon. "If even a great atheist hears Shri Chaitanya-mangala (previous name for Shri Chaitanya-bhagavata), he immediately becomes a great devotee. So all the great atheists which comprise of 99.99% of the world’s population can become maha-vaishnavas if they get the supreme good fortune of reading this book. Thus in my personal opinion, when this book is published and distributed in mass quantities all over the world" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.107.252 (talk) 20:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

And yet you don't seem to have the basic decency to sign your posts as I ask. That's bad karma, in my opinion. And I'll be frank, here... any religion that claims to be the one and only truth isn't too spiritual, as I see it. Let's get back to the issue at hand. If you break the rules of Wikipedia, you get warnings, blocks and eventually banned. Then you can't contribute. So, why not learn from your experience? I believe that is truly the path of wisdom. Good fortunes to you. Jusdafax 21:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

One who doesn't follow instructions of bona-fide spiritual master - he is doing only karma. One can be purified from karma to karma(jnana/yoga)-misra-bhakti and than to pure bhakti. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.146.226 (talk) 16:08, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Mahā-Viṣṇu is breathing. So taking advantage of that breathing, innumerable universes are generating. And each universe, there is a superintending deity who is called Brahmā. Yasya hi niśvasita- kālam. Kālam atha avalambya jīvanti loma-vilajā jagad-aṇḍa- nāthāḥ. Many hundreds and millions of Brahmās there are. They live, only taking advantage of the breathing period of Mahā-Viṣṇu. [break] Mahā-Viṣṇu is sub-plenary portion. First Kṛṣṇa, then Balarāma, then Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna, Aniruddha, Vāsudeva. Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa. Then, from Saṅkarṣaṇa, Nārāyaṇa. Then, from Nārāyaṇa, again catur-vyūha, second Saṅkarṣaṇa, Vāsudeva, Aniruddha. And from the second Saṅkarṣaṇa is Mahā-Viṣṇu. And from Mahā-Viṣṇu, Kāraṇodakaśāyī-Viṣṇu. And from Kāraṇodakaśāyī-Viṣṇu, Kṣīrodakaśāyī-Viṣṇu. The Kṣīrodakaśāyī- Viṣṇu is in each universe. He is the Supersoul. And when any incarnation comes within this world, He comes through Kṣīrodakaśāyī-Viṣṇu. In that way, Kṛṣṇa comes through Kṣīrodakaśāyī-Viṣṇu. But this Kṣīrodakaśāyī-Viṣṇu is the expansion of the expansion of Kṛṣṇa.

• I see I must be blunt and tell you (I see more than one IP but it is all the same style) to stop posting on my page. Any further posts here will be reverted as vandalism. Thanks in advance for respecting my wishes in this matter. Jusdafax 11:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

its just this editor Jeff G. is stalking me and trying to get rid of that page because i worked on it alot its a good page i hope they dont delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hexenjagd (talk • contribs) 05:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Ok, but please learn from this. Blanking stuff is rarely if ever going to help your cause. Jusdafax 07:10, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hexenjagd (talk • contribs) 12:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Star Wars: The Force Unleashed II on the PC

The reliable source is here. And on Wookieepedia they tell that the PC version will be developed by Aspyr. 84.86.199.99 (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Um, I see you have notified a LOT of editors of this fact, and see that I was one who edited this article. Point taken, but I honestly don't know if Amazon is a WP:RS. Best wishes, Jusdafax 15:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the Vandalism

I couldn't find where or how to message you, so I thought here would be appropriate. A friend of mine was messing around on my computer at a party I recently had. I assume they are the ones that did the wikipedia vandalism. Sorry about that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.15.231 (talk) 10:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Manfred Hamilton

Hello Jusdafax, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Manfred Hamilton to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black veil brides (band)

I found plenty of sources. Joe Chill (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I looked at 'em. They don't strike me as meeting WP:RS. Still, I will continue to closely watch this deletion discussion. If the sources are judged reliable, I'm open to changing my vote. Jusdafax 16:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

The Red-Headed League (1985 TV Episode)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of The Red-Headed League (1985 TV Episode), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The Red-Headed League (TV movie). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

FYI

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give The Red-Headed League (TV movie) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for reverting my user page. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 06:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Happy to help! Jusdafax 06:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Many Thanks

I appreciate your catching and correcting the vandalism on my Wikipedia page. I am not all that familiar with Wikipedia, and in my attempt to fix what the vandal had done, not realizing that you had already fixed it, I think I attempted to or possibly did undo one of your edits / reversions. I didn't know what I was doing, but the page is fine now. Again--many thanks! --Andy W. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyw2100 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Delighted to be of service! Jusdafax 04:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Tărtăria tablets

This is not an encyclopedia. This is a bad geopolitics scrach. You are the fullish man ever. I want corect the fact about Tartaria tablets write by some hungaryan extremist he said that TARTARIA IS IN HUNGARIAN KINGDOM. This is not true and is chipest propaganda. If you are not according to this you are a idiot —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adsignia (talk • contribs) 17:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Sigh. I have no idea about the issues you dispute. Your poor English and manners aside, you need to learn what Wikipedia is and how it works. If you have issues with the content in an article, and get reverted, you must go to the discussion page to talk it over, instead of reverting numerous times, which leads to warnings and blocks. Your extreme hostility does not motivate me to help you much, needless to say. Take a deep breath or two, and try to learn from your mistakes. Arrogance is not a helpful trait in Wikipedia. Jusdafax 17:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Office Professional Academic 2010

Since we seem to already have a relationship of "I change something and then you go a head and change it back" could you look over my submission on the topic listed on the Office 2010 discussion page to review what I have said, thanks.

You may delete this after this has been read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.71.46.111 (talk) 23:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I can't find anything in that article or my edit history or yours that shows we have interacted. It seems I'll need a bit more of a clue from you, if you please. Thanks, Jusdafax 04:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Another FYI

When you tag articles as copyright violations, you should put the url in too as the CorenSearchBot tag is not always correct or complete. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Sure, happy to, how would I do that exactly? Jusdafax 17:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Um, if you're just typing it's {{db-g12|url}}. I don't use huggle, so I'm afraid I don't know how to do it with the tool you're using. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Great, that's good information. I don't always use Huggle, so I'll just use that markup in such cases. Thanks again, as I really want to get the fine art of doing speedy tags right. Jusdafax 17:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

for reverting that edit to WikiProject Bedfordshire, it is much appreciated. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 09:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Yeah that guy was asking for it, a mean spirited vandal indeed. Glad to be of service. Jusdafax 09:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Constructive? Re: Rock and Roll

Wikipedia say it is free, but friend, this is terrorism because it will not let me write what I researched on their own sources (Wikipedia). Says it is not constructive for terrorists (liars and thieves) but for the truth, they want to silence him, but can not. Friends may buy to Zapatero and other politicians sold, but not the population as Spain said the journalist that they threw the shoe and others who have left them with an outstretched hand, and their soldiers drugged, drunken gay and resigned nationality, because they do not want them. I'm impartial, so I decided to investigate and help supplement the information you wrote on this subject in which recognize that even before the 50's this kind of music (rock) was already known, or was not hurt in the only Christian country called Russia (former USSR) where everything we know (worldwide) that they are the only intelligent, capable of dominating the world with their inventions and technology, we gain with her peacefully (not terrorist like you) good service and who would not hurt hurt. (And as the Mexicans say: "GREEN GO", or Saudi "USA GO TO HELL" or the Nicaraguan "GRINGO FILIBUSTERS" or as we say (USA) why they want to separate religion from state if our dollar says "in God we trust" and we do not want the Amero? and as I say, I should tell the truth, and while, say alive, even against their will.) . I hope to correct the incomplete information 50'sy above to read and research and be mature enough to accept the facts as they are obliged to inform and not to be subservient, being a follower of the group, overriding the "freedom" of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa (talk • contribs) 09:33, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

I reverted your edit as a violation of several Wikipedia policies, including WP:NPOV and a lack of WP:RS (you can't use Wikipedia to source itself, Russian version or no). But the bottom line was that your additions don't fit well with what is already there, in my opinion. You don't exactly come off as willing to learn, but those are the facts as I understand them. If you want to make major changes to a reasonably stable and high-profile Wikipedia English article, you should discuss the changes on the talk-page, and not just try to push the changes you want through anyway. I see you reverted me and another editor has already reverted you again, you will get a second warning. I also see you have left another hostile message. I have taken the time to tell you honestly what you are facing, continuing to revert is also a violation of WP:3RR. Please learn from this... again, my best advice is to take this to the discussion/talk page. Jusdafax 09:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Is no Russian version, do I have to look for what is obvious? I used Wikipedia in English (do not speak Russian) YOU? How is assumed that Russian version? Did you write it? I also am going to report false accusations. Threat? Only Muslim terrorists or threaten people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa (talk • contribs) 10:05, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Whatever. You don't seem too reasonable, calling people "terrorists". Jusdafax 10:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Stop YOU

Please stop you of lying and manipulating information by people like you, all of us to get GRINGO´S and tell us thieves and liars, all his fault, WHERE IS THE FREEDOM OF WIKIPEDIA? I just want to express the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa (talk • contribs) 09:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Messages of this type really won't help your cause, you know. Jusdafax 10:26, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 09:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

I do not want the discussion page (I work, do not waste my time.)

"Extraction of Wikipedia? It is noted that almost do not know, because one language to another varies the information and English is very poor. You be careful and do not threaten me. It is the fourth time that I warn you that I only want the truth. I would appreciate if you know Russian to teach me, to know what they think of the robberies that make them (and the Germans with beer or Italian with pizza, and so on). TERRORISTS THREATEN ONLY. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa (talk • contribs) 10:21, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

TERRORISTS THREATEN ONLY.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasnetsov y SirinGa (talk • contribs) 10:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 

LOL my friend

I am learning a lot just by reading your talk page regularly, but mostly I am laughing out loud at your temperate responses to the nonsense such as what I just read above. Poor misunderstood terrorist. I feel for you. Perhaps his wisdom will eventually get through to you? :D MichaelWestbrook (talk) 12:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

I feel sorry for that guy. I've noticed at times there is a culture clash in English Wikipedia. But name-callers need to get, and get fast, that this is a tactic that won't get them very far. I've noticed that some people are unable to understand this basic fact, even when they are told directly. These folks, if new, tend to have a very short time here. Even established admins who violate WP:CIVIL eventually are brought to bay by the community, though usually not until a great deal of agitation is required. Best wishes to you, Michael. Jusdafax 21:43, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: double ended dildo

Define how a source currently unattributed as all other material descriptions constitutes vandalism. Please refrain from removing this edit until you can suitably show that this material is not used to created double ended dildos. ref. device #24: bondage. SECRET #33: Fetish Art and Fashion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.223.164.211 (talk) 03:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Do me a favor and sign your talkpage posts, ok? Now, you may notice that my revert of your edit didn't send a warning to your page, so you are wrong about me calling you a vandal on that edit. I carefully used the non-vandalism Huggle button for "Reverted addition of dubious unsourced content". Next, I seldom remove material from my talk page (as you can see above), so no need for concerns there either. As for your argument that the other descriptions are unattributed so your addition is somehow all right - nope, that's not how Wikipedia actually works. So, pretty much everyting you say here I disagree with. Next, now that I look into the article's edit history, I see another respected editor DID revert you as a vandal on this article, which makes me believe I was too lenient.

You do know the burden of proof for new material is on you, not me, right? I see you have now added a source. However, in my view it fails WP:RS. I suggest you take this up at the article's talk page if you feel so strongly about including your material to Wikipedia; if you keep reverting it just leads to final warnings and a block. Trust me on this. Jusdafax 04:00, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Deepwater Horizon oil spill talk page

Jusdafax, I call on you now for jus da fax, please. There is a new thread discussing a requested rename here at the oil spill talk page: Talk:Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill#Survey ... Please add either your support or opposition there, as I value your previous contribution in an archived thread regarding other rename requests. Thankyou kindly, terrorist :D MichaelWestbrook (talk) 10:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. On my way. Jusdafax 10:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Bands

You might like this: User:JzG/And the band played on... Guy (Help!) 12:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Sad yet funny. Say, have we met? ;) Jusdafax 21:09, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

RfA

Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson#Your Request for Adminship which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Good stuff, as you are eloquent in praise of Peter. Hope you are having fun on Day One! Jusdafax 21:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

About the japanese singer page

Thank you very much for your help. But now I have a BIG problem... The website where I found a maximum of the information deleted Aoi's page (since his record company announced about his problem, it's harder to find old information on him).

I also tried to search other reliable source for the events but there is none...

I only find it in blogs. I saw that it's not a reliable source and for the other part of the information they were on the Official Website...

I tried to do something better on the biography but I'm not sure if it's good... Seikyo(Seven) 11:10 (GMT+1), 22 June 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 09:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC).

If this is your first time creating a Wikipedia article, that's pretty good. Mind you, it needs a lot of work (way too many red-links, for example, and perhaps you would consider that the first sentence refer to him as a "singer-songwriter") but the article is unlikely to just get deleted since it is clear now that you are working on it.

It seems to me that the references you want may indeed be a bit hard to find, and some are possibly in Japanese language. I'm afraid I don't know much about searching the Japanese internet. Keep looking, and if you have saved any print media that refer to him, like articles in magazines, newspapers or books that mention him and his music, you can cite those as well. I'll watchlist the page and see if I can't help out a bit in the next few days. Jusdafax 09:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

It is my first article in Wikipedia English. I first did one on Aoi in Wikipedia France (with less information) then translated it in English and put it in Wikipedia English but it was shortly deleted... I didn't had the time to ask what was not good... Then I thought I could put the best biography of Aoi I did on Wikipedia but... I don't have much time and I don't know where I have to put the reliable source or where put link. I thought there would be other fan of Aoi in wikipedia english who could help me but I feel really alone now...

About the magazine, I buyed one wich had a page on Aoi. It's a French magazine. But most of the information in the biography were on Visunavi... Correction, someone send me a like of Visunavi, looks like Aoi's still on it. But since I used this website for 90% of the information there are in Aoi's biography, what can I do? Do I have to write everywhere the source?

I can search in Europe for the European Event, I think I'll find it easily but in Japan it's harder... I can search in newspaper but I won't be able to find magazine which talk about Aoi... Also, Aoi's record company deleted lots of old information about him so it's harder to find what I need.

But for the time being the greatest help you could give me is to tell me what can I do with the "red links" and where do I put the source thing? Also what is good to put and what is not good? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seikyo(Seven) (talk • contribs) 16:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

This is a difficult topic for a first-time article creator like yourself, whose first language is not (I assume) English. I see there are at least two other Japanese artists with the same name of Aoi, which complicates matters, and add to that the multiple language problems (I have no idea how to source a French magazine, for example) and this becomes complicated, even for an experienced Wikipedian whose native language is English. I have made a few changes to the first paragraph for you which you can change as you see fit. Even that still needs more work.

It's sort of a classic problem; you want to create a solid, well-referenced article but don't know how. The references will go inside these tags < ref > and < /ref > (except all together with no spaces), as I think you know, but there is correct formatting to follow inside. Again, look at how it is done on another article, and copy that. When you think you have it right, hit the "preview" button to see if it looks right in the finished version. If not, keep tinkering with it. That's how I learned!

Do read the book link Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual. It's a lot of good information, so take your time. With that, and by using trial and error, you should be ok. Now that the article has gotten over the first hurdle (namely, it has not been nominated for speedy deletion) you have some time. Since this is a labor of love for you, have fun with it! Jusdafax 17:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Like I said I don't have lot of time but if I understand well I don't have to put links about the lives places? (Also, yes English is not my first language.)

But I think I'll still let a link on the event names which are famous in Europe (like the Japantag or the JAPAN EXPO). About the source I'll see in other Japanese singer biography how it's done...

Ah no... I just watched INORAN's biography and there are no source links... Do I have to create the pages which doesn't exist? I don't know a lot on the JAPAN EXPO even though I went to all the JAPAN EXPO which exist in France (JAPAN EXPO, JAPAN EXPO Sud, Chibi JAPAN EXPO). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seikyo(Seven) (talk • contribs) 17:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Try a big name article like say The Beatles, and look at the editing page to see how the references are done, especially the 'cite web' ones. It is true that Wikipedia articles exist with no references, even of living persons, a very sensitive area of Wikipedia. Currently there is a controversy in Wikipedia about this (see WP:BLP to get an idea of the issues)... so that's why I urge you to get as many reliable sources as you can, so your article can't be challenged and deleted. Additionally, you may need to add references to that second article, if possible, and it seems there are other possible articles you may wish to start, if they are easy to reference. However, you also have to watch out not to violate another Wikipedia rule, WP:COATRACK.

It is unfortunate that you have chosen a such a difficult BLP for your first article. Not having a lot of time is yet another complicating factor. All I can suggest is to try and improve the article(s) a little bit each day, and also try to read that 'Missing Manual' book a little each day, as possible. Learning really is crucial in Wikipedia, and I am still learning myself! Best wishes, Jusdafax 18:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Okay thank you, I saw the page of another band... I think: 1. I abandon 2. I rewrite all the article using another Artist's page 3.I put source where I can so that I won't have problem.

I think I'll do in this order if 3 don't work it's 2 and if 2 don't works then 1...

I don't want to use all of my free time to do that even if it's usefull for Aoi. Because I made this article for him, I promote him everywhere I can on internet but Wikipedia is really the hardest place to let an artist be known...--Seikyo(Seven) (talk) 18:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

2008 Mumbai attacks

Many thanks for that. I've replied on my talk page (in the hope that the two editors see it: at least one of them will, I suspect). The executive summary is: agree absolutely. The pair of 'em need to smarten up, and fast. I'm not going to extend protection indefinitely, not when the easier option is to block to editors for WP:CIVILity issues. TFOWR 10:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

More than welcome. It was a bit of a jolt to read, and it seemed if they read the actual rules of this place it might help 'em both (and keep me from bumping into any more of it in Huggle!)... might be a long hot summer on Wikipedia, but here's hoping for an outbreak of sanity. Jusdafax 10:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Henry Hay (writer)

Hello. I've reverted the speedy, as the article asserts his notability as an author. Might be a candidate for AFD, but I'll try to hunt for some refs online. Thanks, Empty Buffer (talk) 10:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Well... it asserts it but has no WP:RS so I figured this was the best way. I will try, however, to follow your approach in the future if it is indeed the correct procedure. Thanks, Jusdafax 10:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Editor '75' and his socks

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.[2] The discussion is about the topic Seeking admin assistance for disruptive editor. [3]. Thank you. Eurytemora (talk) 10:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

WP:AIV question...

Hello, Jusdafax. You have new messages at WP:AIV.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TFOWR 15:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Zac Efron article

Hello Mr.Jusdafax, I see no reason Further reading in Zac Efron article that you can delete it, thanks.--87.109.192.219 (talk) 10:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

It appears you are removing a note regarding a book about the subject of the article, listed in the "Further Reading" section with an ISBN number. Looks to me like that material is correct. You merely note in your edit summary that you are removing the material; you do not give your reasoning. It could be that you do not realize that the reference is to a book. I notice you do not discuss this on the article's discussion page either. Hope that explains my reasoning for reverting your deletion. Thanks, Jusdafax 11:11, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for the star and the kind words. Herostratus (talk) 03:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. I am quite humbled and impressed by how you handled your "reverse Rfa". Best wishes, Jusdafax 03:46, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Murderdolls: Women And Children Last

My mistake, I didn't know I was "vandalizing." I was merely correcting information. My suggestion is please research and fix the page, it's misleading when you have wrong information listed. The listed producer is wrong. It's not Matt Sepanic, it's Chris "Zeuss" Harris. Even the band's page contradicts what's listed on the album page, and the info on the band's page is correct. Look it up, and YOU can edit it yourself. mytwin 03:46, 3 July 2010

I have reverted it back to your version with my apologies. Will remove warning also. Please use edit summaries, they save us all a lot of time, thanks. Jusdafax 04:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm kinda new, my bad. mytwin 03:51, 3 July 2010

No problem, happy editing. Jusdafax 05:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

A Note

Dear Jusdafax,

I represent Doug Adams, the author of the liner notes to The Lord of the Rings: The Complete Recordings as well as the upcoming book The Music of the Lord of the Rings Films. There are several instances of incorrect information that appear on this page, but every time I update them, they are reverted back to their original state. I assure you that I am not a vandal trying to destroy this page, the author and I are very close, and I am trying to fix the incorrect information.

Thank you,

Middle-D-Inc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Middle-D-Inc (talk • contribs) 04:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

First off, please sign talk page posts with 4 of these ~, thanks. Like the user just above, you failed to use edit summaries - doing so saves a lot of typing for all concerned. I have removed the warnings on what I presume was your IP number, with my apologies. I also see you have gone on editing the arcticle so I suppose you don't need further action there. Again, please use edit summaries when editing, otherwise it looks like vandalism when material is being deleted, thanks. Jusdafax 05:13, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thank you for all the vandal-fighting you've done on here. Much appreciated! MarmadukePercy (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks, and I am much obliged for your good opinion! Best wishes, Jusdafax 07:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Purple Star

		The Purple Star
		I noticed your userpage was vandalized over 200 times, so I thought I would give you this Zonafan39 (talk) 07:35, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

May I say I appreciate your gift of a barnstar as well. One can get compassion fatigue and burnout doing this, and these expressions of appreciation mean a lot to me. Best wishes, today and every day! Jusdafax 08:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for rescuing my user page!

-- φ OnePt618Talk φ has given you a pie! Pies promote the kind of hearty eating that puts a smile on your face and a sustaining meal in your stomach. Hopefully this pie has made your day better. Spread the goodness by giving someone else a pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating! Spread the goodness of pie by adding {{subst:Wikipie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Well done, and cheers!-- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 07:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

My pleasure, and thanks! By the way, I see we have both left messages for that hot-head IP on his talk page. Jusdafax 07:57, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Kaleidoscope (US band) and Chester Crill

Do you have a reference that could be added for Crill's naming rationale? Otherwise the new bracketed text looks too speculative. AllyD (talk) 08:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Actually I believe I do. Hang on, thanks. Jusdafax 08:15, 4 July 2010 (UTC) UPDATE: It comes back to me that it is in that 'Pulsating Dream' website that is cited. The website has a lot of different sections, but the exact quote was about his "straightlaced" parents being the reason Crill came up with all those bogus names. I'll change the edit to quote "straightlaced", to make it precise. Jusdafax FURTHER UPDATE: Went ahead and added the web citation to the exact subpage for clarity. Jusdafax 08:50, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

• Cheers! AllyD (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Casey Reed

This was a poor edit. Reverting all the content using a script like this while a speedy tag is on the article misleadingly gives the impression of there being no content; I mistakenly speedied it as 'no context' before my error was pointed out. The article creator did provide a source (a Soapcentral recap), and you removed far more than just "dubious unsourced content", such as the actress, infobox, and times of appearances, indeed you basically blanked the whole article. Actually the content all looks perfectly verifiable to me from a look through Google News archives. Please don't bite the newbies. I hope this isn't your usual approach to dealing with new articles and editors. Fences&Windows 16:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Agree with your take on this, and no it is not my usual approach. I was not trying to revert it all back, I mistakenly decided the edit was a BLP issue, not realizing it was about a fictional character. I should have reverted my edit right there, but I was confused by the tag and waited to see if the page creator was going to take further steps. Then I got distracted. Again, my intent was not to blank the article, and I will usually do the 'dubious' tag which does not give a warning as a first step. My apologies to you and the article creator, let me know if I can take any corrective measures at this late date. To repeat, this is not my usual approach at all, as I hope either a brief, or a complete look at my edit history will show. I really do try to encourage new users; this time I bellyflopped. Jusdafax 17:15, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

OK, good. I think this one got us all confused. It's all fine now, the content is restored and I've added a couple of sources and a merge tag. A look for sources and comments on the merge proposal would be welcome but not essential. Fences&Windows 20:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

I started a new section regarding this at Talk:The Young and the Restless minor characters and added my support for the proposed merge. Jusdafax 03:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for reverting vandalism on my user page! Greetings from Amsterdam, Kwiki (talk) 23:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Honored to help out, and thanks for the thanks. Jusdafax 02:41, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

RFA Thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which failed with 10 support, 26 oppose, and 13 neutral. Your comments were much appreciated.

--White Shadows ^{There goes another day} 17:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks, and I'll add that your turnaround as an editor is remarkable. If you continue the arc, your next Rfa will be highly improved. Best wishes and see you around, Jusdafax 17:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Fuster Deletion

Was sorry to see you went along with the speedy Fuster deletion rockin guy. Other more experienced editors (I know, "how can that be with 45,000 contributions?!) would have given us time to get additional references, especially since Doc Fuster agreed to add GNU copyright free language to his sites. EENG was hostile from day one, and might have something against Fuster we are missing. We don't know the guy at all, just saw a review about him getting an award, and figured he's notable. Needless to say he will no longer give permission for anything, given EENG's style (calling his accomplishments "fawning" on the talk page!? Cripes, this is the guy who DISCOVERED memory cells, and there are numerous "orange" references to him on Wiki that now still won't go to a page thanks to EENG). After spending hours doing links in that article and communicating with the principal, we'll revert to being an EENG type editor, throwing stones, dispensing templates, but adding no value unless invited by another editor or administrator with more clout that EENG types, who can provide air cover for our work. Learned a valuable lesson here: don't contribute and waste a bunch of work and time unless you've got admins to go to battle for you, and give enough time to complete the research. We would have been happy to work with EENG, but he made it clear from edit one that he wanted only a role of telling us what to do, not adding anything himself! No tanks to dat. Good stuff on the rock and roll work, maybe you can help with our Loy article? Phoenixthebird (talk) 19:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

PS: I'll need to contact Etrigan on Loy, I've now noticed that EENG is targeting ALL our articles, and vandalizing and adding templates to all of them, as a vendetta. Can any of you guys discipline this character? Raining on a newbie is one thing, specifically targeting work as a vendetta has to be against some rule since there are so many here!!!Phoenixthebird (talk) 19:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

From what I can tell from your talk page the situation has stabilized, but if not I'm happy to be contacted further; however, I assume you know I am not an admin. Jusdafax 17:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Template messages

On User talk:124.150.49.182 you added a template message. I'm currently getting used to correctly applying these when reverting edits. Could you please tell me which template you used? Thanks. Mltinus (talk) 14:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

It is merely an auto-generated Huggle template. To be able to use Huggle, you should have WP:ROLLBACK. Jusdafax 14:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my user page

First time it's been vandalized, apparently... GregorB (talk) 20:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

• (Chuckle) ...and prolly not the last. You are quite welcome. Jusdafax 00:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks from me, too, though it was hardly the first time it's been vandalized... -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

(Hearty laugh) Yeah that was a tough case. Thanks for the thanks! Jusdafax 21:28, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The Suite Life on Deck

Can you say me, what is wrong which this ? -- DC Fan 5 (talk) 20:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Nothing, it seems, as I misunderstood your intent. Sorry about that. I have noted this at the AIV page where you also commented earlier. Jusdafax 20:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok. -- DC Fan 5 (talk) 20:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Disruptive editor has returned

Our friend from CT (aka '75' aka Techwriter2B aka ....) is back. Thought you might find the AN/I thread of interest[4]. Best Eurytemora (talk) 03:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Have commented at the ANI thread. The person behind the socks needs a community ban. This is absurd. Thanks for letting me know, and please keep me posted if there are further developments or there is anything else I can do. Jusdafax 08:27, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the user page vandalism reverts

Cybercobra has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

I don't do these often...so...

		The Special Barnstar
		For going above and beyond on ANI, alerting authorities and recognizing that there are real lives behind all of these user names. Smashvilletalk 15:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks! This was the first time I've phoned the cops about something from the encyclopedia, but the officer was friendly, interested, and even looked to see the "evidence" for himself, with a little prompting from me on how to find the history. I appreciate the barnstar; of course, here's hoping there is no actual attack and they can find this kid and scare some sense into him. Jusdafax 15:38, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

		The Real Life Barnstar
		For what is likely the single most important thing you will ever do on Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 16:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

p.s. You are now entitled to display this. Toddst1 (talk) 16:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Gosh! Shucks! Not used to all this... a ton o' thanks, I will indeed put that box on my User page. Thanks yet again! Jusdafax 16:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Far to many editors and admins are reluctant to take real-world action in cases like this. You have set yourself apart from the field. Speaking of which, let me know when you're ready for your RFA. I'd be honored to nom or co-nom. Toddst1 (talk) 16:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Thankee... by the way, you aren't the only one looking forward to my Rfa someday, so is an old friend: [5] 8/ ... I couldn't believe that one! Jusdafax 17:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Anyone with a vendetta that transparent should have little credibility at such an RFA. Toddst1 (talk) 22:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Acknowledgment of warning and warning removal

Not at all -- I'm glad we have this kind of oversight operating. It improves all the work that happens here! Civilizeme (talk) 19:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I thought you were attacking another user, but it turned out to be you! Jusdafax 19:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

User page

Many thanks for removing the vandalism on my page Vrenator (talk) 15:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Delighted to help, as so many people have removed it on mine. That appears to be 'revenge' vandalism for your previous action. As I say in the edit summary, I'll keep an eye on that page and the IP. Best wishes, Jusdafax 15:27, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Christ Episcopal Church (Waltham, Massachusetts)

Jusdafax,

Why are you attempting to delete entire sections of the page I have worked hard to edit and expand for Christ Episcopal Church? I believe that the information I have added to the page is entirely referenced and accurate. Please let me know what is inappropriate about the current version of the page.

Thanks!

Mbalulescu (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

My apologies. It appears I was looking at one section you were working on out of context. I still wasn't sure, so I reverted as a good faith edit, i.e., you did not get a warning for vandalism. I see you reverted my revert, so all is well. May I suggest you use edit summaries as possible? This makes it easier for those of us patrolling recent changes to understand the intent behind the edit. Thanks and happy editing, Jusdafax 19:59, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I will be sure to provide a summary for my edits. Thank you for your understanding, and I appreciate that I did not get a warning :)

Mbalulescu (talk) 21:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Request for Adminship

Hello Jusdafax, thank you for participating in my recent RFA. I have taken all your comments into consideration and will make sure that I do it right if I plan on doing another RFA. Also, please do have a look at the comments made by other editors and myself, regarding this RFA. Thank you again, and have a nice day! Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 03:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate the note. If I can help in any way ask anytime. Good fortunes to you! Jusdafax 19:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Relocated comment from my User page re: List

Don't take this as vandalism - I only want to talk to you. "The subject of ICP cards has been ranked as #2 on the "things that no one gives a shit about" list, with prunes being #1" was something that was passed on to me. I feel that any facts like these should be communicated. Please inform of a better way to communicate this info - I do not want to be banned from wikipedia.

OK... first off, comments should go on my discussion page, not my User page, so I have relocated your comment here. Now regarding your edits - they come off as vandalism because they contain profanity and you have not sourced them with a WP:RS, which is crucial. Assuming your list exists and meets the criteria of WP:NOTE, there are still other factors to consider in order for it to become a part of Wikipedia, mainly, it does not appear to be encyclopedic. But that is a matter of content, and then becomes a content dispute. To get to that point, try to source your list, and don't forget to use an edit summary which will indicate an intent to contribute and not vandalize to those of us patrolling recent changes. Jusdafax 16:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Andre DeJuan TAG

Hello, I deleted the tag from the article on "Andre DeJuan", but I did not create the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redeyewatchman (talk • contribs) 21:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok, but why delete the tag? Jusdafax 21:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

He's/she's back

Hello. I regret to have to inform you that after just three days of silence that he/she is back and as bad as ever. (Please see [6], [7], [8], [9], and [10].) I started the last AN/I case ([11]) and Eurytemora the one in June ([12]). I'm wondering if you would be willing to start a third as I am probably too much out front on this and it may be more effective if the next one was started by a third editor. I will, of course, be happy to contribute to the discussion in my usual well documented way. WP really needs to be rid of this troublemaker for good. Many thanks!!! Centpacrr (talk) 19:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

UPDATE: It looks as if 64.252.0.159 has just been blocked and a community ban is also already underway so I guess that there is no need to post again on AN/I (or AN) for the time being. Best to keep an eye out, however, as he/she will certainly try to evade the blocks and bans via new anonymous IPs and sockpuppet accounts until an effective and wide ranging ban is devised. Centpacrr (talk) 20:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Roger that. I admit I was not looking forward to further jousting at ANI, and thanks to your heavy lifting at that page I believe the community has given this obnoxious character the heave-ho. It is too bad in one respect... the person was capable of decent content work, but their clear inability to behave as a decent collaborator, not to mention all those abusive socks, meant they were not worth having as a Wikipedian. Thank you again for all your hard work on this case! Jusdafax 21:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

You're more than welcome. (I'd like to say "my pleasure" too, but it really hasn't been "a pleasure" if you know what I mean!) Having to deal with this individual for three months now has just been a monumental waste of my time and effort, but if it gets him/her out of WP permanently then at least I will have the satisfaction of doing a community service. Unfortunately, however, I doubt that this is the last we have heard from him/her. Dealing with this clown is sort of like playing wac-a-mole with a chameleon. Centpacrr (talk) 21:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

I am wondering if there is actually a potential technical solution here to blocking a specific user from editing within an IP range without blocking anybody else. Every computer sends a good deal of information beyond just its IP when it requests a page from any server on the internet. (To see what is revealed click here.) If a filter can be designed to include a number of these pieces of information, or preferably the MAC address of either the specific computer and/or modem it is connected to if that be determined using software like "Find MAC Address", within any of the IP ranges he/she uses that should go a long way to targeting only the user to be blocked. Another option is also to set a cookie on the user's browser that blocks that computer from accessing Wikipedia's ftp or upload functions. I'm not sure how to do that, but perhaps some tech person with access to the WP server logs can come up with a filter based on this. What this would do, in effect, is block a specific computer no matter what IP it is using, but allow other users within the range to access all of Wikipedia's functions. Just a thought. Centpacrr (talk) 01:07, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Outstanding thought... further research is needed on this one! Jusdafax 03:06, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

This would, of course, certainly need to be developed and implemented by someone at a level of technical expertise and access to WP's infrastructure way above and beyond any of us. However there are clearly too many loopholes in the current system that can be exploited by banned users such as this one that I think it may be technically possible for WP to come up with a way of closing using one or more of these techniques. It is something worth considering, anyway. The current system is clearly not able to effectively eliminate highly disruptive users like this one from its midst if they don't want to be. Based on his/her previous behavior, I'm sure that we have not heard the last of him/her. Centpacrr (talk) 06:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Don't be under the mistaken impression that a ban is an end to the problems. Absent a technical solution (which is very rare), all you can do is revert and get someone to block if they are convinced it's the same person. The only reason a ban has relevance is so that you can revert with confidence - 3RR doesn't apply to reverting banned user edits. However, if you are reverting someone that others think isn't a sock of the banned user, then that can cause different trouble of its own. Anyway, good luck! Ncmvocalist (talk) 09:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes I understand that, but this user is pretty easy to identify because his/her practices are so obvious and hamhanded so it doesn't take much to reveal his/her true identity as the banned sock. Centpacrr (talk) 09:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Maybe we should make an LTA page for him? --Rockstonetalk to me! 04:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Hadn't thought of that, but sounds like a good idea. He/she certainly seems to more than fit the criteria. Centpacrr (talk) 04:42, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Who's dealt with him/her the most? They should make the LTA page. (I'll start it on my Userpage) --Rockstonetalk to me! 17:18, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that I have. Centpacrr (talk) 17:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay then. If you want to help with the LTA- you can find it here: User:Rockstone35/Techwriter2B--Rockstonetalk to me! 17:23, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

And if I can help in some way, let me know. Jusdafax 17:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

You sure can! If you know any information that can help us get this LTA fleshed out, feel free to add it! --Rockstonetalk to me! 17:27, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Were the two IP's this guy was using banned? I don't see them on your page. Jusdafax 17:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure. I can add them if you know the IPs though. (or you can!) --Rockstonetalk to me! 17:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

 Done - I also included refs to the ANI page and note that User:75.2.209.226 remains unblocked. Jusdafax 18:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

I have added a great deal more information to the LTA. Please check it for formatting, etc. (I added my "signature" to what I added so you can see where it came from. These can be removed when it is posted to the LTA list.) Centpacrr (talk) 20:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Awesome. I'm gonna add it to the LTA list now. --Rockstonetalk to me! 03:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Looks good, thanks! Centpacrr (talk) 04:43, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I am unfamiliar with the "LTA list" and don't know where to find it. Could one of you provide a link? Thanks. Jusdafax 05:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I just checked out the LTA page. Looks good (thanks for doing this). Links:[13][14]. Eurytemora (talk) 05:55, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I can only take a smidgen of credit, for hosting this discussion, and cheerleading. The guys above deserve all the rest. Here's hoping this action will drive a wooden stake in the vampire heart of this sockpuppet abuser for once and for all. Thanks for the link, I was unaware of this area... but then there are many things I have yet to learn. Jusdafax 06:05, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism on my talk page

Thank you for reverting the vandalism from my talk page. (Sorry if this was a bit late.) —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 19:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Delighted to help. That was a nasty one! Jusdafax 02:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

I've started a discussion on adding the subject as question #4 at the RfA talk page. I'm bad at wordsmithing, so if you have some phrasing you think would be good could you add it there? Thanks again for the barnstar! Hobit (talk) 02:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

My pleasure, and I think you started the ball rolling nicely at the Rfa page. I have seconded your motion, though not before someone gave it a thumbs-down. (Grumble!) I also asked there that we not get bogged down in parsing every word, as some Wikipedians love to do. I will keep a close eye on this and if someone does not soon come up with a simple one sentence question that will cover it, I'll give it a shot. Thanks again! Jusdafax 02:21, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Rhacel Parrenas and rollback

I have revoked your rollback until this situation is dealt with. It should have been fairly clear that the editor, who is likely the subject of the article, was acting in good faith. Definitely not a case for rollback + warn. NW (Talk) 03:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

It sure wasn't clear to me. I went to the talk page of the editor and found warnings from anti-vandalism editors I respect highly. On top of that there was a sockpuppet template on the page, leading me to feel fairly secure that someone was pulling a fast one. Now this. Jusdafax 03:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Rollback restored, I've contacted NW. Keegan (talk) 05:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks. I'll leave a friendly (no sarcasm intended) message on his page. Thanks again! Jusdafax 05:13, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for protecting from vandalism and also need little help

Dear Mr. Jusdafax,

Thanks for protecting this page from vandalism. I am a minor editor and lacking of knowledge of the security issue / protection of wiki articles. This page is being vandalized frequently by some unknowns. would you please take necessary steps.

Thank you. - Mmh-duke (talk) 16:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Happy to help. The page doesn't seem too badly under attack compared to some, but I have included it on my watchlist. By the way, no need to call me Mr. Jusdafax (laughs), just plain Jusdafax will do. Best wishes! Jusdafax 16:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. :) Mmh-duke (talk) 05:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of L. Martin Griffin, Jr.

Hello! Your submission of L. Martin Griffin, Jr. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nsk92 (talk) 17:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

As I say on the page, thanks for your suggestions, which have improved the article itself as well as my hopes for it to be accepted as a DYK. Best wishes always, Jusdafax 20:15, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: photo of Bolinas Lagoon

Hello, Jusdafax. You have new messages at Stepheng3's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Stepheng3 (talk) 19:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

By the way, I assume you're aware of Wikipedia:Red link. If not, you might want to review it.--Stepheng3 (talk) 21:16, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Sadly, I did not know this. Thanks for being so kind as to assume so, but adding the info anyway. This is very good to know. Jusdafax 21:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm delighted to be of service. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 22:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

I just saw what you said at Chris' talk, and I want to thank you for the kind words—and right back at you too! --Tryptofish (talk) 20:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Does it seem like years ago that we were all fired up about Cda? Jusdafax 20:12, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

I guess it does. At some point, I plan to revisit that issue, but to do it better, learn from past mistakes. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:24, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

You don't know what vandalism is, so don't bother.

I wrote the word 'the'.--Mollythecoolgirl (talk) 16:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)