User talk:Jim1138

'''Welcome!''' 17.12.2011 Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome]] to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|your contributions]]{{#if:|, especially what you did for [[:{{{art}}}]]}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: *[[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]] *[[Wikipedia:Tutorial|Tutorial]] *[[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]] *[[Wikipedia:Article development|How to write a great article]] *[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Please [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign]] your messages on [[Wikipedia:talk page|discussion page]]s using four [[tilde]]s (<nowiki>~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Makhdoom (clan)

Could you please explain how my edit was "unconstructive" and vandalism? I simply attempted to clean up a previous edit. It'd be nice if you didn't abuse your editor privileges so. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.228.133 (talk) 10:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Look who is working for Visi Print or are you so bored you monitor these sites for free? I Doubt it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.142.40.82 (talk) 05:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token a434e7b92531766a0c00201ecd5c12c3

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

I dont understand how to talk back but my edit of the diary off the dead was piss funny ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.250.73 (talk) 04:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thank you for the Barnstar Jim, much appreciated! I was surprised, relieved, and pleased to have received unanimous support for that page move. Vietminh (talk) 03:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

FGM

I haven't been on Wikipedia in a while, just had an inkling that I should check the FGM page haha. I commented in opposition to the Requested Move and reminded the person that started it that they ought to have checked the recent archives before starting an RM, they would have found the RfC that clearly established overwhelming support for the term FGM. Thanks, Vietminh (talk) 08:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi Jim1138. After reviewing your request for rollback, an administrator has enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!That's me! ^{Have doubt?} Track me! 09:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

RE

Lord EDITS is this IP user. Should the user be reported for Sock puppetry? Oz ^talk 05:16, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Forget about what I said above. Oz ^talk 05:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Causes of sexual violence

Sorry, but the IP has a point: they explained their edits and opened up a conversation on the talk page. If you do not wish to participate in that discussion, that's fine, but you cannot simply revert and give them a final warning for vandalism: they are acting appropriately. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks for you note, Jim; I responded on my talk page. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

You were actually quite right to revert IP's section blanking. The deleted material does discuss the motivation for rape and is therefore perfectly appropriate for the article on causes of sexual violence. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 13:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks: it takes character to do what you did. Enjoy, Drmies (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

AIV report on 174.111.68.211

I blocked him for the long-term disruption, but just so you know, it is perfectly within policy to blank warnings from your user talk page. 04:56, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

User talk:216.73.77.45

Sometimes it's easy! Thanks for cleaning up, Drmies (talk) 21:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

what is your take on argumentum ad baculum? --58.164.108.6 (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

AIV

How did that happen? :) ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 08:04, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Hi878's talk page.
Message added 08:12, 27 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 08:12, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Shrewsbury vandalism

Well done, did not notice the massive revisions - probably because Wikipedia only flagged the most recent change. Will check Page History next time! Samluke777 (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Regarding this edit [1]

I got logged out when I made that edit, it was made by me. I was undoing an edit made long ago just noticed that violated the respect for variants rule. This page appears to be written in American English, and when I uploaded that image and the caption was put in my me and another user, it was spelled without a U. With the exception of the U the caption was essentially the same, barring one or two edits made to clarify the Classic Edition title. Someone purposely put in that U, I just came across it, so I chose to fix it Thegreyanomaly (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

[2] After I added it and DKQwerty reworded some parts, the form still had a U. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 20:42, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

If can get consensus to ensure that the entirety of the page be written in British English be my guest, put keep in mind, we are talking about the video game, not the movie. It was published by an American company (Activision). Anyways I have to get off of Wikipedia for a while Thegreyanomaly (talk) 20:53, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

The Article "Grey"

I noticed your comment on my changes to the "Grey" article. I was only changing the spelling for consistency. After being reverted once, I went back through the history and realized the article's historical spelling of "color" I changed the article again for consistency for the other spelling. I added the American English template today to the talk page to reduce future confusion for myself and others. No harm done. :) —C. Raleigh (talk) 23:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for rv'ing that spam from my talk page - can't believe people are setting up accounts just to spam talk pages! Much appreciated. Michaelmas1957 (talk) 01:05, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Queerditch Marsh

First I changed "Quidditch Marsh" in the article for Harry Potter: Quidditch World Cup to "Queerditch Marsh". Then when you changed it, I not only added a citation this time, but changed the other inconsistencies I hadn't caught before. Ignoring my citation, you changed it again.

I understand you don't think I should vandalize pages, but I wish you would check yourself, especially when I have provided a citation. Queerditch Marsh, in Harry Potter lore, is the birthplace of Quidditch. The word evolved over time. And if you ever find a copy of Harry Potter: Quidditch World Cup, you will find that the game mode in question is actually called "Queerditch Marsh". I wouldn't bother changing this one instance of the word and not all the rest if I just hated the word "Quidditch".

Thanks Samushighwind (talk) 02:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC) By the way-- since the wikia is apparently not a reliable source, can I cite the game itself? It's completely, completely silly that people are disputing a fact that is clearly present in the game. I could take a screenshot. But why does this need a citation when the rest of the article evidently does not? You can google search "Queerditch Marsh" and see that I am right. Samushighwind (talk) 02:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

It appears you've been busy lately. I appreciate the help. See ya 'round Tiderolls 05:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Great job reverting the onslaught of vandalism (you've beaten me to it at least 3 times). Keep up the good work! -- Luke (Talk) 02:37, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

E♭ Instead of Eb

You reverted the edit I made to Songs from Les Misérables that changed "Eb" to "E♭" (that means E-flat. Perhaps I misunderstood exactly what "Eb" was intended to mean in the original version (which I doubt, merely because I'm not sure what else it could have meant), but even if this is the case, I fail to see how making that change was "not constructive," as your note indicates. What exactly is not constructive about seeing a perceived shortcoming with an article's formatting and fixing it? 71.195.205.27 (talk) 04:01, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

You may already know this...

...but I mention it to help you avoid future problems. This edit did not correct a spelling error. See WP:ENGVAR. I apologize if I seem to be lecturing; that's not my intention. I just want to make sure you have all the tools you need to do your job. Let me know if you have questions or concerns. See ya 'round Tiderolls 05:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For helping when ClueBot was down! Andrew Kurish (talk) 00:53, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For helping out during a raid. Much thanks! Reliable Forevertalk 01:56, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting that vandalism! HurricaneFan25 15:27, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

RE: Romanian royal family

There is no such person as "Princess Hannah Elisabeth of Romania." I am a genealogist and historian and have considerable expertise in this matter. Take a look at the official royal family website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.155.137.131 (talk) 17:56, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Premature revert

I think you may have jumped the gun for Turkish pilgrim bus attack.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 23:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Pirate Party of Austria

I'm puzzled why you reverted the article about them back to the vandalized version. --White bird 42 (talk) 03:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

at least check your facts before deciding what version is the vandalized one, see: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:White_bird_42&oldid=463930345 Hogdotmac (talk) 03:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

(Perhaps he IS the vandal. Or he simply disagrees with what you wrote; this is what I have discovered with Jim1138...if he disagrees with your write-up, then you're wrong, or breaching neutrality, etc.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.26.94 (talk) 09:24, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

hello

I put an external link to a see also section. Are there proper sections, or a better way to make this refference?188.25.107.83 (talk) 23:12, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Paul

Edit Waring IP

The Ip on the talk page has been reported to AIV for violating 3RR. This has been going on for several days and I am starting to think that until it is blocked that it is best to leave this one alone.Andrew Kurish (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Blocked by responding admin.Andrew Kurish (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

The Toronto Transit Commission has its pluses and minuses. However, each day TTC riders see these things mentioned plain as day; thus the statements and editions made are objective and repeatably observable. I take the TTC, regularly. I know what I speak of. Do you? To use a common phrase that gets batted around a lot lately: "I am the 99%" The nutshell: The point of view IS neutral, and constantly 'flagging' it because you disagree does not change its neutrality Mr. Bus Driver Man.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.26.94 (talk) 09:21, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello, I just want to say thank you for removing that filthy lie that this IP address has wrote http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/58.7.187.142 He is a big fat stupid ugly motherfucker for writing such a lie to me, thank you so much for removing it for me. Much appreciated. :)--Brainiac Adam (talk) 15:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Areopagus of Eastern Continental Greece

Merhaba, Yunan tarihi için girildiğinde Osmanlı Devleti'nin çıkması daha mı iyi görünüyor ? Osmanlı Yunanistan'ına girildiğinde o dönemi işaret ediyor. Teşekkürler. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.185.125.135 (talk) 07:58, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

RE:December 2011

If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Yes, I believe you have made a mistake by undoing my edit. As I written in my edit summary:

Neither the film nor the cast and crew(including Gemma) say anything about Tamara being the mermaid queen; therefore, she is only a mermaid

I understand completely of Wikipedia's tendency to take only what news articles state. However, films are a source too; so the way they are set up matters as well. No official film material states that Tamara was a mermaid...they say "Gemma Ward portrayed a mermaid named Tamara", but not "Gemma Ward portrayed a mermaid queen named Tamara". No such thing was stated in the film's original script, books, etc state that she's a queen: not even the cast and crew, including Gemma Ward herself.

But back to what I took out stuff, even though one was sourced. As you can see in my edit, I took out all the "mermaid queen" nonsense because nothing related to that is stated in your so-called source. The only thing that's stated is that Gemma Ward played a mermaid. That's it. Nothing else. Nothing saying "Oh, she's playing a queen!". So take that as a source that all of this mermaid queen business is just nonsense and gibberish made by the press.

Thank you for your time. 75.90.114.161 (talk) 03:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

George Grant article

The vandalism of user EducationResource have been continually removed and/or corrected. It would be better to take the article down altogether rather than have derogatory and false information constantly posted. Although I and others have repeatedly reported the abuse, this user persists in what appears to be a personal vendetta. Mniearl (talk) 03:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Bronwen Astor

Jim

Lady Astor lives in the UK. Pimlico, where she attends church, is an area of London SW1. Nothing to do with Florida at all!

Charles — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.90.228 (talk) 22:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

You realize that was a talk page, right? Hello71 (talk) 03:50, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

(Edit Conflict (x2)) I was commenting on User:Tide roll's message on User talk:83.147.132.173. I saw the offending edit on Recent Changes, and rolled it back (Twinkle) before checking said IP's talk page. I saw that Tide roll had left a message already regarding said IP editing the same page, and assumed it to be the same edit. As such, I posted a comment on Tide roll's talk page. Either way... it's not polite to revert people's changes to other people's talk pages. It's Talk:, not Article:. Hello71 (talk) 03:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Now now. I've trouted this huggler, and he'll be more careful next time.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:59, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

You've gotta be careful when using Huggle.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:53, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Just for fun (WP:TROUT),

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Next time be more careful.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

What is Huggle? Hello71 (talk) 03:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Me no likey Google. Also, who uses that Windows thing? Hello71 (talk) 03:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Huggle is the tool this user used to revert your talk page comment on Tide rolls' talk page. It is an automatic program that runs on Windows used for super-fast vandalism reverting. The key is "super-fast" - false positives often occur.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) WP:HUG   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 04:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

your message to me

On the kentucky wildcat page, instead of being angry i did not cite the dui charge of billy gillispie, why not find an article that proves it, it is not controversial, it is a proven fact, he was caught over the legal blood alchohol level to operate a car. he was caught by the cops. in fact multiple times. I just wanted to telly ou all this. i am a new user and not sure how to cite. but it is a true thing and i would like this to be adknowledged — Preceding unsigned comment added by Intellectual factteller (talk • contribs) 02:31, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Sorry

About the anon impersonating me, I just realized he came back on my page and now is impersonating me Reliable Forever^talk 00:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding, it is much appreciated. I was scared to death when I found out that IP had been impersonating me, but now I am relieved. I am going to see if there is anything I can do to prevent further impersonation of me Reliable Forever^talk 17:11, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Hoops gza

A user called Hoops gza has created a bunch of redirects for example List of roads named after Hitler. He has created about a dozen redirects having to do with roads and Hitler. Is this a little excessive?Msruzicka (talk) 03:07, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

thanks for keeping an eye on holder in due course

Piratejosh85 (talk) 17:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Robert Noyce vandal

He's doing that to the Japanese version as well, but I cannot restore it there because for some reason I'm blocked. Could you please oblige? Thanks. 58.138.36.67 (talk) 01:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Exmoor Emperor

Welcome to wikipedia. You may edit anything you wish. However, re: you recent remarks about the Exmoor Emperor:

Re: "welcome to Wikipedia". Why thanks, how kind of you!

Re: "did not appear to be constructive". How dare you! Please (a) apologise (b) put my edit back, (c) read the reference in future and (d) don't jump to conclusions again in future. Here's the ref again for you to check: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-16138993

Many thanks for all your "help". When your done, we'll say no more about it. 87.112.172.134 (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

You're bordering on a personal attack here. Calabe1992 21:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Calabel. Pls remove yourself from this discussion. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.172.134 (talk) 21:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Then don't edit in this demeanor. Also, learn how to WP:SIGN. Calabe1992 21:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Right, here's another link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2072991/Is-head-Emperor-Exmoor-stag-mounted-wall-Devon-hotel.html

Right, here's another link: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/wildlife/8949555/Emperor-of-Exmoors-head-found-mounted-on-hotel-wall.html Right, here's another link: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2011/12/12/head-of-emperor-of-exmoor-stag-found-stuffed-and-mounted-on-hotel-wall-115875-23629779/

Oh look, another link: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3993991/Emperor-head-found-in-hotel.html

Perhaps there's some more. I know; let's google it, there will be hundreds!

Thanks for listening. 87.112.172.134 (talk) 21:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

I think you've proven your point. Let up already. Calabe1992 21:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Wilco, Calabe1992. Let's hope the bleedin' thing sticks this time! 87.112.172.134 (talk) 21:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting a personal attack on my page. Rm1271 ^{talk to me} 21:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Me, too

Thanks for the help on my talk page! Cheers! Wikipelli ^Talk 02:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jim, I was trying to revert vandalism. Have closer look. Jschnur (talk) 02:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Jim Jschnur (talk) 02:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

London, Ohio Motto edit

I have edited the London, OH page to add in my home towns motto. I have heard this said for years, my great grandmother said it, my grandmother said it, the principle of my elementary school said it. It dates back to the original feud between London and West Jefferson Ohio. If you are going to flag my edit as vandalism then please, do the research before passing judgment!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.169.16 (talk) 04:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Leslie Marcus Hughes

He has been appointed as stand-in to the late Gary Speed. His name is: Leslie Marcus Hughes, shortened to Mark. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.168.77 (talk) 22:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting vandalism on my user page! Mark Arsten (talk) 03:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Maxine Waters

That one anon IP has vandalized 7 times in one day. Take off the gloves and go for a block on the very next vandalizing. --Alatari (talk) 07:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for removing vandalism from my talk page - enjoy!! Denisarona (talk) 07:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Tgeairn's talk page.
Message added 07:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tgeairn (talk) 07:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Tgeairn's talk page.
Message added 07:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tgeairn (talk) 07:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: FUS RO DAH

"Anyone who does not float in this inundation is most condemned. Such a person cannot be delivered for millions of kalpas.

PURPORT The kalpa is explained in the Bhagavad-gita (8.17): sahasra-yuga-paryantam ahar yad brahmano viduh. One day of Brahma is called a kalpa. A yuga, or maha-yuga, consists of 4,320,000 years, and one thousand such maha-yugas constitute one kalpa. The author of Sri Caitanya-caritamrta says that if one does not take advantage of the Krsna consciousness movement of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu, he cannot be delivered for millions of such kalpas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.94.55.231 (talk) 09:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm persistent

If you keep reverting mah edits ah will revert them back love katy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.86.211 (talk) 00:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Violence Against Women template on FGM page

I checked and SlimVirgin replaced it in September with the table which shows the prevalence of FGM by country (diff: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Female_genital_mutilation&diff=449608948&oldid=449607044). It's up to you whether you wanna replace it, It seems it was an aesthetic choice on SlimVirgin's part. Happy Holidays Vietminh (talk) 21:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Prespa e Vogël and Golloborda

EEK!! give me a chance, the change comment said I am splitting the article per a long standing split tag that obviously had concensus. I had literally hit edit on the discussion pages to explain to the whole world my intentions. Please give me say an hour to get things sorted Op47 (talk) 20:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

 —Preceding undated comment added 04:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC). 

Talk

Please tell me how what I said could possibly be misconstrued as a personal attack??? This is getting really silly Manson 04:59, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

I reverted vandalism and the reflist should have been re-added with the revert. It was the vandalizing IP that took out the reflist. Please check who you should be chastising before acting hastily and accusing someone who was just doing basic vandal patrol. (talk→ LesHB ←track) 05:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

hello

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Zulfikar_Ali_Bhutto.jpg this is becausue i get new file with free licence: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soubor:Zulfikar_Ali_Bhutto.jpg

and i need delete fair use image, becausue if i use file from commons on EN wikipedia, fair use image it preferated.

please, delete this image: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Zulfikar_Ali_Bhutto.jpg --Teplice, Ústecko (talk) 23:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

AGAIN: only problem is name duplicity of both files. if i use file from commons on en wikipedia, en wikipeduia automatically replace him with fair use version — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teplice, Ústecko (talk • contribs) 23:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

thanks --Teplice, Ústecko (talk) 23:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Your revert on Sollicitudi Rei Socialis

Hi, I merged two very short articles, according to a year-old merge request tag, and created a redirect. While I'm new to wikipedia I do believe that was appropriate and non-controversial. Can you explain why the revert? If it was a mistake would you please put it back? Thanks Jamelchior (talk) 02:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

you did put it back!! Thanks Jamelchior (talk) 02:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Sorry Jim1138, thanks for deleting that piece of information on Naked (Dev song), i would never have noticed it as my annoying sister put that piece of info on it because she is in love with that song! Thank you again, Zach464~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach464 (talk • contribs) 16:57, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

austin stevens

There was nothing wrong with the information in the austin stevens page.. all of that is fact — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.203.252 (talk) 22:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at DeathClutch Gym, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 22:59, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Seamus Heaney

Hello Jim, I don't know about this edit. It seems to me that the IP was improving the article. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

• I see you dropped them a line. Thanks for that. Drmies (talk) 02:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I wanted to thank you for saving my user page from vandalism :-) Cheers, Lord Roem (talk) 23:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

RE: Glendora

The information that was added to Glendora, California's Wikipedia page is completely factual.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRHM6lHaFrU

"I'm the only living person in Glendora" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.171.134.237 (talk) 07:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

NPOV vioation

Sorry, but I would rather instead file a disruptive editing and WP:NPOV violation charge against Malik Shabazz. The Israellycool site and investigation therein is the very definition of a primary source. Shabazz's reversion is based on little more than his own political leanings. My posting is thus in need of escalation to arbitration, as I feel I cannot get a proper vetting from crowdsourcing, which will just go to disruptive editing and thus censorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DevilInPgh (talk • contribs) 07:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Woah there. Arbitration is an absolute last resort. You are not prohibited from going to WP:ANI, but beware of WP:BOOMERANG.Jasper Deng (talk) 07:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

The blanking of pages

Thank you for your attentive and energetic activity in looking out for improper edits.

However, when it comes to the blanking of pages, you may want to take a pause before reverting. Wikipedia practice recognizes the blanking of pages as a way for an author of an article to request deletion of a page, and it's a legitimate request if he was the only one contributing substance to the article (according to WP:G7). In the case of Jay Rice, that's exactly what was going on. --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

While the template says not to delete the template, that's primarily to prevent people from trying to stop the AfD process (and in fact the user had taken just such a step earlier). An appropriate reason for speedy trumps the need for an AfD. There may be a reading of procedure which would suggest restoring it, but that's more a matter of imprecise (or not-covering-all-contingencies) procedure, rather than the actual intent. --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, misunderstood criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irvinyalom (talk • contribs) 08:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

That was constructive, actually

That edit was actually rather constructive, as it neatly concludes a discussion without breaking any guidelines. There was nothing wrong with it at all, actually. Chairvoyance (talk) 19:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)</nowiki>