User talk:J.delanoy

My wheel-warring policy:

Admins: If you see me make a logged action that you think I should not have done, I will not consider it wheel-warring if you undo it without asking for my permission. However, if I marked the action as being done after running a checkuser query, or as part of a sockpuppet investigation, you should ask me or another checkuser before undoing it. In any case, if you do revert one of my actions, I would appreciate it if you tell me that you did so. Thanks!

Chess, anyone?

Make a move...
View current game and archives

J.delanoy vs. World
Chessboard	Moves
a b c d e f g h 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 a b c d e f g h
	J.delanoy to move...
	# J.delanoy World 1 e4 e6 2 d4 Nf6 3 Bd3 Bb4+ 4 Bd2 Na6 5 a3 Bxd2+ 6 Qxd2 c5 7 Nf3 O-O 8 e5 Nd5 9 Nc3 Nxc3 10 Qxc3 cxd4 11 Nxd4 Qg5 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Donscalos

I've posted an article yesterday about Paul Roche The man died in 2007 and was a very important Poet and writer, translated classic Greek tragedies that had never been before. Not to mention that he was part of one of the most important art group in England in the 20th century. He's a published author and still after his death has lot of followers and fans. Yesterday I tried to replace an article and it is just unfair that it was deleted. Paul Roche (the writer poet) is mentioned as a reference in several articles on Wikipedia but the results of that research is Paul Roche, young sportsman from Ireland with a text as small as his success and importance in the world.

This isn't great and makes the content on several articles irrelevant( Like the one about Duncan Grant). Also it is morally important to bring up the most important information first in an encyclopedia. If my cat was called Barrack Obama and had killed 50 mice I wonder if it would be great to have "Barrack hussein Obama president of the United States of America since 2009" as research keywords because my puss would be taking the space. Well it's a about the same thing Between Paul Roche, an amazing Poet, an acclaimed published writer who wrote a movie script "Oedipus the King" where Orson Welles played and an unknown young man from deep deep Ireland who won a few competition at an obscure sport in his local villages. I don't think the one that comes up first should be the sportsman. Also the content of his article is very poor like his career that still really hasn't taken off. I think Wikipedia should be culture orientated and not become a blogging platform for anyone who fancy's himself as part of an encyclopedia. Even if I might post this article in several blogs :)

Also, as an answer to your comment I wanted to say that the author of this article gave me full rights to publish her text. She actually wrote it for the telegraph not the opposite. She's a writer herself. There's no right violation and I can prove it.

My questions are. How do I make sure that this article won't be deleted after 5 minutes again and could we ask the sportsman to add "Paul Roche Hurling player" ? since his tiny career in hurling is not very important compared to the other Paul Roche's achievements over 91 years and that the nice article I'm trying to post might be important for lot of students in literature and classics. Also everytime someone will mention the important Paul Roche (people are unlikely to write in an article Paul Donald Roche (poet)) on Wikipedia he will find that unimportant person instead. It will be a bad thing for culture I think. I won't let go about this one, it just doesn't make any sense.

Again

Dear J.Delanoy, you said you would do something about the situation in Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/Macedonia. The demeaning and intimidating attitude of ChrisO is as alive as always. His arrogance and offensive attitude are clearly a matter where you as a ref should step in. Please do something or just plainly state that I am wrong and his attitude is civil and according to Wiki policy. Thx GK1973 (talk) 11:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Just got on, checking over pages. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay, you're going to have to be more specific. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[1], [2], [3], [4] (I am not really sure about that, maybe it would be more proper to have notified an admin first?), [5], [6], [7], [8].

So..are profiling, characterizing editors hardcore nationalists, removing edits one does not like, urging editors to leave the discussion (actually this situation is the sole reason why my involvement lessened, a great victory of his I suppose...), calling for bans etc the way we should debate here? GK1973 (talk) 12:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Actually, J.Delanoy, I was actually going to write to you about this myself. I would like you to remove all references to my alleged nationality by users BalkanFever and ChrisO. That would be the entire thread of comments that was initiated by [9] and would definitely include [10], [11] and [12]. I am also asking that oversight be used to permanently delete the edits, as I consider my nationality to be a matter of personal privacy. Further to that, I am requesting that you address BalkanFever's and ChrisO's incivility ([13], [14]). Editors who do not support their POV have been blocked or banned for much less; allowing them to insult people with impunity is beginning to give the impression of two weights and two measures in conduct policy enforcement. Finally, I am now formally accusing ChrisO of attempted outing, in light of his most recent posting of off-wiki stuff in an attempt to speculate on my real-life identity and ethnicity. Please advise as to what further steps should be taken. --Radjenef (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't think you understand how the oversight tool works. Oversighting those edits would be impossible. Well, not impossible, but it would require that every single edit made to that page after the one in question also be oversighted, which is simply not going to happen. Also, while I do not think anything was gained by saying what he did, ChrisO did not out you. Anyone looking at your editing patterns and comments would come to the conclusion that you are Greek, or at the very least, that you are very sympathetic to the Greek side of this issue.

If you still think that ChrisO's comments relating to that are an issue, you should probably talk to him. Which, incidentally, is what both of you should have done in the first place. Why is it that anyone in a dispute immediately comes running to me (or whoever has "power") instead of just talking to the individual that you have a problem with. I don't get why that concept is so difficult to grasp. If you cannot get a satisfactory conclusion after talking to him, post to WP:ANI.

As far as the diffs you and GK1973 gave, once again, talk to the people you have a problem with, and ask them to tone it down. After I finish my current project, I will make a post to the main discussion page about decorum.

And finally, with regard to Radjenef's implied accusation that I am playing with two standards here, ("Editors who do not support their POV have been blocked or banned for much less.") please give me ONE example where I have been impartial. As far as I know, there have been only two people blocked and/or banned as a result of their edits to the discussion pages. One was wiki-lawyering to evade a topic ban imposed on him by the Arbitration Committee. The other was a sockpuppet of someone Future Perfect at Sunrise apparently disagreed with in the past, and was only contributing in order to harass him. In any case, the sock's response to my ban notification clearly shows what his intentions were. Are you seriously suggesting that what ChrisO and BalkanFever have said is comparable to sockpuppetry and overt evasion of an ArbCom-imposed ban? J.delanoy^gabs_adds 17:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't referring to you, J.delanoy, I apologise if it sounded that way. I was referring to the way things were handled prior to the commencement of the generalized discussion. It goes without saying that we are all thankful for all the time and effort you (and the other referees) have put into overseeing the discussion. --Radjenef (talk) 17:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

As far as speculations concerning my nationality go... I understand why someone might deduce, after checking my editing patterns, that I am sympathetic to the Greek side of this issue (even though my views are always backed up by a policy rationale). But to speculate on nationality is a different thing, especially when people allege to track my off-wiki actions. Looking at people's editing patterns I could easily deduce that Future Perfect, ChrisO, Taivo and many others are sympathetic to the Republic's side of this issue. That wouldn't give me the right to claim that they have some connection to the Republic. These people have been asking that Greeks be excluded from the discussion because of bias. Now, I guess, they're asking the same thing, not for Greeks, but for people they deduce to be Greek? This is the ugly slippery slope I was referring to during arbitration: "Anyone who disagrees with us must be Greek, so they should be excluded from the discussion". I guess I'll go post at ANI if worse comes to worse. --Radjenef (talk) 17:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

No one, I repeat, no one is going to be banned/blocked for anything other than their own actions. Full stop. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I have clearly stated to him on many occasions that I find his attitude demeaning and offensive. He never denied it, he just pushed on. What else should I do? Writing here was not my first attempt to oppose his "style" of writing. GK1973 (talk) 07:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Please give us a break

please give us a break on the editing it was funny right? :) we wont vandalize any more although you might find others that we vandalized earlier. we are sorrey but there is nothing we can do about the ones we already vandalized from: the people who vandalized chubby cox,stay out of my life,mark wood, and the adventures of tom sawyer. :(

First off, vandalism is not funny. It damages the hard work of other editors, and is some cases it is defamatory. Second, the vandalism to the other articles you vandalized has been removed...

Contributing constructively is better than vandalism... It helps the encyclopedia, it obviously doesn't result in punishment, and you can do it all you want :) Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 19:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

BTW you forgot to fix 6sn7 your welcome your vandalizing friends:)

User talk:92.226.152.244

Hello, I noticed you reverted one of his edits so you must know this guy and I thought I should probably ask you, if it's OK. If you can, could you please protect his page. He's only using it for further abuse and his last edit is just so off the wall. Per these [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. If possible please protect it thanks. --Brad Polard (talk) 20:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Chiranjeevi

I was just about to request page protection, when I saw you'd got to it. There's something going on, I'm not sure what, but I've started Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vza.kurrodu.  pablo_hablo. 21:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Range block in Greek wikipedia

We know how to use range blocks but there is no problem at all. We apreciate a lot your help against vandalism in greek wikipedia.--MARKELLOS^{Leave me a message}

Shame on your for deleting the Crabcore article

I was disappointed to see this article get deleted, thanks to some hokey made-up policies and pseudo-technical jargon. This is why we can't have nice things. NIRVANA2764 (talk) 05:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

YES! That was very upsetting - I don't see why the article was deleted. Crabcore was even recently referenced in an article in The Guardian, a large UK newspaper. Why did you vandalize the page?76.112.235.92 (talk) 11:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

If you want to appeal the decision, Deletion review is down the hall and to the left. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

banned

You have banned user Spis Ikke Gul Snø. Personally, I would ban anyone using the term f*** when addressing fellow users. As an administrator, I now ask of you to find out this user's IP address and, if possible, whose shockpuppet he/she is. Politis (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Simply being an administrator is not enough to find out what someone's IP address is. You have to be a checkuser to be able to do that, and I am not. Sorry. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 15:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

J.delanoy is right... a checkuser is needed, and those are rather sparse around here, due to the nature of the userright. Also, it's sockpuppet, not shockpuppet :) UntilItSleeps ^{Public PC} 17:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Although a "shockpuppet" if it existed would be a terrifying creature. It would be like Chucky meets Raiden! :D Shadowmorph ^{^"^} 20:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Spamming all the arbitrators

You are not allowed to remove ISP headers. Spamming all the arbitrators' talk pages is not going to do anything. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I am allowed to keep my page as I see fit. I want no page.
I am not spamming arbitrators. It is called discussion. Go to the dictionary & lookup the word. & honestly, your opinion of what Im doing matters not. If the page owners have a problem they'll let me know. 173.79.58.33 (talk) 18:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

See WP:BLANKING. By the way, that is exactly what the arbs will tell you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I read that long ago. My favourite part is this : Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred... Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users, and can encourage further disruption; removal of template warnings is rarely an urgent or important matter, and it is often best to simply let the matter rest if other disruption stops. 173.79.58.33 (talk) 18:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments yes, ISP headers no. You know this, and yet you have done it multiple times over the last few months. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments, isp headers,newsletters,wikilove, & any other thing posted that I dont want. Why? Bc it is my page.
There is no need for my ISP to be shown. This is not a shared ip. If you all will run the checks you claim you will do you will see this.
And the archives show all info it isnt neccessary for it to be posted.173.79.58.33 (talk) 18:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

A Request

User:ChildofMidnight has started a thread, which I believe is nothing but him looking for an arguement with anyone and everyone. I boldly closed it and archived it (with the archive top and bottom templates) and was reverted by CoM. Would you mind taking a look at the thread and see if it needs to be closed. If any admin closes it, CoM is less likely to revert. If you wish not to get in the middle of this mess, I will completely understand. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 02:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Crabcore is a real genre, Respect!

I disagree with your decision to delete the article on Crabcore as it was somewhat informative and provided good examples. Its stub-like articles like these that help people learn about the new emerging trends in music and the media. I remember this same thing happened back with Hollywood Undead, mods deleted their page claiming that they were not a real band even though they had an EP out and stated one of the reasons why as being "joke band in a joke genre". I think it would be unwise to make a similar mistake, please reconsider un-deleting the crabcore article.

Regards, ~GrinningDemon.

I think that the consensus was clear when you take away all the canvassed users. If you want to appeal, we do have a Deletion review. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Macedonia main articles RfC

Hi J.delanoy, here when you prepared the page for RfC you removed proposal C. I'm not sure whether this was intentional or not. Could you please clarify? Thanks, BalkanFever 08:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it was intentional. On the main page, I described why I chose the proposals that I did. Specifically in this case, no one who chose Proposal C said that it was their "first choice". J.delanoy^gabs_adds 13:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Please have a look at my comment regarding the removal of option G for C. I really think that, given the circumstances, both proposals should stay. --Radjenef (talk) 14:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied there. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 14:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Michael Jackson

Hello,

Michael Jackson converted to Islam in November 20, 2008 and changed his name to "Mikhaeel Jackson" in a cerenomy in Los Angeles. Also, I gave 2 relevant source. Why does not this information to Michael Jackson page of Wiki ? Thanks.--Cemsentin1 (talk) 13:16, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

What the heck are you yelling at me for? J.delanoy^gabs_adds 13:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting User talk:SeamenDrewPickles . Look at what he left on my talkpage [15]the reply I left on his talk page;)[16] Happy EditingSchnitzelMannGreek. 15:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Odin5000

Might I suggest that you take a look at Odin5000's contributions list? This looks very much like a sleeper sockpuppet account, probably of one of the many editors blocked for disruption in this topic area, possibly one of those sanctioned by the ArbCom. A checkuser probably wouldn't be inappropriate (though I know you can't do that yourself, of course). -- ChrisO (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I asked a CU, and they said that there is no evidence of socking, although they did agree that it is clearly an SPA. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the clarification. -- ChrisO (talk) 17:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Odin500

You do know that he has reported you to AIV. I don't belive him, but you may want to straighten it out. Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 16:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw, thatnks. I believe that I have the authority to do what I did, but if he wants to pursue it, he is of course welcome to do so. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 16:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

He's now started an AN/I discussion - WP:AN/I#Ban J.delanoy for Vote Rigging. -- ChrisO (talk) 17:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 17:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Request for clarification: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia 2

Since you are involved in the discussion concerning the removal of Proposal G, I am informing you of the request for clarification I have put forth [17]. I am only doing this because I believe that the greater community should have a chance of seeing and evaluating the proposal by itself. I highly regard all of the effort that you have put in this discussion, so far, and wish to thank you for it. --Radjenef (talk) 17:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

User_talk:Aitias#Odin5000

Hey J.delanoy. :) Just if that was not clear, my question was not at all intended to question your actions; I was just curious. Best wishes, — Aitias // discussion 18:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

That's perfectly fine. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

E-mail

You've been sent one. Thanks. Acalamari 19:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 19:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Responded. I won't bug you here anymore with further replies. Thanks. Acalamari 19:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Spellcast

Perhaps time for unprotection? What are your thoughts? Enigma^msg 19:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Done. I had assumed that he would unprotect it himself, but I guess he didn't notice. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 20:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you.

Thanks for the vandal revert on my user page (userpage?). - Eugene Krabs (talk) 21:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Note

Just a note to say I'm suspicious that the IP you blocked earlier is possibly an IP sock of User:ColScott, of whom I ran afoul because of repeated sock activities. I'm mostly basing that on what is essentially stalking of my contributions to revert and add the reference to my vision problem (which is misrepresented in the edit summary). I can't quite confirm the sock or I'd make another new report, but I did want to apprise you of this. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

OTRS query

Sorry to bother you, but you're the first name I recognised on the OTRS lists and I'm unfamiliar with The Ways Of OTRS.

There's a book cover: File:LeapIntoLegend.JPG. It's in use on the artist's page, has been used on the author's page (then removed, the image deleted, now the article AfDed) and would be useful on the article for the book subject Bluebird K7, as there's seemingly nothing else available that isn't copyrighted. The image page seems to claim both OTRS permission by the artist for the artist's page (alone?) whilst retaining copyright, yet it's also tagged (correctly?) as being GFDL and CC-by-sa.

This puzzles me. If it's CC-by-sa, then it's free for use on any article, can't be restricted to one article, and why would there need to be an OTRS ticket at all? Is it really licensed under CC-by-sa?

Can you please either clarify this, or point to where I ought to be looking. Thanks. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Grnch

Hi again! Would you say that User:Grnch would be classified as a Macedonia-focused WP:SPA since all of his other edits were minor edits done two years ago [18]? If yes, then would the WP:SPA accounts do not get to !vote ruling apply to him too? --Radjenef (talk) 00:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Also, could we request for a Checkuser? This user's knowledge of wikipedia policies seems strange given their list of contributions. --Radjenef (talk) 01:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I am not an active editor, but still a regular reader and user of Wikipedia for several years, so it is natural that I have become familiar with WP policies and other WP lore over the years. Checkuser will reveal that I am logging on from my home cable connection which has a semi-static IP address that hasn't changed since last year.

I am disengaging that user for now as the situation seems hopeless. He has been reverting all my edits and responds to my talk page comments with personal attacks. For the love of God please enforce 1RR: [19], [20], [21]. Note that the last revert used a personal attack as a response to my policy rationale. --Radjenef (talk) 02:29, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Unilateral editing of Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Macedonia/main articles

User:Radjenef is making unilateral edits to proposal text without discussing them first ([22] [23] [24]), even though we already entered the RfC phase. I reverted them with explanatory comments ([25] [26] [27]). Could you please take a look at this and clarify whether such unilateral edits are allowed at this point?

It was not clear to me what is the status of proposals at this point. If reverting was the wrong thing to do, I apologize and I will accept any sanctions you deem appropriate. --Grnch (talk) 02:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Chris Clements

Apparently there was more than one contributor to this page (so G7 doesn't apply), and Scorpion0422 (talk · contribs) requests that it be restored. Could you look into this? Thanks. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. I was deleted as part of a deletion discussion in the past, so I don't know. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

It was deleted as the result of an afd, but since then the person has received several more directing credits and was nominated for an Emmy Award (it should be noted that I was the user that originally nominated it for deletion). -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 16:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Logger9's glass state article

You just restored that article. Did _you_ read and understand it ? Could you explain why a text on the glassy state starts with a long section about the viscosity of simple liquids ? Could you tell me what the fifty-odd unsorted references are good for ? -- Paula Pilcher (talk) 16:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

John Strange (Musician)

If you're still around I've come across this negative, unsourced BLP that is just begging for deletion. :) -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 05:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah, please disregard. DMacks zapped it right after I posted this. Thanks anyway, though. -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 05:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Image not displaying in article

Hi J.delanoy,

Could you help me to find out why an image I like to embedd in my latest article 'Colin Lester' doesnt display? I uploaded it in wiki commons and the image is named: Colin_Lester.png but when addin it at this section

{{Infobox musical artist |Img = |Name = Colin Lester | Img = Colin Lester.png | Img_capt = Colin Lester | Img_size = 147

it only displays this: File: Colin Lester.png

would you know if there is a time delay between uploading to wiki commons and the image displaying in the article or did i miss anything here? One thing is that if I perform a search in commons, it also shows no search results... would you know why?

this is the image i try to add:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Colin_Lester.PNG

could you edit the article Colin Lester in wikipedia and add this image for me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knersi1 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

thanks for your help

Knersi 1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knersi1 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Civility??

I don't believe it is necessary for this individual to speak to me in this manner. Here[28] and here[29]. I've asked for a reference and in response I get;

• ".. I mean for fuck's sake, don't you see the double standard here."
• "Tell me, what is there to reference? Your lack of knowledge of a basic English word? Your blatant dislike for me and obviously, my people?"

Followed by the deletion of a reference.[30]

And this statement[31];

• "To conclude, I've decided that I truly don't give a fuck, I won't revert the "results" on this page anymore. There you fucking go."

--Kansas Bear (talk) 20:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Unknown edit

Hi...

I just arrived at wikipedia and discovered a message waiting for me. Apparently you reverted a change that had been made to a page on wikipedia (earl of something, I believe).

Just letting you know that I have never made a change to anything on wikipedia.

Keep up the earnest and unending patrol to weed out those confounders of truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.27.196 (talk) 01:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

24.80.121.187

Looks like one of Anonymous' best (worst?) is going to need his talk page blocked for the duration of his block. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Help please

I changed my username yesterday and not I'm not autoconfirmed. Is there anyway you as an admin can change this sts so I can use twinkle and edit semi protected pages? There is a Road, No Simple Highway (talk) 17:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but there is no way for an administrator to grant autoconfirmed status to a user who does not already have it. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 17:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Is it because you are still logged in on your old account? - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 17:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I had it until yesterday, How long do I have to wait until it forwards my watchlist and contrib history to the new one? I don't want to lose 3000 contribs. How do I log out of the old one? it has a redirect. There is a Road, No Simple Highway (talk) 17:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

It is because you are still logged in on your old account. You see, that edit to this talk page came from Special:Contributions/HellinaBucket. Your new user name is User:Hell in a Bucket, log in as that and you'll have autoconfirmed back, along with your watchlist and contribs - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 17:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Try logging out and logging back in as your new username. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 17:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You sir are a genius, thank you it worked! Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm not vandalising u idiot, i'm changing that bike racers statistics to what they actually are, this guy only joined Moto GP two races ago so he has no rave wins or fastest laps, all statistsics from other seasons(apart from all time points, race starts and chapionships) stop reporting people when u don't know anything about it yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.248.188 (talk) 21:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)