Jump to content

User talk:J.delanoy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mathamax (talk | contribs)
→‎IMPORTANT: new section
Mathamax (talk | contribs)
Line 335: Line 335:
Are you bothering to read anything I write, or is this some kind of bot?
Are you bothering to read anything I write, or is this some kind of bot?


== User: J delanoy Is a Retard ==
== IMPORTANT ==


I am so stupid. I am also gay. Fuck me!!!
Fuck you asshole. you are a retard

Revision as of 01:27, 17 December 2008


My wheel-warring policy:
Admins: If you see me make a logged action that you think I should not have done, I will not consider it wheel-warring if you undo it without asking for my permission. However, if I marked the action as being done after running a checkuser query, or as part of a sockpuppet investigation, you should ask me or another checkuser before undoing it. In any case, if you do revert one of my actions, I would appreciate it if you tell me that you did so. Thanks!


Chess, anyone?

Make a move...
View current game and archives

J.delanoy vs. World
Chessboard Moves
abcdefgh
8
a8 black rook
c8 black bishop
f8 black rook
g8 black king
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
d7 black pawn
f7 black pawn
g7 black pawn
h7 black pawn
a6 black knight
e6 black pawn
e5 white pawn
g5 black queen
d4 white knight
a3 white pawn
c3 white queen
d3 white bishop
b2 white pawn
c2 white pawn
f2 white pawn
g2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
a1 white rook
e1 white king
h1 white rook
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
J.delanoy to move...
# J.delanoy World
1 e4 e6
2 d4 Nf6
3 Bd3 Bb4+
4 Bd2 Na6
5 a3 Bxd2+
6 Qxd2 c5
7 Nf3 O-O
8 e5 Nd5
9 Nc3 Nxc3
10 Qxc3 cxd4
11 Nxd4 Qg5
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

Think about this...

If Space is Infinite, then there are an infinite amount of J. Delanoy's eating a coconut, right now.

--TheCiscoKid Talk to me 22:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hehe, that's sweet. J.delanoygabsadds 22:23, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know, seriously, that also means that there are an infinite amount of Ciscokid's that are on there way home from a long day of school (But, I'm not one of them :O) --TheCiscoKid Talk to me 22:37, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And there's probably a j.delanoy somewhere who got pulled over for going 85 on the highway around an hour ago, but it's not me >_> J.delanoygabsadds 22:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quite sure that there are an infinite number of DavidWSs trying to buy coconuts as a gift for an infinite number of J.delanoys, and, due to customs, will all be returned to a single on or to the sender. Due to the fact that the mass of all these coconuts exceeds the mass of our puny planet, we will all die after being covered by billions of tons of coconuts, all because a userbox specified that J.delanoy likes coconuts. Therefore, we shall blame him for the end of the world. DavidWS (contribs) 19:14, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While you have infinite parallel wavefunctions (the coconuts, for instance), they are otherwise probability-tunneled variants of the same object. In the event of a wave function collapse across the infinite variations in probability, you would end up with a single coconut being returned to sender, not a multitude of coconuts. Instead of a solar-system swallowing singularity snacking sedately on our little blue-green dirtball of a world, the larger issue of your scenario would be the twin affronts to our economy of the price of coconuts dropping to nil (since we'd have an infinite supply of them) and uncollected insufficient postage costs crippling the shipping industry. Of course, since my own scenario implies a total existence failure (that is, the universe just ceases to exist), I think I'd prefer cheap coconuts instead. Laters! Kylu (talk) 00:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
O_o my brain hurts now! All because J.delanoy here likes coconuts! :D. UntilItSleeps PublicPC (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suuurrre. Blame me... >_> J.delanoygabsadds 19:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why

i went to ashcroftt high school and what i put was the truth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmjnhh123 (talkcontribs) 11:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide a citation to a reliable source. J.delanoygabsadds 18:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page For Stephen Elliott (music manager)

Hi,

I was wondering what "promotional" services were advertised in the article posted my colleague?

Also i was wondering what needs to be changed for it to get posted?

All the best, Ben Carp —Preceding unsigned comment added by BennyBoi09 (talkcontribs) 15:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is your colleague incapable of asking me himself? J.delanoygabsadds 18:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Can you leave my page up please even for a few days? i'm not trying to start a hoax or anything but am doing this as a joke to a friend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratchet 2008 (talkcontribs) 17:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NOT for a list of many of the things Wikipedia is not. ("Joke to a friend" qualifies.)  Frank  |  talk  17:58, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing

File:Allaroundamazingbarnstar3.png All Around Amazing Barnstar
For being an excellent editor, reverting fastor than cluebot, for being humerous, for excellent judgement, excellent admin duties etc. You get the idea! :D Basically this is for being one of the best (if not the best) editors on the wiki! Andy (talk) 18:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
O_O Wow... Thanks! J.delanoygabsadds 18:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Totally deserved. Andy (talk) 18:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ban him!

You left a warning message on User:162.82.215.196's talk page. Why not do Wiki a real favour by banning this vandal. Check his history here. Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 21:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]

A ban applies to a person, not an IP address, so this would not be possible. We can (and do) block IP addresses when vandalism is persistent and warnings do not seem to be sufficient to stop the behavior. I issued another warning to the user in question; if it continues, rest assured a block will be forthcoming.  Frank  |  talk  21:29, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It didn't take long. There were four warnings from four different editors in the last 24 hours.  Frank  |  talk  21:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

81.102.38.189 A persistent vandal spreading anti semetic and vile allegations on Celtic Fc related pages. Could you please take action against this individual. Jokes about child molestation are really not on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.167.221.3 (talk) 22:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Review

Hey J.delanoy, when you get the time, could you review me at my editor review? Thanks. UntilItSleeps PublicPC (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be nice to me

The words "popular", "successful", "long-running" and so on are not "POV" words as you label them, they are descriptive. While it is certainly legitimate to challenge on of them for their accuracy, they are not verboten in and of themselves, and deleting them wherever you find them is, once again, disruptive to the encyclopedia. --98.192.44.39 (talk) 16:45, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Natural disaster

I reverted your revert to this article as "vandalism". Immediately afterwards I noticed that you had tried doing the right thing, but hadn't noticed previous vandalism. I've reverted the article to the last stable version. My apologies for this incident. JoJan (talk) 17:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, I didn't even notice. It's not a problem. J.delanoygabsadds 19:34, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, J.delanoy. In the chapter Ethnogenesis and getetic links an unregistred 141.211.29.184 (talk) has predominantly disruptive edits . Any sources or references, only reverts in his POV-pushing and constant deleting of well sourced info. This is not correct. Regards. Jingby (talk) 18:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! The Reply

WP:IAR, my dear bot, IAR. bibliomaniac15 01:15, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. It appears that the edit the IP made has now been oversighted. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 10:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! J.delanoygabsadds 17:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Userbox

Hi, i was just wondering how you got your userboxes to show they way they are on you user page Thanx -- arges86 (talk) 18:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The code is at User:J.delanoy/userpage, if you want to see if you can do it yourself. If you can't get it to work, I can set it up for you, if you want. J.delanoygabsadds 18:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. I got it to work perfectly. arges86 (talk) 22:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please help

Is YouTube considered a reliable source, under any circumstance? --The Guy complain edits 18:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. Any user-generated content is unreliable, because anyone can say whatever they want. J.delanoygabsadds 19:01, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What if it's official from the creator of a content. For example: there is, hypothetically, some information about a book on the writer's YouTube page. A user argues that it is reliable because it is the writer's YouTube, not a random account's. Is it reliable in that theoretical case? --The Guy complain edits 19:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. I don't know about that. I'd say that if it is legitimate information, it is unlikely that the only place you can get that info would be on YouTube, so maybe try and see if you can find the info somewhere else, and only use YouTube as a last resort if there is utterly nothing anywhere else. J.delanoygabsadds 19:17, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the actual predicament is quite different. It's that somebody is trying to write a description for a music video, but it is severely POV. I mean, every sentence there is something like "there is soldiers who resemble soldiers from Nazi Germany," etc, except he has no references to back up those POVs. I tried removing the content, but he is adamant that YouTube is a valid reference for those POV sentences. I am sure YouTube is not a valid reference in that case, is it? --The Guy complain edits 19:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Correct. Unless a reliable source says they look like Nazi soldiers, saying they do is a personal opinion and thus it is original research, which is unacceptable. Describing something yourself is not appropriate, as things will likely look different to other people. J.delanoygabsadds 19:23, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure if I tell him this, he'll still argue it. I'm basically done, this is getting to the point where I'm getting stressed, and I'm the only one arguing against him. Would you like to help me, please? Just say the word. If not, then that's fine, too. --The Guy complain edits 19:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK I'll see what I can do. J.delanoygabsadds 19:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the link to the discussion and here's the section in question. Thanks! --The Guy complain edits 19:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to consult you; I made a reply here, and I wanted your opinion (at your earliest convenience, of course) on whether it is in compliance with the general policies, and whether or not it is well thought-out. Thanks in advance. --The Guy complain edits 02:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems good. J.delanoygabsadds 02:20, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the opinion. Now, here's the original description of the music video which was being debated:


Here's the one I just made, adjusted as I watched the video. I tried to keep my own interpretations out, favoring instead to simply state the events of the video:


Is mine an improvement? --The Guy complain edits 02:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm probably not the best person to ask that, but I think it's OK. J.delanoygabsadds 02:44, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know any users who could come into this discussion and give an unbiased viewpoint? Right now he's arguing the significance of the Swastika (which doesn't appear once in the video, but a thing he believes to resemble it does). He's saying since the Swastika is so significant, then that means if something resembles it, it belongs there. He continues to revert my edits, and still is citing YouTube as a reference. He even posted a reference for one of his user-interpretations. I was surprised and was going to let it pass; until I checked the reference. It was a photo of the thing he was describing, with not text, but the comment he was citing it for said that the drawing resembled SS soldiers and Darth Vader, clearly his own interpretation, him citing a simple picture making that obvious. Anyways, I just want some more unbiased opinions, here. He doesn't take me seriously, so I figure I need at least another person to sort this out, as I suspect both our aspects are a little misconstrued. --The Guy complain edits 15:27, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might try asking User:Realist2. He does a lot of work with articles related to music. J.delanoygabsadds 15:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll check it out later today, I need to eat some food right now, going down the shops. — Realist2 18:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question For Ya

Perhaps you know the question to this. Why have all images changes from "Image:<file name here>" to "File:<file name here>"? Just wondering. - NeutralHomerTalk • December 14, 2008 @ 03:09

A bug was fixed. J.delanoygabsadds 03:10, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That switched the file names around? Interesting. They had always been that way since I came here in 2006. When I add images to a page, what do I put..."Image:<file name here>" or "File:<file name here>"? - NeutralHomerTalk • December 14, 2008 @ 03:14
Yeah, the bug was filed in 2002, and they finally changed it over. Image still works, so yeah. J.delanoygabsadds 03:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, long time to wait on a bug. Thanks!...NeutralHomerTalk • December 14, 2008 @ 03:20

all in good fun

wow, that deletion of my joke on the article "Covini C6W" was super fast. are you on this thing all the time??? don't you agree, the C6W is very goofy? who in their right mind would drive this? looks like a cross between a sports car and tractor trailer. anyway, just thought my "goofy" comment would inject a little humor. no real attempt at vandalism. i actually counted on someone to correct the page, but didn't count on it being so soon. 128.147.28.1 (talk) 03:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)captainpicard[reply]

I am using a software tool to remove vandalism. Wikipedia is a serious project, and other people won't find your jokes funny. If you want to play around, you can do pretty much whatever you want in the Sandbox. J.delanoygabsadds 03:15, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
hehe, I think some of these "people" should lighten up every once in awhile! 128.147.28.1 (talk) 03:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)captain picard[reply]

FYI

I protected your mainspace name after the latest attempt to insult you. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:26, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hehehe. Does that mean I leveled up? :D J.delanoygabsadds 03:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Consider it a badge of honor. At least yours can be locked. Mine I just have to watch list. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
o_O That's got to be fun... J.delanoygabsadds 03:30, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is not as bad as you would think. It is actually quite funny when they do find it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He does make a very valid point. Have you anything to show you're not a horde faggot pansy ass blood elf faggot? – iridescent 22:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. Well, I don't play WoW at all, so I don't guess I can't prove I'm not. J.delanoygabsadds 22:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That had to be one of the funniest insult pages I've read in a long time. Made my head hurt trying to read it, but it was funny. Since we were kind of talking about it, an IP dumped my mainspace article into my user page [1]. Except I don't think I look fat at all. I think I'm a rather fit and trim bird, IMHO. Hmph! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request Notification

Hello, J.delanoy! A user you have blocked, Snapperhat, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification opt-in page. The unblock request is on his user talk page here. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, DavidWSBot (talk) 04:15, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Happy holidays! DavidWS (contribs) 19:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback misuse

I was considering creating {{uw-rollback}} to warn users about rollback abuse. How many warnings should the users be given for this? -- IRP 21:08, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just my two cents' worth: Users with rollback privileges are already established regulars, so a templated warning for rollback abuse might raise WP:DTTR concerns. Cosmic Latte (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:DTTR (and WP:TTR, come to that) are personal essays, not any kind of policy, so pay as much or as little attention to it as you want. My take would be that this template is unnecessary for the opposite reason; no warning ought to be given. If a user's abusing rollback – or any other tool – take it away from them and they can reapply when they're ready. Inappropriate rollback is more disruptive than vandalism, as it potentially drives away valid editors, and I see no reason to make allowances if kids don't know how to work their new toys. – iridescent 21:24, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! If you're going to use edit summaries like that, you only have yourself to blame… – iridescent 21:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LMFAO I wondered how I got an edit conflict. Oh, god... J.delanoygabsadds 21:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please replace the content...

...of Fatass with "{{RedirecttoWiktionary}}" (Without quotes). -- IRP 21:46, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It already was replaced with {{subst:RedirecttoWiktionary}}. J.delanoygabsadds 21:48, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A year ago. – iridescent 21:50, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted it replaced with a transcluded version so we can find these types of pages in the "what links here" for {{RedirecttoWiktionary}}. -- IRP 22:22, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Category: Redirects to Wiktionary already exists and the template auto-adds articles to this category. Despite the sometimes shambolic appearance, things here do work the way they do for a reason! Un-subst-ed templates kill the Server Kitties. – iridescent 22:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The template is {{wi}} and it shouldn't be subst'd. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Advice on dealing with a new editor

Hi, User talk:arojr has been adding links to his blog to various articles, which have all been reverted. His first complete article Transportation and the Farmington canal was speedied G12 yesterday for being a copy of an article on his blog. To get around this he has removed the article from his blog and recreated it here. He's asked me if this is OK. How do I tell him that this doesn't really solve the problem with the article - which is a school report - without discouraging him from contributing? Thanks, Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request Notification

Hello, J.delanoy! A user you have blocked, Mich5482, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification opt-in page. The unblock request is on his user talk page here. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, DavidWSBot (talk) 14:49, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing problem...

Ughh....too used to different formatting. Do you know an internal link that could help me out with background colours, boundaries, etc? Thanks! Cheers. Imperat§ r(Talk) 16:27, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't, sorry :/ Most of what I know I learned by looking around and seeing how other people do it. A good place to learn some fun tricks is in User:Phaedriel's userspace. She was freakin' awesome at combining wikimarkup and HTML. As far as colors go, they are just HTML colors. here is a mess of colors, and if you want moar, I'm sure googling "HTML colors" would come up with plenty of results. J.delanoygabsadds 17:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey

...been a while! :) Thanks for this. And congrats on the adminship! Noticed that only now. prashanthns (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) I saw your post on Jimbo's talk page, and I went to your page to say "Hi" (and to be envious of your pic with him...) I saw the typo, so I fixed it, and I was going to leave a note on your talk page, but I got distracted by my teacher so I forgot. Welcome back! J.delanoygabsadds 17:02, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Ban

Hi I am a high school student at this IP (199.216.95.253). You banned the IP for 1 year until September 11 2009. I am requesting that you permaban our IP. Since the intelligence of our students in this district will not increase over 1 year thank you! Thank you again for your time! scarred_phoenix —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scarred phoenix (talkcontribs) 18:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Phoenix.
You are probably right, but we generally don't block IP addresses permanently. Also, when the block expires, if there is more vandalism, it will likely be only a short time before your school is blocked for another year. It only takes a short time to block someone, and our anti-vandalism team is very good, so I don't think it will be a major issue. Thanks for the advice, though. J.delanoygabsadds 18:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

TheCiscoKid Talk to me 21:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I started this page of a chess tounament Here! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciscokid21 (talkcontribs) 22:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What was the outcome of the previous chess game?

??????

--TheCiscoKid Talk to me 23:05, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I resigned. J.delanoygabsadds 23:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't Block me

I am very sorry and have learned my lessons You have my humble apologies

Snorlax

If you don't vandalize any more, you won't be blocked, so don't worry about it. J.delanoygabsadds 04:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello

I edited a page called wheelchairs. and I said that sometimes electric wheelchairs break and one man died which is true. I was not vandalizing. Can you switch it back? Please respond. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gigidi (talkcontribs) 04:45, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure something like that would be good for inclusion, since it is pretty vague, and it really doesn't seem to be very informative. Sorry for saying it like that, I can't think of a better way to say it. J.delanoygabsadds 04:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual template sighting

A new editor asking your advice: can you tell me what template {reset} is used for, and why an editor might put it on a page he created himself? Thanks, Chuckiesdad (talk) 05:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I've never seen that template before. I think it's used when an article is really bad, like libelous, and the Wikimedia Foundation basically rolls it back to almost non-existent. In any case, only WMF staff can do that, so I undid his edit. J.delanoygabsadds 05:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South Park "Trapped in the Closet" credits are John Smith

If you watch the episode, all credits are listed as John Smith and Jane Smith. That is how it is listed. Not vandalism, that is correct. -Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.187.154.49 (talk) 05:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought you were vandalizing. J.delanoygabsadds 05:36, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

Please see the recent entries: Special:Contributions/68.158.255.197.LeadSongDog (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your previous game

ouch,



did you see the chess competition I'm "attempting"? (check it out)

--TheCiscoKid Talk to me 22:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There, just seen the Leona Lewis page, noticed that you reverted the edits but on my browser i am still seeing nothing where the article used to be, maybe its just my browser but thought id check to make sure with you. (Neostinker (talk) 23:38, 16 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Try purging the server cache. J.delanoygabsadds 23:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there has been a mistake.

You have recently sent me a message regarding an unconstructive change to the Rochelle, IL page on Wikipedia. I made no such change to the page and I don't know who did or how the message was sent to me, because I don't have a wikipedia account and can't edit pages. Just letting you know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.54.25.114 (talk) 23:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you don't have to have an account to edit >99% of pages on this site (although you can do a lot more if you do create an account and log in). If you are not logged in, Wikipedia's software treats your IP address as your username, so it is likely that someone else used the IP you have now to vandalize. Again, the best way to avoid getting irrelevant warnings is to create an account. I would encourage you to do so. Wikipedia requires absolutely no personal information to create an account, although it is recommended that you provide an email address in case you forget your password. J.delanoygabsadds 23:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request Notification

Hello, J.delanoy! A user you have blocked, Washington95, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification opt-in page. The unblock request is on his user talk page here. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, DavidWSBot (talk) 23:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for unblocking me (I promise not to vandalize again). But i do ask of you a question.....How do you make user boxes? Please get back to and Thankyou User:Washington95 (talk) 00:10, 17 December, 2008 (UTC)

Hi Washington!
I think this page shows how to do it. If you can't figure it out, feel free to ask. J.delanoygabsadds 00:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hey, i got the user box and the content but I cant get the picture, Any tips, Thank you.Washington95 (talk) 00:33, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean. Do you just want to add an image to your page? J.delanoygabsadds 00:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fable II

Hi, I noticed you just reverted some IP's edit on the Fable II article. That was fast!! I had already looked at your userpage earlier today, and a couple minutes ago I looked at "recent changes." The blanking of the page was literally the fourth edit on the list, and as soon as I clicked on the history (from the Recent Changes menu) I saw that you had already reverted it. Well, anyway, good job. Go give yourself a barnstar or something. Tezkag72 01:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, yeah. I'm using a software tool, so I can't take credit for it, but thanks! J.delanoygabsadds 01:04, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandlaism

Are you bothering to read anything I write, or is this some kind of bot?

User: J delanoy Is a Retard

I am so stupid. I am also gay. Fuck me!!!