Jump to content

User talk:Irn: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted to revision 589205727 by Limbojazz (talk): Vandalism. (TW)
Line 54: Line 54:
[[User:Limbojazz|Limbojazz]] ([[User talk:Limbojazz|talk]]) 22:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
[[User:Limbojazz|Limbojazz]] ([[User talk:Limbojazz|talk]]) 22:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>
<br style="clear: both;"/>

== Mind your own business, wanker ==

Go back to revising and streamlining your fan fiction. It's REALLY important.
[[User:Housewares|Housewares]] ([[User talk:Housewares|talk]]) 20:40, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:40, 17 February 2014

Wallis

Thanks. Done. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 18:55, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hipster edit War

Your recent editing history at Hipster (contemporary subculture) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Irn (talk) 23:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I've never heard of this "three edit rule" before. I only made one reversion on that page in January because another user vandalised the page by removing the gallery. I simply restored it to its original state and gave a short explanation: there were too many photos cluttering the page

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Hipster_%28contemporary_subculture%29&action=history — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osama57 (talkcontribs) 23:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I figured you hadn't heard of the three revert rule, which is why I posted the message on your page - to let you know about it. Also, don't forget to sign any comments you make on talk pages (user talk, article talk, whatever) by including four tildes like so: ~~~~ Cheers, -- Irn (talk) 00:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks. Osama57 (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading photos

Hi Irn, I'm a Wiki newbie and have a question -- hope this is the right place. I have a few photos to upload to accompany pages I am editing. They are a mixture of screencaps from music videos I directed and press shots of me. I have the copyrights to all the materials. How do I go about uploading them in a legal and issue-free way? Thanks! NogaP (talk) 19:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. When I want to upload photos, I use the File Upload Wizard, which I find to be very easy. For your purposes, you'd want to mark the work as free, and then select that it is your own work and proceed from there. I hope this helps!
(If you're not already familiar with it, you should probably also check out the guidelines on conflicts of interest because it sounds like that might apply to your editing.) Cheers, -- Irn (talk) 13:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Irn, thanks for the quick response! Another related question -- if I want to post pictures of known/famous person (properly cited from an article online) to add to their pages, what is the proper copyright choice for that? Thanks again! NogaP (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's a little tricky. Since the photos aren't yours, you need to prove fair use, which can be complicated. Beyond that, according to the non-free content guideline, the photos also need to be "used for a purpose that cannot be fulfilled by free material". As far as I understand it, since all living persons can have their photos taken, and, as such, their photos could be provided freely, it'll be pretty hard for you to justify the use of non-free images. More generally, Wikipedia:Media copyright questions is an excellent place to go for photo-specific questions. Cheers, -- Irn (talk) 01:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: "Associated acts" guidelines

The "guideline" which I've indicated can be found in Template:Infobox_musical_artist#associated_acts. Thank you. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 20:36, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Irn (talk) 20:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request: Real full name of Arundhati Roy in her article

This edit request has been pending on the article's talk page for almost an eternity now (in the meantime you seem to have answered many others, but for some reason you never even reply to this one). The real full name of Arundhati Roy is Suzanna Arundhati Roy. Even her Encyclopedia Britannica article uses this correct full name, but not so Wikipedia (which one thought was supposed to be more agile than good old Britannica, LOL). Even a trivial cursory google search will bear out that the subject is well known as Suzanna Arundhati Roy, which is her real full name. Hence, I have two requests: (1) change the name of the article from "Arundhati Roy" to "Suzanna Arundhati Roy", and (2) make the relevant edits (Arundhati Roy -> Suzanna Arundhati Roy) to the page. 180.149.53.194 (talk) 20:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

south bronx birthplace of hip hop

www.rollingstone.com/music/news/the-ghetto-brothers-pioneers-of-hip-hop-culture-get-album-reissue-20121120 because it says that that the sedgewick address is the birthplace of hip hop and its truly not. hip hop did not start from one house party, it started from the block party culture - when dj's didn't even use the turntables. please read the rolling stone article or atleast include the fact of the article to the true roots of hip hop thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiphopwikileaks (talkcontribs) 02:59, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ft. Lean Edit

Why does my edit have to be constructive? The statement was factual (source, I was that Confidence man) I could provide many details about that night and exchange. This was in reguard to Fort Lean Frontman Keenan Mitchell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.39.136 (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Keep up the good editing work!

Limbojazz (talk) 22:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mind your own business, wanker

Go back to revising and streamlining your fan fiction. It's REALLY important. Housewares (talk) 20:40, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]