User talk:Hamiltonstone: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Trolling trolls |
|||
{{User:Hamiltonstone/Header}} |
{{User:Hamiltonstone/Header}} |
||
{{User:Deckiller/FAC urgents|style=font-size:88%; width:23em;}} |
{{User:Deckiller/FAC urgents|style=font-size:88%; width:23em;}} |
Revision as of 05:56, 30 September 2010
Trolling trolls
|
|
FACs needing feedback view • | |
---|---|
Weise's law | Review it now |
RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significa liberdade | 52 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Open | 22:18, 21 September 2024 | 6 days, 8 hours | no | report |
GA
Hi. Just wanted to say thanks for helping out in the last part there with the Progress Party article so it could finally pass as GA. Your patience as a reviewer was also very much appreciated. Regards, -TheG (talk) 13:37, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Spacerecord
Hi. Thanks for your message re the Phobos article. Much appreciated. I deleted the references to obscure sources and added complete links to the better references. Best regards, Spacerecord. talk 29 September 2010
yeah...
What can I say? There goes another innocent if unworldly college professor who idled onto Wikipedia thinking he could change it for the better, only to have his worst prejudices confirmed yet again. Strike one for me. Serendipodous 00:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)