Jump to content

User talk:Bongwarrior: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by USAJO13 (talk) to last version by MelanieN
STOP: new section
Line 95: Line 95:


::This looks like another one: [[User:Jjusa123]]. He's already been indef-blocked for vandalism. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 16:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
::This looks like another one: [[User:Jjusa123]]. He's already been indef-blocked for vandalism. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 16:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

== STOP ==

STOP your annoyance Retard. [[User:KOMontNW|KOMontNW]] ([[User talk:KOMontNW|talk]]) 23:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:05, 22 March 2013


Archive
Archives
Archive 1 (April 2007 – October 2007)
Archive 2 (October 2007 – January 2008)
Archive 3 (January 2008 – April 2008)
Archive 4 (April 2008 – September 2008)
Archive 5 (September 2008 – April 2009)
Archive 6 (April 2009 – January 2010)
Archive 7 (January 2010 – October 2010)
Archive 8 (October 2010 – May 2011)
Archive 9 (May 2011 – October 2011)
Archive 10 (October 2011 – May 2012)
Archive 11 (May 2012 – October 2012)
Archive 12 (October 2012 – present)

Another deletion

Was just wondering if this page could be deleted too. The other three were deleted so I don't see why this one should be as well. --Shadow (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was planning on leaving it, since it was redirected, but it's not a particularly valuable redirect. So okay. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

I noticed that there's been some vandalism to Mouse. I haven't been following the drama but I'm guessing it was the subject of persistant vandalism, was protected, was today unprotected and then immediately vandalized. You have my sympathy. What I wanted to say was that Grape is also routinely vandalized and I was wondering if that might also be worth protecting? I have no experience in this area but noticed what you'd done (or tried to do) with Mouse and thought it might be worth bringing it to your attention. There's no need to reply. Keep up the good work! Regards, nagualdesign (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not a terrible idea at all, but I'd prefer to monitor it for a little while first. It does seem like most of the edits are vandalism, but the overall volume of edits is pretty manageable (and I did notice one or two good edits). This probably would be a good candidate for either semiprotection or pending changes at some point. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:58, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bongwarrior, I will be celebrating my birthday on 19 March. So, I would like to give you a treat. If you decide to "eat" the cookie, please reply by placing {{subst:munch}} on my talk page. I hope this cookie has made your day better. Cheers! Arctic Kangaroo 15:02, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks, I'm going to save it for later. Enjoy your birthday! --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, edit conflict on DMacks talk page

Not sure what's been left, but apparently you & I were reverting at the same time. Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's no problem. Your version actually ended up restoring a comment that really didn't need to be removed, so it looks fine to me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cool...cookies all around! Shearonink (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Hello, Bongwarrior. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Flyer22 (talk) 07:58, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another probable sockpuppet of JoMontNW

You have been busily blocking sockpuppets of this account JoMontNW. Just now a new face called JoMontSW popped up and started doing all the same things. For example [1] [2]. This must be a dozen times this person has come back to do the same edits. Is there some kind of IP block that could stop this? Thanks - --MelanieN (talk) 17:22, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, it's been dealt with. --MelanieN (talk) 17:54, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reopened SPI and blocked the sock (VOA account anyway...) Peridon (talk) 17:58, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know about this, even though I wasn't around to deal with it. Don't hesitate to let me know if you see any more that haven't been handled. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:11, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He's baaaaack! [3] Username User:EWUSAJO. --MelanieN (talk) 15:16, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again. --Bongwarrior (talk) 16:53, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This looks like another one: User:Jjusa123. He's already been indef-blocked for vandalism. --MelanieN (talk) 16:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

STOP

STOP your annoyance Retard. KOMontNW (talk) 23:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]