User talk:Bluerasberry

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #211

The weirdest thing just happened

Lane, I finally got your e-mails from the East Africa case, apparently Gmail lost them somehow. Wish I would have gotten your warning about striking option one a lot sooner we could have avoided that whole row. Ronk01 talk 15:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

At the time I checked your user history to see if you were crazy and found no supporting evidence of that, so I was a little confused. This discussion has attracted all types. It was probably better that you got booted quickly, just because this is a mediation which others will probably re-read and it is probably for the best that a media cabal organizer has been watching this, even if he did not do much. I would work with you again in the future - ask me if something comes up. Blue Rasberry 21:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

I can assure you that I am not crazy (though I am fairly sure that certain mediation participants are). I've been talking to a few of the remaining editors in an effort to formulate some kind of positive result. If you want you could join in on the mediation page. Ronk01 talk 21:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Not even a little crazy? You have been responding to a proposal I just made on the mediation page. Blue Rasberry 21:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm probably a bit crazy (most surgeons are, you should be afraid of the sane ones). Ronk01 talk 22:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Warning

Hi, am I fine to strike out your warning you gave me, because it seems your edit was reverted, I think its because I'm no longer on the Huggle whitelist, and you reverted my revert.. feel free to check the history :) --LcawteHuggle (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

You removed obvious vandalism and I reverted to the vandalized version. This was definitely my mistake, and I said so on your talk page. Blue Rasberry 16:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Your involvement

Can you please continue your part in the discussion at Category talk:Hindu terrorism? If it is just left to Pectore and myself (and we are opposed to each other's opinion), then there will definitely be no consensus made. Silverseren^C 22:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Reply here. Blue Rasberry 04:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Meth Project Minor Edits

Hi Bluerasberry,

I totally understand your concern over removing information; it would be a great help, however, if you could redo your edit so that it undoes the removal, instead of the other four changes (many of which contain verb tense changes, and replacing "MMP" with "Montana Meth Project". It would also be helpful if you could undo your edits so that the first paragraph explains that there are seven state programs as of 2010 (not 2009).

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notevenonce (talk • contribs) 22:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Here are the edits which I reverted. I do not see any verb tense changes, nor do I see where you replaced "MMP" with "Montana Meth Project." The acronym "MMP" is used throughout the article, so I did not see the usefulness of you removing the establishment of the acronym in the lede. Here is the rule about this.

2009 was the year when seven state programs came to be, so I think it would be incorrect to say this happened in 2010. However, I see you have already changed this yourself and the MMP does not date their announcements on the source page, so I suppose it should stay.

I am not taking any action at this time as you seem to already be editing things as you like. Thanks for working on the article and keep up the good work. Blue Rasberry 16:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

This seems to be in response to me reformatting someone's reference; I assume Shovon76 had a problem with the person posting the statement referenced. My reply to this user is here. Blue Rasberry 01:28, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Renaming of category

I have proposed here to rename Category:Hindu terrorism to Category:Hindutva terrorism, as to be more accurate to the meaning that the terrorism is politically and nationally motivated and not religiously motivated. Please join the discussion. Silverseren^C 22:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Your Comment on Talk Tree shaping page

Hi, I thought you may be interested in the fact that your comment on Tree shaping talk page has been taken out of context and used to give the impression of support for removal of cite text. Link Blackash have a chat 01:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for coming and clarifying exactly what you thought on the talk page. I did put back the Alternative names section and give my reasoning on the talk page, if you want links to diffs or stuff in the history that I have referred to let me know and I find them. I left your other changes in place. Blackash have a chat 09:15, 13 October 2010 (UTC) I bet the only thing you like better than sucking cock is editing on fagopedia