User talk:Ben Ben: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Sparkels28 - "" |
Sparkels28 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
please leave what i have posted there alone its not advertising its simpley information about a cd. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sparkels28|Sparkels28]] ([[User talk:Sparkels28|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sparkels28|contribs]]) 19:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
please leave what i have posted there alone its not advertising its simpley information about a cd. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sparkels28|Sparkels28]] ([[User talk:Sparkels28|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sparkels28|contribs]]) 19:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
whatever C*** |
Revision as of 19:24, 14 March 2010
|
The article refers to a person. Writing their last name with a capital letter seems to be the right thing to do. Please explain in detail why it should be moved back. - Mgm|(talk) 13:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Missing the capital letter of a last name is quite a common mistake, so having the redirect in place is actually quite useful. Also, deleting the page does not open up disk space, so deleting it seems to offer little advantages. I won't delete it, but I won't stop anyone else from doing so.
The first two times I came across it, you tagged it with the statement that Ferdinand Stock should be moved back there and that a history move was to be made. Please make sure you stick the right tag on to avoid confusion. Write a personal speedy tag if you have to. - Mgm|(talk) 13:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Explained it on the talk page from MacGyverMagic. I didn't see that Mgm is the same person as User:MacGyverMagic is. --Ben Ben (talk) 13:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for noting the faulty link in my talk page header. It seems to have been there for a long time. No one noticed before, though. Now fixed it. - Mgm|(talk) 13:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Please be nice to the newbies
And let 'me know what they did wrong (e.g. User talk:76.244.147.137.) (I was about to revert myself, but you beat me to it.) Thanks Gerardw (talk) 02:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right. Next time I will try to give a short explanation like you did. I'm learning.
- --Ben Ben (talk) 02:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thanks, but no. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.195.3 (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Ben Ben …
Before we get into a revert war over this, please allow me to remind you that I am the author and (so far) the only editor who has contributed to the documentation for {{TV Guide person}} … I am attempting to make the templates used by this boilerplate consistent in the formatting of their examples … I saw the linking of the URL in the documentation for Some Other Template, and decided to retrofit the ones on my current OCD list. :-)
Happy Editing! — 138.88.91.205 (talk · contribs) 16:59, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- P.S. I forgot to mention that with the TfD that killed {{Selected filmography}}, there were some redlinks that I was correcting as well … I guess that was also mistaken for vandalism. — 138.88.91.205 (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have to apologize, as you wrote I had mistaken your changes. Sorry, i'm not in templates.--Ben Ben (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
SPI cases
When filing a second (or subsequent) case at SPI for a user, you must NOT delete the {{SPIarchive notice}} line from the top of the case. Mayalld (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- I had watched for two days, but the case wasn't shown under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations. After I had deleted the {{SPIarchive notice}}, it was shown. Mysteriously, it's still shown after your revert! Bug, X-Files? --Ben Ben (talk) 15:39, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Manmohan Singh
You need to be careful while leaving messages at someone's talkpage. Firstly, Panjab University redirects to Panjab University, Chandigarh. So the question of me mixing it up does not arise. Secondly, refer to this and this edit. So, why am I being lectured for misspelling Panjab University? Thirdly, the case of one being confused between these three universities does not arise because a) Panjab University has only one campus - in Chandigarh. b) University of the Punjab is in Pakistan. c) Punjabi University has a distinctive name (note Panjab is a region and Punjabi is a language) and has no affiliation with Panjab University. So, when some says Manmohan Singh graduated from Panjab University, it is pretty obvious he graduated from the one in Chandigarh. That said, this is a very small issue. Some people have a habit of making a big issue out of a small one for the sake of arguing and unfortunately for you, I'm not one of them. --Nosedown (talk) 17:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Answer on your user talk, where I've started the discussion. [1].--Ben Ben (talk) 19:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
lol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.140.117 (talk) 12:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Payback
THat Was Payback Because someone Removed information That I put on Sherri Shepherd's Page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.80.248.115 (talk) 23:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Bad idea - was it this?[2]
- If you cite your source, then it will stay - I think.--Ben Ben (talk) 23:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
didn't you see, that the whole section at Omanakuttan is destroyed? I simply repaired it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.130.91.93 (talk) 16:48, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, first thing I saw was the tag references removed on WP:RCP. That's what you did also; by accident I think now. Restored your sentence with the references. Check it out [3]. Bye --Ben Ben (talk) 09:22, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism
What an annoying IP, right? Here's a flower for you. :-) Sciurinæ (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- This one was really annoying. Danke für die Blume. --Ben Ben (talk) 19:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
speedy deletion of User talk:24.240.186.152/SS Free declined
- This does not meet the definition of "patent nonsense" as defined in criteria G1. It may be stupid, but it is not incomprehensible. Consider WP:MFD if you still wish to pursue deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
J.P. Cormier Page
Is there some place where you could put that he has a signuture model ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.237.162 (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, no. Wikipedia isn't the place for advertising: WP:SOAP --Ben Ben (talk) 17:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
re: your edits to Armorial of the Communes of Nord 3
I see you rearranged the 'external links' and 'references' sections. Is there a specific standard, 'cause I haven't been following one. (Sigh!)
Also, you changed the 'self-referencing' line. Is that a problem? It just shows bold and seemed appropriate to me (as well as allowing simple cut and paste <g>). I'm still relatively newish at this whole wiki editing thing.
(Boy, it's nice being able to hold a discussion in a language I'm actually fluent in <grin>) --David V Houston (talk) 20:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
please leave what i have posted there alone its not advertising its simpley information about a cd. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparkels28 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
whatever C***