User talk:Apostrophe: Difference between revisions
Black Kite (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (t)]] [[Special:Contributions/Black_Kite|(c)]] 13:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC) |
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (t)]] [[Special:Contributions/Black_Kite|(c)]] 13:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
So I HERD YOU LIEK MUDKIPS. Go suck it. |
Revision as of 18:11, 5 October 2010
So i herd u like mudkipz???
Hi! I'm a friendly Wikipedia editor who stumbled upon an article on Encyclopedia Dramatica which says that you (Apostrophe) personally undo vandalism related to internet memes. The article provides a link directly to your user page. I tried to paste the article's URL here, but Wikipedia said I couldn't paste it because it was a blacklisted site.
So, if you're wondering about any weird edits to your page... this is where they're coming from.
My mudkipz goes out to you. Those vandals are real mudkipz. Good luck! 67.248.125.199 (talk) 02:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Baaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwww.
They may be arse-holes but at least they don't think wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.26.11 (talk) 18:37, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
So i herd u like mudkipz???
A tag has been placed on Apokalips requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
So i herd u like mudkipz???
Thanks for uploading File:ShadowHeartless.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 20:54, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:NobodyKHII.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:NobodyKHII.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 20:54, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
up urs ' ? encyclopediadramatica ftw! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.246.68.72 (talk) 20:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Fernald, The Hook-Handed Man (Hookie)
I have nominated Fernald, The Hook-Handed Man (Hookie) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 19:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Whats wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZKToaster1949 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Timeline of fictional future events
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Timeline of fictional future events. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of fictional future events. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
So, I hurd you leik mudkipz
dat iz wut i heard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.232.117.167 (talk) 07:10, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Earth (Transformers)
I have nominated Earth (Transformers), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth (Transformers). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated Shokaract, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shokaract and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
The article Cruellock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Minor fictional character for whom no notability is asserted, nor any third-party sources or coverage included.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (t) (c) 13:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
So I HERD YOU LIEK MUDKIPS. Go suck it.