User talk:Anbu121

Contributions	Edit Count	Articles Edited	Articles Created	AfD Stats	CSD Log	Automated Edits	Barnstars	Userboxes

Porto Metro navbox

Thanks for the move to Template: Porto Metro navbox. Silly me. Sw2nd (talk) 21:19, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

your recent edit of changing vijay's current photo is not satisfactory

please don't give silly excuses for removing a freely licensed current picture of vijay .You have removed it since its a promotional picture from thuppaki team and u have said that "Usage criteria of the image license is not compatible with usage on this article. The image is licensed only for promotion of thupakki film, hence cannot be used on this article".how silly is it? Actually the thuppaki team has released it without watermark which means anybody can used it anywhere not only for promoting the film, they have not given any license for that picture therefore your statement is completely wrong and r they going file a case against wikipedia LOL:):) and also as per your logic many actors pic in articles such as vikram,surya was all promotional pics for their films such as raavan and ratha charitha etc,please stop this if u keep on doing like this there wont be a good article of the actor. If u dont like the actor dont do like this.Be neutral in wikipedia.there is no such rule in wiki to remove a actors picture for being a promotional picture of his film. you yourself create the rules i think stop your illogical edit. Anyway thanks for your cooperation in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bothiman (talk • contribs) 10:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Dude iam really disappointed with you placing a deletion template in my photo of vijay

First of all do you know what is free art licence? In free art licence, source is not important if possible you can provide a source please read the rules about how to use free art licence in this free art licence user guide read this http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stylishedit (talk • contribs) 13:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Please read this : Commons:Essential_information --Anbu121 (talk me) 13:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

dude commons essential licence is different and free art licence is totally different c my licence its free art licence

I think you r confused with both free art licence and commons licence .commons licence needs source compulsory but free art licence doesnt need a source my photo falls under the category of free art licence try to understand dont keep on placing deletion template in my photo its not fair — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.174.4.53 (talk) 13:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

You have to provide a proof that the image you uploaded is indeed free image. --Anbu121 (talk me) 13:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

you r making me laugh dude if it is not a free image automatically the sinebot or the cluebot of wikipedia will place the speedy deletion template they will notice the file immediately but in my case since it is released without watermark(copyrights) .wikipedia itself has accepted it and placed its own watermark. more than this nobody will explain it to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.174.4.53 (talk) 13:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Images without watermark are not necessarily free image. --Anbu121 (talk me) 13:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

r u playing pranks with me dude do know what is watermark? lol .If the owner of the image release a photo without watermark then its automatically understood its a free image and he wants to distribute his rights of the photo with everyone freely:):) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.174.4.53 (talk) 13:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

No. You are Wrong. Please read Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#For_image_creators and Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Free_licenses. An image can be termed as free image only if it is explicitly released (by the person who took the photograph) under any of these licenses: GFDL, CCBYSA3, FAL, Attribution, Public domain. Else, it is not a free image even if it doesn't have watermark. --Anbu121 (talk me) 13:53, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

"you read this paragraph Wikipedia encourages users to upload their own images. All user-created images must be licensed under a free license, such as the GFDL and/or an acceptable Creative Commons license, or released into the public domain, which removes all copyright and licensing restrictions. When licensing an image, it is best practice to multi-license under both GFDL and a Creative Commons license."since Iam not the owner I have published it under FAL. In FAL if you know name of the author,date of photo then tats more than enough but since iam not the creator of the photo I have not published it under GFDL or your commons licence this is what your wiki rules saysa and Iam the one who is right. what is your problem dude stop this playing:):) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stylishedit (talk • contribs) 14:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

If you are not the owner, you have no rights to publish it under any of the licenses. Only the person who took the photograph has the right to choose which license he wants to publish it. If you upload a photograph which is owned by some one else, a proof has to be given that the image was released under any of these free licenses. --Anbu121 (talk me) 14:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

this is really so silly from you lol then there will be no photos of anyone in wikipedia if only the person who took the photograph should publish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stylishedit (talk • contribs) 14:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

May sound silly to you, but it is absolutely true. That's why we have Wikipedia:Non-free content. Non-free content should be used only if free image is impossible to obtain. --Anbu121 (talk me) 14:26, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

dude r u thala fan? Iam also the same but in wikipedia you have to be neutral I will treat everyone as the same but I dont know about you. for the above statement I have already replied you with the proof that mine is a free image :) my hands r paining dude by explaining it to you:{ please stop this:( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stylishedit (talk • contribs) 14:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

If the image is taken by the cinematographer of the film, it is not free image unless the cinematographer or producer of the film releases it under any of the five licenses explicitly. It is not free image unless you provide a proof that it is released under any of the free license. --Anbu121 (talk me) 14:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

hello wikipedia has placed its own substitute watermarker c this u will find it in the comments section of my photo which means it has accepted my photo as a free image more than this i cannot make u understand byeee dude it was a nice tym chatting wid u:) {subst:Upload marker added by en.wp UW}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stylishedit (talk • contribs) 14:46, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

That's not watermarking. That's a substitute template indicating that the file was uploaded through upload wizard. --Anbu121 (talk me) 16:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Mother fucker

You are a mother fucker

Talkback

Hello, Anbu121. You have new messages at Dengero's talk page.
Message added 09:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dengero (talk) 09:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Adminship?

• Should you be interested, leave a note on my talk page. Best. Wifione ^Message 09:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Chennai collabs

Hi Anbu, Are we going for GA review for the Chennai collabs. Please let the forum know - if there are gaps, we can address and push for it. Ssriram mt (talk) 00:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Replied at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chennai/Collaborations of the month --Anbu121 (talk me) 03:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Arignar Anna Zoological Park

Hi Anbu, I am working on the map and it's almost complete. I am expecting it to be done this weekend. Thanks for the Barnstar. Happy editing :) --Challengethelimits (talk) 01:27, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Fixing my error.

Thank you for fixing my River Arun error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.15.11.47 (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Grand Venus Mall"

A page you created, Grand Venus Mall, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Phearson (talk) 17:42, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Please read the article to which it redirects to. --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Please point out to me the reference that shows this mall's alternative name. Phearson (talk) 17:49, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Here you go: http://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/leisure/article3558600.ece --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:51, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Ponyo has already retracted the speedy del. I am satisfied. Phearson (talk) 17:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Help needed

Please look into Sharad Kumar Dixit. I have created the article but am unsure if all the details that i have entered there are correct. Used many unreliable sources. Help me out in verying/improving it please. And add many references if you can. Could you tell me other Indian users whom I can contact? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scbs 2007 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

It looks like copy pasted from different sources. You can't do that. --Anbu121 (talk me) 18:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

That's why i asked for your help. There are not a lot of articles on this person. the few that are present have redundant data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scbs 2007 (talk • contribs) 20:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Right now, don't I don't have enough time except for putting the copyright tag on the article. Post on the talk page of the article the list of sources from where you copy pasted. Let me see if I can do some copy editing. By the way, if you copy paste again, you could be blocked. --Anbu121 (talk me) 20:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

/:) Ok! Don't need you to look into it. Thanks anyways! Scbs_2007 (talk)

Being for more than a year here and having contributed constructively, I thought you would be aware of copyright policies of Wikipedia. Your first reply appeared very sarcastic to me. Read this (Wikipedia:Copyright violations) if you are not aware of it till now and try to remove the copy-pasted content yourself. --Anbu121 (talk me) 21:57, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Ever come across this: Wikipedia:Civility There was absolutely no need of retorting in the way you did! \:) Let's end it here! PEACE!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scbs 2007 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

I was right. You do know about all the policies and guidelines here and still you have chosen to copy paste and call others to clean up your mess. Initially I thought of dropping a warning template for copyright on your talk page, but you would have already known that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Anbu121 (talk me) 04:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

i guess i wait

thanks for the help,,,,,,,,,,--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Jonfoerster

Hi there. I'm glad this page (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Akash_Maharaj) was deleted, but do you have any idea why the first line of the pre-deleted page ("Akash Maharaj is a former Yale student whose acceptance was rescinded...") still shows up in google search and why the whole page can be easily viewed in cache? Is there a way to delete that too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonfoerster (talk • contribs) 09:33, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

I guess it takes one or two days for google to refresh its cache. But, I am not very sure about it. Try asking it in the Help Desk --Anbu121 (talk me) 09:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

vandalism

are monitoring his activities? 124.176.20.38

LIER I WASNT VANDALISINGG DIE DIE DIE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katiealwill (talk • contribs) 15:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Jake costello

my page was not to threaten or harm anybody it is to my friend jake costello we edit pictures of each other all the time and crop face and bodies just for a laugh so now i thought i would make a page on here about him there is nothing in this that would harm him attack him or make him upset or angry in any way — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nath2k10 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not the place to play with your friend. What you do is called as vandalism. If you continue to create such pages, you could get blocked. --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Query

Thanks for your suggestion.Do you know any editor who has expertise in file related issues.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 17:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

You can contact User:INeverCry. --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

IsAnybodyDown?

Article is not notable and is being used to harass and defame an individual. Please DO NOT REVERT. 75.70.221.14 (talk) 19:21, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

If you think it is not notable, you can nominate it for deletion through Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Don't blank it. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:22, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

It is defamatory and therefore must be blanked immediately. It is illegal. By reverting it you are aiding in the commission of a crime. 75.70.221.14 (talk) 19:25, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

All the information in the article is sourced. Wikipedia articles are written by using information which is publicly available and hence is not illegal. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

The sources are invalid, and being used to defame. Any further revision of my edits and I will make sure you are charged as an accessory. 75.70.221.14 (talk) 19:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Only some of the references are blogs, but you have removed far too many sources and content. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:49, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

The IP (75.70.221.14) belongs to the owner of the site. He has a total COI in this. 2A02:2498:E002:70:0:0:0:20 (talk) 22:13, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Guilty

Yes I deleted White Terror. It is hopelessly biased propaganda and an editor claims possession and refused incremental improvement. Best to delete it and start again. cwmacdougall 21:29, 5 November 2012

If talk page discussions doesn't lead to a consensus, you can take it to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard --Anbu121 (talk me) 20:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion. I have now filed a complaint on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. cwmacdougall 23:29, 5 November 2012

Untitled

I thought it was apropriate and intelligent BTW i am adam chu — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.33.44.253 (talk) 21:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)