User talk:Alexandria: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Wickedclown28 (talk) to last revision by Hurricanefan25 (HG) |
←Replaced content with 'HOPE YOU LEARN FROM YOUR MISTAKES!!!' |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
HOPE YOU LEARN FROM YOUR MISTAKES!!! |
|||
If it's urgent, try reaching me on IRC, username AlexandriaB or kwsn. |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 70K |
|||
|counter = 1 |
|||
|algo = old(7d) |
|||
|archive = User talk:Alexandria/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
}} |
|||
{{archives}} |
|||
== Response == |
|||
Well firstly i was reporting on behalf of another editor and secondly , His edits were reverted several times; i got banned for reverting something three times (which was simular to this guys case except on a political page) and all he got was a warning! He then ignored that and continued making unconstructive edits , good faith or bad they were tagged as unconstrutive and were removed. Also, that guy, while i do have a lot of respect for him; in my humble opinion accusing me of a personal attack is quite frankly pathetic as he should of assumed good faith on my part. Ive noticed on a number of occasions people accuse others of bad faith , and that in itself is against the rules but alas i cant really be bothered for this; but thank you for your help and advice. [[User:Goldblooded]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Goldblooded|(Return Fire)]]</sup></small> 17:25, 21 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
And also , you should of really put that comment in the constructive criticism page NOT my talk page. [[User:Goldblooded]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Goldblooded|(Return Fire)]]</sup></small> 13:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 == |
|||
Dear Alexandria, one "issues tag" on the article [[Miss_Asia_Pacific_World_2011|Miss Asia Pacific World 2011]] is outdated. The article is no longer written as an advertisement. Now it's reasonably more something between "Start" and "Stub" class. How can the tag be cleaned up/updated/removed? |
|||
Furthermore, there's an ongoing content dispute with many IP addresses making changes and some parties asking for "protection" of the article and the blocking of other editors. The "multiple issues" template should at least acknowledge that there's a dispute. I consult Wikipedia hundreds of times every month and this alert makes me look closer at the veracity of an article: "The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved." How can this alert for the sake of fairness and objectivity be added to the article in question? Best regards. [[User:Kanovski|Kanovski]] ([[User talk:Kanovski|talk]]) 08:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Dear Alexandria, Thank you for your note on my talk page. The "dispute" that you seem to be referring to originated in October 2011. I requested information about an outdated template from ''February'' 2011, in order to help with Wikipedia's cleanup and quality efforts. If I have mistaken your role and purposes at Wikipedia, then of course I am sorry for any inconvenience. [[User:Kanovski|Kanovski]] ([[User talk:Kanovski|talk]]) 08:14, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlexLevyOne]] == |
|||
I think you missed [[User:Miranda Tate]]! [[User:JohnInDC|JohnInDC]] ([[User talk:JohnInDC|talk]]) 18:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== SKYRAD nominated for speedy deletion == |
|||
My (fist) attempt to contribute to Wikipedia resulted in a nomination for Speedy Deletion do to apparent product advertising. My contribution was about an acronym I created to facilitate winter alpine recreation participants in a global message using SKYRAD. The letters stand for each of the fundamental skier/snowboarder responsibility requirements to prevent some winter sports activities. There is no product to sell. I have created a poster to visually represent the message. Posters are not for sale, but given, for free to groups participating in safety discussions. SKYRAD is a copyrighted term used in educational forums in an effort to inform winter athletes using an easy to remember vehicle. |
|||
Please reconsider my contribution and help me spread the good word of safety. |
|||
[[User:DelRecord|DelRecord]] ([[User talk:DelRecord|talk]]) 17:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Del Record |
|||
== [[Tummel]] == |
|||
Hi, [[User:FredrikT]] restored the article [[Tummel]], which I had nominated for deletion and you in turn reverted to a previous redirect. [[Special:Contributions/126.109.230.149|126.109.230.149]] ([[User talk:126.109.230.149|talk]]) 03:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:: Hi Alexandria, I noticed Tummel on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tummel]] and felt it could be saved, given quite favourable reviews. I've added 4 reviews from good sources to the AfD and the article itself. with best wishes [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 08:53, 29 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== USURP@arwiki == |
|||
your request has been approved, thanks for waiting and sorry for being late.--[[User:Antime|<span style="color:#008000;background:#ADDFAD;">'''Antime'''</span>]] •[[User_talk:Antime|<font face="andalus" size="3"><span style="color:#008000;background:#FFFFFF;">(Talk)</span></font>]] 08:35, 29 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== TaraLoveYou SPI == |
|||
[[Staples Inc.|That was fast™]]. '''[[User:Hurricanefan25|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #AC0000">HurricaneFan</span>]][[User talk:Hurricanefan25|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #35628F">25</span>]]''' 14:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:36, 29 October 2011
HOPE YOU LEARN FROM YOUR MISTAKES!!!