Jump to content

User talk:Acroterion: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Reverted to revision 286880984 by Tresiden; rv nonsense. (TW)
Koupa (talk | contribs)
3 edits
←Replaced content with 'Shut up and go away you big faggot or I'll block your greasy fat ass for 75 years!'
Line 1: Line 1:
Shut up and go away you big faggot or I'll block your greasy fat ass for 75 years!
{{administrator}}

{{Notice|<center>'''If you leave a message for me''': I will respond here. Either add this page to your watchlist or ask me to notify you of a response on your talk page.
----
'''If I leave a message for you''': Respond on your talk page. I will add it to my watchlist, so you don't need to notify me.
<br>
This prevents the same discussion occurring in multiple stages on multiple pages.</center>}}

{{message}}

[[/Signpost|Signpost]]

{{archivebox|[[/Archive_Q2_2007|Archive Q2 2007]] [[/Archive_Q3_2007|Archive Q3 2007]] [[/Archive_Q4_2007|Archive Q4 2007]] [[/Archive_Q1_2008|Archive Q1 2008]] [[/Archive_Q2_2008|Archive Q2 2008]] [[/Archive_Q3_2008|Archive Q3 2008]] [[/Archive_Q4_2008|Archive Q4 2008]] [[/Archive_Q1_2009|Archive Q1 2009]] [[/Archive_Q1_2009|Archive Q2 2009]]}}

== Centrifugal Force ==

Acroterion, I'd be grateful if you could keep an eye on the centrifugal force page again. There isn't going to be an edit war, but I'm going to make an attempt to tidy up a section on that page. Any sign of an edit war and I'll pull out, but I'd be grateful if you could monitor it to see if certain persons are maliciously undoing any edits that I make. David Tombe [[Special:Contributions/81.151.2.23|81.151.2.23]] ([[User talk:81.151.2.23|talk]]) 12:37, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

==A polite complaint==

why the hell did you delete my page! <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Salrovella|Salrovella]] ([[User talk:Salrovella|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Salrovella|contribs]]) 11:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Because Wikipedia is not for promotion, and because the term predates World War II, possibly WWI. It most certainly did not originate with CoD. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 11:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Why did you delete the article about XSitePro? It seems odd when there are articles on all of the other HTML editors. Please refer to the following:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Comparison_of_HTML_editors

It seems odd that there are articles on all the HTML editors listed EXCEPT for XSitePro. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Frankbenny|Frankbenny]] ([[User talk:Frankbenny|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Frankbenny|contribs]]) 12:26, 12 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Please rewrite article ==

You deleted the article on XSitePro which is referenced by the following page.

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Comparison_of_HTML_editors

Can you please add the necessary article on XSitePro as now this page is going to be inaccurate. I'm still mystified as to why you 'delete' an article rather than add to it, when it is a perfectly valid article and one that adds to the completeness of Wikipedia.

If you are to delete the XSitePro article I feel you should also, for fairness sake, be deleting all of the following:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Freeway_(software)
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Adobe_Dreamweaver
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Microsoft_Expression_Web
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/RapidWeaver
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/SeaMonkey

I was going to get going on adding the other editors that are missing from the following page:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Comparison_of_HTML_editors

but it seems like I will be wasting my time if people like you just go around deleting pages for no VALID reason, rather than adding to them, which is what I think you should be doing. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Frankbenny|Frankbenny]] ([[User talk:Frankbenny|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Frankbenny|contribs]]) 12:41, 12 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I deleted the article because it made no assertion of significance and consisted almost entirely of links back to the company: in other words, it looked a lot like spam. I have no objection to its re-creation, provided documentation is provided of its notability in non-trivial references in independent media. You were the editor who added it to the list of HTML editors, so your argument that "it's on the list" is invalid. Not every HTML editor is necessarily eligible for inclusion. I have copied the content into you [[User:Frankbenny/sandbox]] for you to work on. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 15:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

==Happy Acroterion's Day!==
{| style="border:2px outset #399; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background:#6F3; padding-left: 8px; padding-right: 8px; padding-top: 8px; padding-bottom: 8px;" align=center
|[[Image:Featured article star.svg|150px|none|left]]
|style="padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 10px; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;"|
'''[[User:Acroterion|Acroterion]]''' has been identified as an '''''[[User:bibliomaniac15/Today|Awesome Wikipedian]]''''',<br>
and therefore, I've officially declared today as [[User:Acroterion|Acroterion's day]]!<br>
For your excellent counter-vandal and speedy deletion work,<br>
enjoy being the Star of the day, Acroterion!

Cheers,<br>'''''[[User:bibliomaniac15|<font color="black">bibliomaniac</font>]][[User talk:bibliomaniac15|<font color="red">1</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Bibliomaniac15|<font color="blue">5</font>]]'''''<br>04:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

<small>If you'd like to show off your awesomeness, you can use [[User:SteveBaker/Userboxes/AwesomeWikipedianDay|this userbox]].</small>
|}

Thank you very much! '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 11:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

== Smiley Face Murders ==

I think there is a sock/meat puppet doing editting on the Smiley Face Murders page: IP 97.92.80.116. You already blocked one IP, it looks like he got another one. [[User:Angryapathy|Angryapathy]] ([[User talk:Angryapathy|talk]]) 18:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
:Looks like {{user|FT2}} has had a go, and maybe an oversighter, based on whatever the deleted comment might be. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 19:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

==[[Mount Harmon]] added text==
Congrats on your special day ... a well deserved tribute! Can you take a look at the text added to NRHP entry [[Mount Harmon]] by user [[User talk:Enchanted Forest]]? It is totally unattributed and I want to know what you think. Thanks in advance.--[[User:Pubdog|Pubdog]] ([[User talk:Pubdog|talk]]) 01:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
:I fear that it's been copied from a text somewhere; nothing turns up on Google. In any case, it needs to be extensively pruned, wikified and and formatted. I've left a nice note on the editor's talkpage and a welcome; we'll see what they say. See also [[St. Stephen's Episcopal Church (Earleville, Maryland)]]. I'm loth to undertake much editing until I know what the source is, in case it has to be deleted. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 01:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
::Thanks very much for adding the tags and contacting Enchanted Forest. Best wishes ...--[[User:Pubdog|Pubdog]] ([[User talk:Pubdog|talk]]) 10:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

I recently wrote a page about my hich school teacher Steve Corcoran, whcih has much truth to it, as well as some fabrication which was pointed out in order to show how wikipedia can be an uncredible source in a paper or other school work, due to the fact that people can edit these pages on ther own, and i would like to know how I can get this page submitted without being deleted. Please respond to my talk page. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bizkitdac|Bizkitdac]] ([[User talk:Bizkitdac|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bizkitdac|contribs]]) 20:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Deletion of Levels of Awesome ==

Hello Kind Sir,

I am curious as to why my Levels of Awesome entry was flagged as G3:Vandalism and deleted from Wikipedia. I fail to understand how my entry includes blatant or obvious misinformation. There '''are''' levels of awesomeness and anyone that has watched the television show on CBS "How I Met Your Mother" can attest to this fact based upon the repeated wisdom of Barny Stinson as played by Neil Patrick Harris (see: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Barney_Stinson#Catchphrases).

I will grant you that I cannot 100% verify the capacity of bears to recognize rawksomeness, but then again, Wikipedia's entry on Human-Bear interactions (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Bears#Relationship_with_humans) is not very thorough and therefore does not disprove nor dispel the idea that bears cannot. (I would certainly contend that a certain, smarter-than-your-average bear would have the ability to communicate with humans, but his ability to recognize rawksome would still be questionable [http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Yogi_bear].)

So, besides the potentially unsupportable hypothesis about bears' speech capacity, which can easily be removed, I do not believe my entry so flagrantly violates Wikipedia's standards as claimed.

Could you please reinstate my entry, or at least produce for me peer-reviewed studies that show my entry to contain other erroneous (blatant and/or obvious) information?

Thank you. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Gibreal|Gibreal]] ([[User talk:Gibreal|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gibreal|contribs]]) 17:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Sadly, no. Amusing as it is, it is up to '''you''' to provide [[WP:RS|sources]] that comply with Wikipedia's requirements for [[WP:V|verifiability]]. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 17:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

== Wizard 101 ==

Dear Acroterion,

I am outraged that you have such a blunt disregard for the trademark of Wizard 101. You have disgraced the industry that calls itself Wizard 101. I, However, am a frequent player. I am quite livid at your unusually no discovery of the superiosity of ''Wizard 101. I am quite disgusted and deeply hurt.

Yours truly,
Nickothode Lily James Evans <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nickothode|Nickothode]] ([[User talk:Nickothode|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nickothode|contribs]]) 19:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I share your outrage, disgust, hurt and lividity. Or at least I would if I had any idea what you're talking about; perhaps you're looking for [[Wizard101]]? '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 20:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

== GeekDad deletion? ==

This is a particularly relevant blog receiving well over 20k hits per day and has won multiple awards as a top blog. What more do I need to do to get it un-deleted? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Batman88|Batman88]] ([[User talk:Batman88|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Batman88|contribs]]) 21:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:See [[WP:WEB]] for notability criteria for web content. You'll need to find coverage by independent media of some significant standing, apart from Wired, obviously, that indicates that the blog has received notice in the wider media. Can you document those awards? Also, it's best to use a sandbox, like [[User:Batman88/sandbox]] to construct the article before putting it out in article space. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 21:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

{{talkback|Delicious carbuncle}}
{{Talkback|TomCat4680}}

== Fuel TV sysop unprotection request ==

I filed a report on WP:RFPP but they said contact you directly. Please remove the sysop protection on [[Fuel TV]]. The content dispute and flame war were both resolved. I see no need for the sysop any longer. Part of my early unblock was I promised to stay away from it for a few weeks until it cools down, and I will. I also promised not to exceed 1RR and I have apologized to delicious carbuncle and I won't bother him any more. [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 16:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
:Done. I'm glad to see that you've sorted things out. Thanks for working through the issue and making peace. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 16:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

== [[CRLA-179/2007]] ==

The article has been recreated. The user appears to have a very limited understanding of what Wikipedia actually is. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:26, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
:Oh, you beat me there. I would support a block, this user really isn't helping. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
::That's where we're headed if this keeps up - I note his comments re: you. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 21:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
:::He was responsible for the terrible state of [[Manu Sharma]] fairly recently, and was happy to edit war to keep his preferred version (BLP-vios, serious POV issues, copyright violations etc) and is now back to editing the article, complete with legalese, a self-professed conflict of interest and refusal to cite sources. I've warned him for 3RR and pointed him to various policies, but I really don't want this. I think the article should have been deleted a long time ago, and the last thing I want to do is block/protect/delete myself. Long story short- could you do something about this, if need be? Do you think it's worth bringing up on a noticeboard? I really don't think this editor is adding anything to the project. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
::::There we go, 3RR- [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Manu_Sharma&diff=prev&oldid=285101940 fourth revert]. No attempt at discussion anywhere, dispite my attempts to contact him on his talk page. Will you block, or should I report it? [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::Bloody hell, you're quick. Thankyou. You've beaten me to dealing with everything I've reported. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::He can't say he wasn't warned, and I was sitting on it waiting for 4RR. I can see that there's a lengthy history of blocking which gives me little faith that matters will improve. His talk page is littered with copyvio notices as well. You were correct to avoid use of admin tools in this matter, although the copyvio+personal opinion+BLP stuff gives you a pass on the reverts in my opinion. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 21:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Thanks a lot for your help in this issue. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::::You're welcome, but I doubt it's the last we see of this. You don't see edit-warring/copyvio/BLP/personal attacks/COI in one package like that very often. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 22:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I left a longer message for J Milburn on his talk page a bit ago but... You two [[WP:BITE|BIT]] this editor rather than [[WP:AGF|assuming good faith]] - and, rather annoyingly, he was factually right on the status of the appeal, AND in the right under [[WP:BLP]] regarding defamatory information on article subjects.

I'm going to follow up with more after I get done with his OTRS complaint, but jeez, guys, please don't do this sort of thing. I agree he didn't play nice, but you two escalated this all rather than AGFing and this wasn't helpful. [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 03:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

:Looks like I owe an apology. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 11:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
::I've explained why this was a rather simplistic view on George's talk page. This user is far better off blocked. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
:::I understand, but I ''am'' concerned about the apparent fact the the editor was, in fact, correct on the BLP issue. I was concerned about that at the time, and didn't pursue my own inquiry - shame on me. On the other points, the editor's attitudes toward copyright, civility and edit-warring are self-evident. There's no cost to unblock, and if the editor shows a willingness to do as I asked, to use the talk page and appropriate edit summaries, then fine. If it continues as before, then it's easy enough to re-block. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 22:34, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
::::I can accept that, but I think the user has had enough second chances, and has shown no improvement after any of them. I am waiting for George's advise regarding the issue- I may take it to the noticeboards yet. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 20:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::Don't let me get in the way of a noticeboard discussion - I came in because of the OTRS complaint, had to dig the sources he was pointing to, and responded to what I found. Him being factually right on the latest point is not relevant to a history of disruption, if there's one there. I was trying not to get too tangled up in the other aspects of it, sorry if it seemed like I was holding things up. Feel free to file a note on ANI. [[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 21:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::I've been waiting to see what the editor's next move is, and will base my reaction on that. He hasn't edited since being blocked, and I left him some advice on unblocking. We'll see if he takes it. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 21:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

==Deletion==
We created the Cynthia Kosut page in total seriousness. It's an accompaniment to the STARPAP page we entered- Cynthia Kosut is a teacher at the Nueva School in Hillsborough California (http://www.nuevaschool.org). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.2.21.34|216.2.21.34]] ([[User talk:216.2.21.34|talk]]) 21:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I believe it. However, she does not appear to be [[WP:NOTE|notable]] by Wikipedia's standards. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>'''

== lol, how can i create a page for myself withoutn it being deleted?? ==

sorry bout the iron chef thing mate copy and pasted and i did the Genius thing because its .....true :)

But would writing a small article just about me be deleted?? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ioannoud|Ioannoud]] ([[User talk:Ioannoud|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ioannoud|contribs]]) 12:41, 21 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Are you [[WP:NOTE|notable]]? In other words, have you personally been written about in non-trivial articles in independent media? I mean, I realize that you're a cooking media star and all-around genius, but has anybody written about that in a national publication? Happy editing, '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 12:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

{{Talkback|TomCat4680}}

== Why was the Aine O'reilly article deleted? ==

...and if possible could you put it back online just for a day, it was a suprise. i understand it makes no sense to the general public but sure who else will be looking at it apart from me and the woman herself!!! please!
:It was a negative unsourced biography that has no place on Wikipedia. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 17:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

== Proposal to add new content to WTC7 ==

I propose to add details from the [http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/NCSTAR1Aindex.htm new NIST report]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/NCSTAR1Aindex.htm |title=NIST NCSTAR 1A: Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7|author= Patrick D.Gallagher|publisher=''National Institute of Standards and Technology'' |date=2008-10-01}}</ref>. There, the collapse is described in three phases: (Cite page 87)

* In Stage 1, the descent was slow and the acceleration was less than that of gravity. (until t=1.75s)
* In Stage 2, the north face descended at gravitational accelaration (between t=1.75s and t=4.0s)
* In Stage 3, the acceleration decreased somewhat as the upper portion of the north face encountered increased resistance from the collapsed structure and the debris pile below. (between t=4.0s and t=5.4s)

Also Fig.3-15 of pdf page 88 should be included in the article for a better understanding. As far as is saw is the new report not yet included in the articles references.

Is it possible to include this information, or are there any reasons why it can/should be excluded?
[[User:Johninwiki|Johninwiki]] ([[User talk:Johninwiki|talk]]) 02:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

:You should make this proposal on the article talkpage so the involved editors can discuss. I'm not sure that the figure's in the public domain (although I suspect it is). '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 02:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

::Thank you for the quick answer. I added the proposal to [[Talk:World_Trade_Center#WTC7]] yesterday (and now a revised vesion), but without any response so far.. After I saw that you are also one of the editors, I was interested to hear your opinion. Is there any "Editor in charge" for WTC7 which I may ask ? [[User:Johninwiki|Johninwiki]] ([[User talk:Johninwiki|talk]]) 02:38, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

:::These things take some time to develop unless it's a highly-trafficked article. I have taken no significant role in editing that article, apart from dealing with vandalism or poorly-considered/undiscussed edits. Since it's a wiki, there's no "editor in charge" for any of the 2.8 million articles here. You must convince the community at large that your edits are worthwhile. Most of the time that's not hard, but as WTC 7 is a [[WP:FA|featured article]], editors will demand more, especially since it's in the 9/11-related category and attracts some interesting ideas. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 02:47, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:9px;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Kitten-stare.jpg|120px|left]]
[[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) has given you a [[kitten]]! Kittens promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. <br />

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{tls|Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
{{clear}}
</div><!-- Template:Kitten -->

==Thank you...==

... for the midnight knock and quick departure of the black van. Our one-off editors seem to be becoming stranger and stranger. Who knows, maybe the next angry edit-warrior will accuse one of us of excessive neutrality? (Dante put them in the vestibule...) [[User:Antandrus|Antandrus ]] [[User_talk:Antandrus|(talk)]] 20:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
:(Resisting the urge to lapse into Boris-speak) The Committee for State Security thanks you for your services to the State security organs. We do, however, request that you appear before the Sub-Committee on Political Orthodoxy concerning your apparent Fascist sympathies. Additionally, you will answer questions concerning your apparent adherence to [[Maoism|certain discredited foreign ideas]]. Your book will, of course, be confiscated for examination. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 02:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

::Hey, I paid five bucks for that copy! (And in right-wing [[Orange County, California]] -- that's the strangest part.) (It's a nicely-bound Chinese-printed edition ... I should really photograph it for the [[Little Red Book]] article.) [[User:Antandrus|Antandrus ]] [[User_talk:Antandrus|(talk)]] 02:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

:::I was going to give you the Uncle Duce Award for Contradictory Political Bias featuring inscribed portraits of Stalin and Mussolini, but a lack of skill and an almost-escaped dog conspired to thwart me. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 02:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

::::LOL! That's hilarious ... but our pets always come first. :) [[User:Antandrus|Antandrus ]] [[User_talk:Antandrus|(talk)]] 03:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

==Plagiarism question==
Hey Acroterion, you know your way around Wikipedia better than I. I found an article whose lead paragraph is directly taken from a copyrighted work without attribution. I don't have the time right now to rewrite the paragraph properly and wonder if there is some way to flag this for the wiki community for another editor to correct it? [[User:Pmcyclist|pmcyclist]] ([[User talk:Pmcyclist|talk]]) 21:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
:I think your simplest option is to post about it at [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems]], and others will address it. If you want to go further, you can yourself tag the article with {{tl|copyvio}}, which is more extreme, as it blanks the article. There are more instructions about notifications and listing on a central work-page you should follow, too, at [[wp:copyvio]]. There certainly is a centralized process to handle these. You can contribute the info that there appears to be a problem, but you don't need to take on the entire solution by yourself. Hope this helps. [[User:Doncram|doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 21:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
::Thanks so much, peanut gallery, for your advice. I will do that! [[User:Pmcyclist|pmcyclist]] ([[User talk:Pmcyclist|talk]]) 22:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
::Thanks for the talkpage stalking, Doncram, your advice is better than I would have managed, since I wasn't necessarily aware of the Copyright problems page. Short of personally rewriting it, that's your best option. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 23:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
::::Glad u dont mind my butting in. :) Plagiarism is a topic that interests me, otherwise i wouldn't have been likely to come visit. I was deceived, this was about copyvio, tho, which is different. (You can plagiarise from a public domain source, for example, where there is no copyvio possible.) About plagiarism, vote for a guideline at [[wt:plagiarism]], an open RfC ... [[User:Doncram|doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 00:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
:::Thanks to both of you. I found out that the publishing house was in fact copying from wiki rather than the other way around. Case solved, Watson! [[User:Pmcyclist|pmcyclist]] ([[User talk:Pmcyclist|talk]]) 23:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
::::I've discovered other instances of circular attribution (a nicer term than a crib straight from Wikipedia) that trace back to a Wikipedian origin - it can get pretty confusing (and it's amusing when it appears in a broadly-circulated publication). '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 02:49, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

== Sslota ==

Hiya,

{{user|Sslota}} put a help request on your page; I've moved it over to [[User_talk:Sslota#Help_request]] and answered it there.

Just a small point, but please note that when you welcome people (as you did [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sslota&diff=282016593&oldid=282007674 here]), please;

*Put the welcome in a new section on their page (&nbsp;<code><nowiki>== Welcome ==</nowiki></code>&nbsp;) - even if it's a brand-new page. This gets the new user off to a good start in learning how talk pages work, etc.

*Please use <code><nowiki>{{subst:welcome}}</nowiki></code> instead of just <code><nowiki>{{welcome}}</nowiki></code> - so that the code itself is put onto their page instead of a [[WP:TRANSCLUDE|transclusion]]. Again, this helps to make things more understandable to our new users.

There are policies on this, but I can't be bothered to dig them out right now :-) I hope my explanations will suffice.

Cheers, and keep up the good work helping new users. <small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background-color:darkblue; color:#FFFFFF"> &nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B; background-color:yellow; border: 0px solid; ">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 04:28, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

:I am aware of those policies, however I find that I can't be bothered to follow them with 100% consistency. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <sub><small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 12:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:13, 1 May 2009

Shut up and go away you big faggot or I'll block your greasy fat ass for 75 years!

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Acroterion&oldid=287314935"