User talk:Acroterion

Signpost

I went to the school, so did they, but now we go to a different school.

The names were red so I just quickly made a page for them so it was blue.

You made what could be interpreted as a threat, and in violation of every rule we have concerning biographies. I think you meant it as a joke, but you may consider editing constructively from now on. Acroterion _(talk) 23:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: TWINKLE

I figured it was worth a shot. Didn't think I would run into so much static. Not by you, you were actually nice, but everyone else. My main reason is, it is difficult to respond to vandalism, revert, warn the user and then respond to the next vandalism from the user (which there is always more than one vandalism from a certain user) in a timely fashion. If anything, I was looking at something to make the process easier or quicker.

I thought people would like the "look over my shoulder" idea (that was a BIG bust and taken in the wrong way). Most thought I would use it wrong and I should be watched. I thought people would feel better if I were open to people watching my edits.

As for exile, personally I have felt like I was in exile for awhile now. Mostly since everything I do is watched like a hawk by Metros (for all the wrong reasons) and I have to take demands from him. Not a great working environment. Little I can do about it. - NeutralHomer • Talk • December 3, 2008 @ 04:52

Rollback

It doesn't look like FisherQueen knows how, can you look into it for me, if she hasn't already. HairyPerry 17:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

It looks like Ioeth has already taken care of it. Regards, Acroterion _(talk) 18:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

tacos

I was trying to delete vandalism

You're right. Replied on your talk page. Acroterion _(talk) 23:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Regarding our article!

Good day Acroterion,

My name is Gregory and I'm trying to write article regarding our new site. We are not trying to promote our site, just want our article to be listed on wikipeida. I do not know many guidelines and I did create second account because first one just got deleted, something about external link spam. But today when I was trying to improve our article, it was deleted also. First Account: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Masterg-wiki Second Account: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Sextubeguide

Our site is similar to ovguide.com just for adult users. Our site does not carry adult content, just links and logo of other popular adult sites. So far I have created this article, but again, I don't know much about wikipedia guidelines if you can, please let me know on how I can improve it this article that I have submitted below for you to check. my email is grishab72@hotmail.com

Thank you,

Greg

The article was deleted because it was clearly promotional in nature (see WP:SPAM), and did not indicate that it met any of Wikipedia's requirements for notability (WP:WEB). Please review these guidelines, and remember that Wikipedia is not a venue for advertising, nor is it a set of external links. Articles on web content should include references in reliable third-party media indicating the notability of the site, not a set of links to the website being described. Acroterion _(talk) 02:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

By the way, the second account does not exist, and I strongly advise that it stay that way, as it will be blocked as a promotional account. We do not permit accounts representing organizations to contribute content: see WP:COI. If a website is sufficiently noteworthy, someone else will take an interest and write an article. We strongly discourage articles on yourself, your company, your band, or any other subject in which you are directly involved. Acroterion _(talk) 02:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

PI was trying to make it right based on reviews of other article similar to this sites below

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Ovguide None Adult

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Xtube Adult

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Youporn Adult

Again, we are not trying to promote our site through wikipedia, just want our article to be listed so we can add direct link of wikipedia.org/wiki/example to our site so that our users can click on the link that will take them to wikipedia.org/wiki/example so they can read more information regarding our site.

I can remove all external links if that works. Please let me know? or can you help me fix existing article for me?

Thank you,

Greg

Masterg-wiki (talk) 03:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

I wouldn't cite Ovguide as a model article, but the common thread for all three is extensive coverage in third-party media, and in the case of the latter two, solid referencing documenting this coverage. That is the crucial point: has the website received significant coverage in independent media? If so, it should be cited. If there isn't, then it's not eligible for inclusion on Wikipedia. There are three issues: promotion, an apparent lack of notability, and an apparent conflict of interest. Acroterion _(talk) 03:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Giant Forest Lodge Historic District

The Giant Forest Lodge Historic District article looks great. It's nice to have these articles in Wikipedia and I thank you for contributing them. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! It's an interesting one, as it's not really there anymore, and was torn down by the folks in charge of cataloging it. There's an external link here [1] that contains a lot more pictures, but it's not exactly encyclopedic, as the author is very unhappy about its demise, so I've foregone a link in the article. Acroterion _(talk) 05:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Help with Sotterley (Hollywood, Maryland)

I'm afraid, similar to Whitehall (Annapolis, Maryland), I created a new entry for Sotterley (Hollywood, Maryland), without first realizing there was an existing entry titled Sotterley (St. Mary's County, Maryland). Can you look at them for me and see whether I have done the merge correctly? I rtied after teh fact to Move Sotterley (St. Mary's County, Maryland) to Sotterley (Hollywood, Maryland), then editing, but I was unable to do that. Sorry about all this; I think I should have handled this differently.--Pubdog (talk) 11:34, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Also, I am wondering whether it was you or User talk:Doncram who added the comment to Sotterley (Hollywood, Maryland), about Resurrection Manor? I found some authoritative data on the latter and created an article on that delisted property. TIA --- Ted--Pubdog (talk) 20:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Done. As before, I saved a copy of the deleted version to your sandbox. My only contribution to the article was to add the MHT external link. Acroterion _(talk) 22:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

reply

yeah, like THATS going to happen —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBestHumanBeingWhoEverLived (talk • contribs) 23:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Barcat

You recently blocked USer:Barcat for removing accurate information and references from Physician assistant. He doesn't seem to have entirely understood. While he only removed half the references this time, he re-introduced a significant mathematical error. (As has been discussed (without any apparent attention from Barcat) at great length on the article's talk page, it is not possible to get "about 9%" out of any possible combination of numbers in the listed reference.)

I am fixing the article again, but wonder if you'd undertake a further attempt at educating the editor. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Since I told them their next block would be indef, that's what I did, but I left a note asking them to explain their edits. I'm willing to listen to an explanation, if they're willing to provide one. Acroterion _(talk) 03:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I'd be happy to have Barcat become a productive editor, if that's possible. He just doesn't seem to be 'getting it'. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Aiden Carty

Aiden Carty was a genuine article which was under construction. He is well know to have influenced the works of Louis Kahn and Louis Sullivan. My referance to him being from th efourth dimension was talking about 4d part of one of buchmeinster fuhller books. Aiden Carty was well know to use the geometric systmes just as palladio who incidentally influenced corb. He spent most of his life studying the pazzi chappel and it is an injustice to the architecture world to delete him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.71.4.9 (talk) 16:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Ah. Your "genuine article" which states, and I quote: "Superior human being from the fourth dimension, who has had myriad architectural infulences without any arrogance or influence there upon. His work has been know to be plagerised by Louis Kahn and other greats now know as louis can't." Fine work. Maybe, as an apparent time lord he can alter the universe to make this an acceptable article for an encyclopedia, but I won't hold my breath. And it's Buckminster Fuller, just so you know. Acroterion _(talk) 16:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletion

I have been trying to add an article on Wikipedia titled "FoxFury."

It seems that you have deleted the article. May I ask why? I tried to keep all advertisement out of the article and leave only fact. I have looked over all WIKIPEDIA Rules and Regulations in adding an article and tried to apply them to the best of my abilities.

I have also view other lighting company’s Wikipedia article and the “FoxFury” article I have written looks no different.

What are your recommendations in how to change the article to make it seem less like an advertisement?

If you can please notify me on my talk page. USERNAME: Risingsaint

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.250.103.150 (talk) 00:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

dongcopter

Hiya. i think this (dongcopter/helicockter) is a notable topic, as it caused quite a media uproar by upsetting Gary Kasparov's meeting... i can re-write the article into a proper, non-vandalism/prank page, if allowed. RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 03:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Be my guest: the edit I deleted consisted of "http://dongcopter.com/images/dcspray.jpg jews did 9/11 on wheels" in its entirety, which is a little short on context and long on vandalism.Acroterion _(talk) 03:46, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Giant Forest Lodge Historic District

On 10 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Giant Forest Lodge Historic District, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 23:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletes

I like your style. You are quick, quick. --digitalmischief (talk) 04:53, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks - that kid was already on thin ice, as he had been vandalizing. However, speed isn't always a virtue in speedy deletion, so I try to be judicious. Acroterion _(talk) 05:00, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Dormatitus Article

Thanks for your note, Acroterion.

This is my first new submission, so I'm pretty clumsy. Dormatitus is a "made up" term. It's a slang term used by college students.

How can I verify this is actually part of language? Could you hang on for a few days so I can get third-party validation? And what would be acceptable? Thanks so much, I really appreciate your patience and help.

Best Regards, klasalle Klasalle (talk) 18:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

In general, Google is your friend. We're looking for references in major newspapers or magazines, things like that. Take a look at our verifiability standards. I won't delete it myself, but I can't say that somebody else won't propose it for deletion. Personally, I see so much crap come through as new articles that it's refreshing to see somebody trying to make a good-faith effort, and I'm glad to help and provide encouragement. As it stands, I don't think it will last unless you find some solid references. Don't let that discourage you. Acroterion _(talk) 18:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

The Big League

Greetings,

I had come to Wikipedia to work on the entry I created titled "The Big League" to notice that it had been deleted because I had failed to explain the relevance of the topic. The reason that I believe this page should remain on Wikipedia is because this league and style of fantasy football play is very unique. It has been in existence for almost 20 years and is sen in many circles on the internet as a pioneer of "dynasty leagues" which is a very specialized format of fantasy football. The league style has been copied 100s of times from other users and I have helped share this style of play. If you would reconsider the deletion I would add to the page to explain how they can set up their league to emulate this style of play. I guess the main reason that I created an entry on Wikipedia in the first place was to try and ensure that our league would indeed get credit for being one of the very first "dynasty leagues" in existence and provide a detailed blueprint for other people to follow.

Please let me know if there is anything I can do to have the page restored. I would be willing to do whatever you suggest.

thanks,

Ezlee2 (talk) 05:38, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

TBL Commissioner

The article (which was deleted a year ago) was deleted under our criteria for web content (see WP:WEB), since it did not indicate its notability as a website under Wikiedpa's criteria. It could also have been deleted as a non-notable organization. It did not include the information you mention above, although I don't think that is enough to establish notability on its own. In general, you would need to provide evidence that the league has received non-trivial notice on multiple independent media of national standing. See WP:V for verifiability requirements. If you wish, I will restore the article to your userspace for you to work on. Acroterion _(talk) 14:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

mattyboy

hello there. even though my block has been removed, i would like to advertise the fact that vandalism is described as "a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of wikipedia" . i must disagree about my changes made to andy fish, as all were completely true. i have taken one of his classes, and he told the whole class about how he was attacked by his cat and also how he likes the way that other people talk. if you must say that it must be verifiable, then i ask you to prove that this is not true, specifically by asking mr. fish himself.

                                         -mattyboy786  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattyboy786 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC) 

And I advise you that you are disrupting the encyclopedia, and that you may expect to be blocked if you repeat your behavior. The next time would be permanent. Acroterion _(talk) 01:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

my apologies, i had little idea that this was a "wikipedia law", as i have only been a user for a few days. oh, and by the way, "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." this has been taken directly from the article on vandalism.

If you insist on a label, you were editing disruptively, and blocked accordingly. Vandalism is a subset of disruptive editing. Having learned that that is not countenanced, I'm sure you will be able to be a productive editor and an asset to the encyclopedia. Acroterion _(talk) 02:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

new

hi my name is Mayme08 and i'm new to wikipedia can you give rules about what to do and what not to do please because I don't know what to do thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayme08 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Misc

Thanks very much for all your help with Sotterley (Hollywood, Maryland). I got around today to moving my sandbox to the article. I appreciate very much all the pics you recently added to the National Register of Historic Places listings in Frederick County, Maryland list and articles. They're really boss. I spent T'Giving in Lynchburg, VA and created articles and got pics of most places there. Best wishes ...Ted--Pubdog (talk) 23:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, glad to help out. The light this time of year is good for photography, at least of south-facing buildings, and no leaves to contend with. I'm going to go out around Christmas with a GPS and camera and try to find as many of the places in Jefferson County, West Virginia as I can - I added most of the articles in June. Acroterion _(talk) 02:02, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Shadow Mountain Lookout

Are you planning on expanding this at all? As of right now the article only contains a repeat of the title. TheXenocide (talk) 23:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Ah, too quick for me to even ask. Apologies. TheXenocide (talk) 23:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

I blundered and somehow screwed up the formatting so the text vanished. Easily fixed, and thanks for noticing - I don't always catch my mistakes. Acroterion _(talk) 23:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

BTW

Thanks. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 21:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Declined, of course, although I didn't block the user, considering it a last spasm of rage that they will come to regret when they've grown up. As you say, a mulligan. Acroterion _(talk) 21:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Indeed. LOL. I thought of it as a youthful indiscretion. Just wait till they grow up and find out how comparably meritless their childhood reasons for rage were. Dlohcierekim 21:54, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Dave Lyons

i saw that deleted the article a few monthes ago and i just wanted to check with u b4 i restarted it i just wanted to know wat fact would be good to have in it to keep it up thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Southpw (talk • contribs) 00:58, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

If you can establish notability in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines, with sourcing in multiple, independent media, that's great. If it's the same article about a history teacher, then I would discourage its re-creation. Regards, Acroterion _(talk) 02:21, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

why do you keep deleting my page i just created it took me an hour! i am the guitarist for this band there is nothing false about the information and it is not spam please tell me what i am doing wrong!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Radguitarist512 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

please stop deleting my page that i created

why do you keep deleting my page i just made it took me so long! i am the guitarist for the band i made the page for there is nothing false about the information and it is not spam please tell me what i am doing wrong!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Radguitarist512 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

WP:Notability. Simply put, the band is not notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. -Jéské Couriano ^{(v^_^v)} 05:28, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Help please!

On the Centsports page, 2005 and Phil Bridger keep vandalizing my edits. I would let it go if they were administrators, but they are not. Can you please put a stop to this?—Preceding unsigned comment added by thesavior666 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.98.61 (talk)

There is no vandalism here, and it appears that you are trying to track something by putting code into the URL. Please do not make such unfounded accusations, and the URL should stand according to consensus. This edit summary of yours [2] is unacceptable. You also appear to be editing with both an account and an IP, which is strongly discouraged, and you may be trying to avoid WP:3RR by doing so.Acroterion _(talk) 01:05, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

How do i fix it?

How do i fix my wikipedia article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElderKingpin (talk • contribs) 04:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Please review our inclusion criteria at WP:WEB. In general, web content must have received significant coverage in independent third-party media to be considered sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. There are useful links in the (several) deletions notices you've received, as well. Non-notable content is eligible for speedy deletion, as you have discovered. Acroterion _(talk) 04:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean by third-person party, like another person to signify that im correct?

It's partly to verify, but also to establish notability. A significant newspaper, preferably of national standing, or something like CNN or a major trade magazine. Blogs, individuals and the like are not acceptable. In general, gaming clans are not notable, and have a way of being deleted in minutes. Wikipedia is not for promotion. Acroterion _(talk) 04:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Can i continue to edit my page and not have it released? Like i make it so i edit it and its not technically "released" to the public so i cant get penalized for doing something wrong, and only have administrators have a look at it? or is that not possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElderKingpin (talk • contribs) 04:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Certainly. Tell you what, I'll make you a sandbox at User:ElderKingpin/Sandbox in your userspace and drop the content there and you can work with it. Just understand that there needs to be a credible assertion of notability in the article, with references to back it up before it can be acceptable for article space. Acroterion _(talk) 04:40, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

By the way, please don't include the list of members, admins, their pet's names, etc. - this is an encyclopedia. Acroterion _(talk) 04:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

No Chart?

Did the database not save the chart? It took me an hour and a half to do that chart. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElderKingpin (talk • contribs) 04:57, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

It did, but Wikipedia is not a free webhost for your clan membership, and I chose not to restore it. I will email it to you, if you wish (you will need to enable email in your user preferences). Acroterion _(talk) 05:05, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Chase Brooks article

I am Chase Brooks' personal representative. I wrote an article over him because he is a self-published author whose novel, "Hello, My Love" has actually been doing rather successful. Claiming that this article is "useless" is, to be honest, ridiculous. He is a rising author and the page was created to let both readers, fans, and potential buyers learn more about both Mr. Brooks and his books, as well as his career as his rapidly developing career as a writer. So, please, get off your high horse and take some consideration for the articles that people have been working hard on for ACTUAL people who have ACTUAL careers, not people who sit at home on their computer all day so bored that they delete people's stuff. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbrooks09 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOTE for our notability requirements. If Mr. Brooks can provide multiple references in third-party publications of national standing, then he would be considered notable according to Wikipedia policies. On the basis of the information provided, an author of a self-published book would not be considered eligible for inclusion. Wikipedia is not a free webhost, it is not a means of promotion, and nobody has described the article is "useless". You may also wish to read our policies on conflict of interest, as you appear to have an interest in promoting this subject. Acroterion _(talk) 01:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

National Register of Historic Places listings in Frederick County, Maryland

I've gone ahead and completed stub articles for the remaining entries on the National Register of Historic Places listings in Frederick County, Maryland. Best wishes for the holidays.--Pubdog (talk) 01:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. I saw you'd been adding map links, which are most useful. It would be nice if we can declare one state fully documented w/r/t the NRHP in 2009, but I hadn't really considered Maryland, given the number of articles needed (1500?). Your good work makes me think that it might be possible, after all. Cheers, Acroterion _(talk) 01:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Love Systems

Hi Acroterion,

I've been working on a company page and I could use some feedback on the page. I've followed the guidelines of WP:Corp but I'm not sure if everything is fine. If you have time to review it, I would really appreciate that. The page in questions is http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Coaster7/Love_Systems.

Thanks in advance. Coaster7 (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Sock

Not a problem...I always keep an eye out for socks messing around on the talk pages. Take Care and an Early Merry Christmas....NeutralHomer • Talk • December 22, 2008 @ 23:09

Best wishes for the season

Ecoleetage (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas

Neutralhomer is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks to both you and Ecoleetage: my RL schedule's been pretty intense for the past couple of days and I've had no time for the wiki, so my best wishes to you and to everyone. Acroterion _(talk) 14:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

hi Acroterion just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas ok hope your christmas is good —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayme08 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Virtua girl hd

Hello, Acroterion ...

FYI, someone has recreated Virtua girl hd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), an article that you speedy deleted as G11 ... you might want to WP:SALT it this time. :-)

Happy Editing! — 72.75.108.10 (talk · contribs) _{20:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)}

It's been PROD'ed, and the rewritten version isn't advertising anymore, so it's not a speedy deltion candidate. It will be gone in a few days. Acroterion _(talk) 22:55, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

User_talk:Healyy5

While I admire your attention to this user's vandalism on other pages I have to question this revert: [3], I do believe he has the right to edit his own talk page as he sees fit according to WP:UP#CMT --Uncle Milty (talk) 20:45, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

In 95% of cases, I agree with the sentiment above, but not this time: this was a sockpuppet of some blocked user with a grudge, who knew perfectly well what they were doing. I reinstated the warnings in lieu of a final warning. I would hardly describe this [4] edit as a constructive addition to the encyclopedia or constructive discourse. Acroterion _(talk) 22:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I agree that his edits to your page were vandalism and were dealt with properly. I contend that his edits to his own page were not vandalism and could have been left alone, as reversions like that only serve to raise the antagonism levels. --Uncle Milty (talk) 22:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm well aware of the policy in question, and have mentioned it to others on occasion. I would suggest that WP:DENY, WP:RBI, and WP:DFTT are apropos in this case. I am, however, wrong from time to time. In any case, I think you'll find that we think alike in nearly all circumstances of this sort. Acroterion _(talk) 23:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

My unfairly deleted profane nonsense

He deleted my perfectly fine article.

Airballrocketship (talk) 01:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Clyde

You mean the three sentences of profanity sandwiched between an innoccuous opening and an obnoxious ending? That one? Acroterion _(talk) 02:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

No...I mean the perfectly decent article with three sections and a picture. Just because I don't know the tricks and trade of Wikipedia doesn't mean it's word deleting. AND YOU CHANGE THE TITLE! Way to go, asshole.