User talk:68.191.101.192: Difference between revisions
m Protected User talk:68.191.101.192: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked ([edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 22:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 22:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC))) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' for a period of '''3 days''' from editing in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for persistent [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. <font face="Arial"> [[User:PeterSymonds|<font color="#02e">Peter</font><font color="#02b"><b>Symonds</b></font>]] ([[User talk:PeterSymonds|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 21:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> |
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' for a period of '''3 days''' from editing in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for persistent [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. <font face="Arial"> [[User:PeterSymonds|<font color="#02e">Peter</font><font color="#02b"><b>Symonds</b></font>]] ([[User talk:PeterSymonds|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font> 21:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> |
||
==HE DID IT AGAIN== |
|||
HE MAKES EVERYTHING SEEM LIKE IT SUCKS AND HE RULE I AM FED UP |
Revision as of 22:23, 8 August 2009
August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page King of the Hill has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mygerardromance (talk) 01:34, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Mothra (film). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. - sinneed (talk) 07:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:Mygerardromance/Awards. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. - sinneed (talk) 07:18, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --VirtualSteve need admin support? 07:19, 2 August 2009 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Exert 21:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page The Cleveland Show. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Quantpole (talk) 21:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to To Love and Die in Dixie. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 21:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Exert 21:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in 92 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Malinaccier (talk) 21:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC) |
Your recent edit to Ghostbusters video games (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 21:25, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
sorry
this guy i just don't know what his problem is he needs help can you help him he has just gone to far!
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)HE DID IT AGAIN
HE MAKES EVERYTHING SEEM LIKE IT SUCKS AND HE RULE I AM FED UP