This is an archived log. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to leave a message for me or comment on this log, please do so at User talk:Rhododendrites.
Reason: Horribly promotional article with no independent sources. If she were clearly notable, I'd be inclined to WP:TNT myself, but the sources I'm seeing largely have a PR vibe, and mostly e.g. interviews on blogs. At best this is a WP:TNT scenario. If someone does find reliable sources (WP:RS) to satisfy WP:GNG, no objection to recreation. If deleted I'll likely add to the A+F list to see if sources can be found to write a neutral article at that point.
Reason: I'm finding very little by way of independent coverage of this award -- only primary sources/press releases and various awards databases. Looks to fail WP:GNG.
Reason: Not seeing evidence of WP:GNG. Excessive detail based on primary sources (or unsourced), and some routine coverage. I see the wind turbine has received some minor coverage that isn't actually coverage of the business park (and not quite enough to carry notability on its own).
Reason: The sources in the article do not show notability as per WP:GNG. We would need to cover the subject based on the consensus among reliable sources, which would mean it would be an [arguably, I suppose] mostly negative biography. Based on notability and WP:BLP concerns, it seems like deletion is worth considering. There's still a little more research I'd want to do before sending it to AfD. FWIW I'm not familiar with the subject. Came across the article when someone added it to the alt-right navigational template.
Reason: Was just going to tag, but I'm not seeing quite enough by way of in-depth coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject (WP:CORPDEPTH).
Reason: Possible G11/A7 CSD, but there may be a claim of significance here. Either way, this looks to all be based on the website (lots of activities and little other content), and it's not clear it passes WP:GNG/WP:CORPDEPTH.
Reason: Does not look to pass WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH based on a search for sources. The current article seems to be a compilation of primary sourced material.
