User:Peter/RfA reviews/CTSWyneken

• CTSWyneken (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

• Edit count - Currently 4884, mostly article and article talk. Wikipedia:148, WP talk:50, usertalk 1111.
• Time around - First edit 20 June 2003
• Email enabled? - yes
• Controversial userpage? - only if people dislike public declaration of possible POV (not a problem for me as long as it doesn't enter articles)
• Any blocks? - no
• Stupid signature? - no
• Edit summaries - Mathbot "99% for major edits and 74% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 143 minor edits in the article namespace." Mostly used, bit low in places.
• Civil? No person attacks? - (check after full namespace review)
• Mistakes - (ditto)
• Any edit warring? - (ditto)

Main oppose reasons from last RFA:

• Low project space edits:
• Oppose by SlimVirgin, bias on Martin Luther, will need to take a look at this.
• Slight concern over low edit summary usage
• Narrow range of edits
• Not fully familiar with admin processes (e.g. blocking)
• "wolf in sheep's clothing" accusation/POV pushing
• General feeling of not being able to trust that admin tools won't be used to help in content disputes.
• Answers to questions - first couple are rather on the short side, not sure ignoring Doright on an RFA is best option- but not sure on this as I don't know the history of this editor.