User:NatasaEleftheriou/French Bulldog/NK560 Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing? NatasaEleftheriou
- Link to draft you're reviewing: User:NatasaEleftheriou/French Bulldog
Lead
[edit]Lead evaluation
[edit]The lead was updated and they added a few sentences, but it's not overwhelming and the lead is still concise. The lead does a good job of briefly describing the topic without going into too much detail.
Content
[edit]Content evaluation
[edit]The content added is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date. The content isn't all uploaded but the changes made thus far are relevant and updated. There was a good variety of information added, as there were things that were updated in every section rather than just one, and they added pictures in addition to sources and information.
Tone and Balance
[edit]Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]The content added is neutral and unbiased, and the information is balanced. there isn't one section that feels severely lacking or one section that is too overloaded with information.
Sources and References
[edit]Sources and references evaluation
[edit]The sources are the most up-to-date they can be, and are accurate and from credible sources. There weren't a lot of new references added but there were a good amount of outdated references that were updated.
Organization
[edit]Organization evaluation
[edit]The added content fits the article very well, the information and wording matches the existing content and was very organized. The sections are clearly divided and easy to understand and doesn't look messy.
Images and Media
[edit]Images and media evaluation
[edit]The images added were appropriate and adds to the content of the article. They were not irrelevant or inappropriate, and there is a good balance between text and pictures.
Overall impressions
[edit]Overall evaluation
[edit]I think that the article is more complete and that the information added was useful and relevant to the topic. A lot of the edits were updating existing information but I think that that improved the article and its content. The article is pretty solid so far!