User:Bmaghen/Sonoporation
Sonoporation
[edit]From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search Sonoporation, or cellular sonication, is the use of sound (typically ultrasonic frequencies) for modifying the permeability of the cell plasma membrane. This technique is usually used in molecular biology and non-viral gene therapy in order to allow uptake of large molecules such as DNA into the cell, in a cell disruption process called transfection or transformation. Sonoporation employs the acoustic cavitation of microbubbles to enhance delivery of these large molecules.[1] The bioactivity of this technique is similar to, and in some cases found superior to, electroporation. Extended exposure to low-frequency (<MHz) ultrasound has been demonstrated to result in complete cellular death (rupturing), thus cellular viability must also be accounted for when employing this technique.
Sonoporation is under active study for the introduction of foreign genes in tissue culture cells, especially mammalian cells. Sonoporation is also being studied for use in targeted Gene therapy in vivo, in a medical treatment scenario whereby a patient is given modified DNA, and an ultrasonic transducer might target this modified DNA into specific regions of the patient's body.[2]
Equipment
[edit]Sonoporation is performed with a dedicated sonoporator. Sonoporation may also be performed with custom-built piezoelectric transducers connected to bench-top function generators and acoustic amplifiers. Standard ultrasound medical devices may also be used in some applications.
Measurement of the acoustics used in sonoporation is listed in terms of mechanical index, which quantifies the likelihood that exposure to diagnostic ultrasound will produce an adverse biological effect by a non-thermal action based on pressure.[3]
Microbubble contrast agents
[edit]Microbubble contrast agents are generally used in contrast-enhanced ultrasound applications to enhance the acoustic impact of ultrasound. For sonoporation specifically, microbubbles are used to significantly enhance membrane translocation of molecular therapeutics.[4]
General features
[edit]The microbubbles used today are composed of a gas core and a surrounding shell. The makeup of these elements may vary depending on the preferred physical and chemical properties.[5] Microbubble shells have been formed with lipids, galactose, albumin, or polymers. The gas core can be made up of air or heavy gases like nitrogen or perfluorocarbon. [6]
Mechanism of action
[edit]Microbubble gas cores have high compressibility relative to their liquid environment, making them highly responsive to acoustic application. As a result of ultrasound stimulation, microbubbles undergo rapid expansion and contraction, otherwise known as cavitation. When a microbubble is attached to the cell membrane, the microbubble cavitation oscillations produced by ultrasound stimulation will push and pull on the membrane to produce a membrane opening. These rapid oscillations are also responsible for adjacent fluid flow called microstreaming which increases pressure on surrounding cells producing further sonoporation to whole cell populations.[7]
Mechanism
[edit]The mechanism by which molecules cross cellular membrane barriers during sonoporation remains unclear. Different theories exist that may potentially explain barrier permeabilization and molecular delivery. The dominant hypotheses include pore formation, endocytosis, and membrane wounds.
Pore formation
[edit]Pore formation following ultrasound application was first reported in 1999 in a study that observed cell membrane craters following the application of ultrasound at 255 kHz.[8] Later, sonoporation mediated microinjection of dextran molecules showed that membrane permeability mechanisms differ depending on the size of dextran molecules. Microinjection of dextran molecules from 3 to 70 kDa were reported to have crossed the cellular membrane via transient pores, whereas with dextran molecules of 155 and 500 kDa were predominantly found in vesicle-like structures, likely indicating the mechanism of endocytosis.[9] This variability in membrane behavior has led to other studies which investigate membrane rupture and resealing characteristics depending on ultrasound amplitude and duration.
Endocytosis
[edit]Various cellular reactions to ultrasound indicate the mechanism of molecular uptake via endocytosis. These observed reactionary phenomena include, ion exchange, hydrogen peroxide and cell intracellular calcium concentration. Studies have used patch clamping techniques to monitor membrane potential ion exchange for the role of endocytosis in sonoporation. Ultrasound application to cells and adjacent microbubbles were shown to produce marked cell membrane hyperpolarization along with progressive intracellular calcium increase, which is believed to be a consequence of calcium channels opening in response to microbubble oscillations. These findings act as support for ultrasound application inducing calcium mediated uncoating of clathrin-coated pits seen in traditional endocytosis pathways.[10][11] Other work reported sonoporation induced formation of hydrogen peroxide, a cellular reaction which is also known to be involved with endocytosis.[8]
Membrane wounds
[edit]Mechanically created wounds in the plasma membrane have been observed as a result of sonoporation produced shear forces. The nature of these wounds may vary based on the degree of acoustic cavitation leading to a spectrum of cell behavior, from membrane blebbing to instant cell lysis. Multiple studies examining membrane wounds note observing resealing behavior; a process that is dependent on recruitment of ATP and intracellular vesicles. [8]
Membrane resealing
[edit]Following sonoporation-mediated membrane permeabilization, cells can automatically repair the membrane openings through a phenomenon called "reparable sonoporation."[12] The membrane resealing process has been shown to be calcium dependent. This property may suggest that the membrane repair process involves a cell's own active repair mechanism in response to the cellular influx of calcium.[13]
Preclinical studies
[edit]In vitro
[edit]The first study reporting molecular delivery using ultrasound was a 1987 in vitro study attempting to transfer plasmid DNA to cultured mouse fibroblast cells using sonoporation.[14] This successful plasmid DNA transfection conferring G418 antibiotic resistance ultimately led to further in vitro studies that hinted at the potential for sonoporation transfection of plasmid DNA and siRNA in vivo.
In vivo
[edit]In vivo ultrasound mediated drug delivery was first reported in 1991[14] and many other preclinical studies involving sonoporation have followed. This method is being used to deliver therapeutic drugs or genes to treat a variety of diseases including: Stroke, Cancer, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's...[12] The preclinical utility of sonoporation is well illustrated through past tumor radiation treatments which have reported a more than 10-fold cellular destruction when ionizing radiation is coupled with ultrasound-mediated microbubble vascular disruption. This increase in delivery efficiency could allow for the appropriate reduction in therapeutic dosing.[15]
 | This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
- ^ "Bacteria-mediated gene transfer (bacteria-mediated plasmid transfer, bacteria-mediated expression plasmid transfer)", The Dictionary of Genomics, Transcriptomics and Proteomics, Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, pp. 1–1, 2015-12-18, retrieved 2021-10-27
- ^ Wu, Junru; Nyborg, Wesley (2006-08). "Emerging Therapeutic Ultrasound". doi:10.1142/6047.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help); Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ Church, Charles C. (2005-07). "Frequency, pulse length, and the mechanical index". Acoustics Research Letters Online. 6 (3): 162–168. doi:10.1121/1.1901757. ISSN 1529-7853.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Fowlkes, J.B.; Kripfgans, O.D.; Carson, P.L. "Microbubbles for ultrasound diagnosis and therapy". 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Macro to Nano (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821). IEEE. doi:10.1109/isbi.2004.1398466.
- ^ Klibanov, Alexander L. (2006-03). "Microbubble Contrast Agents: Targeted Ultrasound Imaging and Ultrasound-Assisted Drug-Delivery Applications". Investigative Radiology. 41 (3): 354–362. doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000199292.88189.0f. ISSN 0020-9996.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Lindner, Jonathan R. (2004-06). "Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions". Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 3 (6): 527–533. doi:10.1038/nrd1417. ISSN 1474-1776.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Fan, Zhenzhen; Kumon, Ronald E; Deng, Cheri X (2014-04). "Mechanisms of microbubble-facilitated sonoporation for drug and gene delivery". Therapeutic Delivery. 5 (4): 467–486. doi:10.4155/tde.14.10. ISSN 2041-5990.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ a b c Bouakaz, Ayache; Zeghimi, Aya; Doinikov, Alexander A. (2016), Escoffre, Jean-Michel; Bouakaz, Ayache (eds.), "Sonoporation: Concept and Mechanisms", Therapeutic Ultrasound, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 175–189, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22536-4_10, ISBN 978-3-319-22536-4, retrieved 2021-10-27
- ^ Meijering, Bernadet D.M.; Juffermans, Lynda J.M.; van Wamel, Annemieke; Henning, Rob H.; Zuhorn, Inge S.; Emmer, Marcia; Versteilen, Amanda M.G.; Paulus, Walter J.; van Gilst, Wiek H.; Kooiman, Klazina; de Jong, Nico (2009-03-13). "Ultrasound and Microbubble-Targeted Delivery of Macromolecules Is Regulated by Induction of Endocytosis and Pore Formation". Circulation Research. 104 (5): 679–687. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.183806.
- ^ Hauser, Joerg; Ellisman, Mark; Steinau, Hans-Ulrich; Stefan, Esenwein; Dudda, Marcel; Hauser, Manfred (2009-12). "Ultrasound Enhanced Endocytotic Activity of Human Fibroblasts". Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 35 (12): 2084–2092. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.06.1090. ISSN 0301-5629.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Tran, T.A.; Roger, S.; Le Guennec, J.Y.; Tranquart, F.; Bouakaz, A. (2007-01). "Effect of ultrasound-activated microbubbles on the cell electrophysiological properties". Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 33 (1): 158–163. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.07.029. ISSN 0301-5629.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ a b Wu J (2018-12-18). "Acoustic Streaming and Its Applications". Fluids. 3 (4): 108. doi:10.3390/fluids3040108. ISSN 2311-5521.
- ^ Zhou, Yun; Shi, Jingyi; Cui, Jianmin; Deng, Cheri X. (2008-02). "Effects of extracellular calcium on cell membrane resealing in sonoporation". Journal of Controlled Release. 126 (1): 34–43. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.11.007. PMC 2270413. PMID 18158198.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ a b Tomizawa, Minoru (2013). "Sonoporation: Gene transfer using ultrasound". World Journal of Methodology. 3 (4): 39. doi:10.5662/wjm.v3.i4.39. ISSN 2222-0682. PMC 4145571. PMID 25237622.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ Alter, Julia; Sennoga, Charles A.; Lopes, D.M.; Eckersley, Robert J.; Wells, Dominic J. (2009-06). "Microbubble Stability is a Major Determinant of the Efficiency of Ultrasound and Microbubble Mediated in vivo Gene Transfer". Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 35 (6): 976–984. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.12.015. ISSN 0301-5629.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)