User:TenOfAllTrades: Difference between revisions
Craftyminion (talk | contribs) m Reverted 1 edit by FlushToilet identified as vandalism to last revision by HamburgerRadio. (TW) |
TimeScience (talk | contribs) accuracy |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
My undergraduate studies were in physics and chemistry; my graduate work in biology and biophysics. I try to have at least a passing acquaintance with most things scientific. |
My undergraduate studies were in physics and chemistry; my graduate work in biology and biophysics. I try to have at least a passing acquaintance with most things scientific. |
||
I became a |
I became a [[Sodomist]] in [[November]] of [[2004]]. |
||
== [[Daniel Okrent|Okrent's Law]] == |
== [[Daniel Okrent|Okrent's Law]] == |
Revision as of 00:01, 26 November 2009
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
I like to keep my online personae separated from my real world existence, though I'm sure a relatively determined individual could tie the identities together.
My undergraduate studies were in physics and chemistry; my graduate work in biology and biophysics. I try to have at least a passing acquaintance with most things scientific.
I became a Sodomist in November of 2004.
Daniel Okrent, first Public Editor of the New York Times, once observed,
- "The pursuit of balance can create imbalance because sometimes something is true."
Apply and interpret WP:NPOV with due care and caution, please.
On helping troubled editors
“ | Wikipedia editors are generally generous and helpful people, as one would expect from a volunteer-driven project. The average Wikipedian will bend over backwards to help — until he gets the impression that you're asking him to bend over forwards. |
” |
Useful Wikilinks
sandbox 1 sandbox 2 sandbox 3 sandbox 4 Shustov cleanup spamhunt Post mortem
Why shouldn't I give medical advice on the Reference Desk?, an essay
You'll look like a crank if... — editing strategies which will weaken your perceived credibility
Wikipedia:De-adminship proposal checklist