Jump to content

User:OwenX: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m About Me: update
Yeah
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 4: Line 4:
{|
{|
| [[Image:Lock-icon.png|40px| ]]
| [[Image:Lock-icon.png|40px| ]]
| After being vandalized over 160 times, this page has been [[Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy|semi-protected]] to reduce the amount of time admins and other RC-patrollers have to spend reverting vandalism on it. This is not meant to discourage any legitimate registered users from editing it. I welcome any improvement to this page!
| After being vandalized over 160 times, this page has been [[Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy|semi-protected]] to reduce poophave to spend reverting vandalism on it. This is not meant to discourage any legitimate registered users from editing it. I welcome any improvement to this page!
</div>
</div>
|}
|}

Revision as of 23:00, 19 June 2015

After being vandalized over 160 times, this page has been semi-protected to reduce poophave to spend reverting vandalism on it. This is not meant to discourage any legitimate registered users from editing it. I welcome any improvement to this page!
This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

20,000+This user has made more than 20,000 contributions to Wikipedia.
This user has been on Wikipedia for 19 years, 10 months and 30 days.
This editor is a Senior Editor and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star.




About Me

Proudly Canadian

Wikiholic's Dictionary

  • Babel gun, noun – someone who fills their user page with screenfulls of silly little userbox template tags
  • Bush guardian, noun – one of the many RC patrollers who make it their mission to revert any vandalism to the George W. Bush article
  • crying 'Uncle' – complaining about someone being too bold
  • Curps diem – 22 November 2005, the only day in recorded history that Curps wasn't on Wikipedia, allowing dozens of sockpuppets and Doppelgangers to seize the rare opportunity
  • 15 seconds of fame – the period of time between creating a new account called User:I PWN WIKIPEDIA!!1! and being permanently banned by Curps
  • IP freely – an anonymous vandal's dream: an IP address frequently shared with a well-known and fussy registered user
  • (to) get the Booth, verb – to come short of a unanimous RfA by one opposing vote
  • pillaring – ending an argument by quoting one of the Five Pillars, e.g. "You want to know why I changed your vote and added three of my own on that RfA? Because we're here to write an encyclopedia, dammit!"
  • shooting barnstar, noun – someone who awards users barnstars liberally and indiscriminately for small or trivial achievements
  • vandal's return-receipt (or VRR), noun – getting your user page trashed by a vandal to whom you have just issued a warning

Fields of Expertise or Interest

Accolades and other niceness

Edit of the Day