Jump to content

2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by Patriziainbhutan; Unsourced, improbable posturing. (TW)
Line 35: Line 35:
Delegates from 183 countries met in Bonn from 1 to 12 June 2009. The purpose was to discuss key negotiating texts. These will serve as the basis for the international climate change agreement at Copenhagen. At the conclusion the Ad Hoc Working Group under the Kyoto Protocol ([[AWG-KP]]) negotiating group was still far away from the emission reduction range that has been set out by science to avoid the worst ravages of climate change: a minus 25% to minus 40% reduction below 1990 levels by 2020. The AWG-KP still needs to decide on the aggregate emission reduction target for industrialised countries, along with individual targets for each country. Progress was made in gaining clarification of the issues of concern to parties and including these concerns in the updated draft of the negotiating text.<ref name="Bonn">{{cite web|url=http://unfccc.int/files/press/news_room/press_releases_and_advisories/application/pdf/091206_closing_pr_sb30.pdf|format=PDF|title=Progress Made in Negotiations for Ambitious and Effective Copenhagen Deal at Bonn UNFCCC Meeting|date=12 June 2009|work=Press Release|publisher=UNFCCC/CCNUCC|page=2|accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref>
Delegates from 183 countries met in Bonn from 1 to 12 June 2009. The purpose was to discuss key negotiating texts. These will serve as the basis for the international climate change agreement at Copenhagen. At the conclusion the Ad Hoc Working Group under the Kyoto Protocol ([[AWG-KP]]) negotiating group was still far away from the emission reduction range that has been set out by science to avoid the worst ravages of climate change: a minus 25% to minus 40% reduction below 1990 levels by 2020. The AWG-KP still needs to decide on the aggregate emission reduction target for industrialised countries, along with individual targets for each country. Progress was made in gaining clarification of the issues of concern to parties and including these concerns in the updated draft of the negotiating text.<ref name="Bonn">{{cite web|url=http://unfccc.int/files/press/news_room/press_releases_and_advisories/application/pdf/091206_closing_pr_sb30.pdf|format=PDF|title=Progress Made in Negotiations for Ambitious and Effective Copenhagen Deal at Bonn UNFCCC Meeting|date=12 June 2009|work=Press Release|publisher=UNFCCC/CCNUCC|page=2|accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref>


=== Seventh session ===
=== Seventh sesmmghm
sion ===
==== Bangkok ====
==== Bangkok ====
The first part of the seventh session of the AWG-LCA was held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Monday, 28 September at the [[United Nations Conference Centre (Bangkok)|United Nations Conference Centre]] (UNCC) of the [[United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific]] (UNESCAP), [[Bangkok]], Thailand.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://unfccc.int/meetings/intersessional/bangkok_09/items/4967.php|title=Bangkok Climate Change Talks – 2009|publisher=United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change|accessdate=2009-12-07}}</ref>
The first part of the seventh session of the AWG-LCA was held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Monday, 28 September at the [[United Nations Conference Centre (Bangkok)|United Nations Conference Centre]] (UNCC) of the [[United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific]] (UNESCAP), [[Bangkok]], Thailand.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://unfccc.int/meetings/intersessional/bangkok_09/items/4967.php|title=Bangkok Climate Change Talks – 2009|publisher=United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change|accessdate=2009-12-07}}</ref>

Revision as of 20:44, 15 December 2009

Template:Infobox generic

Connie Hedegaard, president of the UN Climate Change Conference 2009 in Copenhagen

The United Nations Climate Change Conference is taking place at the Bella Center in Copenhagen, Denmark, between 7 December and 18 December 2009. The conference includes the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP 15) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the 5th Meeting of the Parties (COP/MOP 5) to the Kyoto Protocol. According to the Bali Road Map, a framework for climate change mitigation beyond 2012 is to be agreed there.[1]

The conference was preceded by the Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions scientific conference, which took place in March 2009 and was also held at the Bella Center.

Negotiating position of the European Union

On 28 January 2009, the European Commission released a position paper, "Towards a comprehensive climate agreement in Copenhagen."[2] The position paper "addresses three key challenges: targets and actions; financing [of "low-carbon development and adaptation"]; and building an effective global carbon market".[3]

In order to demonstrate good example, the European Union had committed to implementing binding legislation, even without a satisfactory deal in Copenhagen. Last December, the European Union revised its carbon allowances system called the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) designed for the post-Kyoto period (after 2013). This new stage of the system aims at further reducing greenhouse gases emitted in Europe in a binding way and at showing the commitments the EU had already done before the Copenhagen meeting. To avoid carbon leakage—relocation of companies in other regions not complying with similar legislation—the EU Commission will foresee that sectors exposed to international competition, should be granted some free allocations of CO2 emissions provided that they are at least at the same level of a benchmark. Other sectors should buy such credits on an international market. Energy intensive industries in Europe have advocated for this benchmark system in order to keep funds in investment capacities for low carbon products rather than for speculations.[4] The European chemical industry claims here the need to be closer to the needs of citizens in a sustainable way. To comply with such commitments for a low-carbon economy, this requires competitiveness and innovations.[5]

The French Minister for Ecology Jean-Louis Borloo pushes the creation of the Global Environment Organisation as France's main institutional contribution, to offer a powerful alternative to the UNEP.

Official pre-Copenhagen negotiation meetings

A draft negotiating text[6][7] for finalisation at Copenhagen has been publicly released. It is being discussed at a series of meetings before Copenhagen.

Bonn – second negotiating meeting

Delegates from 183 countries met in Bonn from 1 to 12 June 2009. The purpose was to discuss key negotiating texts. These will serve as the basis for the international climate change agreement at Copenhagen. At the conclusion the Ad Hoc Working Group under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP) negotiating group was still far away from the emission reduction range that has been set out by science to avoid the worst ravages of climate change: a minus 25% to minus 40% reduction below 1990 levels by 2020. The AWG-KP still needs to decide on the aggregate emission reduction target for industrialised countries, along with individual targets for each country. Progress was made in gaining clarification of the issues of concern to parties and including these concerns in the updated draft of the negotiating text.[8]

=== Seventh sesmmghm sion ===

Bangkok

The first part of the seventh session of the AWG-LCA was held in Bangkok, Thailand, from Monday, 28 September at the United Nations Conference Centre (UNCC) of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), Bangkok, Thailand.[9]

Barcelona

The resumed session was held in Barcelona, Spain, from 2 to 6 November 2009. Thereafter, the AWG-LCA will meet to conclude its work at its eighth session, concurrently with the fifteenth session of the Conference of the Parties which opened in Copenhagen on 7 December 2009.

Listing of proposed actions (by country/political union)

Proposed changes in absolute emissions
Area 1990→2020 Reference base
Japan -25%
EU -20 to -30%
Russia -20 to -25%
South Africa -18%
New Zealand -10 to -20%
Australia -4 to -24% CO2-e w/- LULUCF
Canada -3%
United States -1.3%
Brazil +5 to -1.8%

Australia

To cut carbon emissions by 25% below 2000 levels by 2020 if the world agrees to an ambitious global deal to stabilise levels of CO2e to 450 ppm or lower. This equates to a 16% cut below 1990 levels by 2020.[10]

To cut carbon emissions by 15% below 2000 levels by 2020 if there is an agreement where major developing economies commit to substantially restrain emissions and advanced economies take on commitments comparable to Australia. This equates to a 5% cut below 1990 levels by 2020.

To cut carbon emissions by 5% below 2000 levels to 2020 unconditionally.[11]

It is clearly stated in proceedings from the Australian Senate[12] and policy statements from the government[13][14] that the Australian emission reductions include land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) with the form of inclusion remaining undecided and whilst acknowledging that they are subject to the forming of accounting guidelines from this Copenhagen conference. In contention is the Australian Government's preference for the removal of non-human induced LULUCF emissions - and perhaps their abatement - from the account, such as from lightning induced bushfires and the subsequent natural carbon sequestering regrowth[15]. Using Kyoto accounting guidelines, these are equivalent to an emissions cut of 24%, 14%, and 4% below 1990 levels by 2020 respectively.[16] Raw use of UNFCCC CO2-e data including LULUCF for the years 2000 and 1990 leads to apparent emissions cuts of 33%, 25% and 15% respectively.

Brazil

To cut emissions by 38–42% below projected 2020 levels by that same year.[17]

This is equivalent to an emissions cut of between 5% above and 1.8% below 1990 levels by 2020.[18]

Canada

To cut carbon emissions by 20% below 2006 levels by 2020. This is equivalent to 3% below 1990 levels by 2020. [19]

The three most populous provinces disagree with the federal government goal and announced more ambitious targets on their jurisdictions. Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia announced respectively 15%, 20% and 14% reduction target below their 1990 levels while Alberta is expecting a 58% increase in emissions.[20]

China

To cut CO2 emissions per unit of GDP (emissions intensity) by 40–45% below 2005 levels by 2020.[21]

European Union

To cut greenhouse gas emissions by 30% below 1990 levels by 2020 if an international agreement is reached committing other developed countries and the more advanced developing nations to comparable emission reductions.

To cut greenhouse gas emissions by 20% below 1990 levels by 2020 unconditionally.[22]

India

To cut emissions intensity by 20–25% below 2005 levels by 2020.[23]

Japan

To cut greenhouse gas emissions by 25% below 1990 levels by 2020.[24]

New Zealand

To reduce emissions between 10% to 20% below 1990 levels by 2020 if a global agreement is secured that limits carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) to 450ppm and temperature increases to 2°C, effective rules on forestry, and New Zealand having access to international carbon markets.[25]

Russia

To reduce emissions between 20% to 25% below 1990 levels by 2020 if a global agreement is reached committing other countries to comparable emission reductions.[26]

South Africa

To cut emissions by 34% below current levels by 2020.[27]

This is equivalent to an absolute emissions cut of 18% below 1990 levels by 2020.[28]

United States of America

To cut greenhouse gas emissions by 17% below 2005 levels by 2020, 42% by 2030 and 83% by 2050.[29][30]

This is equivalent to 1.3% below 1990 levels by 2020, 31% by 2030 and 80% by 2050.[18]

Technology measures

UNEP

At the fifth Magdeburg Environmental Forum held from 3 to 4 July 2008, in Magdeburg, Germany, United Nations Environment Programme called for the establishment of infrastructure for electric vehicles. At this international conference, 250 high-ranking representatives from industry, science, politics and non-government organizations discussed solutions for future road transportation under the motto of "Sustainable Mobility– United Nations Climate Change Conference 2009|the Post-2012 CO2 Agenda".[31]

Technology Action Programs

Technology Action Programs (TAPs) have been proposed as a means for organizing future technology efforts under the UNFCCC. By creating programs for a set of adaptation and mitigation technologies, the UNFCCC would send clear signals to the private and finance sector, governments, research institutions as well as citizens of the world looking for solutions to the climate problem. Potential focus areas for TAPs include early warning systems, expansion of salinity-tolerant crops, electric vehicles, wind and solar energy, efficient energy grid systems, and other technologies.[32]

Technology roadmaps will address barriers to technology transfer, cooperative actions on technologies and key economic sectors, and support implementation of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs)[33] and National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs).[34]

Side Event on Technology Transfer

The United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO) and the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) have been assigned the task of co-convening a process to support UN system-wide coherence and international cooperation on climate change-related technology development and transfer. This COP15 Side EventIt will feature statements and input from the heads of UNDESA, UNDP, GEF, WIPO, UNIDO, UNEP, IRENA as well as the UN Foundation. Relevant topics such as the following will be among the many issues discussed: [35]

The Danish government and key industrial organizations have entered a public-private partnership to promote Danish cleantech solutions. The partnership, Climate Consortium Denmark, is an integrated part of the official portfolio of activities before, during and after the COP15.[40]

There is also a European Conference for the Promotion of Local Actions to Combat Climate Change.[41][42] The entire morning session on 25 September was devoted to the Covenant of Mayors.[43]

The Local Government Climate Lounge will be an advocacy and meeting space located directly in the COP 15 building, at the heart of the negotiations.[44]

Reactions

Activism

Some small protests occurred during the first week of the conference.[45] A much larger mostly peaceful march was held in Copenhagen on December 12 calling for a global agreement on climate. Between 40,000 and 100,000 people attended.[46] 968 protesters were arrested at the event, including 19 who were arrested for carrying pocket knives and wearing masks during the demonstration. Of these all but 13 were realeased without charge. One police officer was injured by a rock and a protester was injured by fireworks during the rioting.[45] Some protestors where kettled by police and detained for several hours without access to food, water or toilets.[47] Protestors were said to be angry at the use of what they considered "heavy-handed" police tactics.[46]

The Yes Men made a false statement purporting to be from the Canadian environment minister Jim Prentice, which pledged to cut carbon emissions by 40% below 1990 levels by 2020. The statement was followed by another faked statement from the Ugandan delegation, praising the original pledge and The Yes Men also released a spoof press conference on a fake form of the official website. The statement was written about by the Wall Street Journal before being revealed as a hoax. Jim Prentice described the hoax as "undesirable".[48]

The Danish Text

A leaked document known as "The Danish Text" has started an argument between developed and developing nations. The document was subtitled as "The Copenhagen Agreement" and proposes measures to keep average global temperature rises to two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. Developing countries have reacted to the document by saying that the developed countries had worked behind closed doors and made an agreement according to their wish without the consent of the developing nations. Lumumba Stanislaus Di-Aping, chairman of the G77, has said, "It's an incredibly imbalanced text intended to subvert, absolutely and completely, two years of negotiations. It does not recognize the proposals and the voice of developing countries".[49] A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries shows deep unease over details of the text.[50]

Indigenous rights

The indigenous rights organization, Survival International, has come to public to raise the issue over the fact that some measures to mitigate the problem of climate change affect the survival of tribal people as much as the climate change itself.[51][52][53][54] According to a researcher of this organization, David Hill, “the talks at Copenhagen could have huge consequences for indigenous peoples, their rights and their territories all over the world. What Survival is saying is that indigenous peoples should be fully consulted about measures to stop climate change, they should fully participate in measures to stop climate change and under no circumstances should their rights be violated or their land destroyed.” The report, The most inconvenient truth of all, documents the impact of the biofuels industry, hydro-electric power, carbon-offsetting and forest conservation schemes on indigenous communities worldwide. The organization argues that some climate change mitigation measures have led to exploitation, violation and in some cases destruction of land recognized as belonging to indigenous communities. The International Forum of Indigenous Peoples on Climate Change has expressed similar concerns. Stephen Corry, director of Survival International, explains that “projects that victimise the people and harm the environment cannot be promoted or marketed as green projects”. Survival International calls attention to the fact that these people, who least contribute to the problem of climate change, are already the most affected by it; and that we must seek solutions that involve indigenous people.[55]

See also

Template:Wikinews2

References

  1. ^ IISD Reporting Services – Upcoming meetings
  2. ^ Questions and Answers on the Communication Towards a comprehensive climate change agreement in Copenhagen
  3. ^ Towards a comprehensive climate agreement in Copenhagen
  4. ^ 1 décembre 2008. "Jumping the climate change hurdle". YouTube. Retrieved 2009-12-09.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ 1 oktober 2008. ""Building Blocks for Climate Change Solutions"". YouTube. Retrieved 2009-12-09.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ "Negotiating text" (PDF) (in English (others available)). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. p. 53. Retrieved 2009-06-15.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  7. ^ "Negotiating text" (PDF) (in English (others available)). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. p. 181. Retrieved 2009-09-15.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  8. ^ "Progress Made in Negotiations for Ambitious and Effective Copenhagen Deal at Bonn UNFCCC Meeting" (PDF). Press Release. UNFCCC/CCNUCC. 12 June 2009. p. 2. Retrieved 2009-06-15.
  9. ^ "Bangkok Climate Change Talks – 2009". United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved 2009-12-07.
  10. ^ http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/SeriesDetail.aspx?srid=749&crid=36
  11. ^ Kevin Rudd, Penny Wong, Wayne Swan (2009-05-04), A new target for reducing Australia's carbon pollution, Department of Climate Change and Water{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ^ Australian Labour Party (2009-10-22), Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Bill 2009 [No. 2], Hansard of the Australian Parliament
  13. ^ Kevin Rudd, Penny Wong, Wayne Swan (2008-12-15), Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme: Australia's Low Pollution Future, Department of Climate Change{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ Kevin Rudd, Penny Wong, Wayne Swan (2009-11-24), Details of Proposed CPRS changes, Department of Climate Change{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. ^ Lenore Taylor (2009-12-15), PM and Abbott are in the same boat, News Corporation
  16. ^ UNFCCC (2009), Time series (Annex I): Total CO2 Equivalent Emissions with Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, UNFCCC
  17. ^ Tom Phillips (2009-11-10), Brazil pledges deep emission cuts in 'political gesture' to rich nations, The Guardian
  18. ^ a b IEA (2009-10-06), CO2 emissions from fuel combustion: highlights (2009), IEA
  19. ^ Canada. "U.S. makes first move at Copenhagen". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2009-12-09.
  20. ^ Toronto Star (2009-12-07), Canada inactive on climate front, Toronto Star
  21. ^ BBC (2009-11-28), Where countries stand on Copenhagen, BBC
  22. ^ BBC (2009-11-26), EU climate package explained, BBC
  23. ^ The Hindu (2009-12-04), Jairam Ramesh: 20–25% carbon emission intensity cut by 2020, The Hindu
  24. ^ BBC (2009-09-07), Japan vows big climate change cut, BBC
  25. ^ Nick Smith, Tim Grosser (2009-08-10), NZ Government http://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/2020+target+balances+economy+amp+environment {{citation}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  26. ^ Charles Digges (2009-11-20), Russian announces higher emissions cuts in 11th hour before Copenhagen, Bellona
  27. ^ BBC (2009-12-7), South Africa to cut carbon emissions by 34%, BBC {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  28. ^ http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/SeriesDetail.aspx?srid=749&crid=710
  29. ^ BBC (2009-11-25), Obama vows greenhouse gas emissions cuts, BBC
  30. ^ Whitehouse Press Secretary (2009-11-25), The President of the United States of American http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-attend-copenhagen-climate-talks {{citation}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  31. ^ "UNEP and Daimler Call for Infrastructure for Electric and Fuel-cell Vehicles". Climate-L.org. 2008-07-04. Retrieved 2009-12-09.
  32. ^ http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/smsn/ngo/071.pdf
  33. ^ http://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/india100209b.pdf
  34. ^ "National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs)". Unfccc.int. Retrieved 2009-12-09.
  35. ^ http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/dsd_aofw_tec/tec_sideevent1209.shtml
  36. ^ http://unfccc.int/ttclear/jsp/TNAReports.jsp
  37. ^ http://unfccc.int/ttclear/jsp/index.jsp
  38. ^ http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/sbi/eng/16.pdf
  39. ^ http://esa.un.org/un-energy/
  40. ^ "Climate Consortium - COP15 United Nations Climate Change Conference Copenhagen 2009". En.cop15.dk. Retrieved 2009-12-09.
  41. ^ "I European Conference for the promotion of Local actions to combat Climate Change - Submitted events — EEA". Eea.europa.eu. Retrieved 2009-12-09.
  42. ^ "European Conference for the Promotion of Local Actions to Combat Climate Change, 23-25/9/09 (Huelva, Spanje) | vleva". Vleva.eu. Retrieved 2009-12-09.
  43. ^ "Covenant of Mayors". Eumayors.eu. Retrieved 2009-12-09.
  44. ^ http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=10497&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=4127&tx_ttnews[backPid]=983&cHash=bf5e80d264
  45. ^ a b Heilprin, John (13 December 2009). "Huge rally at climate forum". The Philadelphia Enquirer. Retrieved 14 December 2009.
  46. ^ a b "Climate activists condemn Copenhagen police tactics". BBC News. 13 December 2009. Retrieved 14 December 2009.
  47. ^ McKie, Robin (13 December 2009). "Copenhagen police release hundreds of detained activists". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 December 2009. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  48. ^ Goldenberg, Suzanne (14 December 2009). "Copenhagen spoof shames Canada on the truth about its emissions". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 December 2009.
  49. ^ By  Hilary Whiteman, CNN. "Poor nations' fury over leaked climate text". CNN.com. Retrieved 2009-12-10. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help); no-break space character in |author= at position 3 (help)
  50. ^ "Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after 'Danish text' leak", Guardian.co.uk, 2009-12-08, retrieved 2009-12-10
  51. ^ http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/11/28/nation/5201442&sec=nation
  52. ^ http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/green-business-and-indigenous-rights/
  53. ^ http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/global/undeclaration/79222847.html
  54. ^ http://news.mongabay.com/2009/1123-survival.html
  55. ^ http://www.survivalinternational.org/news/kits/climatechange