Template talk:Infobox RNA family

Ontologies

I've added GO and SO rows, but it might be better to have a single 'Ontologies:' row which can accept GO:XXXXXX and/or SO:XXXXXX accessions and link appropriately. I'll look into doing it but if someone who knows more about template syntax wants to make the change, please do Jebus989 ^✰ 15:49, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion:Update HGNC, OMIM and NCBI links and category names

A couple of suggested edits:

- The links to HGNC are dead and need to be updated to https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/{{{HGNCid}}}

- The links to OMIM are dead and need to be updated to https://www.omim.org/entry/{{{OMIM}}}

- Consider link update for NCBI Gene IDs: The links to NCBI do currently work, but could be updated to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/{{{EntrezGene}}} (also consider updating "EntrezGene" as an identifier, as below).

- Text in identifiers box "Entrez" should be updated to "NCBI" or "NCBI Gene" since NCBI no longer call this database Entrez Gene.

- Text "HUGO" should read "HGNC", and link to the Wikipedia page for HGNC rather than HUGO, as these are distinct entities and HGNC ID's are assigned and maintained by HGNC, not HUGO.

Aretaon (talk) 10:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done!

Thank you Aretaon! I made the changes as you suggested, please see https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mir-200. Let me know if you notice any issues.

Antonipetrov (talk) 11:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 September 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move the template (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 03:47, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox rfam → Template:Infobox RNA family – Name and purpose should be made explicit. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 08:26, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I would have no idea what "rfam" is, and I'm in the sciences! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I work on the Rfam database and this change seems perfectly acceptable. Antonipetrov (talk) 12:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.