Template talk:Redacted

Subst

@Callanecc and MC10: What's the rationale behind forcing this template to always be subst'd? It seems it would clutter up pages it's used on for no benefit. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I really wouldn't have a problem with it being transcluded, my thinking was just that since it will be placed in the middle of a user's comment it might be better to have it subst'd. However thinking about it some more, having the template just transcluded makes it clearer what it's therefore, which could be beneficial sometimes. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 21:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The more I think about substing, the more I think it's a bad idea, so I've reversed it for now. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 7 October 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change content was removed to Content was removed (So capitalize the C.)
Between {{#if:{{{1|}}}| and : {{{1}}} }}, add for the following reason — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 00:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks Mr. Guye. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]