Template talk:LGBTQ
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LGBTQ template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about LGBTQ. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this template. You may wish to ask factual questions about LGBTQ at the Reference desk. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Note: Template talk:LGBT sidebar redirects to this talk page. This is the centralized talk page for Template:LGBT (appears at bottom of articles) and Template:LGBT sidebar (appears at side of some core LGBT articles). Except for the sidebar containing less content, changes to one template should be reflected in the other as well. If your message only relates to one of the templates, please specify sidebar or footer. |
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Removing asexuals and demisexuals
[edit]Asexuals and demisexuals aren't inherently LGBT, thus they do not belong in this template. Tdmurlock (talk) 20:04, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree. Asexual and demisexual people are subject to related discrimination and misunderstanding as sexual minorities and thus belong under the LGBTQ umbrella. Thisisnotatest (talk) 20:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Asexuality and its forms are considered LGBT inherently. DarknessGoth777 (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Sidebar expansion
[edit]Hi Raladic. I understand the concern about not overwhelming the sidebar, however, this a closed drop-down section, so the sidebar will stay limited in size unless [show] is clicked on. I also could've added a lot more pages, such as ones including years, but limited my additions and removed those I added which included this to trying and stop the sidebar becoming overwhelmed. What would you class as "high level related pages"? And can we come to some sort of a compromise on including some of these? Maybe we could open a new section or sections for some of them? Or maybe create a new sidebar for LGBT related media? It would be good to hear your thoughts. All the best. Helper201 (talk) 02:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- The way the LGBTQ sidebar is used is almost always in a partial expanded way, as it has a section expand, which is used on most pages.
- That's why the overlinking is not going to be useful for the LGBTQ sidebar as this is basically the main sidebar to get to top-level articles and then people typically navigate on from there to sub-articles, via more specific sub sidebars, or more commonly bottom navboxes, that's more or less how the navigation is structured for the hundreds of LGBTQ topic articles.
- For LGBTQ media, we have the Template:LGBTQ fiction and of course all sorts of other navigational aids related to LGBTQ articles under the Category:LGBTQ templates. As for the Slang term pages, we already have Template:LGBTQ_slang_terms.
- If you wanted to create sidebars as companions for those two media bottom navboxes for inclusion on those pages, that of course could be something you could do. Raladic (talk) 03:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 4 December 2024
[edit]This edit request to Template:LGBTQ sidebar has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to change the Reproduction label under the Health sidebar to Assisted Reproduction as the Reproduction page does not include birth control or anything other than that. Ellacmccalmont25 (talk) 14:37, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- The "reproduction" in the sidebar links to Use of assisted reproductive technology by LGBT people already. LizardJr8 (talk) 17:10, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Add Template:LGBTQ+ media?
[edit]Per title. Was thinking that this would be a good addition to the navbox.
JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 11:13, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Seeing no opposition, I'm going to go ahead and do it.
- JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 01:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Scratch that, it seems like I misunderstood the template structure and past consensus.
- JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 01:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)