Talk:Isotopes of roentgenium
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of roentgenium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
280Rg
[edit]NUBASE2020 said that 280Rg (T1/2 = 4.3(5) s) is 100% α. Indeed, the energy difference between 280Rg and 280Ds is (280.16514 - 280.16131)×931.4941 = 3.5676 MeV, which is much much higher than the 1.022 MeV threshold of positron emission, so EC seems strange here. 129.104.241.162 (talk) 01:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- There has been some unclarity regarding what exactly is happening in the decay chains of moscovium isotopes, because the detectors used in the experiments could not detect EC. I suspect that weak decay modes exist for some of the intermediate steps (and indeed it's quite plausibly positron emission instead of EC), but that they are small enough branches that current statistics do not allow us to pin them down. Hopefully, the SHE factory will change this, but current results still are not enough. Double sharp (talk) 15:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)