Template talk:Contentious topics

This template is within the jurisdiction of the Arbitration Committee, as one of its associated enforcement processes. Therefore, you must not make significant changes to the wording or functionality of this template without the Committee's consent. Thank you!

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Contentious topics template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 30 days

Consistent word to be used in Template:Contentious topics/alert/first

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This makes a-i sentence consistent with gmo sentence and clearer.

Kenneth Kho (talk) 10:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:18, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"T:ACDS/T" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect T:ACDS/T has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 13 § T:ACDS/T until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 13:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Contentious topics/list closed tag

Jonesey95, as always, I am grateful for your work with lint errors. I am not sure this edit was necessary? I also closed the div on the same line, and lintHint doesn't show anything for the version before your edit. Was the template causing an error elsewhere? Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 02:51, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The opening div tag was not closed with a > character. Look at the version prior to my edit, under the header "List"; the div tag syntax is exposed in the rendered page. That may be beautiful to some of us, but I didn't think it was what you intended. I recommend using Preview, and checking the section that you are editing, before publishing. (Note: I don't always do this, especially when I have an excess of confidence in my edit, and it gets me in trouble. I am always grateful when someone else cleans up my edit and doesn't scold me too fervently about it.) – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh duh.

Self-trout and thank you for your help :) House Blaster (talk • he/they) 02:56, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]