Taser: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 72.236.138.242 (talk) to last revision by Cydebot (HG) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Merge|Electroshock weapon|date=July 2010}} |
{{Merge|Electroshock weapon|date=July 2010}} |
||
A '''Taser''' is an [[electroshock weapon]] that uses [[electrical current]] to disrupt voluntary control of muscles. Its manufacturer, [[Taser International]], calls the effects "[[neuromuscular junction|neuromuscular]] incapacitation"<ref>[http://www.taser.com/research/technology/Pages/NeuromuscularIncapacitation.aspx " Neuromuscular Incapacitation (NMI)"], Taser International, published March 12, 2007, accessed May 19, 2007</ref> and the devices' mechanism "Electro-Muscular Disruption (EMD) technology".<ref>International Association of Chiefs of Police, ''[http://www.theiacp.org/research/CuttingEdge/EMDT9Steps.pdf Electro Muscular Disruption Technology: A Nine-Step Strategy for Effective Deployment]'', 2005</ref> Someone struck by a Taser experiences stimulation of his or her [[sensory nerve]]s and [[motor nerve]]s, resulting in strong involuntary muscle contractions. Tasers do not rely only on [[pain compliance]], except when used in [[#Drive Stun|Drive Stun]] mode, and are thus preferred by some law enforcement over non-Taser [[Electroshock weapon|stun guns]] and other electronic control weapons.<ref>[http://policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&article_id=520&issue_id=22005 "Chief's Counsel: Electronic Control Weapons: Liability Issues"] By Randy Means, Attorney at Law, Thomas and Means, LLP, and Eric Edwards, Lieutenant and Legal Advisor, Phoenix Police Department, and Executive Director, Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police, ''The Police Chief'' magazine, February 2005</ref><ref>''[http://www.gachiefs.com/pdfs/NEWS_FullTaserReport-June2005.pdf Electronic Control Weapons in Georgia: Review and Recommendations]'', |
A '''Taser''' is an [[electroshock weapon]] that uses [[electrical current]] to disrupt the blood flow to your penis voluntary control of muscles. Its manufacturer, [[Taser International]], calls the effects "[[neuromuscular junction|neuromuscular]] incapacitation"<ref>[http://www.taser.com/research/technology/Pages/NeuromuscularIncapacitation.aspx " Neuromuscular Incapacitation (NMI)"], Taser International, published March 12, 2007, accessed May 19, 2007</ref> and the devices' mechanism "Electro-Muscular Disruption (EMD) technology".<ref>International Association of Chiefs of Police, ''[http://www.theiacp.org/research/CuttingEdge/EMDT9Steps.pdf Electro Muscular Disruption Technology: A Nine-Step Strategy for Effective Deployment]'', 2005</ref> Someone struck by a Taser experiences stimulation of his or her [[sensory nerve]]s and [[motor nerve]]s, resulting in strong involuntary muscle contractions. Tasers do not rely only on [[pain compliance]], except when used in [[#Drive Stun|Drive Stun]] mode, and are thus preferred by some law enforcement over non-Taser [[Electroshock weapon|stun guns]] and other electronic control weapons.<ref>[http://policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&article_id=520&issue_id=22005 "Chief's Counsel: Electronic Control Weapons: Liability Issues"] By Randy Means, Attorney at Law, Thomas and Means, LLP, and Eric Edwards, Lieutenant and Legal Advisor, Phoenix Police Department, and Executive Director, Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police, ''The Police Chief'' magazine, February 2005</ref><ref>''[http://www.gachiefs.com/pdfs/NEWS_FullTaserReport-June2005.pdf Electronic Control Weapons in Georgia: Review and Recommendations]'', |
||
Submitted by the Ad Hoc Committee on Electronic Control Weapons, Adopted by the Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police Executive Board June 20, 2005</ref><ref>''[http://www.northbrook.il.us/Government/BoardsCommissions/Passouts/2007/0319MAR/documents/ElectronicControlWeaponModelPolicy-IRMADocument.pdf ELECTRONIC CONTROL WEAPON MODEL POLICY],'' Section 4.02J, Intergovernmental Risk Management Agency (IRMA), Adopted January 2006</ref> At the present time, there are two main police models, the M26 and X26<!-- Links for both weapons removed because there are no articles for the individual weapons -->. Both come with various accessories, including a laser sight and optional mounted digital video camera that can record in low-light situations. Taser International is also marketing a civilian model called the C2. On 27 July 2009, Taser introduced the X3, capable of subduing 3 suspects without reload.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=129937&p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=1303714 |title=TASER International - Investors - RSS Content |publisher=Phx.corporate-ir.net |date=2009-07-01 |accessdate=2009-10-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.officer.com/web/online/Special-Coverage--Stun-Guns/New-Taser-Can-Shock-3-People-Without-Reload/11$47704 |title=New Taser Can Shock 3 People Without Reload: Special Coverage: Stun Guns at |publisher=Officer.com |date=2009-07-28 |accessdate=2009-10-14}}</ref> |
Submitted by the Ad Hoc Committee on Electronic Control Weapons, Adopted by the Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police Executive Board June 20, 2005</ref><ref>''[http://www.northbrook.il.us/Government/BoardsCommissions/Passouts/2007/0319MAR/documents/ElectronicControlWeaponModelPolicy-IRMADocument.pdf ELECTRONIC CONTROL WEAPON MODEL POLICY],'' Section 4.02J, Intergovernmental Risk Management Agency (IRMA), Adopted January 2006</ref> At the present time, there are two main police models, the M26 and X26<!-- Links for both weapons removed because there are no articles for the individual weapons -->. Both come with various accessories, including a laser sight and optional mounted digital video camera that can record in low-light situations. Taser International is also marketing a civilian model called the C2. On 27 July 2009, Taser introduced the X3, capable of subduing 3 suspects without reload.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=129937&p=RssLanding&cat=news&id=1303714 |title=TASER International - Investors - RSS Content |publisher=Phx.corporate-ir.net |date=2009-07-01 |accessdate=2009-10-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.officer.com/web/online/Special-Coverage--Stun-Guns/New-Taser-Can-Shock-3-People-Without-Reload/11$47704 |title=New Taser Can Shock 3 People Without Reload: Special Coverage: Stun Guns at |publisher=Officer.com |date=2009-07-28 |accessdate=2009-10-14}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 15:07, 14 October 2010
![]() | It has been suggested that this article be merged with Electroshock weapon. (Discuss) Proposed since July 2010. |
A Taser is an electroshock weapon that uses electrical current to disrupt the blood flow to your penis voluntary control of muscles. Its manufacturer, Taser International, calls the effects "neuromuscular incapacitation"[1] and the devices' mechanism "Electro-Muscular Disruption (EMD) technology".[2] Someone struck by a Taser experiences stimulation of his or her sensory nerves and motor nerves, resulting in strong involuntary muscle contractions. Tasers do not rely only on pain compliance, except when used in Drive Stun mode, and are thus preferred by some law enforcement over non-Taser stun guns and other electronic control weapons.[3][4][5] At the present time, there are two main police models, the M26 and X26. Both come with various accessories, including a laser sight and optional mounted digital video camera that can record in low-light situations. Taser International is also marketing a civilian model called the C2. On 27 July 2009, Taser introduced the X3, capable of subduing 3 suspects without reload.[6][7]
Tasers were introduced as less-lethal weapons to be used by police to subdue fleeing, belligerent, or potentially dangerous subjects, often when what they consider to be a more lethal weapon would have otherwise been used. The use of Tasers has become controversial following instances of Taser use that have resulted in serious injury and death,[8][9] and while they are far less lethal than many other weapons, the U.N. are concerned that use of Tasers may amount to torture, and Amnesty International has reported cases where they believe that their use amounted to "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment which is absolutely prohibited under international law".[10]
Etymology
Taser is an acronym for a fictional weapon: Thomas A. Swift's Electric Rifle.[11][12] Taser is a registered trademark. It has prompted a backformed verb to tase, which means "to use a Taser on"; however, to taser is also commonly used.
History
Jack Cover, a NASA researcher, began developing the Taser in 1969.[13] By 1974, Cover had completed the device, which he named after his childhood hero Tom Swift. The Taser Public Defender used gunpowder as its propellant, which led the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to classify it as a firearm in 1976.[11][14] In 1991, a Taser supplied by Tasertron to the Los Angeles Police Department failed to subdue Rodney King. Its lack of effectiveness was blamed on a faulty battery.[15]
Taser International CEO Rick Smith has testified in a Taser-related lawsuit that the catalyst for the development of the device was the "shooting death of two of his high school acquaintances" by a "guy with a legally licensed gun who lost his temper."[16] In 1993, Rick Smith and his brother Tim began to investigate what they called "safer use of force option[s] for citizens and law enforcement." At their Scottsdale, Arizona facilities, the brothers worked with the "... original TASER inventor, Jack Cover" to develop a "non-firearm TASER electronic control device."[17] The 1994 AIR TASER Model 34000 had an "anti-felon identification (AFID) system" to prevent the likelihood that the device would be used by criminals; upon use, it released many small pieces of paper containing the serial number of the Taser device. The US firearms regulator, the ATF, stated that the AIR TASER was not a firearm. In 1999, Taser International developed an "ergonomically handgun shaped device called the ADVANCED TASER M-series systems" which used a "patented neuromuscular incapacitation (NMI) technology." In May 2003, Taser International released a new weapon called the TASER X26, which used "Shaped Pulse Technology." On July 27, 2009 Taser International released a new type of taser called the X3 which can fire three shots before it must be reloaded. It holds three new type cartridges, which are much thinner than the previous model.
Function
The Taser fires two small dart-like electrodes, which stay connected to the main unit by conductive wire as they are propelled by small compressed nitrogen charges similar to some air gun or paintball marker propellants. The air cartridge contains a pair of electrodes and propellant for a single shot and is replaced after each use. There are a number of cartridges designated by range, with the maximum at 35 feet (10.6 m).[18] Cartridges available to non-law enforcement consumers are limited to 15 feet (4.5 m).[19] The electrodes are pointed to penetrate clothing and barbed to prevent removal once in place. Earlier Taser models had difficulty in penetrating thick clothing, but newer versions (X26, C2) use a "shaped pulse" that increases effectiveness in the presence of barriers.[20]
Tasers primarily function by creating neuromuscular incapacitation, which means that it interrupts the ability of the brain to control the muscles in the body. This creates an immediate and unavoidable incapacitation that is not based on pain and cannot be overcome. Once the electricity stops flowing the subject immediately regains control of his body. Most subjects after being Tasered once will comply so as to avoid being Tasered a second time.[citation needed]
Tasers also provide a safety benefit to police officers as they have a greater deployment range than batons, pepper spray or empty hand techniques. This allows police to maintain a safe distance. A study of use-of-force incidents by the Calgary Police Service conducted by the Canadian Police Research Centre found that the use of Tasers resulted in fewer injuries than the use of batons or empty hand techniques. Only pepper spray was found to be a safer intervention option.[21]
-
The M-26 Taser, the United States military version of a commercial Taser
-
Police issue X26 Taser with cartridge installed
-
A Taser, with cartridge removed, making an electric arc between its two electrodes
Drive Stun
Some Taser models, particularly those used by police departments, also have a "Drive Stun" capability, where the Taser is held against the target without firing the projectiles, and is intended to cause pain without incapacitating the target. "Drive Stun" is "the process of using the EMD weapon [Taser] as a pain compliance technique. This is done by activating the EMD and placing it against an individual’s body. This can be done without an air cartridge in place or after an air cartridge has been deployed."[22]
A Las Vegas police document says "The Drive Stun causes significant localized pain in the area touched by the Taser, but does not have a significant effect on the central nervous system. The Drive Stun does not incapacitate a subject but may assist in taking a subject into custody."[23] "Drive Stun" was used in the UCLA Taser incident and the University of Florida Taser incident (which popularized the widespread use of the phrase "Don't tase me, bro!"). It is also known as "dry tasing", "contact tasing", or "drive tasing".
Amnesty International has expressed particular concern about Drive Stun, noting that "… the potential to use TASERs in drive-stun mode — where they are used as 'pain compliance' tools when individuals are already effectively in custody — and the capacity to inflict multiple and prolonged shocks, renders the weapons inherently open to abuse."[24]
Accessories
The TASER CAM is a specialized device designed for the Taser X26 to record audio and video when the Taser's safety is disengaged. The CAM is integrated into a battery pack and does not interfere with the Taser's existing function.[25]
Users
Taser use in Phoenix increased from 71 incidents in the year 2002 to 164 incidents in the year 2003. In addition, the number of officer-involved shootings decreased by seven during this time period.[citation needed] In Houston, however, police shootings did not decline after the deployment of thousands of Tasers.[26]
According to the analysis of the first 900 police Taser incidents by the Houston Chronicle, no crime was being committed and no person was charged in 350 of those cases.[26] In addition, it has been reported that the Houston Police Department has "shot, wounded, and killed as many people as before the widespread use of the stun guns" and has used Tasers in situations that would not warrant lethal or violent force, such as "traffic stops, disturbance and nuisance complaints, and reports of suspicious people." In Portland, Oregon, meanwhile, police found that 25 to 30 percent of the situations in which a Taser was employed met the criteria for the use of deadly force.[27]
Although Tasers were originally proposed as alternatives to lethal force, they have entered routine use as a way to incapacitate suspects or as a "pain compliance" method at times when the use of firearms would not be justifiable. The American Civil Liberties Union alleges that, since 1999, at least 148 people have died in the United States and Canada after being shocked with Tasers by police officers.[28] Police departments counter that while Tasers were used to subdue these individuals, their in-custody deaths were un-related to their encounter, and could have likely been caused by more traditional police impact weapons (like batons).
A recent development has included marketing Tasers to the general public. A line of pink Tasers are specifically being marketed for women. The Taser website states "Who says safety can't be stylish?" in reference to its "latest designer TASER C2 colors" and patterns, which include leopard print patterns and a range of colors.[29]
Legality
Australia
Taser use in Australian law enforcement is varied across all States and Territories. Possession, ownership and use of a stun gun (including Tasers) by civilians is considerably restricted, if not illegal in all States and Territories. The importation into Australia is restricted with permits being required.
Law enforcement use within Australia:
Australian Federal Police - used only by officers attached to the Specialist Response and Security Team.
New South Wales - Used by general duties (patrol), supervisors/duty officers and specialist officers attached to the Tactical Operations Unit and Public Order and Riot Squad.
Northern Territory - Used by both general duties (patrol) and the Territory Response Group.
Queensland - Used by both general duties (patrol) and Special Emergency Response Team.
South Australia - Used only by the Special Tasks and Rescue Group with a general roll out to other police being trialled.[30]
Tasmania - Used only by the Special Operations Group
Victoria - Used only by the Critical Incident Response Team and Special Operations Group.
Western Australia - Used by both general duties (patrol) and the Tactical Response Group.
Canada
According to previous interpretation of the Firearms Act, Tasers were considered to be "prohibited weapons" and could be used only by members of law-enforcement agencies after they were imported into the country under a special permit. The possession of restricted weapons must be licensed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) Canadian Firearms Program unless exempted by law.[31] A 2008 review of the Firearms Act found that the act classifies "the Taser Public Defender and any variant or modified version of it" as "prohibited firearms". However, Canadian police forces typically treat Tasers as "prohibited weapons", inconsistent with the restrictions on firearms.[32]
The direct source for this information comes from an independent report produced by Compliance Strategy Group[33] for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. The report is called An Independent Review of the Adoption and Use of Conducted Energy Weapons by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.[34] In the report that is available through access to information, the authors argued that the CEW was, for several years after its adoption by the RCMP, erroneously characterized as a prohibited "weapon" under the Criminal Code, as opposed to a prohibited "firearm." This misunderstanding was subsequently incorporated into the RCMP's operational policies and procedures as well as those of other police services in Canada. While the most recent RCMP operational manual, completed in 2007, correctly refers to the CEW as a prohibited firearm, a number of consequences of this error in classification remain to be dealt with by both the RCMP and other Canadian police services.[35] Consequently, it could be argued the police in Canada may not have had the proper authority under their provincial policing Acts and Regulation to use the CEW in the first place. The point of unauthorized use by the police was also raised by Dirk Ryneveld, British Columbia's Police Complaint Commissioner at the Braidwood inquiry on June 25, 2008. Taser safety and issues have been extensively rehearsed and investigated after the Robert Dziekański Taser incident at Vancouver International Airport.[36]
Estonia
Tasers are not allowed in this country.[citation needed]
France
Tasers are used by the French National Police and Gendarmerie. In September 2008, they were made available to local police by a government decree,[37] but in September 2009, the Council of State reversed the decision judging that the specificities of the weapon required a stricter regulation and control.[38] However, since the murder of a policeman on duty, the Taser is in use again by local police forces in 2010.
Greece
The Greek police use tasers. Greek Police Special Forces used a taser to end the hijacking of a Turkish Airlines A310 by a Turkish citizen at Athens International Airport in March 2003.[39]
Hong Kong
Under HK Laws. Chap 238 Firearms and Ammunition Ordinance, "any portable device which is designed or adapted to stun or disable a person by means of an electric shock applied either with or without direct contact with that person" is considered as 'arms' and therefore, the importation, possession and exportation of Tasers require a license by the Hong Kong Police Force which would otherwise be illegal and carries penalties up to a fine of $100,000 and 14 years in jail.
Iceland
Use of tasers are prohibited in Iceland, for both civilians and police.
Ireland
Use of Tasers are prohibited in Ireland, except for the Emergency Response Unit which is the special unit of the Garda Siochanna use the X26 stun gun for crowd control and room clearance
Israel
Israeli police approved using Tasers. As of 16 Feb 2009, the first Tasers became available to police units.[40]
Israeli Defense Force first usage
Tasers where first used by the Israeli Defense Force by the former Special counter-terror unit "Force 100 at 2004. The unit was disbanded in 2006.[41] Tasers are expected to re-enter operational use by the Israeli Defense Forces in the near future.[42]
Malaysia
Royal Malaysian Police are set to become the second in Southeast Asia police force after Singapore Police Force to use the non-lethal Taser X26 stun guns. The force had taken delivery of 210 units of the stun guns, known as the X26 electronic control device, which cost RM2.1 million, last year they have yet to be distributed to personnel on the ground. Taser would be included under the Firearms Act 1960. The Taser X26 set bought by Malaysian police comes with a holster and uses a non-rechargeable lithium battery able to deliver 195 cartridge shots. Policemen going on rounds will be issued four cartridges. The force began toying with the idea of using Tasers in 2003 when they purchased 80 units of the M26, the X26's bulkier predecessor. This was not made public as it was part of a testing exercise. The Tasers were issued to policemen in Petaling Jaya, Dang Wangi in Kuala Lumpur and Johor Bahru.[43]
Poland
Under Polish law, Tasers are not considered to be firearms. No permission is needed to buy and carry one.
Kenya
Tasers are not recognized under Kenyan law hence they are illegal.
Sweden
Usage and ownership of tasers are prohibited for civilians in Sweden. The police evaluated the usage of tasers for law-enforcement purposes, but decided not to adopt the system.
United Kingdom
Tasers are considered to be "prohibited weapons" under the Firearms Act 1968 and possession is an offence.[44] The maximum sentence for possession is ten years in prison and an unlimited fine.[45]
Taser guns are now used by some British police as a "less lethal" weapon. It was also announced in July 2007 that the deployment of Taser by specially trained police units who are not firearms officers, but who are facing similar threats of violence, would be trialled in ten police forces.[46] The 12 month trial commenced on 1 September 2007 and took place in the following forces: Avon & Somerset, Devon & Cornwall, Gwent, Lincolnshire, Merseyside, Metropolitan Police, Northamptonshire, Northumbria, North Wales and West Yorkshire.[46].
Following the completion of the trial, the Home Secretary agreed on 24 November 2008 to allow chief police officers of all forces in England and Wales, from 1 December 2008, to extend Taser use to specially-trained units in accordance with current Association of Chief Police Officers policy and guidance, which states that Taser can be used only where officers would be facing violence or threats of violence of such severity that they would need to use force to protect the public, themselves, and/or the subject(s).[47]
Also, in Scotland Strathclyde Police agreed in February 2010 to arm 30 specially trained police officers using the Taser X26. The pilot would last three months and would be deployed in Glasgow City Centre and Rutherglen.[48]
A fund for up to 10,000 additional Tasers is being made available for individual chief police officers to bid for Tasers based on their own operational requirements.[47]
United States
Taser devices are not considered firearms by the United States government.[49] They can be legally carried (concealed or open) without a permit in 43 states. They are prohibited for citizen use in the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island,[50] and Wisconsin, as well as certain cities and counties. Their use in Connecticut and Illinois is legal with restrictions.[51]
Safety concerns
Taser International claims that Tasers are safe, but critics disagree, citing the number of deaths occurring after Taser use. Amnesty International has documented over 334 deaths that occurred after the use of Tasers between 2001 and 2008.[1] Amnesty International Canada and other civil liberties organizations have argued that a moratorium should be placed on Taser use until research can determine a way for them to be safely used.[49]
A number of studies have investigated the potential dangers of Taser use. They have included examination of incident records, limited human testing, and experimental studies on pigs. Although tests on police and military volunteers have shown Tasers to function appropriately on a healthy, calm individual in a relaxed and controlled environment,[49] Amnesty International says that they "do not take into account real life use of Tasers by law enforcement agencies, such as repeated or prolonged shocks and the use of restraints".[52]
At least one police official has been tased to demonstrate confidence in the device's safety.[53] Police officers in at least five US states have filed lawsuits against Taser International claiming they suffered serious injuries after being shocked with the device during training classes.[54]
While their intended purpose is to circumvent the use of lethal force such as guns, the actual deployment of Tasers by police in the years since Tasers came into widespread use is claimed to have resulted in more than 180 deaths as of 2006.[55] It is still unclear whether the Taser was directly responsible for the cause of death, but several legislators in the U.S. have filed bills clamping down on them and requesting more studies on their effects.[56] Despite the growing controversy, a study funded by the U.S. Justice Department asserted that majority of people tasered from July 2005 to June 2007 suffered no injury. A study led by William Bozeman, of the Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, of nearly 1,000 persons subjected to Taser use, concluded that 99.7% of the subjects had either minor injuries, such as scrapes and bruises, or none at all, while three persons suffered injuries severe enough to need hospital admission, and two other subjects died. Their autopsy reports indicated neither death was related to the use of a Taser.[57][58][59]
The use of the Taser has come under scrutiny in Canada following national media coverage of the 2007 Robert Dziekański Taser incident in which a Polish immigrant died after being tasered five times by a Royal Canadian Mounted Police officer at the Vancouver International Airport.[60] As a result several official reviews of Taser safety are underway in Canada and two police forces have put large orders of the device on hold.[61]
In October and November 2007, four individuals died after being tasered in Canada, leading to calls for review of its use. The highest-profile of these cases was that of Robert Dziekański, a non-English-speaking man from Poland who died in under two minutes after being tasered by Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) at the Vancouver International Airport, October 14, 2007.[62][63][64] Followed by three other post-Taser deaths, this incident led Amnesty International to demand an end to Taser use in Canada.[65]
On December 12, 2007, in response to the death of Robert Dziekański, Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day requested that the federal Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP (CPC) prepare recommendations for immediate implementation. The CPC report recommended to "immediately restrict the use of the conducted energy weapon (CEW)" by reclassifying it as an "impact weapon".[66] The commission released its report on 18 June 2008; recommendations include restricting use to experienced officers (5 years or more), providing medical attention to those who have been zapped, improving previous documentation of specific deployment of the weapon, among other things.[67][68]
In June 2008, a federal jury ordered Taser International to pay the family of Robert Heston, Jr., $6 million in punitive and compensatory damages for the 2005 death of the man a day after he was shocked repeatedly by officers using Tasers. According to a press report, the jury "said Taser had failed to warn police in Salinas, California, that prolonged exposure to electric shock from the device could cause a risk of cardiac arrest."[69]
In December 2008, in light of extensive testing of Tasers by the CBC, many Canadian police agencies, including the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have suspended use of either all Tasers or just those manufactured before 2006.[70]
On September 30, 2009, the manufacturer issued a warning and new targeting guidelines to law enforcement agencies to aim shots below the chest centre mass as "avoiding chest shots with ECDs avoids the controversy about whether ECDs do or do not affect the human heart".[71] Calgary Police Service indicated in a news interview that the rationale for the warning was "new medical research that is coming out is showing that the closer probe to heart distances have a likelihood, or a possibility, that they may affect the rhythm of the heart".[72] In response to claims that the new guidelines were implemented to avoid health concerns, Steve Tuttle, vice president of communications for Taser International states, "We have not stated that Taser causes [cardiac] events in this bulletin, only that the refined target zones avoid any potential controversy on this topic."[73]
In October 2010, Police from across Australia and New Zealand attended a two-day Australasian Conducted Energy Weapon Forum on the Sunshine Coast, following controversies surrounding use of the weapons. The forum was organised as a result of a recommendation made by the Queensland Crime and Misconduct Commission and the state's police service in 2009. The review was ordered after the death of north Queensland man Antonio Galeano in June 2009. Data downloaded from the Taser used on the 39-year-old showed he was stunned 28 times in a confrontation with officers at Brandon, near Townsville. [74]
Excited delirium
![]() | It has been suggested that this article be merged into Taser safety issues. (Discuss) Proposed since July 2008. |
![]() |
Taser and its supporters in the police community regularly attribute the cause of deaths that follow Tasering to "excited delirium", a term for a phenomenon in which agitated or disturbed individuals respond in an irrational, bizarre, and hyperactive manner when confronted or apprehended by police. Critics argue that as this alleged condition exists only in relation to being apprehended by police, its existence is dubious.[75] Grame Norton, director of the public safety project of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association argues that "Anytime you see a specific condition being referenced in only one context, it raises serious question." Other critics assert that the term is used to mask police brutality. While the term "excited delirium" has been accepted by the National Association of Medical Examiners, in the United States it has been rejected by the American Medical Association, and the Canadian Medical Association Journal dismisses it as a "pop culture phenomenon".[75] The condition is not recognized by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Police psychologist Mike Webster testified at a British Columbia inquiry into Taser deaths that police have been "brainwashed" by Taser International to justify "ridiculously inappropriate" use of the electronic weapon. He called "excited delirium" a "dubious disorder" used by Taser International in its training of police.[76]
Incidents
Taser-related incidents that gained widespread media coverage include:
- May 2006, US. Otto Zehm
- November 2006, US. UCLA Taser incident
- September 2007, US. University of Florida Taser incident
- October 2007, Canada. Royal Canadian Mounted Police; Robert Dziekański Taser incident
- September 2008, US. Iman Morales Taser incident
- July 2010, UK. 2010 Northumbria Police manhunt
Use in schools and on children
Police officers that patrol schools, including grade schools, in several U.S. states (including Kansas, Minnesota, Kentucky, Virginia and Florida) have been carrying tasers since the early 2000s. In 2004, the parents of a 6-year-old boy in Miami sued the police department for firing a taser at their child. The police said the boy was threatening to injure his own leg with a shard of glass, and claimed that using the device was the only option to stop the boy from injuring himself. Taser International asserts that the taser is safe for use on anyone weighing 60 pounds (27 kg) or more. Nevertheless, the boy's mother told CNN that the three officers involved might have found it easier to reason with her child. Two weeks later, a 12-year-old girl skipping school was tased in Miami-Dade.[77] In March 2008, an 11-year old girl was shocked by a Taser.[78] In March 2009, a 15-year-old boy died in Michigan after being tased.[79]
Taser supporters suggest that the use in schools consist of merely switching on the device followed with threatening to use it, which can be effective in frightening violent or uncooperative students. This is the method, only if verbal reprimands have not succeeded. Critics counter that tasers may interact with preexisting medical complications such as medications, and may even contribute to someone's death as a result. As a result, tasers should either be prohibited in schools or classified as lethal weapons. Critics also suggest that using a taser on a minor, particularly a young child, is effectively cruel and abusive punishment, or unnecessary.[80][81][82][83][84]
Torture
A report from a meeting of the United Nations Committee against Torture states that "The Committee was worried that the use of Taser X26 weapons, provoking extreme pain, constituted a form of torture, and that in certain cases it could also cause death, as shown by several reliable studies and by certain cases that had happened after practical use."[85][86] Amnesty International have also raised extensive concerns about the use of other electro-shock devices by American police and in American prisons, as they can be (and according to Amnesty International, sometimes are) used to inflict cruel pain on individuals. For example, Eric Hammock of Texas died in April 2005 after receiving more than 20 Taser shocks by Fort Worth police officers.[87][dead link] Maurice Cunningham of South Carolina, while an inmate at the Lancaster County Detention Center,[88][89] was subjected to continuous shock for 2 minutes 49 seconds, which a medical examiner said caused cardiac arrhythmia and his subsequent death. He was 29 years old and had no alcohol or drugs in his system.[90]
In response to the claims that the pain inflicted by the use of the Taser could potentially constitute torture, Tom Smith, the Chairman of the Taser Board, has stated that the U.N. is "out of touch" with the needs of modern policing.
"Pepper spray goes on for hours and hours, hitting someone with a baton breaks limbs, shooting someone with a firearm causes permanent damage, even punching and kicking - the intent of those tools is to inflict pain, ... with the Taser, the intent is not to inflict pain; it's to end the confrontation. When it's over, it's over."[91]
- - Taser Chairman Tom Smith
Tasers may also not leave the telltale markings that a conventional beating might. The American Civil Liberties Union has also raised concerns about their use as has the British human rights organization Resist Cardiac Arrest.
See also
- Electroshock weapon
- Taser safety issues
- Taser International
- Braidwood Inquiry Official Canadian enquiry into Tasers and simlar devices
- Dazzler
- Incidents concerning the use of Tasers
References
- ^ " Neuromuscular Incapacitation (NMI)", Taser International, published March 12, 2007, accessed May 19, 2007
- ^ International Association of Chiefs of Police, Electro Muscular Disruption Technology: A Nine-Step Strategy for Effective Deployment, 2005
- ^ "Chief's Counsel: Electronic Control Weapons: Liability Issues" By Randy Means, Attorney at Law, Thomas and Means, LLP, and Eric Edwards, Lieutenant and Legal Advisor, Phoenix Police Department, and Executive Director, Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police, The Police Chief magazine, February 2005
- ^ Electronic Control Weapons in Georgia: Review and Recommendations, Submitted by the Ad Hoc Committee on Electronic Control Weapons, Adopted by the Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police Executive Board June 20, 2005
- ^ ELECTRONIC CONTROL WEAPON MODEL POLICY, Section 4.02J, Intergovernmental Risk Management Agency (IRMA), Adopted January 2006
- ^ "TASER International - Investors - RSS Content". Phx.corporate-ir.net. 2009-07-01. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ "New Taser Can Shock 3 People Without Reload: Special Coverage: Stun Guns at". Officer.com. 2009-07-28. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ eg, Mounties To Curb Taser Use After Report Robert Dziekanski died on October 14, 2007, after [Canadian] police zapped him [several times] with a stun gun. Police said they used the Taser after he began acting erratically at an airport. Dziekanski, an immigrant who spoke only Polish, had become upset after waiting for 10 hours at the airport for his mother, who was supposed to pick him up. His death brought international attention and intense criticism after video of the incident was released. More than a dozen people have died in Canada after being hit with Tasers in the last four years, according to Amnesty International.
- ^ dead link Kevin Piskura, 24, was pronounced dead at 4:17 p.m. Chicago time of injuries suffered when police in Oxford, Ohio fired the stun gun at him early Saturday morning.
- ^ "Document - USA: Amnesty International's concerns about Taser use: Statement to the US Justice Department inquiry into deaths in custody | Amnesty International". Amnesty.org. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ a b Talvi, Silja J. A. (November 13, 2006). "Stunning Revelations". In These Times. Retrieved 2006-12-17.
- ^ Inventor's obituary, Time Magazine early (before March) 2009.
- ^ Langton, Jerry (December 1, 2007). "The dark lure of `pain compliance'". Toronto Star. Retrieved 2007-12-01.
- ^ "Jurisdiction over the Taser Public Defender (#236)" (PDF). U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. 1976-03-22. Retrieved 2008-07-23.
- ^ Riordan, Teresa (2003-11-17). "TECHNOLOGY; New Taser Finds Unexpected Home In Hands of Police". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-05-24.
- ^ "Taser chief gives jurors demonstration of stun-gun blast in court - CourtTV.com - Trials". CourtTV.com. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ "Corporate History". Taser.com. 2007-02-05. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ TASER Cartridges (Law Enforcement & Corrections), TASER site. Retrieved December 15, 2007.
- ^ TASER Cartridges (Consumers), TASER site. Retrieved December 15, 2007.
- ^ "Shaped Pulse Technology". Taser International. 2007-04-27. Retrieved 2009-03-29.
- ^ "Police batons more dangerous than Tasers: Study".
- ^ Law Enforcement Advisory Committee (Summer 2005). "Less Lethal Weapons: Model Policy and Procedure for Public Safety Officers" (PDF). Michigan Municipal Risk Management Authority. Retrieved 2009-05-12.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ Use of the Taser, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
- ^ "Amnesty International's concerns about Tasers". Amnesty.ca. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ "Taser Cam". Taser.com. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ a b The Taser Effect: Two years after HPD armed itself with the stun guns, questions linger over how and how often the weapon is being used Jan. 14, 2007
- ^ How the Taser Works Dec 2007
- ^ "Unregulated Use of Taser Stun Guns Threatens Lives, ACLU of Northern California Study Finds". ACLU. Retrieved 2007-12-22.
- ^ "Home". TASER. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ Tasers rollout for SA police - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
- ^ Police investigate after Taser loaned to doughnut worker[dead link]
- ^ MacCharles, Tonda (2008-06-28). "Taser use could put police under fire". Toronto Star. Retrieved 2008-07-16.
- ^ "Compliance Strategy Group". Compliance Strategy Group. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ Kiedrowski Report[dead link]
- ^ "An Independent Review of the Adoption and Use of Conducted Energy Weapons by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police". Rcmp-grc.gc.ca. September 12, 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-26.[dead link]
- ^ "Transcripts - Braidwood Inquiry". Braidwoodinquiry.ca. Retrieved 2008-12-26.
- ^ "Les policiers municipaux bientôt autorisés à utiliser le Taser". AFP. Retrieved 2008-09-14.
- ^ "le Conseil d'Etat annule le décret autorisant la police municipale à utiliser le taser". Le Nouvel Observateur. 2009-09-02. Retrieved 2009-09-02.
- ^ "TASER International, Inc. commends Greek Police Special Forces on use of Advanced Taser M26 to arrest Turkish Airlines Flight 160 hijacker". TASER International. Retrieved 2007-06-09.
- ^ "המשטרה מציגה: שוטרים מחשמלים". Maariv.
- ^ "כח מאה". Force 100.
- ^ "Taser Electric Shock Gun to Be Used in IDF". IDF.[dead link]
- ^ "Taser X26 stun guns in use soon". New Straits Times. 26 June 2009. Retrieved 2009-07-08.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help)[dead link] - ^ Extended operational deployment of Taser for Specially Trained Units, Operational Guidance, section 5.2[dead link]
- ^ Schedule 6 to the Firearms Act 1968
- ^ a b "Police to be allowed wider use of Tasers". Reuters. 19 July 2007. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
- ^ a b Leppard, David (2008-11-23). "Police to get 10,000 Taser guns". London: Times Online. Retrieved 2009-05-08.
- ^ "Strathclyde Police allowed to carry tasers". Strathclyde Police Force. Retrieved 2010-03-27.
- ^ a b c "In depth: Tasers". CBC News. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- ^ "RI Law Title 11 Chapter 11-47 Section 11-47-42". State of RI General Assembly. Retrieved 2009-10-27.
- ^ "Taser C2, C2 Taser, Less-than-Lethal Weapons, Non-Lethal Weapons". Worthprotectionsecurity.com. Archived from the original on April 29, 2008. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ Amnesty International's continuing concerns about Taser use (in the USA)[dead link] 2006
- ^ Top cop tastes a Taser May 17, 2007
- ^ Steven DiJoseph (November 21, 2005). "Arizona Sheriff Announces Test of Alternative to Taser Stun Gun" (reprint).
- ^ Parker Waichman Alonso LLP, Associated Press, Jun 14, 2006. Justice Department to review TASER deaths.. Retrieved December 3, 2007.
- ^ KHAMPHA BOUAPHANH, AP file, Houston & Texas News.. Retrieved 12-03-2007.
- ^ "The study by William Bozeman of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center". Physorg.com. 2007-10-08. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ "Study Suggests Taser Use By US Police Is Safe", Catharine Paddock, Medical News Today, October 9, 2007. Retrieved January 31, 2008.
- ^ Bozeman WP, Hauda WE, Heck JJ, Graham DD, Martin BP, Winslow JE (2009). "Safety and injury profile of conducted electrical weapons used by law enforcement officers against criminal suspects". Ann Emerg Med. 53 (4): 480–9. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.021. PMID 19157651.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Fournier, Suzanne (2009-03-01). "Mountie admits he Tasered Dziekanski five times due to stapler fear". Theprovince.com. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ "We can learn from Taser video, B.C. premier says". CBC News. 15 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-15.
- ^ "Witness blames RCMP, Vancouver airport for death of Tasered man". Cbc.ca. 2007-10-18. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ "New details emerge in Vancouver airport death". CTV.ca. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ "Taser video shows RCMP shocked immigrant within 25 seconds of their arrival". Cbc.ca. 2007-11-15. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ (AFP) – Nov 24, 2007 (2007-11-24). "AFP: Fourth Taser gun death in Canada: police". Afp.google.com. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "RCMP watchdog releases report on Taser use". CTV News. December 12, 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-12.
- ^ Rookie Mounties should be barred from using Tasers: watchdog, CBC News, June 18, 2008
- ^ RCMP fire Tasers multiple times despite health hazards: probe, CBC News, June 11, 2008
- ^ "Taser loses first product-liability suit". Bloomberg.com. 2008-06-07. Retrieved 2008-09-06.
- ^ "Taser International disputes CBC/Radio-Canada testing as 'flawed'". CBC News. 2008-12-10. Retrieved 2008-12-14.
- ^ http://www.taser.com/legal/Documents/TASER%20Training%20Bulletin%2015%20Research.pdf
- ^ "Taser maker issues new guidelines". Calgary.ctv.ca. 2009-10-07. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ "Taser warning: Stun-gun maker suggests avoiding chest shots". The Salt Lake Tribune. 2009-10-22. Retrieved 2009-12-01.
- ^ Police to attend Taser talkfest, Australian Times, accessed 12 Oct 2010. http://www.australiantimes.co.uk/news/Police-to-attend-Taser-talkfest
- ^ a b Humphries, Adrian (2008-05-17). "'Excited Delirium' Blamed For Deaths - 'Not About Tasers'". National Post. CanWest. Retrieved 2008-05-19. [dead link]
- ^ Hall, Neil (2008-05-14). "Police are 'brainwashed' by Taser maker; Psychologist blames instructions". Vancouver Sun. Canwest. p. A1. Retrieved 2008-08-30.
- ^ CNN, Susan Candiotti, contributor. Police review policy after tasers used on kids November 15, 2004
- ^ "Officials: Deputy Shocks Girl, 11, With Taser At Elementary School". Local6.com. 2008-03-27. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ Font size Print E-mail Share 93 Comments (2009-03-23). "Michigan 15-year-old Dies After Police Tase Him". Cbsnews.com. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Police Use Taser On 12-Year-Old On School Bus: Police Say Boy Threatened, Assaulted Officer June 10, 2005
- ^ Kansas Students Speak Out Against Tasers In Schools Apr. 6, 2006
- ^ Teen dies after being shot by stun gun Nov. 1, 2006
- ^ Tasers Implicated in Excited Delirium Deaths - NPR February 27, 2007
- ^ More UK Police to be equipped with TASERs 16 May 2007
- ^ Committee against Torture Concludes Thirty-Ninth Session[dead link], press release, United Nations Office at Geneva, November 23, 2007. Retrieved 26 November 2007.
- ^ Tasers a form of torture, says UN, The Daily Telegraph, November 24, 2007.
- ^ "Electro-shock weapons", Supplementary Briefing to the UN Committee Against Torture, Chapter 9.1., p.38, USA Amnesty International, AI Index: AMR 51/061/2006
- ^ "Taser Blamed for Inmate's Death". United Press International. 2005-09-28. Retrieved 2008-11-08.
- ^ "Officers used tasers, baton on inmate". Associated Press. 2005-07-28. Retrieved 2008-11-08. [dead link]
- ^ Amnesty International’s continuing concerns about taser use 2006
- ^ "UN 'out of touch' on torture: Taser boss". Australian Broadcasing Commisson. 2007-11-28. Retrieved 2008-06-12.