Talk:Boeing XB-44 Superfortress

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boeing XB-44 Superfortress redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

	Aviation portal This redirect is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This redirect is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation Unassessed

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

???

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

Stand-alone article

Shouldn't this aircraft really be part of the B-50 Superfortress article? There's only really one actual paragraph here, which would fit into the B-50 article rather neatly. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 15:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As written, yes. Might need some verifiable sources to back this up though. - BillCJ 04:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it does need to be merged. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, it should be merged. --Compdude123 (talk) 04:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 10:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MILHIST Assessment

This needs drastic overhaul... give an infobox, give specifications, comparisons with the B-29. Career in service, if any. The Design and Development is also skipped. More references should be added along with any info that comes along. Otherwise, I'd suggest AfDing this and adding the info to the B-50 page. Sniperz11^talk|edits 19:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, it ought to be merge with the B-50 article. It was just a B-29 testbed for the engines that would be used in the B-50. -Compdude123 (talk) 04:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's consensus to merge and redirect (not AfD!), I just need to get around to doing it. :) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:52, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]