Talk:Wenman Wykeham-Musgrave

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved to Wenman Wykeham-Musgrave. ukexpat (talk) 04:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wykham-Musgrave → Wykeham-Musgrave — Mispelt title Gboothew. Gboothew (talk) 18:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Article does not indicate how or why the subject is important or siginificant. Tagged for speedy deletion accordingly. – ukexpat (talk) 21:53, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Deletion proposal

This is a well-cited (especially considering it's less than 72-hours old!) biographical stub concerning a person who is still remembered in numerous present-day sources even though the most striking events of his life took place almost 100 years ago. I wonder what percentage of living persons with WP biographies that will be true of 100 years from now. Proposed deletion tag recommended incorporating material into main article, but it's not at all clear to me what main article the material would be incorporated into. Jbening (talk) 23:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jbening. I understand your concerns. So that you understand the background behind the proposed deletion tag, please see the discussion here. This article was discussed within the Military History project where general concensus was that the subject was not notable beyond the single event of his survival, thus not passing WP:ONEVENT. IMO the subject also doesn't pass WP:MILPEOPLE, although this is not a policy document and, therefore, not binding. The information about the subject's survival has now been included in the Action of 22 September 1914 article. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 07:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted "the" as in "the HMS Aboukir"

Warship names with designations that include a personal pronoun, such as "HMS" or "SMS", should be preceeded by "the"; in effect, writing "The HMS Aboukir" is saying "The His Majesty's Ship "

Writing "The Aboukir", without "HMS", is correct, however.

13:48, 28 October 2012 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Al-Nofi (talk • contribs)